Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Joint Motion re Page Limits on Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation

Joint Motion re Page Limits on Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation

Date
2021-11-05

Full text

Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB
JOINT MOTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36324)
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
BRIAN DANITZ (SBN 247403)
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com
KARIN B. SWOPE (Pro Hac Vice)
kswope@cpmlegal.com
ANDREW F. KIRTLEY (SBN 328023)
akirtley@cpmlegal.com
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
Fax: (650) 697-0577
MICHAEL RUBIN (SBN 80618)
mrubin@altber.com
STACEY M. LEYTON (SBN 203827)
sleyton@altber.com
MATTHEW MURRAY (SBN 271461)
mmurray@altber.com
CONNIE K. CHAN (SBN 284230)
cchan@altber.com
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 421-7151
Fax: (415) 362-8064

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
(Additional Counsel Listed Below)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO DIVISION
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS LITIGATION
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-LAB-MSB

JOINT MOTION RE: EXTENSION
OF PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION
TO DISMISS

This Document Relates to All Actions

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 86     Filed 11/05/21     PageID.638     Page 1
of 4

1
Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB
JOINT MOTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the Court ordered that the memorandum of
points and authorities in support of any motion to dismiss must be no longer than
40 pages; Plaintiffs’ response to any motion to dismiss must be no longer than 40
pages; and any reply must be no longer than 20 pages (Dkt. No. 48);
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Master Consolidated
Complaint (Dkt. No. 72) setting forth allegations and claims by 25 Class Plaintiffs
and 230 Individual Plaintiffs;
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2021, Defendant Bank of America, N.A.
(“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Master Consolidated Complaint
(Dkt. No. 84);
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2021, Defendant filed a 40-page memorandum of
points and authorities in support of its motion to dismiss, which raises arguments
concerning the allegations of the 25 Class Plaintiffs and the 230 Individual
Plaintiffs, accompanied by a 10-page appendix (Dkt. No 84-1);
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agree that the page limit
for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss should be extended by
10 pages, and the page limit for Defendant’s Reply in support of its Motion to
Dismiss should be extended by 5 pages;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties in the above-captioned actions, by their
undersigned counsel, JOINTLY MOVE the Court to enter the Proposed Order
accompanying this joint motion.

Dated: November 5, 2021

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP

By: /s/ Brian Danitz

JOSEPH W. COTCHETT
BRIAN DANITZ
KARIN SWOPE
ANDREW F. KIRTLEY

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the
Proposed Class
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 86     Filed 11/05/21     PageID.639     Page 2
of 4

2
Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB
JOINT MOTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 5, 2021

Dated: November 5, 2021

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

By:  /s/ Michael Rubin

MICHAEL RUBIN
STACEY M. LEYTON
MATTHEW MURRAY
CONNIE K. CHAN

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the
Proposed Class

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

By:   /s/ Yvonne W. Chan

LAURA A. STOLL
DAVID R. CALLAWAY
JAMES W. MCGARRY
YVONNE W. CHAN
THOMAS M. HEFFERON

Counsel for Defendant Bank of America

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 86     Filed 11/05/21     PageID.640     Page 3
of 4

3
Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB
JOINT MOTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative
Policies and Procedures Manual, I, Brian Danitz, hereby certify that the content of
this document is acceptable to all the signatories herein and that I have obtained
counsel’s authorization to affix their electronic signatures to this document.

/s/ Brian Danitz

BRIAN DANITZ

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 86     Filed 11/05/21     PageID.641     Page 4
of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.86.0.pdf
Size
125,245 bytes
SHA-256
3c31bacf8a78424702981d0b19aea56cf2487628764301ff712753164ec2802b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.86.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top