Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Order Re: Related Actions — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 85, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Order Re: Related Actions — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 85, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Filed October 13, 2021 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2021-10-13

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 85 · 2021-10-13 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-md-02992-LAB-MSB 
 
ORDER RE: RELATED ACTIONS 
 
Two new cases related to this multidistrict litigation and involving an 
individual plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-1659-LAB-MSB, Woodears v. Bank of America, 
N.A., and Case No. 21-cv-1660, Delapaz v. Bank of America, N.A., have been filed, 
and the Court anticipates that more such actions may continue to be filed. Rather than 
consolidate them with these actions, the Court intends to stay new and related actions 
until the multidistrict litigation is resolved. On a party’s motion after such a stay is 
lifted, the Court will consider applying its MDL rulings to the non-consolidated cases 
via nonmutual collateral estoppel or any other applicable theory.  
IT IS SO ORDERED.   
 
Dated: October 13, 2021  
 
Hon. Larry Alan Burns 
United States District Judge 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 85     Filed 10/14/21     PageID.637     Page 1
of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.85.0.pdf
Size
223,460 bytes
SHA-256
2640c7fb32a0b36b616b3b3999d8accfd183754fc9d43f6102d45af391c3d9e6
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.85.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84)same docket · 2022-01-10
  2. RESPONSE in Opposition re 84 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90)same docket · 2021-11-15
  3. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Brian Danitz — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90.5)same case · 2021-11-15
  4. Exhibit B to the Declaration of Brian Danitz — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90.6)same case · 2021-11-15
  5. Notice - Kyc Company Litigation (2021-11-15)same docket · 2021-11-15
  6. Order Granting Joint Motion Re: Extension of Page Limits on Motion — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 87)same docket · 2021-11-08
  7. [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Motion Re:… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 86.1)same docket · 2021-11-05
  8. Joint Motion re Page Limits on Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigationsame docket · 2021-11-05
  9. Declaration of Shane Daniels in Support of Defendant Bank of America — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-8)same docket · 2021-10-01
  10. Exhibit 3 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.7)same docket · 2021-10-01
  11. Exhibit 2 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.6)same docket · 2021-10-01
  12. Exhibit 1 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.5)same docket · 2021-10-01
  13. Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-2)same case · 2021-10-01
  14. Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Bank of America — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-1)same case · 2021-10-01
  15. Notice of Plaintiffs' Request to Appear In Person by Jennifer Meza — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 77)same case · 2021-09-29
  16. Stipulated Protective Order 81 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 82, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2021-09-24
  17. Exhibit A - Proposed Stipulated Protective Order — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 81.1)same case · 2021-09-24
  18. Joint Motion for Protective Order by Consolidated Plaintiffs. (Danitz, Brian)Attorney — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 81)same case · 2021-09-24
  19. Response re 77 Notice (Other) to Plaintiffs' Request to Appear In-Person — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 79)same docket · 2021-09-21
  20. ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request to Appear In-Person for the Scheduled Early Neutral… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 80)same docket · 2021-09-16

Part of: In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · Pandemic unemployment insurance · Lender and platform litigation · Orders and opinions · 2021 · Court filings

Back to top