Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Order Granting Joint Motion Re: Extension of Page Limits on Motion — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 87)

Court filing

Order Granting Joint Motion Re: Extension of Page Limits on Motion — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 87)

Filed November 8, 2021 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2021-11-08

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 87 · 2021-11-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-md-02992-LAB-MSB 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT 
MOTION RE: EXTENSION OF 
PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO 
DISMISS [Dkt. 86] 
 
The parties have jointly moved for an extension of the page limits (the 
“Motion”) applicable to briefing on Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s pending 
motion to dismiss the Master Consolidated Complaint. (Dkt. 86; Dkt. 84). For good 
cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s 
Motion to Dismiss must be no longer than 50 pages. Defendant’s Reply in support of 
its Motion to Dismiss must be no longer than 25 pages.  
IT IS SO ORDERED.   
 
Dated: November 8, 2021 
 
 
Hon. Larry Alan Burns 
United States District Judge 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 87     Filed 11/09/21     PageID.644     Page 1
of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.87.0.pdf
Size
215,256 bytes
SHA-256
b50b91d5654023b1d1720b44ebcd92489665ad51aecf48367b857fe5c31a780b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.87.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. Bank of America - Southern District of CA SD Div - Y. Chan Notice of Address Changesame docket · 2022-03-09
  2. Reply Memorandum Of Points Andsame docket · 2022-01-31
  3. 1. Reply Memorandum of Pointssame docket · 2022-01-31
  4. Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84)same case · 2022-01-10
  5. RESPONSE in Opposition re 84 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90)same docket · 2021-11-15
  6. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Brian Danitz — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90.5)same docket · 2021-11-15
  7. Exhibit B to the Declaration of Brian Danitz — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 90.6)same docket · 2021-11-15
  8. Notice - Kyc Company Litigation (2021-11-15)same docket · 2021-11-15
  9. Joint Motion re Page Limits on Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigationsame docket · 2021-11-05
  10. [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Motion Re:… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 86.1)same docket · 2021-11-05
  11. Order Re: Related Actions — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 85, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same docket · 2021-10-13
  12. Declaration of Shane Daniels in Support of Defendant Bank of America — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-8)same docket · 2021-10-01
  13. Exhibit 3 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.7)same case · 2021-10-01
  14. Exhibit 2 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.6)same case · 2021-10-01
  15. Exhibit 1 to the Chestnut Declaration — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 84.5)same case · 2021-10-01
  16. Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-2)same case · 2021-10-01
  17. Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Bank of America — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 84-1)same case · 2021-10-01
  18. Notice of Plaintiffs' Request to Appear In Person by Jennifer Meza — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 77)same case · 2021-09-29
  19. Stipulated Protective Order 81 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 82, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2021-09-24
  20. Exhibit A - Proposed Stipulated Protective Order — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 81.1)same docket · 2021-09-24

Part of: In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · Pandemic unemployment insurance · Lender and platform litigation · Orders and opinions · 2021 · Court filings

Back to top