Court filing
Probation Revocation Hearing — USA vs. Malik Breckenridge, Case 2:22-cr-00084 (Document 79, District Judge Daybook Entry, 7/30/2025)
Summary
District Judge Daybook Entry for a Probation Revocation Hearing on 7/30/2025, Document 79, in USA vs. Malik Breckenridge, Case Number 2:22-cr-00084 (S.D. W. Va. at Charleston), before the Honorable Berger. Amy McLaughlin appears for the government and John Balenovich for the defendant, with probation officer Codie Blankenship. The notes say the defendant received written notice of alleged violations, waives reading of the allegations, and admits them. The Court finds that he has violated conditions of probation and REVOKES probation. It imposes custody of 6 months and supervised release of 24 months, advises him of the right to appeal, and remands him.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed July 30, 2025 in Malik Breckenridge; one of 65 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-07-30 |
Cite this document
“Probation Revocation Hearing — USA vs. Malik Breckenridge, Case 2:22-cr-00084 (Document 79, District Judge Daybook Entry, 7/30/2025).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:22-cr-00084, Doc. 79, filed 2025-07-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-malik-breckenridge-wvsd-234070/2025-07-30-gov-uscourts-wvsd-234070-79-0-doc-79/
, SHA-256 f2373423f1ac706673ae9b36ac7b912a6c916fec154b66baf5c41a9ea68d1217.Full text
District Judge Daybook Entry United States District Court - Southern District of West Virginia at Charleston Date: 7/30/2025 Case Number: 2:22-cr-00084 Case Style: USA vs. Malik Breckenridge Type of hearing: Probation Revocation Hearing Before the Honorable: 2516-Berger Court Reporter: Lisa Cook Courtroom Deputy: Kierstin Tudor Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff or Government: Amy McLaughlin Attorney(s) for the Defendant(s): John Balenovich Law Clerk: Emily Ogden Probation Officer: Codie Blankenship Court Times Start Time End Time Court Time Description 11:01 AM 11:27 AM Non-Trial Time/Uncontested Time Time in court: 0 hours and 26 minutes. Non-Trial Time/Uncontested Time Courtroom Notes Scheduled Start 11:00 a.m. Actual Start 11:01 a.m. Defendant present in person and by counsel. Counsel note appearances on the record. Defendant placed under oath. Court sets forth relevant background in case. Defendant has received written notice of alleged violations. Court addresses allegations contained in Petition; Defendant waives reading of the allegations. Evidence against Defendant has been disclosed. Defendant admits the allegations. Court finds Defendant has violated conditions of probation. Court REVOKES probation. Parties speak before sentence is imposed. Defendant speaks on his own behalf. Court imposes sentence as follows: Custody: 6 months Supervised Release: 24 months Court states reasons for sentence imposed. Defendant advised of right to appeal. Defendant remanded. Court recessed at 11:27 a.m. Case 2:22-cr-00084 Document 79 Filed 07/30/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 231
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wvsd.234070.79.0.pdf
- Size
- 45,200 bytes
- SHA-256
- f2373423f1ac706673ae9b36ac7b912a6c916fec154b66baf5c41a9ea68d1217
- Original
- PACER (login required)