Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Malik Breckenridge United States v. Breckenridge — U.S. District Court, S.D. W. Va., Charleston Sentencing Memorandum as to Malik Breckenridge — United States v. Breckenridge (Dkt. 47, S.D. W. Va.)

Court filing

Sentencing Memorandum as to Malik Breckenridge — United States v. Breckenridge (Dkt. 47, S.D. W. Va.)

Filed October 27, 2022 in Malik Breckenridge; one of 47 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Filed2022-10-27

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:22-cr-00084 · Doc. 47 · 2022-10-27 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA 
 
 
CHARLESTON DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Criminal No. 2:22-00084 
 
MALIK BRECKENRIDGE 
 
 
DEFENDANT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM 
Now comes the Defendant, Malik Breckenridge, through counsel, Assistant 
Federal Public Defender Rhett H. Johnson, and submits this Sentencing 
Memorandum.  Breckenridge pled guilty to one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 
U.S.C. § 1343 relating to a fraudulent claim for Paycheck Protection Plan (“PPP”) 
funds.  In total, Breckenridge received $41,666.00 in PPP monies.  Presentence 
Report (“PSR”), ¶ 100.  With a total offense level of 11 and a criminal history category 
I, the guideline range is 8 to 14 months, with Zone B sentencing options.  PSR, ¶ 54. 
In view of his guideline range and the other 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, Breckenridge 
requests that this Court impose a sentence of probation.  Should this Court feel it is 
necessary to impose some term of confinement to achieve a just sentence, 
Breckenridge asks this Court to fashion it in a way that will permit him to continue 
full-time employment through either home-confinement or intermittent confinement.  
See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.1(c).    
A. 
Presentence Report Objections 
There are no remaining objections to the presentence report.   
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 47     Filed 10/27/22     Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 119

2 
 
B. 
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Factors for Consideration 
1. 
Malik Breckenridge is 26 years old.  His criminal history score is zero.  
He grew up in Charleston, West Virginia, where he, along with his younger sister, 
were primarily raised by their mother.  After completing the residential program at 
the Mountaineer Challenge Academy, Breckenridge graduated from Capital High 
School in 2014.  PSR, ¶ 46.  After high school, he briefly attended Potomac State 
College and Glenville State University.  PSR, ¶ 47.  Later in 2020, he obtained a 
certification in fiberoptics from Bridge Valley Community College in Charleston, 
West Virginia.  Id.    
2. 
As set forth in the PSR, in the Spring of 2021, Breckenridge made the 
regrettable decision to apply for a PPP loan despite being ineligible for such monies.  
PSR, ¶ 17.  He received two separate wire transfers in the amount of $20,833.  When 
confronted by law enforcement, Breckenridge readily admitted his wrongdoing.   
3. 
While on pretrial release, Breckenridge has maintained consistent 
employment.  See PSR, ¶¶ 48-49.  He currently resides with his younger sister in 
Charleston, West Virginia.  PSR, ¶ 41.  They both lived together with their mother, 
Malechra Pannell, until she passed away in September 2021 due to the coronavirus.  
This was a devastating blow to both Breckenridge and his younger sister, as both 
were extremely close with their mother.  Since that time, they have leaned on one 
another for support.    
4. 
Breckenridge asks this Court to fashion a probationary sentence in this 
matter.  The instant offense is Breckenridge’s first and only criminal conviction.  
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 47     Filed 10/27/22     Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 120

3 
 
Because it is a felony conviction, the attendant collateral consequences will follow 
him the rest of his life.  Probation has been historically utilized to allow a convicted 
person who is considered “a good social risk … the opportunity for rehabilitation and 
to “give young and new violators of law a chance … to escape the contaminating 
influence of association with hardened or veteran criminals in prison.”    Brent E. 
Newton, The Story of Federal Probation, Am. Crim. L. Rev. 311 (2016) (emphasis 
added) (internal quotations omitted); see also Korematsu v. United States, 319 U.S. 
432, 435 (1943) (Probation is intended to restore offenders who are good social risks 
to society); Berman v. United States, 302 U.S. 211, 213 (1937) (“Probation is 
concerned with rehabilitation, not with the determination of guilt.”).  Congress itself 
directed the Commission to “ensure that the guidelines reflect the general 
appropriateness of imposing a sentence other than imprisonment in cases in which 
the defendant is a first offender who has not been convicted of a crime of violence or 
an otherwise serious offense.”  28 U.S.C. § 994(j).   
Breckenridge’s offense was a crime of opportunity the presented him with the 
ability to obtain a significant amount of money with little effort.  A comparable 
opportunity is unlikely to present itself, and Breckenridge understands that if it 
does, and he commits a similar transgression, any future pleas for leniency will ring 
resoundingly hollow.   
C. 
Conclusion 
For the reasons contained herein, Breckenridge submits that a probationary 
sentence, that includes a condition that he make efforts to pay restitution in regular 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 47     Filed 10/27/22     Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 121

4 
 
installments, along with additional proposed conditions set forth in the PSR, is 
sufficient, but not greater than necessary to achieve a just sentence in this matter. 
D. 
Witnesses to be Called and Estimated Time Needed for Sentencing 
Counsel does not intend to call any witnesses at sentencing.  The hearing 
should take no longer than thirty minutes. 
Date:  October 27, 2022.  
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MALIK BRECKENRIDGE 
 
 
 
By Counsel 
 
 
WESLEY P. PAGE 
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 
 
s/Rhett H. Johnson_________________                                        
Rhett H. Johnson, WV Bar No. 12114 
Office of the Federal Public Defender 
300 Virginia Street, East, Room 3400 
Charleston, WV 25301 
Telephone: (304) 347-3350 
Facsimile: (304) 347-3356 
E-mail: rhett_johnson@fd.org 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 47     Filed 10/27/22     Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 122

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvsd.234070.47.0.pdf
Size
157,683 bytes
SHA-256
a63faef9ee090756b4f98bb10b33f1a902ca21eb0caf7ac4d0cce30dd77d5340
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvsd.234070.47.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top