Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Breckenridge — U.S. District Court, S.D. W. Va., Charleston RESPONSE by United States of America TO STANDARD DISCOVERY… — United States of America…

Court filing

RESPONSE by United States of America TO STANDARD DISCOVERY… — United States of America v. Breckenridge (Dkt. 21)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Filed2022-05-17

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:22-cr-00084 · Doc. 21 · 2022-05-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

The government's response to the defendant's standard discovery requests and request for reciprocal discovery in United States of America v. Malik Breckenridge, No. 2:22-cr-00084, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, filed May 17, 2022 as Doc. 21. Under Rule 16 and the arraignment order entered May 4, 2022, it answers Requests A to M, pointing to memoranda of interviews with the West Virginia State Police, loan applications, grand jury responses and a grand jury transcript. Under Rule 404(b) it gives notice that it plans to introduce evidence of PPP loan draws and the defendant's statements to law enforcement. It asks the court to take judicial notice that Charleston, Kanawha County is within the district and requests reciprocal discovery within 14 days. It is signed by Assistant United States Attorney Kathleen E. Robeson.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA 
CHARLESTON 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CRIMINAL NO. 2:22-cr-00084 
 
 
MALIK BRECKENRIDGE  
 
RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
TO DEFENDANT'S STANDARD DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND 
REQUEST OF THE UNITED STATES FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY 
 
 
Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16.1(a) of the Local 
Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Arraignment Order and Standard Discovery Request entered 
by the Court in this case on  May 4, 2022, the United States of America, by counsel, herewith 
responds to each of defendant's Standard Discovery Requests. 
At the outset, the United States notes that, with this Response, it is providing materials 
through USAFx. The materials on USAFx are organized into folders and sub-folders, including 
criminal history, grand jury responses, grand jury transcript, and memoranda of interviews 
(MOIs) and a Bates Log has also been provided.  
 
Request A:  Disclose to defendant the substance of any relevant oral statement made 
by defendant, whether before or after arrest, in response to interrogation by a person the 
defendant knew was a government agent if the government intends to use the statement at 
trial.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(A)] 
 
Response:  See the MOI’s of defendant’s interviews with the West Virginia State Police 
on September 16, 2021, February 10, 2022, and April 6, 2022.    
 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 56

2 
 
 
Request B:  Disclose to defendant and make available for inspection, copying or 
photographing, all of the following: 
 
(i)  Any relevant written or recorded statement by the defendant if the statement is 
within the government's possession, custody, or control; and the attorney for the government 
knows--or through due diligence could know--that the statement exists.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 
16(a)(1)(B)(i)] 
 
Response:  Enclosed on the disc are various documents that were authored, authorized, 
signed or may otherwise be deemed to be statements of the defendants, including but not limited 
to loan applications. See also Response to Request A. 
 
(ii)  The portion of any written record containing the substance of any relevant oral 
statement made before or after arrest if the defendant made the statement in response to 
interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 
16(a)(1)(B)(ii)] 
 
Response:  There are no known records of this kind at this time.  The United States reserves 
the right to supplement its response.  
 
(iii)  The defendant's recorded testimony before a grand jury  relating to the charged 
offense.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(B)(iii)] 
 
Response:  Defendants did not testify before a grand jury relating to the charged offenses. 
 
Request C:  Where the defendant is an organization, e.g., a  corporation, partnership, 
association or labor union, disclose to the defendant any statement described in Fed. R. Crim. 
P. 16(a)(1)(A) and (B), if the government contends that the person making the statement (i) 
was legally able to bind the defendant regarding the subject of the statement because of that 
person's position as the defendant's director, officer, employee, or agent;  or (ii) was 
personally involved in the alleged conduct constituting the offense and was legally capable to 
bind the defendant regarding that conduct because of that person's position as the 
defendant's director, officer, employee, or agent.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(C)] 
 
Response:  Not applicable. 
 
Request D:  Furnish the defendant with a copy of defendant's prior criminal record 
that is within the government's possession, custody, or control if the attorney for the 
government knows--or through due diligence could know--that the record exists.  [Fed. R. 
Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(D)]. 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 57

3 
 
 
Response:  The United States reserves the right to supplement this response. 
 
Request E:  Permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, 
documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, building or places, or copies or portions of 
any of those items, if the item is within the government's possession, custody or control, and 
(i) the item is material to preparing the defense; (ii) the government intends to use the item 
in its case-in-chief at trial; or (iii) the item was obtained from or belongs to defendant.  [Fed. 
R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(E)] 
 
Response:  The United States does not object to this request. Moreover, the following 
categories of documents and records are enclosed are provided with this response: grand jury 
responses, grand jury transcript, and memoranda of interviews (MOIs). 
 
Request F:  Permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph the results or 
reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific tests or experiment if (i) 
the item is within the government's possession, custody, or control; (ii) the attorney for the 
government knows--or through due diligence could know--that the item exists; and (iii) the 
item is  material to preparing the defense or the government intends to use the item in its 
case-in-chief at trial.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F)] 
 
Response:  The United States reserves the right to supplement its Response to this request, 
but does not have any applicable items to produce at this time. 
 
Request G:  Give to the defendant a written summary of any testimony the 
government intends to use under Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence 
during its case-in-chief at trial. If the government requests discovery under Federal Rules of 
Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(C)(ii) and the defendant complies, the government must, at the 
defendant's request, give to the defendant a written summary of testimony that the 
government intends to use under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as 
evidence at trial on the issue of the defendant's mental condition.  The summary must 
describe the witness's opinions, the bases and  reasons for those opinions, and the witness's 
qualifications.  [Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(G)] 
 
Response:  None noted at this time. The United States reserves the right to supplement its 
Response to this request.    
 
Request H:  Disclose to defendant all evidence favorable to defendant, including 
impeachment evidence, and allow defendant to inspect, copy or photograph such evidence. 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 58

4 
 
 
Response:  The United States is unaware of any such evidence other than what has already 
been provided in the attached production. 
 
Request I:  Notify defendant of all evidence the government intends to introduce 
pursuant to Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 
 
Response:  The United States plans to introduce evidence of both draws defendant received 
from PPP loans and his statements given to law enforcement during the investigation. The United 
States believes this evidence is intrinsic to the charged offense but if the Court does not find this 
evidence is intrinsic to the defendant’s scheme to defraud, the United States plans to introduce this 
evidence as 404b evidence of the defendant’s intent, knowledge, motive or absence of mistake. 
 
Request J:  Disclose to defendant all reports of government "mail cover," insofar as 
the same affects the government's case against the defendant or any alleged aiders and 
abettors or co-conspirators. 
 
Response:  Not applicable.  
Request K:  Disclose to defendant any matter as to which the government will seek 
judicial notice. 
 
Response:  The United States will seek judicial notice that Charleston, Kanawha County 
is within the Southern District of West Virginia.   
 
Request L:  Disclose to defendant and make available for inspection, copying or 
photographing, the results of any interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in 
the possession, custody or control of the government, the existence of which is known, or by 
the exercise of due diligence could become known, to the attorney for the government, which 
contains any relevant statement made by the defendant or which is material to the 
preparation of the defendant's defense or which is intended for use by the government as 
evidence in its case-in-chief at the trial.  For each such interception, disclose (1) any 
application for an order authorizing the interception of a wire or oral communication; (2) 
any affidavits filed in support thereof; and (3) any court order authorizing such interception. 
 
Response:  Not applicable, the United States reserves the right to supplement its Response 
to this request as necessary. 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 59

5 
 
 
Request M:  Provide notice to defendant of the government's intention to use evidence 
pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 
 
Response:  The United States reserves the right to use all information and evidence 
disclosed herein or made available for inspection and copying pursuant to this Response and such 
information and evidence which may be discovered and finally provided to defendant. 
 
Any discovery provided that is not mandated by Court order, the Federal Rules of Criminal 
Procedure, federal statute or federal case law, is provided voluntarily as a matter of discretion 
solely to expedite and facilitate litigation of this case. 
REQUEST OF THE UNITED STATES FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY 
 
Pursuant to Rules 16.1(b) and 16.1(d) of the Local Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United 
States of America requests that defendant provide all applicable reciprocal discovery within 14 
days of the service of this response and the provision of materials requested by defendant in the 
Standard Discovery Request. 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
WILLIAM S. THOMPSON  
United States Attorney 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
/s/ Kathleen E. Robeson 
KATHLEEN E. ROBESON 
Assistant United States Attorney 
VA Bar No. 89526 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 Virginia Street, East 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Room 4000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charleston, WV 25301 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Telephone:  304-345-2200 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fax: 304-347-5104 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email:  kathleen.robeson@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 60

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
It is hereby certified that the foregoing “RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES OF 
AMERICA TO DEFENDANT'S STANDARD DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND REQUEST OF 
THE UNITED STATES FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY” has been electronically filed and 
service has been made on opposing counsel by virtue of such electronic filing this 17th day of 
May, 2022.  
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Kathleen E. Robeson 
KATHLEEN E. ROBESON 
Assistant United States Attorney 
VA Bar No. 89526 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 Virginia Street, East 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Room 4000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charleston, WV 25301 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Telephone:  304-345-2200 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fax: 304-347-5104 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email:  kathleen.robeson@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00084     Document 21     Filed 05/17/22     Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 61

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvsd.234070.21.0.pdf
Size
170,465 bytes
SHA-256
ae662f0da03ccce3f5fced80843e327053a3faafa9c818aaf92343d5ffbaa29e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvsd.234070.21.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top