Order Granting Bank Of America, N.A.s Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 682 ) — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 707)

Summary

A two-page order in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, dated and filed February 24, 2026 as Document 707, before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Finding compelling reasons, the court grants Bank of America, N.A.'s motion to seal portions of its reply in support of its motion to exclude the purported expert opinions of Greg J. Regan, the plaintiffs' damages expert. The order does not describe the sealed material.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL  
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION 
TO SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS REPLY 
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE PURPORTED EXPERT 
OPINIONS OF GREG J. REGAN 
[Dkt. No. 682.] 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 707     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.60071     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (BANA) 
Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Exclude Purported 
Expert Opinions of Greg J. Regan, the Court concludes that compelling reasons exist 
to seal portions of BANA’s Reply. Accordingly the Court GRANTS BANA’s 
Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Exclude Purported 
Expert Opinions of Greg J. Regan. 
IT IS SO ORDERED 
 
Dated:  February 24, 2026 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 707     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.60072     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.707.0.pdf

Size

235,319 bytes

SHA-256

dc03730bb5590f73f23220efb6691e6e52942b8d9bb8f3b567158f218e72e1ed

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.707.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)