Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Order Granting Bank Of America, N.A.s Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 682 ) — Bofa Ca Unemploy…

Court filing

Order Granting Bank Of America, N.A.s Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 682 ) — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 707)

Filed February 24, 2026 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2026-02-24

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 707 · 2026-02-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL  
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION 
TO SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS REPLY 
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE PURPORTED EXPERT 
OPINIONS OF GREG J. REGAN 
[Dkt. No. 682.] 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 707     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.60071     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (BANA) 
Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Exclude Purported 
Expert Opinions of Greg J. Regan, the Court concludes that compelling reasons exist 
to seal portions of BANA’s Reply. Accordingly the Court GRANTS BANA’s 
Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Exclude Purported 
Expert Opinions of Greg J. Regan. 
IT IS SO ORDERED 
 
Dated:  February 24, 2026 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 707     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.60072     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.707.0.pdf
Size
235,319 bytes
SHA-256
dc03730bb5590f73f23220efb6691e6e52942b8d9bb8f3b567158f218e72e1ed
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.707.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top