ORDER Granting Defendant Bank Of America, N.A.s Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 679 ) — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 703)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 703 · 2026-02-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order dated and filed February 24, 2026 in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. It grants Bank of America, N.A.'s motion to seal (Dkt. No. 679) documents filed with its reply in support of its motion to exclude the opinions of an expert. The Court states that compelling reasons exist to seal the documents. The order seals portions of the reply brief and portions of exhibit HX 40 to a supporting declaration, noting in a footnote that HX 40 was previously sealed (ECF 602). It is Doc. 703, a two-page proposed-form order bearing the caption of Goodwin Procter LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL  
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S 
DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, 
N.A.’S MOTION TO SEAL 
DOCUMENTS FILED IN REPLY IN 
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE THE PURPORTED 
EXPERT OPINIONS OF DAVID I. 
LEVINE 
[Dkt.  No. 679.] 
 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 703     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59838     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (BANA) 
Motion to Seal Documents Filed in Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude the 
Purported Expert Opinions of David I. Levine and the documents at issue, the Court 
concludes that compelling reasons exist to seal the documents. Accordingly, the 
Court GRANTS BANA’s Motion to Seal the following: 
1. 
Portions of BANA’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude 
Purported Expert Opinions of David I. Levine; and 
2. 
Portions of the following exhibit to the Hoyle Declaration: HX 40.1 
IT IS SO ORDERED 
 
Dated:  February 24, 2026 
 
 
 
1Exhibit HX 40 was previously sealed by this Court (ECF 602) in connection with 
BANA’s Motion to Exclude the Purported Expert Opinions of Greg J. Regan (ECF 
567). 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 703     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59839     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.703.0.pdf

Size

252,494 bytes

SHA-256

1a1473cabfb3ad11e45e82e6b08e4964f6dc612530e08aaa5bc9f9646d124a26

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.703.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)