ORDER Granting Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Seal Documents (Dkt.… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 699)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 699 · 2026-02-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and filed February 24, 2026 as Document 699. It grants Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s motion to seal documents (Dkt. No. 673) filed with its reply in support of its motion to exclude the opinions of a proposed expert. The Court concludes that compelling reasons exist to seal the documents. The order seals portions of BANA's reply and portions of Exhibit HX 51 to a declaration.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL  
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION 
TO SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN 
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS 
MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE 
PURPORTED EXPERT OPINIONS OF 
JAY MINNUCCI 
[Dkt. No. 673.] 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 699     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59784     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (BANA) 
Motion to Seal Documents Filed in its Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude the 
Purported Expert Opinions of Jay Minnucci and the documents at issue, the Court 
concludes that compelling reasons exist to seal the documents. Accordingly the Court 
GRANTS BANA’s Motion to Seal the following: 
1. 
Portions of BANA’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude the 
Purported Expert Opinions of Jay Minnucci; and 
2. 
Portions of Exhibit HX 51 to the Hoyle Declaration. 
IT IS SO ORDERED 
 
Dated:  February 24, 2026 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 699     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59785     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.699.0.pdf

Size

251,566 bytes

SHA-256

ee1aa244a44b1c1bf3bde874a3ae758d3b5c8e938086450dc30d9ed427f8a942

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.699.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)