ORDER Granting Defendant Bank Of America, N.A.s Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 676 ) — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 701)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 701 · 2026-02-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order filed February 24, 2026 as Doc. 701 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. It rules on the motion of defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) at Dkt. No. 676 to seal portions of its reply in support of its motion to exclude the opinions of a proposed expert. The court concludes that compelling reasons exist to seal portions of the reply and grants the motion. The order is two pages and bears the Goodwin Procter LLP caption.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL  
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION 
TO SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS REPLY 
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE THE PURPORTED 
EXPERT OPINIONS OF CHLOE N. 
EAST 
[Dkt. No. 676.] 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 701     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59819     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’s (BANA) 
Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude the 
Purported Expert Opinions of Chloe N. East, the Court concludes that compelling 
reasons exist to seal portions of BANA’s Reply. Accordingly the Court GRANTS 
BANA’s Motion to Seal Portions of Its Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude 
the Purported Expert Opinions of Chloe N. East. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  February 24, 2026 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 701     Filed 02/24/26     PageID.59820     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.701.0.pdf

Size

234,777 bytes

SHA-256

8075f05159547226ad4911dc2a6538b41153f7a29906f171941717d7d4018cee

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.701.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)