Court filing
Exhibit PX25 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 634-26, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)
Filed January 9, 2026 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-01-09 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 634-26 · 2026-01-09 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
PX25
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53200
Page 1 of 46
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALI FORNIA
I N RE BANK OF AMERICA
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS LITI GATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL
ACTIONS
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO .
) 3 : 21-MD-02992-GPC-
) MSB
)
)
)
__________________ )
REMOTE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MELISSA RAMIREZ
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2025
JOB NO . :
10157864
REPORTED BY HEIDI FUEHRER, CSR 14145
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53201
Page 2 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
1 7
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MELISSA RAMIREZ, TAKEN ON
BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS , AT 9:35 A.M . , TUESDAY,
FEBRUARY 11 , 2025 , AT CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, BEFORE
HEIDI FUEHRER, CSR NUMBER 14145 .
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
FOR THE PLAINTIFFS AND THE PROPOSED CLASS:
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
BY:
CONNIE K. CHAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW
---AND- - -
COLIN C. JONES , ATTORNEY AT LAW
177 POST STREET
SUITE 300
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNI A 94108
415 - 362-8064
CCHAN@ALTBER . COM
---AND-- -
COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY , LLP
BY:
BRIAN DANITZ, ATTORNEY AT LAW
---AND- - -
KARIN B. SWOPE , ATTORNEY AT LAW
840 MALCOLM ROAD
SUITE 200
BURLINGAME , CALIFORNI A 94010
6 5 0-697-6000
BDANITZ@CPMLEGAL.COM
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53202
Page 3 of 46
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefiits Litigation
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL (CONTINUED):
FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS:
SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC
BY:
JOSHUA B. SWIGART, ATTORNEY AT LAW
---AND---
ILANA PLATKIEWICZ, ATTORNEY AT LAW
2221 CAMINO DEL RIOS
SUITE 308
SAN DIEGO , CALIFORNIA 92108
866-219-3343
JOSH@SWIGARTLAWGROUP.COM
---AND---
SHAY LEGAL, APC
BY:
DANIEL SHAY, ATTORNEY AT LAW
2221 CAMINO DEL RIOS
SUITE 308
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
6 1 9- 222-7429
DAN@SHAYLEGAL . COM
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
GOODWIN PROCTER, LLP
BY:
LINDSAY E. HOYLE, ATTORNEY AT LAW
---AND-- -
ANNE BAYLY BUCK, ATTORNEY AT LAW
620 EIGHTH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018
2 1 2 -813 - 8800
LHOYLE@GOODWINLAW.COM
ALSO PRESENT:
MARISA RAMOS, VIDEOGRAPHER
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53203
Page 4 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA;
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2025, 9 : 35 A.M .
(Prior to the deposition commencing,
all counsel stipulated to waive the
reporter read on and read off pursuant
to Federal Rul e 30 . )
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Good morning .
We are on the
record.
The time is 9 : 35 a .m. Paci fic time on
February 11 , 2025.
This begins the remote v i deo
r ecorded deposition of Melissa Ramirez taken in the
matter In Re Bank of Ameri ca California Unemployment
Benefits Litigation filed before the united states
District Court, Southern Di strict of California, case
number of which is 3 : 21- md-02992-GPC-MSB.
This
deposition is being held virtually, and the witness is
located in Charl ot te , North Carolina.
Throughout the
deposition I wil l be using Pacifi c time to read u s on
and off the record.
My name i s Marisa Ramos.
I'm the videographer
today.
The court reporter is Heidi Fuehrer, and we are
both here representing Aptus Court Report ing located a t
401 West A Street , suite 1680, San Diego, California .
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53204
Page 5 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
1 6
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
Please not e t hat audio and video recording wi ll cont inue
t o take p l ace unl ess all parti es agree to go off the
record .
Micr ophones are sensitive so I ask if there are
any electronic devices around you that make noi se, such
as notifications, t hat you please place those on silent
or away from the microphones as that my interfere with
the deposition audio .
counsel , would you please state your appearance
and affiliations for the record, after which, the court
reporter wi ll issue a statement and swear in the
witness .
MS. CHAN :
Good morning .
Conni e Chan for clas s
plaintiffs .
MS . HOYLE:
Lindsay Hoyle and Bayly Buck from
Goodwin Procter on behal f of defendant Bank of America.
THE COURT REPORTER :
J ust for the record, my
name is Heidi Fuehrer, and my license number is 14145 .
MELISSA RAMIREZ,
HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN BY THE REPORTER,
WAS EXAMINED AND TESTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
EXAMINATION
BY MS. CHAN:
Q
Thank you.
Good morning, Ms. Ramirez.
Thank
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53205
Page 6 of 46
1
2
3
4
·s
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
12
13
1 4
1 5
16
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
you again for being here.
As I said earlier, my name is
Connie Chan.
I'm one of the counsel for plai ntiffs.
Have you had any prior names?
A
Yes, Melissa Gargagliano.
Q
And when did you change your name from Mel issa
Gargagl iano to Melissa Ramirez?
A
After divorce, I'm trying -- do you need the
exac t date of when I fi l ed or approxima te dat e ?
Q
Just the year is fine .
A
Let me t hink about it.
I t hink t he year
would have been 2022 or earl y 2023 when the divorce
wa s f inalized.
Q
Thank you.
A
I could look at my driver' s l i cense i f tha t
helps.
Q
No, that's not necessary.
Thank you.
Have you
been deposed before?
A
No .
Q
You understand that you are testifying under
oath and under penalty of perjury today the same as if
you were in court?
A
Q
Correct , yes .
Thank you.
What, if anything, did you do to
prepare for your deposition today?
A
I spoke wi th Li nds ay and got a lay of the
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53206
Page 7 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Melissa Ramirez
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
land on how it woul d work and the protocols, and that
it woul d be videotaped, and I saw the notice of
deposition, the one t hat you just put up.
By the
way , it looks fine.
I think I can use the technology
to look a t document s you are going to share.
Q
Great.
And you said you met with Lindsay.
Is
that your counsel Lindsay Hoyle?
for
A
Q
your
A
Q
A
Q
lawyers?
A
Q
Yes.
Did you meet with anyone else in preparation
deposition today?
Yes, Matt.
Is his
Matt Riffee?
Riffee, yes, thank you.
Did you meet with anyone other than your
No.
No non lawyers were present for your meetings
with your lawyers?
A
Q
That's correct .
Have you spoken to anyone who has already had
their deposition taken in this case about their
deposition testimony?
Nope.
No.
A
Q
Have you spoken with William Matt Martin about
this case at all?
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53207
Page 8 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
'Melissa Ramirez
A
Q
1ln Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation
No.
Have you spoken with any other bank employees
or former bank employees about this litigation?
A
No.
Q
What documents, if any, did you review to
prepare for your testimony today?
A
Reviewed the notice of deposition to make
sure that it was accurate, and I guess the
statements, I think that was the notice of deposition
with regard to my statements, and talked mai nly about
the protocol and the tutorials and such.
Q
When you say with regard to your statements,
can you clarify what statements you are referring to?
A
That I had a particular role at a particular
time under Bank of America, and it had some other
statements on it. •
Q
Are you referring to a declaration that you
submitted in this case?
A
attorney.
bu t
That ' s what it is, yeah .
sorry, I'm not an
I don't know the legal -- I'm a banker,
Q
That's completely fine.
I just want to make
sure we're on the same page.
So you reviewed the
declaration that you had submitted in this litigation
previously?
www.aptusCR.com
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53208
Page 9 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53209
Page 10 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53210
Page 11 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53211
Page 12 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53212
Page 13 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53213
Page 14 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53214
Page 15 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53215
Page 16 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53216
Page 17 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53217
Page 18 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53218
Page 19 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53219
Page 20 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53220
Page 21 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53221
Page 22 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53222
Page 23 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53223
Page 24 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53224
Page 25 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53225
Page 26 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53226
Page 27 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53227
Page 28 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53228
Page 29 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53229
Page 30 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53230
Page 31 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53231
Page 32 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53232
Page 33 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53233
Page 34 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53234
Page 35 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53235
Page 36 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53236
Page 37 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53237
Page 38 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53238
Page 39 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53239
Page 40 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53240
Page 41 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53241
Page 42 of 46
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53242
Page 43 of 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STATE OF CALI FORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ss.
I, HEIDI FUEHRER, CSR No . 14145, in and for the
State of Cali fornia , do hereby certify:
That prior to being examined, the witness named
in the foregoing deposition was by me duly sworn to
testify to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth;
That said deposition was taken down by me in
shorthand at the time and pl ace therein named and
thereaf ter reduced to typewriting under my direction,
and the same is a true , correct, and complete transcript
of said proceedings;
That if the foregoing pertains to the original
transcript of a deposition in a Federal Case, before
completion of the proceedings , review of the transcript
{
} Was { X } was not required .
I further certify that I am not interested in
the event of the action .
2025 .
Wi tness my hand this 12th day of February,
Cert ified Shorthand Reporter
for the State of California
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53243
Page 44 of 46
..,· --
In re fl1111k 1'.f Amrrirn C11/ijnrui11 l/11c•111pl"y11w11/ IJmefits I.IIIJ:allo11
('nw
11. 3:2/-Ml>-112992-1.AIJ-/\fSJJ
/:'rmtn Slt,•1•1 for Fl'hruary I I . 2015 Dq1miti/lll 1'.f Melfn·11 R11111lre,
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53244
Page 45 of 46
In accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. I have read the entire transcript of my testimony
or it has been read to me. I have listed my changes on the above Errata Sheet. listing page and line
numbers. I request that these changes be entered as part of the record of my testimony, and request and
authorize that th is Errata Sheet be appended to the transcri pl of my testimony and be incorporated therein.
M-
F.xecutcd this Ji day of March, 2025.
Melissa Ramirez
2
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-26 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53245
Page 46 of 46File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.casd.709615.634.26.pdf
- Size
- 3,327,220 bytes
- SHA-256
- bb7ddf35169d0c99743e4b8b78d726b9c628b2918d6c786bee47bb72444a7247
- Original
- PACER (login required)