Court filing
Exhibit PX29 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 634-30, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)
Summary
Exhibit PX 29, filed 01/09/26 as Document 634-30 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB in the Southern District of California, contains pages from the Deposition by Written Questions of the California Employment Development Department, read by Shameel Singh as its representative, taken on behalf of plaintiffs on Thursday, May 8, 2025. The EDD was represented by the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, which read the plaintiffs' direct questions and the Bank's cross-questions. The definitions describe the claim fraud filter the Bank applied to EDD cardholders' claims, which was the subject of the Yick preliminary injunction; the answers themselves are blank in this filing.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 9, 2026 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1602 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-01-09 |
Cite this document
“Exhibit PX29 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 634-30, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 634-30, filed 2026-01-09. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/2026-01-09-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-634-30-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-634-30/
, SHA-256 9b7e7bea3ff51ad9c441e48fa293eac6ca68f8db4427c5476d249a4a34468760.Full text
PX29 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53492 Page 1 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A IN RE BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATI ON ) ) ) Case No.: ) 3:21 - md- 02992 - GPC- MSB ) ) ) ) ) ) DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (READ BY SHAMEEL SINGH) Appearing Remotely Thursday , May 8, 2025 Stenographically reporte d by: EMILY SAMELSON, CSR No . 14043 Job No .: 10163945 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53493 Page 2 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) IN RE BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNI A UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATI ON ) Case No.: ) 3 : 21-md-02992-GPC-MSB ) ) ) ) ) ) Deposition By Written Questions of CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (READ BY SHAMEEL SINGH), taken on behalf of Plaintiffs, a l l parties appearing remot ely, commencing at 10 : 11 a.m . and ending at 11:24 a .m. on Thursday, May 8, 2025 , s tenographical ly reported before Emily Samelson, CSR No. 14043 . www.aptusCR.com Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53494 Page 3 of 36 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 0 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation APPEARANCES : (All parties appearing remotely) For Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class: COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP BY: DAVID G. HOLLENBERG, ESQ. 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, California 94010 650.697.6000 dhollenberg@cpmlegal . com ALTSHULER BERZON LLP BY: MICHAEL RUBIN , ESQ . 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 415 . 421 . 7151 mrubin@altber . com For Individual Plaintiffs: SWIGART LAW GROUP, APC BY: JOSHUA B. SWIGART , ESQ. ILANA PLATKIEWICZ, ESQ. 2221 Camino Del Rio S . , Suite 308 San Dieg o, Cal ifornia 92108 866 . 219.3343 j osh@s wi gartlawgroup . com For California Employment Devel opment Department: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: LEANNA C. COSTANTINI , ESQ. 300 South Spri ng Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, California 90013 213.269 . 6231 l eanna . costantini@doj.ca.gov Ill Ill Ill www.aptusCR.com Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53495 Page 4 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation APPEARANCES (CONT ' D): (All parties appearing remotel y) For Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.: GOODWI N PROCTER LLP BY: LAURA BRYS, ESQ. BENJAMIN SHI N, ESQ. 601 South Figueroa Street , Suite 4100 -Los Ang~l e s , Californi a 90017 213 . 426 . 2584 lbrys @goodwinlaw . com bshin@goodwi nlaw . com Also Present: Nicholas Scheuer, EDD Representative www.aptusCR.com Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53496 Page 5 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation EXAMINATION INDEX EXAMINATION BY DIRECT QUESTIONS BY PLAINTIFFS (Read By Ms. Costantini, Esq . ) CROSS-QUESTIONS BY DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (Read By Ms. Costantini, Esq.) --000-- www.aptusCR.com PAGE 11 47 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53497 Page 6 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation Thursday, May 8, 2025; 10:11 a.m. --000 - - THE STENOGRAPHIC REPORTER: My name is Emily Samelson, a California Certified Short hand Reporter, License Number 14043. I am a code-compl iant reporter and will be producing a transcript of this proceeding that is automatically admissible in c ourt. SHAMEEL SINGH (AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) , having first been duly sworn, was examined and testifi ed as follows: THE STENOGRAPHIC REPORTER : Proceed, Counsel. MR. HOLLENBERG: Okay. Good morning. This is David Hol lenberg from Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy on behalf of the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs move the notice of subpoena to EDD as Exhibit 1 to this deposition by written questions . (Exhibit 1 was marked for identification. ) MS. BRYS : Good morning. This is Laura Brys, counsel for Bank of America. Bank of America moves as Exhibit 2 BANA ' s objections and cross written questions into the record . (Exhibit 2 was marked for identification.) MS. COSTANTINI: Good morning . Leanna Costantini. I'm the attorney for the deponent , the www.aptusCR.com Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53498 Page 7 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Shameel Singh In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation Cali forni a EDD . So I will be readi ng the definitions. The f i rst one is : 11Bank 11 refers to defendant Bank of America, N.A. No . 2: "claim fraud filter " and "CFF" refers to the Bank ' s automated cl ai m fraud filter that the Bank applied between September 28 , 2020 , and June 8 , 2021, to not ice of error claims submi tted by EDD debit cardhol ders and that was the subj ect of the preli minary injunction order enter ed i n the consoli dated Yick V. Bank of America, N.A. action on or about June 2 , 2021 (N .D. Cal , Case No . 3 :21-cv- 00376-VC , Dkt. 103). No. 3 : "Defendant" refers to defendant Bank of America, N.A. No. 4 : "EDD" means the Cali forni a Employment Development Depart ment. No. 5: "EDD debit card" refers to a prepaid debit card i ssued by defendant to an EDD debit cardholder for the purpose of all owing the EDD debit cardhol der to access , spend, or otherwise use EDD benefits deposited into their EDD debit card account. No. 6: "EDD debi t card account " refers to a bank account established by defendant for use by an EDD debit cardholder. No . 7: "EDD debit cardholder" refers to a www.aptusCR.com Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53499 Page 8 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53500 Page 9 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53501 Page 10 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53502 Page 11 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53503 Page 12 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53504 Page 13 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53505 Page 14 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53506 Page 15 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53507 Page 16 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53508 Page 17 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53509 Page 18 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53510 Page 19 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53511 Page 20 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53512 Page 21 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53513 Page 22 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53514 Page 23 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53515 Page 24 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53516 Page 25 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53517 Page 26 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53518 Page 27 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53519 Page 28 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53520 Page 29 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53521 Page 30 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53522 Page 31 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53523 Page 32 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53524 Page 33 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53525 Page 34 of 36 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53526 Page 35 of 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 1 22 23 24 25 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken before me at t he time and place herein set forth; t hat any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to testifying , were duly sworn; that a verbatim record of the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; that the foregoing transcript is an accurate transcription thereof. Further, that if the foregoing pertains to the original transcript of a deposition in a federal case, before completion of the proceedings, revi ew of the transcript [X] was J was not requested. I further certi fy I am neither financially interested in the action nor a relative or employee of any attorney or any of the parties. my name. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed Dated : 22nd of May, 2025 EMILY SAMELSON, CSR No. 14043 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-30 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53527 Page 36 of 36
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.casd.709615.634.30.pdf
- Size
- 2,134,492 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9b7e7bea3ff51ad9c441e48fa293eac6ca68f8db4427c5476d249a4a34468760
- Original
- PACER (login required)