Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Re: ECF 365 by Consolidated Plaintiffs — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 373)

Court filing

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Re: ECF 365 by Consolidated Plaintiffs — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 373)

Filed November 20, 2024 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-11-20

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 373 · 2024-11-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Joint Mtn to Extend Time Re: ECF 365; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36324) 
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 
BRIAN DANITZ (SBN 247403) 
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 
KARIN B. SWOPE (pro hac vice) 
kswope@cpmlegal.com 
COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY, 
LLP 
840 Malcolm Road 
Burlingame, CA 94010 
Telephone: (650) 697-6000 
Fax: (650) 697-0577 
MICHAEL RUBIN (SBN 80618) 
mrubin@altber.com 
CONNIE K. CHAN (SBN 284230) 
cchan@altber.com 
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 
177 Post Street, Suite 300 
San Francisco, CA 94108 
Telephone: (415) 421-7151 
Fax: (415) 362-8064 
 
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and  
the Proposed Class  
(Additional Counsel Listed Below) 
JAMES W. McGARRY (pro hac vice) 
JMcGarry@goodwinlaw.com 
MICHELLE T. BRIGGS (pro hac vice) 
MBriggs@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
100 Northern Avenue 
Boston, MA 02210 
Tel.: +1 617 570 1000 
Fax: +1 617 523 1231 
 
SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH (pro hac vice) 
SRoseSmith@goodwinlaw.com 
MATTHEW L. RIFFEE (pro hac vice) 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
1900 N Street NW 
Washington, DC 20036 
Tel.: +1 202 346 4000 
Fax: +1 202 346 4444 
 
Attorneys for Defendant 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND  
TIME RE: ECF 365 
This Document Relates to All Actions 
 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
Ctrm: 
2D (2nd Floor) 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 373     Filed 11/20/24     PageID.13783     Page
1 of 5

 
Joint Mtn to Extend Time Re: ECF 365; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
1 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
In light of the Court’s analysis in its November 15, 2024, amended order 
granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to seal certain documents 
supporting Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (ECF 365; the “Order”), the 
Parties met and conferred and Plaintiffs on November 13, 2024, filed a Notice of 
Withdrawal of their Opposition to Defendant’s pending motion to seal (ECF 363).   
Pursuant to the Parties’ further agreement, as well as Federal Rules of Civil 
Procedure 6(b) and 16(b)(4), Civil Local Rule 7.2, and ¶ 6 of this Court’s Civil 
Procedures, the Parties now jointly request an extension of the November 22, 2024 
deadline set forth in the Order. The requested extension is needed for two principal 
reasons, as set forth below and in the accompanying declaration of Plaintiffs’ counsel 
Vasti S. Montiel (“Montiel Decl.”). 
After meeting and conferring, the Parties agreed that:  
(1) an extension would enable the Parties to complete their meet and confer 
regarding which portions of documents should be redacted and sealed pursuant to the 
Order, in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Order; and  
(2) the Parties also plan to meet and confer regarding the appropriate redaction 
and sealing of documents to be filed in connection with Plaintiffs’ Reply to 
Defendants Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, which is due 
November 21, 2024, in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Order and 
Section 12.5 of the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF 82).  
Accordingly, the Parties jointly request a two-week extension of time from the 
November 22, 2024 date set forth in the Order to December 6, 2024.  The Parties 
believe the requested extension would further party and judicial economy by 
providing time to complete meet and confer discussions in an effort to reach an 
agreement regarding redactions in accordance with the Court’s guidance.  
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 373     Filed 11/20/24     PageID.13784     Page
2 of 5

 
Joint Mtn to Extend Time Re: ECF 365; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
2 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED MODIFIED SCHEDULE: 
Event 
Current Date 
Proposed Date 
Joint Motion Outlining Parties’ Positions 
Regarding Redactions (ECF 365) 
11/22/2024 
12/6/2024 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
Dated:  November 20, 2024 
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 
 
By:  
/s/ Brian Danitz 
 
 
 
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT  
BRIAN DANITZ  
KARIN B. SWOPE  
BLAIR V. KITTLE 
VASTI S. MONTIEL 
 
Dated:  November 20, 2024 
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 
 
By:  
/s/ Connie Chan 
 
 
 
MICHAEL RUBIN  
STACEY M. LEYTON  
CONNIE K. CHAN 
KATHERINE G. BASS 
COLIN C. JONES 
 
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the 
Proposed Class 
 
Dated:  November 20, 2024 
By:   
/s/ Matthew L. Riffee 
 
 
MATTHEW L. RIFFEE (pro hac vice) 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
THOMAS M. HEFFERON (pro hac vice) 
THefferon@goodwinlaw.com 
SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH (pro hac vice) 
SRoseSmith@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
1900 N Street NW 
Washington, DC 20036 
Tel.: +1 202 346 4000 
Fax: +1 202 346 4444 
 
JAMES McGARRY (pro hac vice) 
JMcGarry@goodwinlaw.com 
MICHELLE T. BRIGGS (pro hac vice) 
MBriggs@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
100 Northern Avenue 
Boston, MA 02210 
Tel.: +1 617 570 1000 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 373     Filed 11/20/24     PageID.13785     Page
3 of 5

 
Joint Mtn to Extend Time Re: ECF 365; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
3 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Fax: +1 617 523 1231 
 
YVONNE W. CHAN (pro hac vice) 
YChan@jonesday.com 
JONES DAY 
100 High Street 
Boston, MA 02210 
Tel.: +1 617 960 3939 
Fax: +1 617 449 6999 
 
Counsel for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 373     Filed 11/20/24     PageID.13786     Page
4 of 5

 
Joint Mtn to Extend Time Re: ECF 365; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
4 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION 
Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of this Court’s Electronic Case Filing 
Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I, Brian Danitz, hereby certify that 
the content of this document is acceptable to all the signatories herein and that I have 
obtained counsel’s authorization to affix their electronic signatures to this document. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Brian Danitz 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
BRIAN DANITZ 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 373     Filed 11/20/24     PageID.13787     Page
5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.373.0.pdf
Size
141,981 bytes
SHA-256
551d5300fbf837d7af681d8e320f438fbea5a4c0db0e4980e9e10821a8f6da29
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.373.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. Exhibit 95 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 350-96, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-10-24
  2. Exhibit 89 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 350-90, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-10-24
  3. Exhibit 91, Orange County Register — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigationsame docket · 2024-10-24
  4. Motion - Kyc Company Litigation (2024-10-25)same docket · 2024-10-25
  5. Order. The Court directs Defendant to file, under seal, the regulatory letters — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 354)same case · 2024-10-29
  6. Order - Kyc Company Litigation (2024-10-31)same docket · 2024-10-31
  7. BANA - EDD MDL - Brys Decl. ISO Opp to Pls Ex Parte re Oversized Replysame docket · 2024-11-19
  8. Response in Opposition re 369 Ex Parte Motion for Leave — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 370)same docket · 2024-11-19
  9. Declaration of Gayle M. Blatt in Support of Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Request — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 369-1)same docket · 2024-11-19
  10. Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by Carlos Rodriguez — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 369)same docket · 2024-11-19
  11. Notice of Filing Public Versions of Exhibits 22 and 90 to the Declaration — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 374)same docket · 2024-11-20
  12. Exhibit 22 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 374-1, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same docket · 2024-11-20
  13. Reply - Other re 324 Motion to Certify Class filed by Consolidated Plaintiffs — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 378)same docket · 2024-11-21
  14. Declaration of Connie K. Chan — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-2, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-11-21
  15. Exhibit 158 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-3, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-11-21
  16. Exhibit 159 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-4, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-11-21
  17. Exhibit 160 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-5, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-11-21
  18. Exhibit 161 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-6, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2024-11-21
  19. Exhibit 162 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-7, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same docket · 2024-11-21
  20. Exhibit 163 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 378-8, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same docket · 2024-11-21

Part of: In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · Pandemic unemployment insurance · Lender and platform litigation · Motions · 2024 · Court filings

Back to top