ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (ECF No. 282… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 283)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 283 · 2024-02-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
21md2992-GPC (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA 
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
Case No.:  21md2992-GPC (MSB) 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY 
PAPERS [ECF NO. 282] 
 
On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte 
Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena.  (ECF No. 220.)  The following day, the Court issued 
a briefing schedule for the motion.  (ECF No. 221.)  TTEC timely filed its Response on 
February 23, 2024.  (ECF No. 222.)  Now pending before the Court is the parties’ third 
Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (hereinafter, “Joint Motion”).  
(See ECF No. 282.)  The Court granted extensions of time for this discovery dispute on 
March 1, 2024, March 12, 2024, and April 8, 2024.  (See ECF Nos. 228, 239, 260.)   
In the instant Joint Motion, Plaintiff explains that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion and 
TTEC’s Opposition “continue to lead to productive meet and confer discussions . . . [and] 
the production of substantial materials.”  (ECF No. 282 at 2.)  During each of the 
extended time periods to date, Plaintiff says the parties “have made significant 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 283     Filed 05/13/24     PageID.2918     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
21md2992-GPC (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
progress, including TTEC’s production of a significant volume of highly relevant data 
surrounding calls made by EDD beneficiaries to TTEC call centers.”  (Id.)  The parties 
believe additional discussions regarding the production of documents are “likely to lead 
to a near complete resolution of the present discovery dispute.”  (Id.)  They ask the 
Court to extend the deadline to file reply papers from May 10, 2024, to June 7, 2024.  
(Id. at 3.)  Finding good cause, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion.  Because briefing on 
this discovery dispute was originally set to close on March 1, 2024, and the Court has 
now granted four extensions, the Court will not permit any further extensions of time 
absent extraordinary circumstances.  Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve TTEC with a copy of 
this Order.   
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  May 13, 2024 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 283     Filed 05/13/24     PageID.2919     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.283.0.pdf

Size

104,619 bytes

SHA-256

39ac2cfc9aaa81ad07ae088853523bddf6714838390faf311f0e17fe8891e2ab

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.283.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)