Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on 220 Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Ex Parte Motion to……

Court filing

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on 220 Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Ex Parte Motion to… — BofA Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 221)

Summary

An Order Setting Briefing Schedule, Document 221 filed 02/15/24 in Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California. The order concerns Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Ex Parte Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena for the Production of Documents, filed February 14, 2024 against non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC. It states that TTEC's counsel asked for more time, orders TTEC to respond no later than February 23, 2024, and allows Plaintiff to reply by March 1, 2024. It also orders Plaintiff to serve TTEC with the motion and the order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on 220 Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Ex Parte Motion to… — BofA Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 221).” Original at ecf.casd.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 221. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/undated-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-221-0-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-221-0/, SHA-256 0e84ae885a9025b721ca5628e316c3894153c40cfe2012c436f6ac68446386bb.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB        Document 221      Filed 02/15/24   PageID.2339     Page 1
                                          of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11   IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA               Case No.: 21md2992-LAB (MSB)
     UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION
12
                                                     ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
13                                                   ON PLAINTIFF LINDSAY MCCLURE’S EX
                                                     PARTE MOTION TO COMPEL
14
                                                     COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA FOR THE
15                                                   PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
16
17         On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte
18   Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC
19   (“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena. (ECF No. 220.) On February 15, 2024, counsel for
20   TTEC contacted the undersigned chambers and requested additional time to respond.
21   TTEC is ORDERED to respond to the Ex Parte Motion no later than February 23, 2024.
22   Plaintiff may reply no later than March 1, 2024. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve TTEC with
23   a copy of the Ex Parte Motion and this Order.
24         IT IS SO ORDERED.
25   Dated: February 15, 2024
26
27
28
                                                 1
                                                                                21md2992-LAB (MSB)


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.221.0.pdf
Size
99,832 bytes
SHA-256
0e84ae885a9025b721ca5628e316c3894153c40cfe2012c436f6ac68446386bb
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.221.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top