ORDER Granting 259 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 260)

Summary

An Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua Sponte Continuing Deadline [ECF No. 259], Document 260, filed 04/08/24 in Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No.: 21md2992-LAB (MSB), in the United States District Court, Southern District of California. The Court recounts that Plaintiff Lindsay McClure filed an Ex Parte Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC to comply with a subpoena (ECF No. 220). The parties request that the reply deadline be continued from April 5, 2024 to April 29, 2024, and finding good cause, the Court grants the Joint Motion and sua sponte continues the deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply to May 10, 2024. The order is dated April 8, 2024.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA 
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
Case No.:  21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY 
PAPERS AND SUA SPONTE CONTINUING 
DEADLINE [ECF NO. 259] 
 
On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte 
Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena.  (ECF No. 220.)  The following day, the Court issued 
a briefing schedule for the motion.  (ECF No. 221.)  TTEC timely filed its Response on 
February 23, 2024.  (ECF No. 222.)  Now pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint 
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (hereinafter, “Joint Motion”).  (See 
ECF No. 259.)  The Court previously granted extensions of time for this discovery dispute 
on March 1, 2024, and March 12, 2024.  (See ECF Nos. 228 & 239.)   
In the instant Joint Motion, Plaintiff explains that Plaintiff’s motion to compel and 
TTEC’s opposition have “led to productive meet and confer discussions . . . [and] the 
production of substantial materials.”  (ECF No. 259 at 2.)  The parties believe additional 
discussions regarding the production of documents are “likely to lead to a near 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 260     Filed 04/08/24     PageID.2544     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
complete resolution of the present discovery dispute.”  (Id.)  They request the deadline 
to file reply papers be continued from April 5, 2024, to April 29, 2024.  Finding good 
cause, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion.  The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply is 
SUA SPONTE CONTINUED to May 10, 2024.  Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve TTEC with a 
copy of this Order.   
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  April 8, 2024 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 260     Filed 04/08/24     PageID.2545     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.260.0.pdf

Size

102,593 bytes

SHA-256

fdd6a19f5f8cd3c3f7335eadd48b62dacb60562e153913575ff8801648eefa5a

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.260.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)