Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Granting 259 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua… — B…

Court filing

ORDER Granting 259 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 260)

Filed February 14, 2024 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-02-14

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 260 · 2024-02-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA 
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
Case No.:  21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY 
PAPERS AND SUA SPONTE CONTINUING 
DEADLINE [ECF NO. 259] 
 
On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte 
Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena.  (ECF No. 220.)  The following day, the Court issued 
a briefing schedule for the motion.  (ECF No. 221.)  TTEC timely filed its Response on 
February 23, 2024.  (ECF No. 222.)  Now pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint 
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (hereinafter, “Joint Motion”).  (See 
ECF No. 259.)  The Court previously granted extensions of time for this discovery dispute 
on March 1, 2024, and March 12, 2024.  (See ECF Nos. 228 & 239.)   
In the instant Joint Motion, Plaintiff explains that Plaintiff’s motion to compel and 
TTEC’s opposition have “led to productive meet and confer discussions . . . [and] the 
production of substantial materials.”  (ECF No. 259 at 2.)  The parties believe additional 
discussions regarding the production of documents are “likely to lead to a near 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 260     Filed 04/08/24     PageID.2544     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
complete resolution of the present discovery dispute.”  (Id.)  They request the deadline 
to file reply papers be continued from April 5, 2024, to April 29, 2024.  Finding good 
cause, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion.  The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply is 
SUA SPONTE CONTINUED to May 10, 2024.  Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve TTEC with a 
copy of this Order.   
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  April 8, 2024 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 260     Filed 04/08/24     PageID.2545     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.260.0.pdf
Size
102,593 bytes
SHA-256
fdd6a19f5f8cd3c3f7335eadd48b62dacb60562e153913575ff8801648eefa5a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.260.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top