Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers in Further Support — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 227)

Court filing

Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers in Further Support — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 227)

Filed March 1, 2024 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-03-01

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 227 · 2024-03-01 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers 
  
                                                                            Case No. 21MD2992 LAB (MSB)  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC.  
 
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783) 
Albert Y. Chang (SBN 296065) 
Aaron P. Arnzen (SBN 218272) 
7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 
La Jolla, California 92037 
Telephone: 
(858) 914-2001 
Facsimile: 
(858) 914-2002 
E-mail: fbottini@bottinilaw.com 
achang@bottinilaw.com  
aarnzen@bottinilaw.com   
 
Counsel for Class Representative Plaintiff Lindsay 
McClure 
 
 
 
[Additional Counsel Listed Below] 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
In re BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-LAB-MSB 
 
The Honorable Michael S. Berg 
 
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for 
Extension of Time to File Reply 
Papers in Further Support of Motion 
to Compel Compliance with 
Subpoena for the Production of 
Documents 
 
This Document Relates to All Actions 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 227     Filed 03/01/24     PageID.2421     Page 1
of 3

 
 
 
1 
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers 
 
                                                                            Case No. 21MD2992 LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs hereby respectfully move for an order extending their deadline to file 
reply papers in further support of their motion to compel compliance with subpoena 
for the production of documents.  In support of this motion, Plaintiffs state as follows: 
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel third party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC’s 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena for the production of documents, and TTEC’s 
opposition brief, have led to meet and confer discussions between counsel.  These 
discussions seem likely to lead to at least a partial, and perhaps a complete, resolution 
of the present discovery dispute.  Much will depend on what the parties and TTEC 
learn about the types and completeness of data and other information that were 
transferred from TTEC to Bank of America during the relevant time period.  The 
parties and TTEC are currently involved in discussions surrounding such transfers of 
data and information.  TTEC’s counsel has informed the undersigned that TTEC does 
not oppose this motion. 
In light of the foregoing, good cause exists to extend Plaintiffs’ March 1, 2024 
deadline to file their reply papers to March 11, 2024.  Accordingly, the Court should 
grant this unopposed motion and issue the accompanying proposed order extending 
Plaintiffs’ March 1, 2024 deadline to file their reply papers to March 11, 2024. 
 
Dated: March 1, 2024 
Respectfully submitted, 
BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC. 
s/ Aaron P. Arnzen 
Aaron P. Arnzen 
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783) 
Albert Y. Chang (SBN 296065) 
Aaron P. Arnzen (SBN 218272) 
7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 
La Jolla, CA 92037 
Telephone:  858/914-2001 
Facsimile: 
858/914-2002  
Email:          fbottini@bottinilaw.com 
 
 
aarnzen@bottinilaw.com   
 
 
achang@bottinilaw.com  
Counsel for Class Representative Plaintiff Lindsay 
McClure 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 227     Filed 03/01/24     PageID.2422     Page 2
of 3

 
 
 
2 
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers 
 
                                                                            Case No. 21MD2992 LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 
Joseph W. Cotchett (SBN 36324) 
Brian Danitz (SBN 247403) 
Karin B. Swope (Pro Hac Vice) 
Andrew F. Kirtley (SBN 328023) 
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 
Burlingame, CA 94010 
Telephone:   (650) 697-6000 
Email:           jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 
kswope@cpmlegal.com 
akirtley@cpmlegal.com 
 
 
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 
Michael Rubin (SBN 80618) 
Stacey M. Leyton (SBN 203827) 
Matthew Murray (SBN 271461) 
Connie K. Chan (SBN 284230) 
177 Post Street, Suite 300 
San Francisco, CA 94108 
Telephone: (415) 421-7151 
Email:         mrubin@altber.com 
                   sleyton@altber.com 
                   mmurray@altber.com 
                   cchan@altber.com 
 
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the 
Proposed Class 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 227     Filed 03/01/24     PageID.2423     Page 3
of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.227.0.pdf
Size
107,978 bytes
SHA-256
38d97ea4f96da3e620c22d302765ba66c3e03091e9b87b7ec78dbc3dc9bac2e5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.227.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top