Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Granting 237 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua… — B…

Court filing

ORDER Granting 237 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers and Sua… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 239)

Filed February 14, 2024 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-02-14

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 239 · 2024-02-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA 
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
Case No.:  21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY 
PAPERS AND SUA SPONTE CONTINUING 
DEADLINE [ECF NO. 237] 
 
On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte 
Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena.  (ECF No. 220.)  The following day, the Court issued 
a briefing schedule for the motion.  (ECF No. 221.)  TTEC timely filed its Response on 
February 23, 2024.  (ECF No. 222.)  Now pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint 
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (hereinafter, “Joint Motion”).  (See 
ECF No. 237.)  The Court previously granted an unopposed motion for an extension of 
time on March 1, 2024.  (See ECF No. 228.)  In the instant Joint Motion, Plaintiff 
reiterates that meet and confer discussions between counsel “seem likely to lead to at 
least a partial, and perhaps a complete, resolution of the present discovery dispute.”  
(ECF No. 237 at 2.)  Plaintiff explains that an outstanding question of the discovery 
dispute is “the types and completeness of data and other information that were 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 239     Filed 03/12/24     PageID.2455     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
transferred from TTEC to Bank of America during the relevant time period.”  (Id.)  To 
allow for continued discussions, the parties request that the current deadline to file a 
Reply be continued from March 11, 2024, to March 20, 2024.  (Id.)   
Finding good cause, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion.  The deadline for 
Plaintiff to file a Reply is SUA SPONTE CONTINUED to April 5, 2024.  Plaintiff is 
ORDERED to serve TTEC with a copy of this Order.   
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  March 12, 2024 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 239     Filed 03/12/24     PageID.2456     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.239.0.pdf
Size
101,974 bytes
SHA-256
84d71ae94ca685cea71441194c3d3ed55380320368c29ce76bedf58189e4f872
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.239.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top