Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Granting 227 Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time……

Court filing

ORDER Granting 227 Plaintiff Lindsay McClure's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 228)

Filed February 14, 2024 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-02-14

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 228 · 2024-02-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA 
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION 
 
Case No.:  21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
 
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LINDSAY 
MCCLURE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY 
PAPERS [ECF NO. 227] 
 
On February 14, 2024, Plaintiff Lindsay McClure (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte 
Motion seeking an order compelling non-party TTEC Government Solutions, LLC 
(“TTEC”) to comply with a subpoena.  (ECF No. 220.)  The following day, the Court issued 
a briefing schedule for the motion.  (ECF No. 221.)  TTEC timely filed its Response on 
February 23, 2024.  (ECF No. 222.)  Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s 
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Papers (“Unopposed Motion”).  
(See ECF No. 227.)  Plaintiff explains that briefing has led to meet and confer discussions 
between counsel, which “seem likely to lead to at least a partial, and perhaps a 
complete, resolution of the present discovery dispute.”  (Id. at 2.)  Accordingly, Plaintiff 
requests that the current deadline to file a Reply be continued from March 1, 2024, to 
March 11, 2024.  (Id.)  TTEC does not oppose this request.  (Id.) 
/ / / 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 228     Filed 03/04/24     PageID.2424     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
21md2992-LAB (MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Finding good cause, the Court GRANTS the Unopposed Motion.  The deadline for 
Plaintiff to file a Reply is CONTINUED from March 1, 2024, to March 11, 2024.  Plaintiff 
is ORDERED to serve TTEC with a copy of this Order.   
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  March 4, 2024 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 228     Filed 03/04/24     PageID.2425     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.228.0.pdf
Size
101,065 bytes
SHA-256
2306264a2651cfc958042eb6bf2c2e4e546e6a0b9db452883c78479d57b73af7
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.228.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top