Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Siampwizi USA v. Siampwizi — U.S. District Court, N.D. Ga., Atlanta Division Order Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Austin Martin Siampwizi — USA v. Siampwizi (Dkt. 11, N.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Order Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Austin Martin Siampwizi — USA v. Siampwizi (Dkt. 11, N.D. Ga.)

Filed August 8, 2023 in USA v. Siampwizi; one of 27 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2023-08-08

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC · Doc. 11 · 2023-08-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

M.\GISTRA TE'S CRIMINAL MINUTES 
ARRAIGNMENT 
PLEA AND 
SENTENCE 
Time in Court: 
___ Hrs J5_ Min 
Filed in Open Court: 
Date: 8 I 8' I 2023 Time: 
Tape: FTR 
Magistrate (presiding): 
CHRISTOPHER C. BLY 
Deputy Clerk:--'J._a=m=e=s __ J"""a"""rv'-'-is"--_..aaE=x=hi=b.a.ait.;;;..s_Ya...;e=s- D _____ 
N __ o .... O 
_ _ 
Case Number: 
AUSA: 
Defendant's Attorney: 
USPO/PTR: 
Type Counsel: ( ) Retained ( '-'f'CJA ( 
/4 
REST DA TE: 
INTERPRETER: 
~
ITIAL APPEARANCE HEARING. ( ) In THIS DISTRICT 
Oft in custody? () Yes 
( ) No 
Defendant advised of right to counsel. 
( ) WAIVER OF COUNSEL filed. 
ORDER appointing Federal Defender Program as counsel. () INITIAL APPEARANCE ONLY. 
/ 
ORDER appointing So-r~ ~C 
'-', 
jl\in~\ -,i 
s counsel. 
ORDER giving defendant 
days to employ counsel (cc: served by Mag CRD) 
----------------------
D ft to pay attorney fees as follows: 
INFORMATION/COMPLAINT filed. 
WAIVER OF INDICTMENT filed. 
Vcopy indictment/information given to dft? ( X) Yes 
() No 
Read to dft? () Yes 
( ) No 
(X ) Prior to Hrg 
CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE MAGISTRATE (Misd / Petty) offense filed . 
- /4RRAIGNMENT HELD.( )indictment/ information 
() Dft's WAIVER of appearance filed. 
Arraignment continued to 
at 
Request of ( ) Govt 
( ) Oft 
----
Oft failed to appear for arraignment. 
Bench warrant 
_ / 
issued 
/
ott enters PLEA OF NOT GUil TY. () Oft stood mute; plea of NOT GUil TY entered. () Waiver of appearance. 
MOTION TO CHANGE PLEA, and order allowing same . 
./ASSIGNED TO JUDGE 
jtl MR 
for () trial 
-
~
SIGNED TO MAGISTRATE ~ n h0 t 
( ) arraignment/sentence. 
Estimated trial time: 
days. 
for pretrial proceeding/ 
( ) SHORT 
(y"MEDIUM 
( ) LONG 
---
PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION filed . Referred to USPO for PSI and continued 
until 
at 
for sentencing. 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 11     Filed 08/08/23     Page 1 of 3

ARRAIGNMENT - Pg. 2 
Case No.: 
Defendant: 
~
ernment MOTION FOR DETENTION filed. Hearing set for 
-✓Temporary commitment issued. 
Oft remanded to custody of US Marshals Service. 
BOND REVOCATION/ DETENTION HEARING 
BOND/ PRETRIAL DETENTION hearing held. 
Government MOTION FOR DETENTION ( ) GRANTED 
() DENIED () WITHDRAWN 
WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. 
HEARING HELD on motion for reduction I modification of bond. 
Motion for reduction/ modification of Bond 
( ) GRANTED 
() DENIED. 
WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. 
BOND SET at 
Non-surety 
Surety ( ) Cash 
( ) Property 
( ) Corporate surety ONLY 
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 
Bond filed; defendant released. 
Bond NOT EXECUTED. 
Defendant to remain in Marshal's custody. 
at 
__ Defendant to remain on pretrial release under the terms and conditions set forth in the U. S. District for the 
WITNESSES: 
SENTENCE: 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 11     Filed 08/08/23     Page 2 of 3

' . 
~ 
uant to the Due Process Protections Act, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(f), the government is directed to adhere 
to the disclosure obligations set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to provide all 
materials and information that are arguably favorable to the defendant in compliance with its obligations under 
Brady; Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); and their progeny. Exculpatory material as defined in Brady 
and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1995), shall be provided sufficiently in advance of trial to allow a defendant 
to use it effectively, and exculpatory information is not limited to information that would constitute admissible 
evidence. 
The failure of the government to comply with its Brady obligations in a timely manner may result in serious 
consequences, including, but not limited to, the suppression or exclusion of evidence, the dismissal of some or all 
counts, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings, or other remedies that are just under the circumstances. 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 11     Filed 08/08/23     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.318618.11.0.pdf
Size
262,062 bytes
SHA-256
1df34bd1f5fb4e702d30bab93adffb0e7a9d254020a4176b5ffeccce282e8f4f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.318618.11.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top