Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Siampwizi USA v. Siampwizi — U.S. District Court, N.D. Ga., Atlanta Division Order Granting 22 Motion for Continuance of Pretrial Conference — USA v. Siampwizi (Dkt. 24, N.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Order Granting 22 Motion for Continuance of Pretrial Conference — USA v. Siampwizi (Dkt. 24, N.D. Ga.)

Filed August 22, 2023 in USA v. Siampwizi; one of 27 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2023-08-22

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC · Doc. 24 · 2023-08-22 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA  
ATLANTA DIVISION
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
  
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AUSTIN MARTIN SIAMPWIZI, 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
  
 
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 
1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Continue Pretrial 
Motions Deadline and Pretrial Conference [Doc. 22]. 
 
For good cause shown, Defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED. Pretrial 
motions will be due no later than October 20, 2023. The Pretrial Conference is hereby 
rescheduled for Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.1   
 
The delay between the original and rescheduled pretrial conference shall be 
excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations because the Court finds that the 
reason for the delay is for good cause and will allow defense counsel time to 
review the voluminous discovery and meet with her client. The Court also finds that 
 
1   The Pretrial Conference will be conducted by telephone.  The Court will send instructions to all 
parties via email prior to the hearing. 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 24     Filed 08/22/23     Page 1 of 2

 
2 
 
the delay caused by the requested continuance should be excluded from Speedy 
Trial Act calculations because the additional time is needed for adequate preparation
and to prevent a miscarriage of justice and the ends of justice are served by 
granting this continuance, in that they outweigh the best interests of the public and 
the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) 
& (iv). 
 
The clerk is DIRECTED to exclude this time from calculation under the 
Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) & (iv). 
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of August, 2023. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGINA D. CANNON 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Magistrate Judge  
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 24     Filed 08/22/23     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.318618.24.0.pdf
Size
126,537 bytes
SHA-256
77097006efde20af83ee468665fa2c1ae9e1aa9f946c61c7853f37ecca55e812
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.318618.24.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top