Text of Proposed Order — USA v. Siampwizi (Dkt. 22.1)

Summary

A [PROPOSED] Order, Document 22-1 filed 08/20/23 in United States of America v. Austin M. Siampwizi, No. 1:23-CR-246-WMR-RDC, in the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. It concerns the Defendant's Motion to Continue Pretrial Motion Deadline and Pretrial Conference. The proposed order would grant the motion for good cause shown, with the new deadline and conference date left blank, and would exclude the delay from Speedy Trial Act calculations to allow defense counsel time to review the voluminous discovery. The signature block is for Hon. Regina D. Cannon, United States Magistrate Judge, with the day of August 2023 left blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
) 
 
 
) 
No. 1:23-CR-246-WMR-RDC 
 
) 
 
 
) 
 
AUSTIN M. SIAMPWIZI, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
 
Defendant. 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
 
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Continue Pretrial 
Motion Deadline and Pretrial Conference [Doc. ___].  
For good cause shown, Defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED. Pretrial 
motions will be due no later than ______, and the pretrial conference will occur at 
____ on _______, 2023.  
The delay between the original and rescheduled pretrial conference shall be 
excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations because the Court finds that the 
reason for the delay is for good cause and will allow defense counsel time to 
review the voluminous discovery and meet with her client. The Court also finds 
that the delay caused by the requested continuance should be excluded from 
Speedy Trial Act calculations because the additional time is needed for adequate 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 22-1     Filed 08/20/23     Page 1 of 2

2 
preparation and to prevent a miscarriage of justice and the ends of justice are 
served by granting this continuance, in that they outweigh the best interests of the 
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), 
3161(h)(7)(B)(i) & (iv).  
The clerk is DIRECTED to exclude this time from calculation under the 
Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) & (iv).  
SO ORDERED, this _____ day of August, 2023.  
 
_________________________________ 
HON. REGINA D. CANNON 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC     Document 22-1     Filed 08/20/23     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.318618.22.1.pdf

Size

104,852 bytes

SHA-256

3c03eb3d1393ba357c0d64a0d9312b588f74deab9f96acb5ec9c80e6e3812cbb

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.318618.22.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)