Court filing
REDACTED FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM FOR DEFENDANT ARTUR AYVAZYAN filed — USA v. Ayvazyan et al (Dkt. 646)
Filed June 28, 2021 in USA v. Ayvazyan et al; one of 233 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-06-28 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW · Doc. 646 · 2021-06-28 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 FILED CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUN 2 8 2021 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY ,,,/1 f . DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, RICHARD AYVAZYAN, MARIETTA TERABELIAN, ARTUR AYVAZYAN, TAMARA DADYAN, MANUK GRIGORYAN, ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN, EDVARD PARONYAN, VAHE DADYAN, Defendants. CR 2:20-579 (A)-SVW FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM= FOR DEFENDANT ARTUR AYVAZYAN Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:9510 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 We, the jury in the above-captioned case, present the following unanimous verdict as to defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN: Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment (~~FSI"), the government seeks forfeiture of the following property: All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Tarzana, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031 1. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense committed in Count 1? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 2. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Glendale, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033 Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense 2 committed in Count 1? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 3. 29 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:9511 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008 3. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense committed in Count 1? YES ~J NO K Please proceed to Question 4. $74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate Towing & Transport LLC 4. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense committed in Count 1? YES C~ NO K ~ ` Please proceed to Question 5. $65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account ending in `9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service 5. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds 30 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 3 of 11 Page ID #:9512 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ~~ obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense committed in Count 1? YES ~~ NO K Please proceed to Question 6. $12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan 6. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense committed in Count 1? YES K NO Please proceed to Question 7. COUNTS TWO THROUGH TWELVE and TWENTY-FOUR Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on Counts 2-12 and 24 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the following property: All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Tarzana, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031 7. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the 26 27 28 evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 24? 31 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 4 of 11 Page ID #:9513 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 8. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Glendale, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033 8. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 22? YES ~` NO K . ~ Please proceed to Question 9. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008 9. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 22? YES NO K Please proceed to Question 10. 26 27 28 $74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate Towing & Transport LLC 32 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 5 of 11 Page ID #:9514 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 10. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 22? YES, ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 11. $65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account ending in `9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service Inc. 11. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 22? YES ~L NO K /~ Please proceed to Question 12. $12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan 12. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture ecause it constitutes, or is erive from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 2-12 and 22? YES K NO 33 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 6 of 11 Page ID #:9515 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 •7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 Please proceed to Question 13. COUNTS THIRTEEN THROUGH TWENTY Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on Counts 13-20 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the following property: All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Tarzana, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031 13. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 13-20? YES ,~T~ NO K Please proceed to Question 14. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Glendale, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033 14 committed in Counts 13-20? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 15. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the o enses 34 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 7 of 11 Page ID #:9516 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008 15. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 13-20? YES ~' NO K Please proceed to Question 16. $74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate Towing & Transport LLC 16. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 13-20? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 17. $65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America Inc. 17. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture 35 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 8 of 11 Page ID #:9517 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Counts 13-20? YES NO K Please proceed to Question 18. $12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan 18. Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses committed in Co 13-20? Y E S (i,~~ ~ N O ~l Please proceed to Question 19. COUNT TWENTY-SIX Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on Count 26 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the following property: All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Tarzana, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031 Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? YES ~ NO K 36 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 9 of 11 Page ID #:9518 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 Please proceed to Question 20. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Glendale, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033 20. Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 21. All of the convicted defendant's right, title and interest in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008 21. Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? YES ~ NO K Please proceed to Question 22. $74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate Towing & Transport LLC 22. Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? Y E S [~/' N 0 K Please proceed to Question 23. 37 Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 10 of 11 Page ID #:9519 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 $65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America account ending in `9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service Inc. 23. Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? YES ~C NO K Please proceed to Question 24. $12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan 24. Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is property involved in the offense committed in Count 26? YES K NO DATED FOREPERSON m REDACTED Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 646 Filed 06/28/21 Page 11 of 11 Page ID #:9520
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.646.0.pdf
- Size
- 399,059 bytes
- SHA-256
- b441bb3e5ec7347a1c3fb3a16a75fdd71938bb4b5dcf04ae775ea9ddf8200bbf
- Original
- PACER (login required)