Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thomas et al USA v. Thomas et al — Amanda Christian filings, N.D. Ga., Atlanta Order Denying as Moot 988 Motion to Appoint Counsel as to Amanda Christian (9) — USA v. Thomas et al. (Dkt. 1066, N.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Order Denying as Moot 988 Motion to Appoint Counsel as to Amanda Christian (9) — USA v. Thomas et al. (Dkt. 1066, N.D. Ga.)

Filed July 10, 2024 in USA v. Thomas et al.; one of 41 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2024-07-10

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS · Doc. 1066 · 2024-07-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
       v. 
 
AMANDA CHRISTIAN, 
 
 
 
     CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 
     1:20-CR-00296-JPB 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
ORDER  
 
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s letter dated April 22, 2024.  
[Doc. 988].  In the letter, Defendant asks the Court to appoint an attorney for her in 
order to file a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).  The Court 
thus construes Defendant’s letter as a motion to appoint counsel.   
In the Northern District of Georgia, an administrative order exists that 
provides that the Federal Defender Program “is appointed to review the file of each 
defendant on the United States Sentencing Commission’s list and every other 
defendant who files in this Court a pro se motion for a reduction in sentence under 
Amendment 821 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).”  [Doc. 1046, p. 1].  The 
administrative order further states that the Federal Defender Program is also 
“appointed to review the case of each defendant who files a motion to appoint 
counsel to pursue such a motion.”  Id. 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1066     Filed 07/10/24     Page 1 of 2

2
By operation of the administrative order, the Federal Defender Program has 
already been appointed to review Defendant’s case because she filed a motion to 
appoint counsel.  As such, the motion to appoint counsel [Doc. 988] is DENIED 
AS MOOT. 
SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2024. 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1066     Filed 07/10/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.292218.1066.0.pdf
Size
137,237 bytes
SHA-256
28022ee49d7822fd0fc8b66a70a782c127b673c48884b367bcbd80252f3f781f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.292218.1066.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top