Final Judgment — Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance (Dkt. 51, D. Colo.)

Summary

The Final Judgment in Joshua Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance, et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, filed September 2, 2025 as Document 51. Entered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), it records that United States District Judge Regina M. Rodriguez adopted the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and granted the State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [ECF No. 33]. Claims against the Division of Unemployment Insurance and official-capacity claims against individual Defendants are dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and individual-capacity claims against Barela and Fitzgerald are dismissed with prejudice. The ADA claim and remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice, and judgment is entered for the Defendants. It is signed by a deputy clerk for Clerk Jeffrey P. Colwell.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR          Document 51      filed 09/02/25    USDC Colorado        pg 1
                                           of 2



                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                                 Judge Regina M. Rodriguez

Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR

JOSHUA ABRAMS,

        Plaintiff,

v.

DIVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE,
JOE BARELA,
JEFF FITZGERALD,
JOHN AND JANE DOE(S)

        Defendants.


                                      FINAL JUDGMENT


        In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

        Pursuant to the Order of United States District Judge Regina M. Rodriguez entered

on September 2, 2025 [ECF No. 50] it is

     ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No.

121] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is

     ORDERED that the State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [ECF No.

33] is GRANTED as follows:

        •   Plaintiff’s claims against the Division of Unemployment Insurance are DISMISSED

            WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject

            matter jurisdiction;

        •   Plaintiff’s official-capacity claims against all individual Defendants are DISMISSED

            WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject

            matter jurisdiction;
Case No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR              Document 51    filed 09/02/25       USDC Colorado    pg 2
                                               of 2



        •    Plaintiff’s individual-capacity claims against Defendants Barela and Fitzgerald are

             DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

        •    Plaintiff’s ADA claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

        •    Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

    FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against

the Plaintiff.

            This case will be closed.

            Dated at Denver, Colorado this 2nd day of September, 2025.

                                                      FOR THE COURT:
                                                      JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

                                                      By:    s/K. Myhaver
                                                            K. Myhaver
                                                            Deputy Clerk


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cod.239393.51.0.pdf

Size

97,674 bytes

SHA-256

1f3fe0d9f195b1a445ae5884575a5ededc25d337766a90ecdb48cea733772dd2

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cod.239393.51.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)