Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Kisha Sutton — S.D. W. Va., No. 2:24-cr-00192 PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by United States of America as to Kisha… — United States of America…

Court filing

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by United States of America as to Kisha… — United States of America v. Sutton et al (Dkt. 304)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Filed2025-06-30

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:24-cr-00192 · Doc. 304 · 2025-06-30 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

Proposed voir dire questions filed June 30, 2025 by the United States in United States of America v. Kisha Sutton and Shamiese Wright, Criminal No. 2:24-cr-00192, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, as Document 304. Assistant United States Attorney Jonathan T. Storage asks the Court to put 38 numbered questions to the jury panel. The questions cover availability for a trial estimated at three working days, acquaintance with listed witnesses, counsel and the defendants, prior contact with law enforcement or the courts, media exposure to the case, attitudes toward the federal government and law enforcement, and willingness to follow the Court's instructions. Question 30 asks whether jurors or family members have been victims of bank fraud. The 10-page filing ends with a certificate of service on defense counsel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA 
CHARLESTON 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   CRIMINAL NO. 2:24-cr-00192 
 
 
KISHA SUTTON – 1 
SHAMIESE WRIGHT - 2 
 
 
 
PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES 
Comes now the United States of America, by Jonathan T. 
Storage, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern 
District of West Virginia, and respectfully requests the Court to 
ask the following voir dire questions of the jury panel. 
1. 
It has been estimated by the attorneys that it may take 
three working days to complete the trial of this case.  Do any of 
you have any reason to believe that you would not be able to serve 
as a juror for that period of time? 
(This would include any personal or business obligations that 
might cause an interruption in the trial of this case.) 
a. 
Would serving as a juror on this case have any 
adverse effect with regard to your family life or 
your job?  
b. 
Do you have any physical or medical problems that 
might make it difficult to follow the evidence or 
sit on the jury?  
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1542

2 
 
2. 
Are any of you acquainted with or have any kind of 
relationship, professionally or personally, including through 
social networking websites such as “X”, Instagram, and/or 
Facebook, with any of the following individuals who may be called 
as witnesses in this case?  
a. 
Ben Wood, Task Force Officer with the FBI 
b. 
Greg Lipari, Special Agent with the FBI 
c. 
Damisha Brown 
 
d. 
William Powell 
 
e. 
Jasmine Spencer 
 
f. 
Lydia Spencer 
 
3. 
Are any of you acquainted with, professionally or 
personally, including through social networking websites such as 
Twitter and/or Facebook, or have you or any of your family members 
ever been represented by any of the following? 
a. 
Jonathan T. Storage or Jennifer D. Gordon, 
Assistant United States Attorneys, or any other 
member of the United States Attorney's Office 
b. 
Connor Robertson, Esq. 
c. 
Michelle Fox, Esq. 
4. 
Are you or any member of your family related to or 
acquainted with the defendants, KISHA SUTTON or SHAMIESE WRIGHT, 
professionally or personally, including through social networking 
websites such as “X”, Instagram, and/or Facebook? 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 1543

3 
 
5. 
Are any of you acquainted with or have any relationship, 
professionally or personally, including through social networking 
websites such as “X”, Instagram, and/or Facebook, or otherwise, 
with any other member of the jury panel? If yes, would this in any 
way affect your ability to decide this case solely on the law and 
the evidence presented?  (If yes, consideration should be given 
to making further inquiry outside the presence of the prospective 
jurors.)  
6. 
Have you, any member of your family, or any close 
personal friends ever been questioned or arrested by a law 
enforcement officer?  (You may approach the bench to answer this 
question if you would like.  If yes, consideration should be given 
to making further inquiry outside the presence of the prospective 
jurors.) 
7. 
Have you, any member of your family, or any close 
personal friend, ever been charged with or convicted of committing 
either a felony or a misdemeanor?  (You may approach the bench to 
answer this question if you would like.  If yes, consideration 
should be given to making further inquiry outside the presence of 
the prospective jurors.)  
8. 
Have you, any member of your family, or any of your close 
friends ever been incarcerated?  (You may approach the bench to 
answer this question if you would like.  If yes, consideration 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 1544

4 
 
should be given to making further inquiry outside the presence of 
the prospective jurors.) 
9. 
Have you read about this case, or any other article about 
the defendant in the newspapers, either online on in print?  (If 
yes, consideration should be given to making further inquiry 
outside the presence of the prospective jurors.)  
10. Have you heard or seen anything about this case, or about 
the defendant generally on the radio or television? (If yes, 
consideration should be given to making further inquiry outside 
the presence of the prospective jurors.)  
11. Have you heard or read anything at all from any source 
about the facts of this case, including on or through social 
networking websites such as “X” and/or Facebook?  (If yes, 
consideration should be given to making further inquiry outside 
the presence of the prospective jurors.)  
12. Do you, of your personal knowledge, excluding what you 
have read in the newspapers or heard through the media, have any 
information about the facts of this case?  
13. Have you discussed any aspect of this case with anyone 
who claimed to have some knowledge of what actually occurred, 
including on or through social networking websites such as Twitter 
and/or Facebook? 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 1545

5 
 
14. Notwithstanding what you have heard on the television or 
radio, what you have read in the newspapers, or what you have read 
and/or discussed on or through social networking websites such as 
“X” and/or Facebook, would you be able to sit as a juror in the 
case and render a verdict based solely upon the law and the 
evidence presented? 
15.  Is there any reason at all why you should not sit on 
this case?   
16. Are you or have you ever been involved in any conflict, 
controversy, or litigation with the United States Attorney's 
Office? [If yes, would this affect your ability to sit as an 
impartial juror in this case?] 
17. Are you or have you ever been involved in any conflict, 
controversy or litigation with any department or agency of the 
United States?  [If yes, would this affect your ability to sit as 
an impartial juror in this case?] 
18. Have you ever served as a petit juror in a criminal or 
civil case either in federal or state courts?  [If so, what was 
the case and what was the outcome?]  
19. Have you ever served as a grand juror on either a federal 
or state panel?  
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 1546

6 
 
20. Have you or your family ever participated in a lawsuit 
as a party or witness or in some other capacity?  (If so, what was 
the case about and what was the outcome?) 
21. Have you or any member of your family ever participated 
in a criminal trial, either as a witness for the prosecution or 
the defense, or in some other capacity?  [If so, what was the 
offense charged and the verdict.] 
22. Are any of you related by blood, marriage, adoption, or 
by any other means, to any law enforcement officers, either local, 
state or federal?  
23. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever 
been the victim of a crime?  
24. Are any of the panel members related by blood, marriage, 
adoption, or by any other means, to any person who has been 
prosecuted by the United States? 
25. Have any of the panel members expressed or do any panel 
members have any strong sentiment about the justness of any recent 
prosecution brought by the United States Attorney's Office in this 
District? 
26. This case is being prosecuted by the federal government.  
Have any of you ever had any difficult or unpleasant experiences 
with the federal government or the United States Attorney=s Office, 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 1547

7 
 
or do any of you have very strong personal feelings against the 
federal government for whatever reason? 
27. Some of the witnesses who may be called to testify 
include local, state, and/or federal law enforcement officers.  Do 
any of you have any strong feelings for or against law enforcement 
officers for whatever reason? 
28. Have you or any member of your family or any of your 
close friends ever filed a lawsuit or complaint concerning the 
conduct of a law enforcement officer? 
29. 
Have you, or has anyone close to you, ever been the 
victim of a crime?  If so, would that experience prevent you from 
giving either the government or the defendant a fair trial? 
30. 
Have you or any of your immediate family members ever 
been the victim of bank fraud? 
31. 
Are any of you or your family, members of any anti-
government group including, but not limited to, paramilitary 
organizations or militias? 
32. 
Does any member of the jury panel believe that they would 
have trouble following the Court's instructions regarding the law 
if they disagreed with it? 
33. 
Irrespective of your personal feelings about any issue 
that may arise in this case, will you follow the law as the Court 
gives it to you during this case? 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 1548

8 
 
34. 
Even if you disagree with the law, would you be able to 
return a verdict of guilty, if the prosecution meets its burden 
beyond a reasonable doubt? 
35. 
There are some people who, for moral, ethical, or 
religious reasons, believe that it is not proper, or who would 
find it difficult, to pass judgment on the conduct of others.  Is 
there any one of you who holds such beliefs, or who might be 
affected by such beliefs? 
36. 
Knowing what you now know about this case, do you have 
any reservations about your ability to hear the evidence, 
deliberate, and return a fair and impartial verdict? 
37. 
Have any of you or your close family members been 
contacted in any way, via telephone, in writing, or on or through 
social networking websites such as Twitter, Instagram, and/or 
Facebook, by any of the parties in this case including defendants 
KISHA SUTTON and SHAMIESE WRIGHT, or any of their family members, 
lawyers, or the United States Attorney’s Office? 
38. 
If you were one of the parties in this case, do you know 
of any reason why you should not be content to have someone in 
your frame of mind sitting on the jury in this case?  
The United States respectfully requests that the Court ask 
appropriate follow up questions if any juror answers in the 
affirmative. 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 1549

9 
 
                            
Respectfully submitted, 
 
                    
 
LISA G. JOHNSTON 
                         
Acting United States Attorney 
 
By:  
/s/ Jonathan T. Storage  
 
 
JONATHAN T. STORAGE 
Assistant United States Attorney 
WV Bar No. 12279 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 Virginia Street, East  
Room 4000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charleston, WV 25301 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Telephone: (304) 345-2200 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fax: (304) 347-5705 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email: jonathan.storage@usdoj.gov 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 1550

10 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
It is hereby certified that the foregoing “PROPOSED VOIR DIRE 
QUESTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES” has been electronically filed and 
service has been made on opposing counsel by virtue of such 
electronic filing this the 30th day of June 2025. 
 
Connor D. Robertson, Esq. 
2702 Main Street 
Hurricane, WV 25526 
Email: cdr@croblaw.com 
 
Michelle R. Fox, Esq. 
LAW OFFICES OF MICHELLE ROMAN FOX 
3359 Teays Valley Road 
Hurricane, WV 25526 
Email: michellefox@smithlawpllc.net 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jonathan T. Storage  
 
 
JONATHAN T. STORAGE 
Assistant United States Attorney 
WV Bar No. 12279 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 Virginia Street, East  
Room 4000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charleston, WV 25301 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Telephone: (304) 345-2200 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fax: (304) 347-5705 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email: jonathan.storage@usdoj.gov 
  
 
 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 304     Filed 06/30/25     Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 1551

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.304.0.pdf
Size
108,550 bytes
SHA-256
163bcefd1c0b95f83e26f27b890b9d874aaf55d5029465353080fe5147684dde
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.304.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top