Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States of America v. Sutton et al United States of America v. Kisha Sutton et al Response in Opposition by Kisha Sutton re: 272 Motion — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 275, S.D. W. Va.)

Court filing

Response in Opposition by Kisha Sutton re: 272 Motion — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 275, S.D. W. Va.)

Summary

Defendant Kisha Sutton's response to the government's motion for judicial notice, filed 06/24/25 as Document 275 in United States v. Kisha Sutton, CASE NO.: 2:24-cr-00192, Southern District of West Virginia. Sutton does not object to the court noticing that Huntington, Charleston and South Charleston are within the Southern District of West Virginia, but objects to any notice that an alleged crime took place there, citing her pending venue challenge. She also objects to judicial notice of federal administrative rules for the Paycheck Protection Program because the government has not said which version it means, and the PPP rules were amended many times during the pandemic. Advocacy document; claims are Sutton's.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed June 24, 2025 in United States v. Sutton et al.; one of 235 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Filed2025-06-24

Cite this document

“Response in Opposition by Kisha Sutton re: 272 Motion — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 275, S.D. W. Va.).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:24-cr-00192, Doc. 275, filed 2025-06-24. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-kisha-sutton-wvsd-240497/2025-06-24-gov-uscourts-wvsd-240497-275-0-doc-275/, SHA-256 14643fb2c7ad68d5ea2f2a44088e62df427a28fd890131caf481f1ee69dc48e5.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

‭IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT‬
‭FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA‬
‭CHARLESTON DIVISION‬
‭UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,‬
‭PLAINTIFF,‬
‭V.‬
‭CASE NO.: 2:24-cr-00192‬
‭KISHA SUTTON,‬
‭DEFENDANT.‬
‭DEFENDANT KISHA SUTTON’S RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT’S‬
‭MOTION MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE‬
‭NOW‬ ‭COMES‬ ‭the‬ ‭Defendant,‬ ‭Kisha‬ ‭Sutton,‬ ‭by‬ ‭and‬ ‭through‬ ‭counsel,‬ ‭and‬ ‭hereby‬
‭responds to the‬‭Government’s Motion for Judicial Notice‬‭by stating as follows:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Defendant‬‭Sutton‬‭does‬‭not‬‭object‬‭to‬‭the‬‭Court‬‭taking‬‭Judicial‬‭Notice‬‭of‬‭the‬‭fact‬‭that‬
‭Huntington,‬ ‭Cabell‬ ‭County,‬ ‭West‬ ‭Virginia;‬ ‭Charleston,‬ ‭Kanawha‬ ‭County,‬ ‭West‬
‭Virginia;‬ ‭and‬ ‭South‬ ‭Charleston,‬ ‭Kanawha‬ ‭County,‬ ‭West‬ ‭Virginia,‬ ‭are‬ ‭within‬ ‭the‬
‭Southern‬ ‭District‬ ‭of‬ ‭West‬ ‭Virginia.‬ ‭However,‬ ‭Defendant‬ ‭Sutton‬ ‭does‬ ‭object‬ ‭to‬‭the‬
‭Court‬ ‭taking‬ ‭Judicial‬ ‭Notice‬ ‭that‬ ‭any‬ ‭alleged‬ ‭crime‬ ‭took‬ ‭place‬ ‭in‬ ‭those‬ ‭areas‬ ‭as‬
‭there‬ ‭has‬ ‭been‬ ‭no‬ ‭evidence‬ ‭introduced‬ ‭to‬ ‭suggest‬ ‭the‬ ‭same.‬ ‭There‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭pending‬
‭Venue‬‭challenge‬‭addressing‬‭this‬‭issue.‬‭Additionally,‬‭this‬‭Motion‬‭is‬‭simply‬‭premature‬
‭and should be denied at this time.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Defendant‬ ‭Sutton‬ ‭objects‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭Court‬ ‭taking‬ ‭Judicial‬ ‭Notice‬ ‭of‬ ‭any‬ ‭federal‬
‭administrative‬ ‭rules‬ ‭applicable‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭Paycheck‬ ‭Protection‬
‭Program‬ ‭at‬‭this‬‭time‬‭because‬‭the‬‭Government‬‭has‬‭not‬‭suggested‬‭which‬‭version‬‭of‬
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 275     Filed 06/24/25     Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1368

‭the‬‭rules‬‭it‬‭seeks‬‭to‬‭offer.‬‭The‬‭PPP‬‭rules‬‭and‬‭regulations‬‭were‬‭amended‬‭many‬‭times‬
‭throughout‬ ‭the‬ ‭Covid‬ ‭Pandemic.‬ ‭The‬ ‭government‬ ‭has‬‭not‬‭provided‬‭context‬‭to‬‭the‬
‭Court‬ ‭of‬ ‭which‬ ‭rules‬ ‭it‬ ‭seeks‬ ‭to‬ ‭judicial‬ ‭notice‬ ‭of‬ ‭in‬‭relation‬‭to‬‭the‬‭acts‬‭for‬‭which‬
‭Ms.‬ ‭Sutton‬ ‭is‬ ‭accused‬ ‭of‬ ‭violating‬ ‭them.‬ ‭Admitting‬ ‭the‬‭rules‬‭in‬‭whole‬‭at‬‭this‬‭point‬
‭would‬ ‭deprive‬ ‭the‬ ‭Defendant‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭opportunity‬ ‭to‬ ‭contest,‬ ‭at‬ ‭trial,‬ ‭that‬ ‭any‬
‭particular‬‭rule‬‭was‬‭in‬‭place‬‭at‬‭a‬‭time‬‭Ms.‬‭Sutton‬‭allegedly‬‭acted.‬‭This‬‭matter‬‭should‬
‭be left for trial consideration.‬
‭This Court should deny the Government’s Motion.‬
‭Respectfully submitted,‬
‭By Counsel‬
‭S://‬‭Connor D. Robertson‬‭________‬
‭Connor Robertson (11460)‬
‭ROBERTSON LAW PLLC‬
‭2939 Virginia Avenue, Suite 2010‬
‭Hurricane, WV 25526‬
‭(304) 557-1601‬
‭cdr@croblaw.com‬
‭IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT‬
‭FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA‬
‭CHARLESTON‬
‭UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,‬
‭PLAINTIFF,‬
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 275     Filed 06/24/25     Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1369

‭V.‬
‭CASE NO.: 2:24-CR-000192-01‬
‭KISHA SUTTON,‬
‭DEFENDANT.‬
‭CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE‬
‭I,‬ ‭Connor‬ ‭Robertson,‬ ‭certify‬ ‭that‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭24rd‬ ‭day‬ ‭of‬ ‭June,‬ ‭2025,‬ ‭a‬ ‭copy‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭foregoing‬‭Response‬‭was‬‭served‬‭on‬‭the‬‭United‬‭States‬‭by‬‭ECF,‬‭to‬‭Jonathan‬‭Storage,‬‭Assistant‬
‭United States Attorney to the following:‬
‭Jonathan Storage‬
‭Assistant United States Attorney‬
‭Jonathan.Storage@usdoj.gov‬
‭S:// Connor D. Robertson‬
‭Connor Robertson (11460)‬
‭ROBERTSON LAW PLLC‬
‭2939 Virginia Avenue, Suite 2010‬
‭Hurricane, WV 25526‬
‭(304) 557-1601‬
‭CDR@CROBLAW.COM‬
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 275     Filed 06/24/25     Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1370

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.275.0.pdf
Size
76,866 bytes
SHA-256
14643fb2c7ad68d5ea2f2a44088e62df427a28fd890131caf481f1ee69dc48e5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.275.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top