Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. McCabe United States v. Dustin Sean McCabe — S.D. Fla., No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC Stipulation on Restitution by USA as to Dustin Sean McCabe — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 133, S.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Stipulation on Restitution by USA as to Dustin Sean McCabe — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 133, S.D. Fla.)

Filed October 20, 2025 in USA v. McCabe; one of 219 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2025-10-20

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC · Doc. 133 · 2025-10-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
DUSTIN SEAN MCCABE,  
 
 
        Defendant. 
                                    
/ 
 
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT AS TO RESTITUTION AMOUNT 
 
The United States of America hereby moves the Court unopposed to amend the judgment 
in this case, DE 127, to reflect $44,741.06 in restitution owed to the victims in this case and to 
cancel the restitution hearing now set for October 30, 2025. In support, the Government 
respectfully submits the following: 
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 
1. 
On August 22, 2024, a grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Florida returned 
an indictment charging the Defendant with one count of seaman’s manslaughter, in violation of 18 
U.S.C. § 1115, one count of making a false statement within the jurisdiction of an agency of the 
United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), and three counts of wire fraud, in violation 
of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. DE 3. He made his initial appearance in this District and was arraigned on 
September 20, 2024, and was released on bond. DE 13.  
2. 
The Defendant proceeded to trial in February 2025, and a federal jury found him 
guilty on all counts after a seven-day trial. See DE 83.  
3. 
On August 6, 2025, this Court sentenced the Defendant to 100 months in prison, 
followed by three years of supervised release. See DE 125; DE 127. The Court’s judgment also 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 133   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2025   Page 1 of 3

2 
 
included a Criminal Monetary Penalties section that did not set the restitution amount, setting a 
future hearing on October 30, 2025, to determine that amount. See DE 126. The Court further 
provided that the parties must file any “relevant motions, responses, or stipulations on the matter 
of restitution” by October 20, 2025. DE 126.   
BASIS FOR REQUEST AND REQUEST FOR THIS COURT TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT 
4. 
In the months since sentencing, the Government has made inquiries and determined 
that the appropriate amount of restitution in this case to be $44,741.06, which consists of victim 
losses. This amount consists of $5,606.13 due to Tiffany Ghiz, the victim’s sister, for funeral and 
travel expenses to attend the proceedings, as well as $39,135 due to the United States Treasury. 
The Government has supplied supporting documentation to the defense, and the defense does not 
contest this amount as an appropriate restitution judgment in this matter.  
5. 
The Government therefore moves this Court to amend the judgment in this matter 
to reflect $44,741.06 in restitution payable to the victims, to be paid in the manner described in the 
terms set forth in the Judgment. The United States will provide the Probation Office with a victim 
list containing contact information for remittance of payment.  
6. 
The undersigned Assistant United States Attorney has conferred with Terrence 
O’Sullivan and Calisha Francis, counsels for the Defendant, who have indicated that the Defendant 
does not oppose this motion.  
 
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 
 
 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 133   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2025   Page 2 of 3

3 
 
 
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the Court amend its judgment 
in this case to reflect a restitution amount of $44,741.06, to be paid in accordance with the 
conditions set forth in the judgement and cancel the restitution hearing. 
Date: October 20, 2025 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JASON A. REDING QUIÑONES 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY: 
/s/ Jacob Koffsky 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jacob Koffsky 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
99 NE 4th Street 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Miami, Florida 33132 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
305-961-9386 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jacob.Koffsky@usdoj.gov 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Florida Bar. No. 1018115 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL 
 
 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 10-11, 2025, the Government conferred with Terrence 
O’Sullivan and Calisha Francis, attorneys for the Defendant, who indicated that the defense does 
not oppose this motion. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jacob Koffsky 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jacob Koffsky 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 20, 2025, I electronically filed the foregoing 
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jacob Koffsky                                    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jacob Koffsky 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 133   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2025   Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.133.0.pdf
Size
198,098 bytes
SHA-256
a1a3cea871a13e9f108dd66e1b821daab3b61b397274daf762526b0bd1a0c172
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.133.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top