Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. McCabe United States v. Dustin Sean McCabe — S.D. Fla., No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC Transcript of Sentencing as to Dustin Sean McCabe held on 8/06/2025 — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 128, S.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Transcript of Sentencing as to Dustin Sean McCabe held on 8/06/2025 — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 128, S.D. Fla.)

Filed August 13, 2025 in USA v. McCabe; one of 219 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2025-08-13

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC · Doc. 128 · 2025-08-13 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
CASE NO. 24-cr-80103-AMC-1 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Fort Pierce, Florida 
Plaintiff,
August 6, 2025
vs.
1:41 p.m. - 2:59 p.m.
DUSTIN SEAN MCCABE,
Defendant. 
Pages 1 to 68
______________________________________________________________
TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING
BEFORE THE HONORABLE AILEEN M. CANNON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 
ZACH KELLER, ESQ.
TANNER STIEHL, ESQ. 
99 NE 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
FOR THE DEFENDANT: 
TERRENCE O'SULLIVAN LAW, P.A. 
TERRENCE J. O'SULLIVAN, ESQ. 
3810 Murrell Road 
Suite 340 
Rockledge, Florida 32955 
LAW OFFICE OF CALISHA A. FRANCIS 
CALISHA A. FRANCIS, ESQ. 
7481 NW 37th Court 
Lauderhill, Florida 33319 
STENOGRAPHICALLY REPORTED BY:
LAURA E. MELTON, RMR, CRR, FPR
Official Court Reporter to the 
Honorable Aileen M. Cannon
United States District Court
Fort Pierce, Florida
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 1 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
(Call to the order of the Court.)  
THE COURT:  Good afternoon.  Please be seated unless 
you are addressing the Court.  Let's call the case.  
COURTROOM DEPUTY:  Calling case United States of 
America v. Dustin Sean McCabe, Case Number 24-cr-80103-Cannon.  
Counsel, please state your appearances for the record, 
starting with the United States.  
MR. KELLER:  Good afternoon, Your Honor.  
Zachary Keller and Tanner Stiehl on behalf of the 
United States. 
THE COURT:  Good afternoon to both of you.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Good afternoon, Your Honor.  
Calisha Francis and Mr. Terrence O'Sullivan on behalf of 
Mr. Dustin Sean McCabe.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Good afternoon, Ms. Francis and 
Mr. O'Sullivan.  And good afternoon to you, Mr. McCabe.
Who is here for probation? 
THE PROBATION OFFICER:  Frances Weisberg on behalf of 
U.S. Probation.  Good afternoon, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Good afternoon, Officer.  
Okay.  Mr. McCabe, this is your sentencing hearing, as 
you know.  The purpose of today's proceeding is to determine a 
sentence that is reasonable, but not more than what is 
necessary to serve the statutory purposes that are outlined in 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(a).  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 2 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3
As you are also aware, you were adjudicated guilty of 
all counts in the indictment following a jury trial and jury 
verdict.  There were a total of six counts -- excuse me, five 
counts in the indictment, the first of which is seaman's 
manslaughter in Count 1.  The second offense was making a false 
statement within the jurisdiction of an agency of the 
United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 1001(a)(2).  And then there were three counts of wire 
fraud, 3, 4, 5, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 1343.  
I obviously presided over the trial, so I'm fully 
familiar with the facts.  I have also reviewed all of the 
filings pertinent to today's hearing, including the Presentence 
Investigation Report, the objections to that report that were 
filed by your attorney, the addendum, along with a sentencing 
memorandum filed by your counsel with some untimely additional 
objections.  The government also has responded to the those PSI 
objections.  And I think that covers the factual picture.  
Ms. Francis, are there any other items I overlooked for 
today's hearing?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  You have covered it all.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Any from the United States? 
MR. KELLER:  Nothing, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay then.  Before we begin, let me ask 
whether any family members of the victim are present today and 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 3 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4
wish to be heard. 
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor.  So first I will note the 
family members of the victim that are here.  There is Tiffany 
Ghiz, Jack Ghiz, Josh Ghiz, Nick Ghiz, and also, Your Honor, 
Sean Flynn, Mollie's husband is here as well.  
As far as who will be speaking, Tiffany Ghiz and Sean 
Flynn will be speaking. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  And do you wish to have those 
statements following the resolution of the PSI objections?  
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor, at your -- at your 
discretion, however you prefer to have it. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Then we will give anybody who wishes 
to speak an opportunity to do so, and that also applies, of 
course, to any defense witnesses or character references.  
So, with that, let me ask Ms. Francis, have you had a 
full opportunity to review the PSI with Mr. McCabe? 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  It was reviewed with 
Mr. McCabe with Mr. Terrence O'Sullivan.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Stay standing, please.  I have a few 
more questions.  
Briefly walk me through the process that you went 
through to review the PSI with Mr. McCabe.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Okay.  Your Honor, if I may have 
Mr. O'Sullivan -- 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Mr. O'Sullivan, the question is:  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 4 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
5
Please walk us through briefly the process that you went 
through to review the PSI with Mr. McCabe and answer any 
sentencing-related questions.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  Judge, as the Court knows Mr. McCabe 
is at the St. Lucie County Jail, so I visited Mr. McCabe there 
several times, and we went over the PSI.  And we have also 
spoken on the phone.  And me and Ms. Francis have discussed it 
between ourselves, the objections and the contents of the PSI.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  As well as -- 
THE COURT:  Please continue.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  As well as speaking to his family 
members who are here.  They were very involved in the posttrial 
motions and discussions. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  Then let me ask you 
another question, Mr. O'Sullivan.  Do you believe you have 
answered Mr. McCabe's questions to his satisfaction?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  I believe I have, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay then.  
All right.  Let's swear Mr. McCabe in, please.  
COURTROOM DEPUTY:  Please stand and raise your right 
hand.  
Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you 
are about to give in this cause shall be the truth, the whole 
truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 5 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
6
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, ma'am.  
COURTROOM DEPUTY:  Thank you.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  You may take a seat, sir.  
Please provide the microphone to Mr. McCabe.  
Okay.  Mr. McCabe, did you hear my exchange with your 
attorneys regarding your preparation for today?  
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes. 
THE COURT:  Do you agree with everything they have 
said? 
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes. 
THE COURT:  Are you fully prepared to proceed today 
with sentencing? 
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes. 
THE COURT:  And have they answered all of your 
questions to your satisfaction? 
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes. 
THE COURT:  Okay then.  All right.  I do want to make a 
note that there was an outstanding motion for judgment of 
acquittal which was resolved by written order today.  So I 
trust the parties are aware of the Court's ruling on that 
motion.  
Okay.  Let's begin now to address any unresolved 
factual objections to the PSI.  There were a number of items.  
And so my question, Ms. Francis -- and I'm not sure who is 
handling today's hearing in bulk.  Is that going to be you or 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 6 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
7
Mr. O'Sullivan? 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  I will be addressing 
the objections.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  So the way we are going to do this 
is, we are going to start with the factual objections, anything 
that you think is factually inaccurate in the PSI, and then 
we're going to move into any legal objections, in other words, 
any specific offense characteristics that you do not think 
should be applied as far as calculating the advisory guideline 
range.  
Do you follow the structure? 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge. 
THE COURT:  Okay then.  All right.  So first alert me 
to the first unresolved factual objection to the PSI, and 
please be specific as far as which paragraph you think contains 
inaccurate information.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  
Your Honor, if I can begin with the defendant objecting 
to the phrase of "scheme to defraud" and "used to enrich 
himself."  And that was contained in the PSR, and it was 
contained in numerous places.  
Judge, may I address from the podium?  
THE COURT:  It's -- it's preferable that you stay where 
you are, actually, because I'm going to be going back and forth 
between you and government counsel.  So just stay where you 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 7 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
8
are, please.  And if you need another microphone, then you can 
switch spots.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Understood.  Is it okay if I hold my 
laptop, Your Honor?  
THE COURT:  That's fine.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Okay.  Thank you, Judge.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  So with respect to this 
first objection, I see it here, you take issue with the phrase 
"scheme to defraud" and "used to enrich himself" and "in 
furtherance of the scheme."  
What is the basis of your objection, ma'am?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Well, Your Honor, what we are asserting 
is that these terms mirror the government's charging language, 
and it does go beyond the jury's verdict.  We do request that 
the language -- or we did request that the language be replaced 
to reflect that the defendant was convicted of submitting 
materially inaccurate PPP loan applications, which is what the 
jury determined, and that is what meets the elements of 
18 U.S.C. 1343. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  But you would agree that the "scheme 
to defraud" language comes directly from Counts 3, 4, and 5, 
and, of course, the jury convicted him on those three counts; 
correct?  
MS. FRANCIS:  I agree with you, Your Honor.  We do 
agree with that, that it does mirror the charging language.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 8 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
9
However, we assert that it goes beyond the jury's verdict.  
There was -- 
THE COURT:  But for what reason?  This is what -- I'm 
failing to see any daylight between the charging document and 
the convictions reached by the jury on these three wire fraud 
counts.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Judge, what we believe is that this is 
prejudicial to the defendant.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  
Okay.  Well, Mr. Keller?  
MR. KELLER:  So, Your Honor, the government responded 
to this objection, I just want to note for the record.  And I 
know you know, but in docket entry 117, on page 5, at the top, 
this is objection 2, the two responses we have -- and because 
on the one hand there is the scheme issue and then there is the 
unjustly enriched issue -- is that as far as the scheme, you're 
correct in pointing to the charging language, but it even is in 
the elements of the offense.  
So not only is it listed in the indictment that the 
defendant engaged in a scheme, but also the jury needed to 
necessarily find that by finding that the -- all four elements 
were proven. 
THE COURT:  And that information and that language was 
in the jury instructions; correct?  
MR. KELLER:  Yes, as to the scheme issue.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 9 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
10
And then as to the unjustly enriched issue, the 
government's position is that we provided ample evidence of 
that during the trial.  The defendant got the money that he 
applied for, for these PPP loans.  He spent it on things like a 
golf club membership that, under any reasonable definition of 
unjust enrichment, that is exactly what happened here.  So our 
position is that both of those aspects of the PSI language are 
appropriate.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  This factual objection will be 
overruled.  I think for all of the reasons stated by the 
United States, I see no basis to deviate from the jury's 
finding of fraud on those counts, nor do I agree that use of 
that language in the PSI somehow goes beyond the jury's 
verdict.  And I think there was ample evidence to show the 
fraud, including, of course, the golf membership, which was 
obtained using funds to which the defendant wasn't entitled 
through the false statements that he made to the -- to banks at 
issue.  
So next factual objection.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  
We are objecting to paragraph 98 of the PSR.  98 
references employment complaints from a former employee.  It 
includes reprimands and altercations that are unrelated to the 
instant offense.  What we are asserting are that these 
incidents were never adjudicated.  They did not result in any 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 10 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
11
kind of discipline that's related to this case.  They have no 
probative value regarding any character or criminal history.  
What we're arguing is that the inclusion of this information is 
unfairly prejudicial.  And it invites the Court to rely on 
unverified hearsay to assess his conduct. 
So, Judge, it is -- what we're saying is that we submit 
that this information should be stricken from the PSR since the 
allegations are not linked to any type of criminal conviction 
or formal misconduct.  It serves no legitimate purpose.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  And so looking at -- paragraph 98, I 
think you said?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge. 
THE COURT:  Is that the only place you see this 
information?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.    
THE COURT:  Do you disagree that his employee file 
included these items?  I know you may take issue with the 
ultimate reliability of the complaints, but is it inaccurate to 
say that his employee file actually had those items in it?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Judge, that is accurate.  The 
employee file did contain these reprimands and altercations.  
Our argument is that these incidents were never adjudicated and 
it didn't result in any kind of discipline.    
THE COURT:  Okay.  
MS. FRANCIS:  And that should not be -- 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 11 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
12
THE COURT:  Okay.  So if there were to be an addition 
to paragraph 98 to, I guess, emphasize your point that none of 
these employee complaints resulted in formal discipline, would 
that cure your objection?  
MS. FRANCIS:  That would, Your Honor.  In addition to 
that, what we are asking for is it to be stricken completely 
from the PSR since the allegations are not linked to these 
criminal charges or any kind of formal misconduct.  What we're 
saying is that it serves no legitimate purpose.  It should be 
stricken.  But, yes, Your Honor, if something was added, that 
would accomplish the same result.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Mr. Keller, anything on this issue?  
MR. KELLER:  Just briefly, Your Honor. 
And this is objection 6 that the government responded 
to on page 7 of docket entry 117.  And our position here is 
essentially that, because they do not contest the facts -- the 
PSI is for all types of different evidence of the defendant's 
history, his characteristics.  His employment history is 
included in that.  We don't think it's unduly prejudicial to 
have it in there because the PSI is supposed to have that type 
of stuff in there, just in the same way that it has information 
relating to family history.  
So because the defense doesn't object to the 
truthfulness of the actual conduct or the -- or the facts in 
there, our position is that, to Your Honor's suggestion, that 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 12 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
13
what is appropriate is that those facts remain in the PSI, but 
that there be an addendum that includes the defendant's, 
you know, characterization, his description of them because we 
don't contest what he is saying.  We are not going to bring a 
witness here to testify about whether those are just reprimands 
or whatnot.  So we don't object to the inclusion of the 
additional language the defense proposes. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  With respect to the requests made by 
the defendant to strike paragraph 98 in its entirety, that 
request will be denied.  I think this information is accurate 
as written.  I also think it's proper -- properly included in 
the PSI.  I see no legal basis to remove it.  
That said, for completeness, I will direct probation to 
add the following language to paragraph 98:  None of these 
items in the defendant's employee file resulted in formal 
discipline, and the defendant objects to the characterization 
of his employment history.  
Okay.  Anything further on that subject?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Judge. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Next factual objection.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Judge, we are objecting to paragraphs 5, 
18, 22, and 24 of the PSR.  Again, that was 5, 18, 22, and 24.  
There, Judge, the PSR repeatedly implies that Mr. McCabe 
engaged in intentional wrongdoing or deception by operating his 
vessel as a recreational vessel.  What we are asserting is that 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 13 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
his vessel was lawfully classified as a recreational vessel 
under the UPVA.  We maintain that the law explicitly permits 
the operation of vessels carrying six or fewer passengers for 
hire without formal Coast Guard inspection or certification as 
a commercial passenger vessel.  What we're arguing is that this 
classification was legally appropriate and consistent with 
federal marine time [sic] regulations, and that suggesting that 
he acted with criminal intent simply for using a lawful and 
recognized vessel classification distorts the facts and 
improperly colors the narrative of both the manslaughter and 
the fraud charges.  
So, Judge, what we are requesting is that all 
references to the vessel classification as misleading, 
deceptive, improper be removed or revised from the PSR report.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Mr. Keller.  
MR. KELLER:  And, Judge, I believe that this is 
objection 7, which the government responds to at 
docket entry 117 on page 7.  And our response here is that the 
defendant, Mr. McCabe, was convicted of lying intentionally 
about the purpose of this vessel to the Coast Guard.  That when 
we say he was intentionally lying, that was part of what the 
jury was finding in convicting him.  This was a specific intent 
crime in that sense. 
THE COURT:  Are you referring to Count 2? 
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor. 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 14 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
15
THE COURT:  Okay.  Please continue.  
MR. KELLER:  And so when the PSI is describing the 
defendant as intentionally lying about the purpose of his 
vessel, that is exactly what was proven at trial, that is 
exactly what the jury convicted him of, and it is, therefore, 
appropriate. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  For the reasons stated by the 
government, both orally and in writing, I am going to overrule 
this objection.  I understand you might take issue with the 
jury's finding, but I think there is no basis to disturb that 
finding, and it's clear to the Court that the defendant's 
material lies on the Coast Guard forms with respect to the 
purported recreational nature of the vessel were proven and 
that nothing in the PSI is inconsistent with the trial evidence 
as received and ultimately found by the jury.  
So next factual objection.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge.  Thank you.  
Judge, I would like to address the two-level 
enhancement under USSG 3B1. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  So before we get there, I just want 
to make sure, do you have any other factual challenge to the 
PSI?  In other words, any language that you think is incorrect? 
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  We have put forth all of 
our objections in the memorandum, and that would be it for 
us -- for our oral arguments on the PSR objections for today.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 15 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
16
THE COURT:  Okay.  I just want to make sure that you 
raise right now any additional factual objections that you 
previously raised that we may not have addressed today.  
Are there any other factual objections that we haven't 
talked about that need to be resolved right now?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor, no additional factual 
objections.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  So now we're going to 
shift and talk about any enhancements that you think are not 
applicable.  So you can return to that argument, please.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Judge. 
Judge, what we would like to address is that two-level 
enhancement under Statute 3BI -- I'm sorry -- 1.3 for alleged 
use of a special skill in the commission of the offense. 
The Presentence Investigation Report applies this 
enhancement based on Mr. McCabe's status as a licensed boat 
captain.  However, the law is clear, particularly under the 
Eleventh Circuit's guidance in United States v. Ward.  Again, 
that was United States v. Ward.  That the government must show 
not only that the defendant possessed a special skill, but that 
he used that skill in a manner that was -- significantly 
facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense.  
Judge, in this case that standard is not met.  The 
offense of conviction, seaman's manslaughter, applies only to 
certain maritime professionals, including captains.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 16 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
17
Mr. McCabe's role as a vessel captain is not merely incidental.  
It is an element of the offense.  That skill is already 
incorporated into the base offense level.  The enhancement, 
therefore, constitutes impermissible double counting.  
Moreover, Judge, there is no evidence that Mr. McCabe used 
specialized knowledge or training, such as advanced navigation 
or seamanship or evasive tactics to further or conceal the 
offense.  The conduct at issue was tragic, but it was not 
executed through any misuse of any special skill.  Accordingly, 
Judge, the enhancement should not apply.  And without it, the 
total offense level would be 24, and the applicable guideline 
range would be reduced to 51 to 63 months. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Let me ask you something.  Did you 
make these arguments in a timely objection to the PSI?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  These were provided 
yesterday in the memorandum.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  You understand, correct, that there 
is a time period for the filing of objections to the PSI, and 
that's all by design so that the government has a chance to 
respond and then probation can respond like it did in the 
initial addendum that was filed in early June?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  We understand and we 
know that we did not abide by the time constraints.  But based 
on the severity of the sentence that he is facing, we wanted to 
bring it to the Court's attention.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 17 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
18
In addition to that, Mr. McCabe has also sought outside 
counsel.  And it was after meeting with that counsel that these 
issues were raised.  So we apologize for the untimeliness.  But 
we feel that it's important that the Court addresses it due to 
the fact that he is facing prison time.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  Well, I'm pretty sure 
that the prospect of an incarceration was self-evident at the 
moment of remand.  
But, in any case, Mr. Keller, why don't you address the 
merits of this untimely objection.  
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor. 
So just to begin with where the defense talks about 
it's baked into the guidelines of the base offense level 
because of the fact that there was a commercial vessel 
involved, the government respectfully disagrees with that.  
That's -- that -- what we look at for these -- for these cases 
is the nature of the facts that happened here.  And here what 
you have is a defendant who was someone who was in a position 
of trust, someone who was believed by every person who 
testified who was on that boat, that they were looking to him 
to keep them safe.  And, in fact, that that is his specific 
role, is to keep them safe and to have the boat in working 
order, to have the propellers in working order and not present 
a danger to his passengers.  
And the reason I say that that matters is because it's 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 18 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
19
different than, for example, in the Fifth Circuit case O'Keefe 
you had a tugboat captain who crashed into someone else.  And 
there it's a very different fact pattern because the victim 
didn't have this relationship with the person who perpetrated 
the crime.  
Here the relationship between Dustin McCabe, 
Mr. McCabe, the defendant, and Mollie Ghiz-Flynn, the victim, 
was one where Ms. Ghiz-Flynn put trust in him, just like 
Sean Flynn did, and we heard him testify about it.  And one in 
which they relied on him to use his specialized knowledge, his 
scuba knowledge as a scuba charter captain, which he had been 
doing for many years, in order to put themselves -- and them 
being these passengers -- in the position to be in his care in 
the first place.  
So our position is that, given the context here, given 
that Mr. McCabe was a scuba charter captain, given the fact 
that he was a merchant, a licensed merchant mariner, given the 
fact that these passengers repeatedly testified that they were 
putting their trust in him based upon his knowledge, based upon 
his role as their captain, that that is enough, and sufficient 
for this Court to apply the 3B1.3 enhancement for the use of a 
special skill in the commission of the offense, which was his 
bringing these people on this boat when he knew there was a 
problem and not warning them for it.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  And what do you say with respect to 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 19 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
20
the claim of double counting based on the terms of 2A1.4 which 
sets the base offense level of 22 if the offense involved the 
reckless operation of a means of transportation? 
MR. KELLER:  And this is what I was meaning to get at 
about the tugboat captain who maybe was using drugs, for 
example, which is the O'Keefe fact pattern.  That what you have 
there is someone who is recklessly operating a means of 
transportation, but there is no obvious skill, there is no 
obvious relationship of trust between that defendant and the 
person who was the victim.  That in that situation it's much 
more arguable as to whether this additional enhancement should 
apply.  
So that's just to say that, just because someone is 
involved in the reckless operation of a means of transportation 
doesn't mean that they're necessarily employing a specialized 
skill.  They could be recklessly just at the helm and they're 
doing whatever they're doing, whether they're on drugs, 
whether -- whatever the reason is.  There, there might be other 
enhancements that might apply.  There might be an upward 
variance, given the egregious nature of what they did, but you 
wouldn't have this specific enhancement apply because they're 
not employing a specialized skill; they're, instead, just 
acting in a grossly reckless way.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  And so the specialized skill here, I 
think you have described it as -- as being the licensed captain 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 20 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
21
operating a vessel which is marketed as a -- as a paid-for-hire 
service, which then necessarily involves a level of trust to 
the paying customers, and then -- I'm just trying to fully 
articulate the basis for this enhancement beyond just the 
reckless operation of the transportation.  
MR. KELLER:  Well, and we would -- the government would 
add to that the nature of scuba, that he was a scuba charter 
captain specifically.  And one of the things that we really 
tried to emphasize to the jury during trial is that when we are 
talking scuba, we are talking about the danger of the 
propellers in a different kind of way than we are, for example, 
with a fishing charter.  
So when we have someone like Mr. McCabe, who is an 
expert or who has been working in the scuba charter area 
specifically, he is someone who they're relying on to keep it 
safe, specific -- specifically as it relates to those 
propellers.  So that is something that makes his knowledge even 
more specialized and even more important, given the danger that 
those propellers present. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  Final argument, 
Ms. Francis. 
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Judge.  
I just want to point out that the guideline expressedly 
prohibits application where the special skill is already 
incorporated into the base level -- the base offense level.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 21 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
22
The adjustment may not be employed if an abuse of trust or 
skill is included in the base level or specific offense 
characteristics.  That goes to the statute.  
Judge, the Eleventh Circuit has clarified that the 
government has to establish both that the defendant possessed a 
special skill and that the defendant used that skill in a 
manner that significantly facilitated the commission or 
concealment of the offense.  Here, the offense of conviction, 
seaman's manslaughter, it inherently applies only to persons in 
maritime positions such as captains.  So Mr. McCabe's role as a 
vessel captain is an element of the offense.  They were 
required to prove that at trial.  And the use of that status is 
already contemplated in the base level offense.  
So if we apply that enhancement, it is double counting.  
Further, Your Honor, the PSI fails to establish that Mr. McCabe 
used his maritime training or captain's license to facilitate 
or conceal the offense in a manner beyond the 
required -- that's required for the offense itself.  
There is no allegation or evidence that specialized 
navigational knowledge or any other type of special skill was 
misused in any way that significantly contributed to the 
commission or concealment of the offense.  Therefore, legally 
and factually it is inapplicable and it must be removed.  
Removal of this two-level enhancement would reduce Mr. McCabe's 
total offense level to 24.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 22 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
23
And that is our argument, Judge.  
THE COURT:  All right.  Thank you.  
With respect to the challenge here, the two-level 
application of the special skill enhancement -- and this is 
reflected in paragraph -- one moment -- 45 of the PSI -- the 
objection is overruled for the reasons stated by the 
government.  
The base offense level of 22 applies for offenses 
involving the reckless operation of a means of transportation.  
It does not, by that language, necessitate the use of a special 
skill, as was employed here to facilitate the offense.  As we 
know from the trial evidence, Mr. McCabe is a licensed scuba 
charter captain that used that status and that licensure and 
his reputation as such to convince folks to come on his boat 
for payment.  Those individuals trusted his expertise and yet 
he obviously failed remarkably in his expectations and 
ultimately resulted in the death of the victim in this case.  
So I think the use of the special skill enhancement is 
warranted, and I don't see a special counting, a special -- 
excuse me, a double counting issue, looking at the language of 
2A1.4(a)(2)(B).  For the reasons stated by Mr. Keller, that 
guideline provision doesn't necessarily mandate the use of a 
special skill, which is why this enhancement exists.  And I 
think it does properly apply here based on the Court's review 
of all of the facts and circumstances.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 23 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
24
Okay.  So that objection will be overruled.  
Let me return for a moment -- Ms. Francis, you had 
raised, I think, some additional factual challenges to the PSI, 
and I just want to make sure that the record is complete.  
Looking at your docket entry, 115, Counsel, can you 
just ensure that there is no additional factual challenge that 
you've raised that wasn't discussed today?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  We have found in 
paragraphs 46 and 52 -- 
THE COURT:  Again, we're just sticking with what you 
have actually objected to in the papers. 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge. 
THE COURT:  So this wouldn't be the time for brand-new 
items that you have just conjured up.  I'm looking at what did 
you actually file, and I just want to make sure that we're 
covering what it is that you flagged in the written objections.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge, this was in the written 
objections. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  So where are we?  We have talked 
about language implying direct causation of death. 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge. 
THE COURT:  We've addressed that; correct?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  And that was overruled.  
We talked about prosecutorial language and fraud 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 24 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
25
descriptions.  That also was addressed and overruled; correct?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  So then anything more on objection 
number 3, as you've described it, "language suggesting intent 
beyond the verdict"? 
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  Just claims of perjury.  
That was included in the PSR report.  That's what we wanted 
to -- 
THE COURT:  That's the extra stuff.  Okay.  So 
objection 3 was resolved factually.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge.  
THE COURT:  All those factual objections, the Court 
finds, are just contrary to the trial evidence and to the 
jury's verdict.  
Okay.  So we still need to address objection 4, which 
is the obstruction of justice enhancement.  
Okay.  Are you still maintaining an objection to the 
inclusion of funeral expenses and emotional losses?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  So that is being abandoned? 
MS. FRANCIS:  That's correct.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  I'm going to note that objection 5 
to inclusion of funeral expenses and emotional losses.  
And so am I correct then that there is no longer a 
challenge to the permissibility of restitution to cover those 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 25 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
losses?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Judge, may I have a minute with my -- 
THE COURT:  Yes, you may.  Let's turn the white noise 
on, please.  
(Discussion between counsel and defendant.) 
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Your Honor.  We are ready to 
proceed.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  
MS. FRANCIS:  And Mr. Sullivan will address the Court, 
Judge. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Mr. Sullivan.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  Thank you, Your Honor.  
As far as restitution goes, the victim's family has 
submitted a letter requesting restitution, however, the crime 
for which Mr. McCabe was convicted under the seaman's 
manslaughter is not covered by the Mandatory Victim Restitution 
Act. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  I think everybody agrees it wouldn't 
be mandatory, but the question is, it is permissible under 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 3663.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  It's permissible, but not mandatory. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  And so I think we're all in 
agreement that it's not mandatory, it's permissive only.  So 
are you still maintaining an objection to the imposition of 
permissive restitution under the facts and circumstances of 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 26 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
this case?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  I think that would, of course, be up 
to the Court.  We would ask that restitution not be part of 
this case, as there was a separate civil settlement that should 
have covered that, but, of course, it's up to the Court. 
THE COURT:  Well, this is where I want to explore the 
argument.  
Okay.  So do you understand that it would be the 
defendant's burden to prove that an offset is warranted to the 
restitution order?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  Yes, Judge, I understand that. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  So what evidence can you prove or 
present to me to show that an offset is warranted perhaps 
because the money received by the beneficiary of a policy was 
intended to compensate for the funeral expenses that are now 
being sought? 
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  I mean, the only thing that we can 
proffer to the Court is that there was a separate civil suit in 
the amount of $300,000 that was paid out already.  And that 
covers -- we believe that covers what any potential restitution 
in this case would cover for funeral expenses.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Do you know who the beneficiary of 
that policy was?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  I do not.  
THE COURT:  Do you know if the payout was intended to 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 27 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
compensate for funeral expenses?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  I don't have that judgment and 
sentence in the civil action, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  Let me hear from the 
government on this restitution issue specifically.  
MR. KELLER:  Judge, the government responded to this 
issue on page 6 of docket entry 117.  And, in essence, it's 
exactly what you said, which is that the defense was citing to 
the Mandatory Restitution Act, when this is not mandatory.  
We're not contesting that.  But there is restitution that can 
be levied.  
And here Ms. Tiffany Ghiz has provided an estimate of 
her restitution.  And, you know, at the end of this hearing we 
will be asking for the hearing to be set for 90 days out, and 
we expect that we will reach a stipulation with the defense 
once we show them documentation relating to that.  
But our position here today is that, and as the law is 
clear, that funeral expenses are absolutely covered by the 
restitution laws, and that they actually specifically say that 
it pays, quote, "an amount equal to the costs of necessary 
funeral and related services."  So our position is that all of 
that is covered and will be appropriate restitution here.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  The objection, as 
briefed in docket entry 115, was a request to remove from the 
PSI any references to funeral expenses, emotional distress, and 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 28 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
29
victim impact letters relating to Count 1.  This was all under 
the mistaken impression that restitution in this case fell 
within the mandatory restitution provision in 3663(A).  That's 
not the case.  
Restitution is legally permissible under 3663, although 
a restitution hearing will be set for a future date, not to 
exceed 90 days from today, at which time the parties can 
present any additional evidence they wish with respect to the 
quantity of restitution.  
And, Mr. McCabe, if there is any evidence your side 
wishes to bring to bear in support of an offset to that amount, 
please note it would be the defense burden to prove that 
necessity for an offset.  
Any further discussion to be had on objection number 5, 
Mr. O'Sullivan? 
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  No, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  So that objection has been resolved.  
We've also resolved objection number 6, which is the 
non-adjudicated employment complaints; that was done earlier 
today.  
Okay.  Ms. Francis, anything left on docket entry 115 
to address today?  I know we still need to do the obstruction.  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  We have covered 
objections 6, 7, and 8, 5, 4, 2, and 3.  
Yes, Your Honor, we have covered all of the objections. 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 29 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
30
THE COURT:  And then 9 and 10 as well?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  We did cover that as 
well, objection 9 and 10.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Those factual objections were 
overruled, again, based on the trial evidence.  
I would say the majority of these factual challenges 
just take issue with the trial evidence, present a different 
view of the facts.  The jury clearly rejected that theory.  
So, all right, that leaves one remaining legal 
objection to the PSI, and that concerns the obstruction 
enhancement applied in paragraph 46.  
Let me start here with Mr. Keller.  
MR. KELLER:  Judge, Mr. McCabe testified for just about 
an entire trial day.  He testified from about 11:00 in the 
morning until about 4:45 in the afternoon.  And he lied about 
basically every aspect of this case.  I have -- I have crossed 
four defendants before.  I have seen probably a half dozen 
others.  I have never seen a defendant lie about every single 
aspect of a case.  Usually they just lie about a couple things, 
or try to, you know, twist the facts at the very end.  
Mr. McCabe lied about the -- what caused the death of 
Ms. Ghiz-Flynn, claiming it was the waves that sucked her 
under.  He lied about the fact that he submitted the PPP loan 
applications, saying that maybe the bank was just lying about 
that.  He lied about whether he ran the vessel aground the day 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 30 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
31
before.  We had five witnesses come and testify about the 
vessel running aground.  Mr. McCabe insisted that he dropped 
anchor, even though all of those people were experienced in 
being on boats, some of them were people who worked at the 
dock, and yet Mr. McCabe just relentlessly lied about thing 
after thing during this testimony.  
So our position is that Your Honor was here as he did 
that for an entire day, and that it was self-evident during 
that, that he was lying, and it was self-evident that he was 
lying with the jury convicting him.  Because if they had bought 
anything he had been selling, then they wouldn't have convicted 
him on every single count.  
In fact, for the government, you know, a feature of our 
rebuttal was the fact that the defendant had just spent an 
entire day lying to the jury about everything about this case.  
So our position -- and we're going to make this 
argument as we talk about an appropriate sentence -- is that 
this obstruction enhancement is absolutely appropriate and 
that, really, it doesn't even do justice to what this defendant 
did as he took the stand during this trial.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  So the specific intentional lies you 
are relying on, are those the ones itemized in paragraph 36, 
subsection A through H?  
MR. KELLER:  Let me just -- yes, Your Honor, 
those -- any one of those would be a sufficient basis, but we 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 31 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
32
would submit that all of those were lies that he told us, he 
testified. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Ms. Francis or Mr. O'Sullivan.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes.  Thank you, Judge. 
Paragraph 36 improperly applies the two-level 
enhancement.  This is based on the alleged perjury without 
specific judicial finding that Mr. McCabe gave false testimony. 
THE COURT:  Well, that's what we're doing here now.  We 
are going to decide whether what he said obstructed justice by 
providing material, false information in connection with this 
criminal proceeding.  
And so what I need to hear from you now is why isn't 
the record quite clear that Mr. McCabe lied on all of those 
subjects as itemized in paragraph 36?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Well, Judge, what we would proffer is 
that we believe that Mr. McCabe did not lie.  His conduct 
throughout the proceedings, it reflects a meaningful degree of 
personal accountability that the Court may consider.  
Prior to the trial, Mr. McCabe even stipulated that he 
would not pursue a defense strategy of blaming or shifting 
blame to any government witnesses or even the victim.  So he 
did not seek to minimize the seriousness of the offense; he 
told his story.  He understands the level and degree of 
seriousness of the offense and that a life was lost.  His 
conduct during the trial was respectful, restrained.  It was 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 32 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
33
devoid of any tactics that was intended to inflame or prolong 
the proceedings.  
So while asserting his legal defenses, Mr. McCabe 
consistently demonstrated more responsibility for the incident.  
So we believe that he was able to exercise his legal right of 
proceeding to trial and that he told his story.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  But the question is, was the story a 
lie?  And it's hard to see how it wasn't, with respect.  You 
have a boat captain who is literally advancing a theory that a 
woman died because she was naturally, through the organic 
movement of the waves, thrust into a propeller.  Yet the 
evidence was overwhelming that there was a malfunction on the 
boat and that she, in fact, was wound up in this engaged 
propeller; and, of course, all of this coming after the notice 
issues the day before.  It's very hard to see how this ocean 
current theory was anywhere in the realm of reality.  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Judge, we do not proffer that 
Mr. McCabe lied.  Based on the testimony of the medical 
examiner himself, he prescribed that the propeller could not 
have been engaged, and that the wounds, although they looked 
bad, were superficial, and that her life would have been saved.  
So, Judge, we do not pro offer [sic] that he lied.  We 
do not believe the propeller was engaged.  The testimony of the 
medical examiner also, you know, revealed that if it was 
engaged, the wounds would have been more detrimental and that 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 33 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
34
her life would have been saved.  So there was plenty testimony 
on the opposite side, but there was testimony that did go with 
what Mr. McCabe said while he was being cross-examined.  
So, Judge, we would not say that he lied.  We presented 
testimony that his mechanic came on board, that he tried to 
rectify the issues.  In no way, shape or form is he trying to 
shift the blame to anyone.  What he did, Judge, was tell his 
story.  He believes in his story, and that was corroborated by 
the medical examiner.  
So, Judge, at this time we would say that --
THE COURT:  Okay.  
MS. FRANCIS:  -- his defenses at trial were warranted, 
and it was his right to present those defenses. 
THE COURT:  Well, he certainly has a right to present a 
defense.  What he doesn't have a right to do is tell 
intentional lies.  
Let me hear from Mr. Keller.  
MR. KELLER:  Judge, this defendant during this trial -- 
and we just have talked about this, so I don't know how much 
more I can even say about it -- that when the jury rejected 
everything he told them, that was them finding the facts here, 
that was them finding that he lied to them about everything 
having to do with this case; about the PPP loans, where he said 
that I didn't know that I was submitting an application; where 
he said I didn't think that Jennifer Hester told me about this 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 34 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
35
problem with the propellers the day before.  Every bit of it is 
stuff that the jury rejected and said that wasn't true.  For 
them to have accepted any of it, they wouldn't have been able 
to convict him on all of these crimes.  
So our position is really that simple.  That this 
defendant got up in front of a jury, pulled out an easel and 
drew waves on a piece of paper and was trying to convince them 
that that's what killed Ms. Ghiz-Flynn, like it was a joke, 
talking like he was going out to lunch with his buddies.  Our 
position is -- 
THE COURT:  What do you say with respect to the ME's 
testimony?  From what I recall, the cause of death was drowning 
exacerbated by the chop wounds; if she had not been wound up in 
the engaged propeller, then perhaps she could have survived if 
given air, but ultimately she was unable to be unhinged from 
the propeller because it had engaged and then wrapped into her 
suit.  
MR. KELLER:  That is still saying that the engine -- 
that the propeller had engaged, which is not what Mr. McCabe 
was trying to convince this jury.  He was trying to convince 
them that it was all windmilling, that this was just a matter 
of the waves going up and down, which was a ridiculous theory 
and one that he, frankly -- and knew better than to try to 
pitch to them.  But he, being a sea captain, thinking he would 
be able to convince them, went for it.  And our position is 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 35 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
36
that that was a brazen lie, just like everything else he 
testified to, so that the enhancement should apply. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Having sat through the trial, I am 
going to overrule this objection, find that the PSI accurately 
applies the adjustment for obstruction of justice under 3C1.1.  
The various categories of lies are itemized in the PSI, and I 
think all of those are well taken and supported by the trial 
record.  
I think the claim that Mr. McCabe didn't minimize the 
seriousness of the offense is belied by the record, to say the 
least.  I don't believe there has been any meaningful degree of 
personal responsibility, as claimed by counsel today.  And I 
think although the defendant did tell a story, it was an 
intentionally false story running through various categories, 
not least of which included falsely disclaiming the grounding 
the day before, claiming that the victim died due to 
windmilling, which was flatly false, testifying that his 
business was operational when it clearly was not.  
And so for all those reasons and based on the false 
testimony itemized in the PSI, I will be applying the 
adjustment for obstruction of justice.  
Does that cover all of the objections to the PSI, 
Ms. Francis?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Any objections to raise from the 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 36 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
37
United States?  
MR. KELLER:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.  Then having resolved and 
denied or otherwise handled all of the PSI objections, factual 
and legal, let me go ahead and adopt the PSI in full, with the 
slight clarification I made earlier, and state for the record, 
the applicable calculations which are as follows:  Total 
Offense Level of 26, Criminal History Category Of I.  This 
produces an advisory guideline range of 63 to 78 months' 
imprisonment, a supervised release range of one to three years, 
a fine range of $25,000 to $250,000, although no fine is 
recommended, and a mandatory special assessment of $100 -- $100 
per count, for a total of $500.  
Is all of that correct, Ms. Francis, based on the 
Court's rulings? 
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Mr. Keller? 
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Then having calculated the 
applicable advisory guideline range, let me hear first from the 
United States.  And if you wish to present any family member 
testimony, you may do so now.  
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor.  So the first person who 
will speak will be Ms. Tiffany Ghiz.  
THE COURT:  Good afternoon, ma'am.  If you could please 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 37 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
38
walk up to the lectern, and tell me your name and then make 
your statement, please.  
MS. GHIZ:  Hi.  My name is Tiffany Ghiz.  
THE COURT:  You can go ahead, ma'am.  
MS. GHIZ:  The only thing I just want to say is that 
there was a lot of choices that were made with this incident, 
and he decided to choose a few fares over the life of my 
sister.  She wasn't just a sister to me.  She was an aunt to 
many; we have five brothers.  He took away a wife, a daughter, 
an aunt, you know?  It wasn't just a -- a charter fare.  She 
was a person and she meant something.  
You could have just had the boat checked, like you said 
you were going to do, but you didn't.  You chose a couple 
hundred dollars over my sister's life.  And that's why it hurts 
so bad, because you were warned:  Hey, check out your boat, 
dude.  Something is wrong.  But you didn't.  You chose the 
fare, a couple hundred bucks.  And now you got this -- all of 
us hurt.  And it's going to go on for generations that it's 
going to hurt because she's got nieces and nephews she never 
got to meet.  
It's been a horrible situation that you put our family 
through, and Sean.  And I just wish to God you would have 
thought about somebody besides yourself.  
I'm going to end it with that.  Thank you. 
THE COURT:  Thank you.  Just one question.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 38 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
39
You were Ms. Flynn's sister?  
MS. GHIZ:  Uh-huh. 
THE COURT:  That's correct?  
MS. GHIZ:  Uh-huh.  She was my only sister.  She was my 
gift from God.  I was so happy when she was born.  
THE COURT:  Thank you, ma'am.  You may take a seat.  
Any other statements?  
MR. KELLER:  So, Your Honor, Mr. Flynn is going to 
speak.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  
MR. FLYNN:  Thank you, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Thank you.  
MR. FLYNN:  This will be fairly brief, even though I 
have had years to think about this.  The only thing that I 
would like the Court to consider is, throughout your life you 
have friends, you have best friends.  I will never have a best 
friend like her.  She was my best friend.  She was everything 
to me.  I have never met anybody like her, and I probably will 
never meet anybody like her again.  She was a one-of-a-kind 
person.  
So -- and for that, like I said, that's a burden that I 
have to live with, the family has to live with.  I understand 
that people make choices, and obviously those choices have led 
to bad decisions.  For me, like I said, that's an emotional 
toll that I will carry for the rest of my life.  Thank you.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 39 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
40
THE COURT:  Thank you, sir.  
Any other statements, Mr. Keller? 
MR. KELLER:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay then.  Please present your argument 
for sentencing.  
MR. KELLER:  Yes, Your Honor.  
And just to begin with what the government's 
recommendation is, and we said this in our sentencing 
memorandum, that we're recommending a top of the guideline 
sentence, so 78 months.  Although I will, frankly, say that in 
preparing for this sentencing, as I have thought more and more 
about it, I absolutely think that above -- a sentence above 
that would absolutely be within this Court's discretion and 
appropriate.  
In explaining why a top of the guidelines, at a 
minimum, sentence is appropriate, the government wants to 
highlight three aspects of this case.  The first is the 
extremely reckless nature of the defendant's conduct and the 
horrific consequences that it had.  This wasn't just a matter 
of someone drowning.  This was a matter of someone getting 
brutally chopped up in front of their spouse.  
This defendant is someone who knew the dangers of this 
particular type of activity that he had been engaging in for 
years.  He had a propeller that was turning on and that had 
almost killed someone just the day before.  He knew about it.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 40 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
41
He was told about it and he did nothing.  And because of that, 
Ms. Ghiz-Flynn is dead.  
And one of the things that is a hallmark of the conduct 
in this trial that we heard time and again from witness after 
witness about Mr. McCabe is that this conduct is very much in 
keeping with the way that he treats everybody.  That he bought 
that boat with someone else's credit; that person ended up 
being on the hook for it.  That he cuts corners.  That he wants 
to do what he wants to do.  He had a vision of what this 
business would be, and he wasn't going to let something like 
someone's safety stop him.  
And when we look at the consequences, at the carnage 
that resulted, Judge -- and we saw Ms. Ghiz-Flynn's body.  And 
the defense talks about, Oh, those wounds weren't fatal.  But 
they were horrific.  They were life altering for everyone who 
saw them, even for the people at this trial who saw them, the 
jurors who had to see them. 
And the other aspect of the horror of this case that I 
want to highlight, Judge, is Mr. Flynn's testimony.  And being 
in this courtroom today, which this is my first time to be in 
the courtroom -- this courtroom since that trial, I can relive 
it myself.  I can picture myself at that table right there, and 
Mr. Flynn sitting there and you being there, and the jury being 
there, and the silence as Mr. Flynn talked about what happened, 
as he talked about those crucial horrific moments that we all 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 41 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
42
sat there in silence.  
And honestly, Judge, as the prosecutor I had to think 
about where to even go from there because the nature of this 
crime and the nature of the consequences were so lasting, were 
so profound.  And just as Mr. Flynn now talks about, and he 
talked about at trial, that he is a different person now.  
So the first factor that we believe the Court should 
consider in fashioning this sentence is the nature of the 
crime, the nature of the destruction that was wrought, the 
ruining of these lives, and the destruction of Mollie's life.  
The second aspect of this case and aspect of this trial 
that we believe weighs in favor of having a, at minimum, top of 
the guideline sentence is the extent of Mr. McCabe's lies, and 
not just his lies, but his demeanor during the whole trial.  
Mr. McCabe was sitting there at trial as Mr. Flynn is 
testifying about the horrific death of his wife on this 
defendant's boat, and Mr. McCabe is sitting there on his phone.  
He is sitting there just sitting back.  
And then when he is testifying, he gets up again with 
his easel, drawing waves on a piece of paper, talking about the 
horrific butchering of this person like it's the most normal 
thing, like it's a random Tuesday.  
So our position is not just the fact that he lied about 
every aspect of this case, which I won't belabor because we 
have already talked about it, but also the way that he did it.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 42 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
43
The way that he carried himself throughout this entire trial 
showed an extreme lack of remorse, showed not just an extreme 
lack of remorse, but a misapprehension and an inability to 
understand the gravity of what happened here, the gravity of 
what was going on during that trial.  That this is someone 
whose life was destroyed and whose family was destroyed.  
And Mr. McCabe during that trial, by lying the way he 
did, by conducting himself the way he did, showed that he had 
no respect for the law, no respect for these proceedings, and 
no respect for this horrific thing that happened.  
So that's the second reason that we submit that a, at 
minimum, top of the guideline sentence is appropriate.  
And then the third factor, which is the least important 
of these three, is the fact that on top of this horrific crime 
that you just heard victims speak about, that we spent the vast 
majority of the trial about, Mr. McCabe committed other crimes 
that aren't even factored into the guidelines here because they 
didn't score in a way, you know, under this labyrinthian system 
we have, to increase his range, his guidelines range.  And that 
is all the fraud and all the lies that he perpetrated outside 
of this courtroom.  That he is someone who lied about the 
purpose of this boat because, again, he wanted to do what he 
wanted to do, which is what led to this dangerous situation in 
the first place.  
And then on top of that, that after he killed Mollie, 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 43 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
44
he kept himself afloat by lying in order to secure COVID-era 
pandemic loans that are not a part of the guidelines 
calculation but that are absolutely just more crimes, more lies 
from this defendant who couldn't be bothered with what society 
needed during this pandemic, much less with what the people he 
was entrusted into their care needed as he conducted this scuba 
charter.  
So our position -- and, Judge, you sat here through 
this seven-day trial.  You saw the trauma.  You saw the 
horrors.  And you saw the lies.  And our position is that those 
factors, under the 3553(a) -- under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) the 
nature of the circumstances of the offense, the need to promote 
respect for the law, the need to have a just sentence, the need 
to deter future criminal conduct, all of these things weigh in 
favor of a stiff sentence, one that is at least at the top of 
his advisory guidelines.  And so that is what we submit to the 
Court as what is appropriate here.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Thank you.  
Ms. Francis.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  If you wish to come to the lectern, you may 
do so, or whatever you are more comfortable with.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge.  I can see better there.  
Thank you.  
Thank you, Your Honor.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 44 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
45
Several key considerations do support a sentence below 
the advisory guideline range or at least at the low end of a 
corrected range.  
This case at its core involves a tragic accident.  
There is no evidence of malice, intent, or willful disregard 
for human life.  Mr. McCabe was engaged in a lawful activity 
that ended in an unforeseen and devastating consequence.  His 
conduct does not reflect the type of calculated or predatory 
behavior that typically justifies a more severe custodial 
sentence.  Mr. McCabe is a first-time offender.  He will be 50 
this year.  No prior criminal history.  He has spent his life 
as a hard working, law-abiding citizen.  
His career as a licensed boat captain required not just 
technical skill, but public trust and responsibility.  This was 
his first incident.  He has strong family and community ties.  
He has expressed sincere remorse for the loss of life that 
occurred.  
Judge, there is nothing in his background that suggests 
that he presents himself as a danger to the public or a risk of 
re-offending.  
Mr. McCabe did exercise his constitutional rights at 
trial, but, Judge, he did so respectfully and while -- without 
attempting to shift blame to the victim or to anyone else that 
was involved. 
THE COURT:  I don't think that's correct.  He may have 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 45 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
46
done so respectfully, but he lied repeatedly on the stand and 
he minimized his criminal conduct, and I think that's 
self-evident in the trial record, but please continue.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Judge. 
We did stipulate before trial that he would not pursue 
a defense that blamed the witnesses or the victim.  He 
refrained from any type of inflammatory tactics and he 
demonstrated a consistent recognition of the tragedy involved, 
time after time again.  He displayed that he understood the 
severity of the crime.  His posture throughout has reflected 
moral accountability.  And, Judge, that deserves weight.  
A guideline sentence that includes all the enhancements 
and everything, that wouldn't just [sic] result in a punishment 
greater than what is necessary to meet the purpose of 
sentencing.  
Mr. McCabe has already suffered significant 
professional and reputational consequences.  A sentence at the 
low end of the range or even below will still adequately 
promote respect for the law.  And -- 
THE COURT:  And so the low end -- just remind me.  You 
view the low end of the corrected range that you would have 
hoped for to be what?  
MS. FRANCIS:  Yes, Judge.  And I believe that was a 
range -- and I will get back to the Court with that -- of 51 to 
63.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 46 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
47
THE COURT:  Okay.  Please continue.  
MS. FRANCIS:  Thank you, Judge. 
And, Judge, as I was saying, a sentence at the low 
range, that would still adequately promote respect and justice 
of the law.  It would afford just punishment and it would serve 
as a sufficient deterrence without inflicting unnecessary 
severity.  
Judge, Mr. McCabe is not in need of correctional 
treatment and nothing suggests that a prolonged term of 
imprisonment is necessary to protect the public.  A shorter 
custodial sentence would facilitate his reintegration into 
society and allow him to resume his role as a constructive and 
contributing member of this community.  
So, Judge, for all those reasons, what we are asking 
the Court to do today is impose a sentence at the low end of 
the range and consider a downward variance, and that's just 
based on the mitigating factors presented.  
Thank you, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Thank you.  
Mr. McCabe, you have a right to address the Court if 
you wish before I make a decision on sentencing.  This is 
called allocution.  You do not have to say anything, sir, but I 
do want to make sure you have the right to do so if you wish.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  Judge, may we have one moment?  
THE COURT:  Yes, you may.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 47 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
48
(Discussion between counsel and defendant.) 
THE COURT:  Mr. O'Sullivan.  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  Thank you.  Mr. McCabe is not going to 
make any statements at this time. 
THE COURT:  Okay.  Thank you.  All right.  
Anything further from the United States?  
MR. KELLER:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Anything further from Ms. Francis or 
Mr. O'Sullivan?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  The Court has considered the 
statements of all parties, the presentence report which 
contains the advisory guidelines and the statutory factors set 
forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(a).  
I'm first going to find, Mr. McCabe, that you are not 
able to pay a fine on top of restitution, so no fine will be 
ordered, but I will be setting a restitution hearing to take 
place.  
Ms. Moran, can you identify a date for that hearing, 
please.  
COURTROOM DEPUTY:  Yes, Judge.  October 30th at 
9:30 a.m.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  And so I will be setting a date for 
the determination of the victims' losses.  That hearing is 
hereby set for October 30th at 9:30 a.m.  And so no fine will 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 48 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
49
be ordered. 
Mr. McCabe, having considered all of these arguments, 
the full trial evidence -- of course, I oversaw the trial 
evidence and I'm fully familiar with it -- along with all of 
the arguments raised today, it is the judgment of the Court 
that an upward variance under my discretion is reasonable and 
warranted in this case based on the extreme severity of the 
offense conduct, which involved a very clear and willful 
disregard for human life, contrary to the suggestions of 
counsel.  
You were warned of issues on this vessel, and yet, for 
reasons that we will never know, decided to proceed forward and 
continue with your for-profit business the very next day, 
subjecting these crew members and also, of course, the 
passengers to extreme risk.  They trusted you.  You violated 
their trust.  And Ms. Flynn lost her life as a result of your 
criminal negligence.  
I disagree that you have exhibited any lack of remorse; 
in fact, I think it's quite opposite.  And all of this, of 
course, doesn't even address the underlying deception that is 
displayed in Counts 2, 3, 4, and 5.  It seems that you have 
operated through this train of deception, even before taking 
those passengers out that day.  Had you done things properly 
and designated your vessel appropriately under the rules, and 
then alerted the Coast Guard to the issues on the day before 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 49 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
50
the victim died, these horrific events very likely could have 
been avoided.  But, again, you persisted with the lies and the 
deception, and here we are with the unfathomable loss of an 
innocent woman whose family is now dealing with the wreckage of 
her death.  And so I think the seriousness of the offense in 
this case is extreme and warrants a very significant sentence.  
In addition to that, the obstructive conduct that you 
exhibited during your trial testimony is, I think, a further 
indication of your lack of remorse and your willingness to 
disregard human life by parroting a ridiculous story of 
windmilling that had no basis in fact.  
And so for all of those reasons, including the need to 
serve the important purpose of general deterrence for anybody 
else who may wish to lie on the navigable waters and subject 
people to extreme risk, it is the judgment of the Court that 
the defendant, Dustin Sean McCabe, is committed to the Bureau 
of Prisons to be imprisoned for 100 months.  
The term consists of 100 months as to each of Counts 1, 
3, 4, and 5, and 60 months as to Count 2, all to be served 
concurrently.  I find this sentence to be reasonable and not 
more than what is necessary to serve the statutory purposes.  
And I want to make clear that I would impose the same sentence 
of 100 months regardless of any issues with the calculation of 
the advisory guideline range.  Again, that's applying the 
3553(a) factors, based on the facts and circumstances of this 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 50 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
51
case.  
As noted, restitution will be ordered pursuant to 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 3663, although the amount 
of such restitution remains to be seen and determined.  Once 
restitution is ordered, during the period of incarceration 
payments shall be made as follows:  
1, if the defendant earns wages in a Federal Prison 
Industries job, then he must pay 50 percent of wages earned 
toward the financial obligations imposed by this judgment.  
2, if the defendant does not work in a UNICOR job, then 
he must pay a minimum of $25 per quarter toward the financial 
obligations imposed in this order.  
Upon release from incarceration, the defendant shall 
pay restitution at the rate of 10 percent of monthly gross 
earnings until such time as the Court may alter that payment 
schedule in the interests of justice.  
The U.S. Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Probation Office, and 
U.S. Attorney's Office shall monitor the payment of restitution 
and report to the Court any material change in the defendant's 
ability to pay.  
These payments do not preclude the government from 
using any other anticipated or unexpected financial gains, 
assets or income of the defendant to satisfy the restitution 
obligations. 
Finally, restitution shall be made payable, once 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 51 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
52
determined, to the clerk and forwarded to the 400 North Miami 
Avenue address, ultimately then forwarded to the victim and her 
family.  
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be 
placed on supervised release for a term of three years.  This 
term consists of three years as to each of Counts 1 through 5, 
all such terms to run concurrently.  
Within 72 hours of release from the custody of the 
Bureau of Prisons, the defendant shall report in person to the 
probation office in the district to which the defendant is 
released.  
While on supervision, the defendant shall comply with 
the mandatory and standard conditions of supervision, as 
referenced in Part F of the presentence report.  And the 
defendant shall also comply with the following special 
conditions:  Mental health treatment, financial disclosure 
requirement, no new debt restriction, permissible search, and 
unpaid restitution, fines or special assessments, as noted in 
Part F of the presentence report.  
It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay 
immediately to the United States a special assessment of $100 
as to each of Counts 1 through 5, for a total of $500.  
The total sentence, therefore, is 100 months' 
imprisonment, restitution to be determined at a future hearing, 
three years of supervised release, and a $500 special 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 52 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
53
assessment.  
Now that sentence has been imposed, does the defendant 
or his counsel object to the Court's finding of fact or to the 
manner in which sentence was pronounced?  
MR. O'SULLIVAN:  We have no objection, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  Okay.  Sir, you have the right to appeal 
the conviction and sentence imposed, but any notice of appeal 
must be filed within 14 days after entry of the judgment.  If 
you are unable to pay the costs of an appeal, you may apply for 
leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
Anything further from probation? 
THE PROBATION OFFICER:  No, Your Honor.  Thank you. 
THE COURT:  Anything further from the United States?  
MR. KELLER:  Nothing, Your Honor.  Thank you.  
THE COURT:  Anything further from the defense?  
MS. FRANCIS:  No, Your Honor.  
THE COURT:  All right.  That concludes our hearing.  
To the victim's family, I know your beloved relative 
will never come back, but I hope this proceeding provides at 
least some closure to you and your family.  
Thank you.  We are in recess.  
(These proceedings concluded at 2:59 p.m.) 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 53 of 68

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
54
C E R T I F I C A T E
I hereby certify that the foregoing is an accurate 
transcription of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter.
DATE:  08-13-2025
/s/Laura Melton 
LAURA E. MELTON, RMR, CRR, FPR
Official Court Reporter 
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida 
Fort Pierce, Florida 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 54 of 68

$
$100 [3] <14:34> - 37:12 <14:58>, 52:21
$25 [1] <14:56> - 51:11
$25,000 [1] <14:34> - 37:11
$250,000 [1] <14:34> - 37:11
$300,000 [1] <14:19> - 27:19
$500 [3] <14:34> - 37:13 <14:58>, 52:22 <14:58>, 
52:25
1
1 [6] <13:42> - 3:5 <14:21>, 29:1 <14:55>, 50:18 <14:56>, 
51:7 <14:57>, 52:6 <14:58>, 52:22
1.3 [1] <14:01> - 16:13
10 [3] <14:22> - 30:1 <14:23>, 30:3 <14:57>, 
51:14
100 [4] <14:55> - 50:17 <14:55>, 50:18 <14:56>, 
50:23 <14:58>, 52:23
1001(a)(2) [1] <13:43> - 3:8
115 [3] <14:13> - 24:5 <14:21>, 28:24 <14:22>, 
29:21
117 [4] <13:50> - 9:13 <13:55>, 12:15 <13:58>, 
14:18 <14:20>, 28:7
11:00 [1] <14:23> - 30:14
1343 [2] <13:43> - 3:10 <13:49>, 8:19
14 [1] <14:59> - 53:8
18 [10] <13:42> - 2:25 <13:42>, 3:7 <13:43>, 3:9 <13:49>, 
8:19 <13:57>, 13:22 <14:18>, 26:20 <14:44>, 
44:11 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 51:3
2
2 [6] <13:50> - 9:14 <13:59>, 14:24 <14:22>, 29:24 
<14:54>, 49:21 <14:55>, 50:19 <14:56>, 51:10
22 [4] <13:57> - 13:22 <14:06>, 20:2 <14:11>, 
23:8
24 [4] <13:57> - 13:22 <14:03>, 17:11 <14:11>, 
22:25
24-cr-80103-Cannon 
[1] <13:41> - 2:5
26 [1] <14:33> - 37:8
2:59 [1] <14:59> - 53:22
2A1.4 [1] <14:06> - 20:1
2A1.4(a)(2)(B) [1] <14:12> - 
23:21
3
3 [7] <13:43> - 3:9 <13:49>, 8:21 <14:15>, 25:4 <14:15>, 
25:10 <14:22>, 29:24 <14:54>, 49:21 <14:55>, 
50:19
30th [2] <14:52> - 48:21 <14:52>, 48:25
3553(a [3] <14:44> - 44:11 <14:56>, 
50:25
3553(a) [2] <13:42> - 2:25 <14:51>, 48:14
36 [3] <14:25> - 31:22 <14:26>, 32:5 <14:26>, 
32:14
3663 [3] <14:18> - 26:20 <14:21>, 29:5 <14:56>, 
51:3
3663(A) [1] <14:21> - 29:3
3B1 [1] <14:00> - 15:19
3B1.3 [1] <14:06> - 19:21
3BI [1] <14:01> - 16:13
3C1.1 [1] <14:32> - 36:5
4
4 [6] <13:43> - 3:9 <13:49>, 8:21 <14:15>, 25:15 <14:22>, 
29:24 <14:54>, 49:21 <14:55>, 50:19
400 [1] <14:57> - 52:1
45 [1] <14:11> - 23:5
46 [2] <14:14> - 24:9 <14:23>, 30:11
4:45 [1] <14:23> - 30:15
5
5 [12] <13:43> - 3:9 <13:49>, 8:21 <13:50>, 9:13 <13:57>, 
13:21 <13:57>, 13:22 <14:16>, 25:22 <14:22>, 
29:14 <14:22>, 29:24 <14:54>, 49:21 <14:55>, 
50:19 <14:57>, 52:6 <14:58>, 52:22
50 [2] <14:45> - 45:10 <14:56>, 51:8
51 [2] <14:03> - 17:12 <14:48>, 46:24
52 [1] <14:14> - 24:9
6
6 [4] <13:55> - 12:14 <14:20>, 28:7 <14:22>, 29:18 
<14:22>, 29:24
60 [1] <14:55> - 50:19
63 [3] <14:03> - 17:12 <14:33>, 37:9 <14:48>, 
46:25
7
7 [4] <13:55> - 12:15 <13:58>, 14:17 <13:58>, 
14:18 <14:22>, 29:24
72 [1] <14:58> - 52:8
78 [2] <14:33> - 37:9 <14:38>, 40:10
8
8 [1] <14:22> - 29:24
9
9 [2] <14:22> - 30:1 <14:23>, 30:3
90 [2] <14:20> - 28:14 <14:21>, 29:7
98 [6] <13:52> - 10:21 <13:53>, 11:10 <13:54>, 
12:2 <13:56>, 13:9 <13:56>, 13:14
9:30 [2] <14:52> - 48:22 <14:52>, 48:25
A
a.m [2] <14:52> - 48:22 <14:52>, 48:25
abandoned [1] <14:16> - 25:20
abide [1] <14:03> - 17:23
abiding [1] <14:46> - 45:12
ability [1] <14:57> - 51:20
able [4] <14:27> - 33:5 <14:30>, 35:3 <14:31>, 
35:25 <14:52>, 48:16
absolutely [5] <14:20> - 28:18 <14:25>, 
31:18 <14:38>, 40:12 <14:38>, 40:13 <14:43>, 
44:3
abuse [1] <14:09> - 22:1
accepted [1] <14:30> - 35:3
accident [1] <14:45> - 45:4
accomplish [1] <13:55> - 12:11
accordingly [1] <14:03> - 17:9
accountability [2] <14:26> - 
32:18 <14:47>, 46:11
accurate [2] <13:54> - 11:20 <13:56>, 
13:10
accurately [1] <14:31> - 36:4
acquittal [1] <13:46> - 6:19
Act [2] <14:18> - 26:17 <14:20>, 28:9
acted [1] <13:58> - 14:8
acting [1] <14:07> - 20:23
action [1] <14:19> - 28:3
activity [2] <14:38> - 40:23 <14:45>, 45:6
actual [1] <13:55> - 12:24
add [2] <13:56> - 13:14 <14:08>, 21:7
added [1] <13:55> - 12:10
addendum [3] <13:43> - 3:15 <13:55>, 
13:2 <14:03>, 17:21
addition [4] <13:54> - 12:1 <13:54>, 12:5 
<14:04>, 18:1 <14:55>, 50:7
additional [8] <13:43> - 3:16 <13:56>, 
13:7 <14:00>, 16:2 <14:01>, 16:6 <14:07>, 20:11 
55
<14:13>, 24:3 <14:13>, 24:6 <14:21>, 29:8
address [11] <13:47> - 6:22 <13:48>, 
7:22 <14:00>, 15:18 <14:01>, 16:12 <14:04>, 
18:9 <14:15>, 25:15 <14:17>, 26:9 <14:22>, 
29:22 <14:49>, 47:20 <14:54>, 49:20 <14:57>, 
52:2
addressed [3] <14:00> - 16:3 <14:15>, 
24:22 <14:15>, 25:1
addresses [1] <14:04> - 18:4
addressing [2] <13:41> - 2:3 <13:47>, 
7:2
adequately [2] <14:47> - 46:18 <14:48>, 
47:4
adjudicated [4] <13:42> - 3:1 <13:52>, 
10:25 <13:54>, 11:22 <14:22>, 29:19
adjustment [3] <14:09> - 22:1 <14:32>, 
36:5 <14:33>, 36:21
adopt [1] <14:33> - 37:5
advanced [1] <14:02> - 17:6
advancing [1] <14:27> - 33:9
advisory [7] <13:47> - 7:9 <14:33>, 37:9 
<14:34>, 37:20 <14:44>, 44:16 <14:45>, 45:2 <14:51>, 
48:13 <14:56>, 50:24
affirm [1] <13:46> - 5:23
afford [1] <14:48> - 47:5
afloat [1] <14:43> - 44:1
afternoon [10] <13:41> - 2:2 <13:41>, 
2:8 <13:41>, 2:11 <13:41>, 2:12 <13:41>, 2:15 <13:41>, 
2:16 <13:42>, 2:19 <13:42>, 2:20 <14:23>, 30:15 
<14:34>, 37:25
agency [1] <13:42> - 3:6
agree [5] <13:46> - 6:8 <13:49>, 8:20 <13:50>, 
8:24 <13:50>, 8:25 <13:51>, 10:12
agreement [1] <14:18> - 26:23
agrees [1] <14:18> - 26:18
aground [2] <14:24> - 30:25 <14:24>, 
31:2
ahead [2] <14:33> - 37:5 <14:35>, 38:4
air [1] <14:31> - 35:15
alert [1] <13:47> - 7:13
alerted [1] <14:54> - 49:25
allegation [1] <14:10> - 22:19
allegations [2] <13:53> - 11:8 <13:54>, 
12:7
alleged [2] <14:01> - 16:13 <14:26>, 32:6
allocution [1] <14:49> - 47:22
allow [1] <14:48> - 47:12
almost [1] <14:39> - 40:25
alter [1] <14:57> - 51:15
altercations [2] <13:52> - 10:23 
<13:54>, 11:21
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 55 of 68

altering [1] <14:39> - 41:15
America [1] <13:41> - 2:5
amount [4] <14:19> - 27:19 <14:20>, 
28:20 <14:21>, 29:11 <14:56>, 51:3
ample [2] <13:51> - 10:2 <13:52>, 10:14
anchor [1] <14:24> - 31:3
answer [1] <13:45> - 5:2
answered [2] <13:46> - 5:17 <13:46>, 
6:14
anticipated [1] <14:57> - 51:22
apologize [1] <14:04> - 18:3
appeal [4] <14:59> - 53:6 <14:59>, 53:7 <14:59>, 
53:9 <14:59>, 53:10
appearances [1] <13:41> - 2:6
applicable [4] <14:01> - 16:10 <14:03>, 
17:11 <14:33>, 37:7 <14:34>, 37:20
application [3] <14:09> - 21:24 
<14:11>, 23:4 <14:30>, 34:24
applications [2] <13:49> - 8:17 
<14:24>, 30:24
applied [3] <13:47> - 7:9 <13:51>, 10:4 <14:23>, 
30:11
applies [7] <13:44> - 4:13 <14:01>, 16:15 
<14:02>, 16:24 <14:10>, 22:9 <14:11>, 23:8 <14:26>, 
32:5 <14:32>, 36:5
apply [9] <14:03> - 17:10 <14:06>, 19:21 
<14:07>, 20:12 <14:07>, 20:19 <14:07>, 20:21 <14:10>, 
22:14 <14:13>, 23:24 <14:31>, 36:2 <14:59>, 
53:9
applying [2] <14:33> - 36:20 <14:56>, 
50:24
appropriate [11] <13:51> - 10:8 
<13:55>, 13:1 <13:58>, 14:6 <13:59>, 15:6 <14:20>, 
28:22 <14:25>, 31:17 <14:25>, 31:18 <14:38>, 
40:14 <14:38>, 40:16 <14:42>, 43:12 <14:44>, 
44:17
appropriately [1] <14:54> - 
49:24
area [1] <14:08> - 21:14
arguable [1] <14:07> - 20:11
arguing [2] <13:52> - 11:3 <13:58>, 14:5
argument [7] <13:54> - 11:22 <14:01>, 
16:10 <14:09>, 21:20 <14:11>, 23:1 <14:18>, 
27:7 <14:25>, 31:17 <14:37>, 40:4
arguments [4] <14:00> - 15:25 <14:03>, 
17:14 <14:52>, 49:2 <14:52>, 49:5
articulate [1] <14:08> - 21:4
aspect [6] <14:23> - 30:16 <14:24>, 
30:19 <14:40>, 41:18 <14:41>, 42:11 <14:42>, 
42:24
aspects [2] <13:51> - 10:7 <14:38>, 
40:17
assert [1] <13:50> - 9:1
asserting [4] <13:49> - 8:12 <13:52>, 
10:24 <13:57>, 13:25 <14:27>, 33:3
assess [1] <13:53> - 11:5
assessment [3] <14:34> - 37:12 
<14:58>, 52:21 <14:59>, 53:1
assessments [1] <14:58> - 
52:18
assets [1] <14:57> - 51:23
attempting [1] <14:46> - 45:23
attention [1] <14:04> - 17:25
attorney [1] <13:43> - 3:15
Attorney's [1] <14:57> - 51:18
attorneys [1] <13:46> - 6:6
aunt [2] <14:35> - 38:8 <14:35>, 38:10
Avenue [1] <14:57> - 52:2
avoided [1] <14:54> - 50:2
aware [2] <13:42> - 3:1 <13:47>, 6:20
B
background [1] <14:46> - 45:18
bad [3] <14:28> - 33:21 <14:35>, 38:15 <14:37>, 
39:24
baked [1] <14:04> - 18:13
bank [1] <14:24> - 30:24
banks [1] <13:52> - 10:17
base [8] <14:02> - 17:3 <14:04>, 18:13 <14:06>, 
20:2 <14:09>, 21:25 <14:09>, 22:2 <14:10>, 
22:13 <14:11>, 23:8
based [14] <14:01> - 16:16 <14:03>, 
17:23 <14:06>, 19:19 <14:06>, 20:1 <14:13>, 
23:24 <14:23>, 30:5 <14:26>, 32:6 <14:28>, 
33:18 <14:33>, 36:19 <14:34>, 37:14 <14:49>, 
47:17 <14:53>, 49:7 <14:56>, 50:25
basis [7] <13:49> - 8:11 <13:51>, 10:11 <13:56>, 
13:12 <13:59>, 15:10 <14:08>, 21:4 <14:25>, 
31:25 <14:55>, 50:11
bear [1] <14:21> - 29:11
begin [5] <13:44> - 3:24 <13:47>, 6:22 <13:47>, 
7:18 <14:04>, 18:12 <14:38>, 40:7
behalf [3] <13:41> - 2:9 <13:41>, 2:13 <13:41>, 
2:18
behavior [1] <14:45> - 45:9
belabor [1] <14:42> - 42:24
belied [1] <14:32> - 36:10
believes [1] <14:29> - 34:8
beloved [1] <14:59> - 53:18
below [2] <14:45> - 45:1 <14:47>, 46:18
beneficiary [2] <14:19> - 27:14 <14:19>, 
27:22
best [3] <14:37> - 39:16 <14:37>, 39:17
better [2] <14:31> - 35:23 <14:44>, 44:23
between [7] <13:45> - 5:8 <13:48>, 7:25 
<13:50>, 9:4 <14:05>, 19:6 <14:07>, 20:9 <14:17>, 26:5 
<14:51>, 48:1
beyond [6] <13:49> - 8:14 <13:50>, 9:1 <13:52>, 
10:13 <14:08>, 21:4 <14:10>, 22:17 <14:15>, 
25:5
bit [1] <14:30> - 35:1
blame [3] <14:27> - 32:21 <14:29>, 34:7 
<14:46>, 45:23
blamed [1] <14:47> - 46:6
blaming [1] <14:27> - 32:20
board [1] <14:29> - 34:5
boat [13] <14:01> - 16:16 <14:05>, 18:20 
<14:05>, 18:22 <14:06>, 19:23 <14:12>, 23:14 <14:27>, 
33:9 <14:28>, 33:13 <14:35>, 38:12 <14:35>, 
38:15 <14:39>, 41:7 <14:41>, 42:17 <14:43>, 
43:22 <14:46>, 45:13
boats [1] <14:24> - 31:4
body [1] <14:39> - 41:13
born [1] <14:36> - 39:5
bothered [1] <14:43> - 44:4
bought [2] <14:25> - 31:10 <14:39>, 41:6
brand [1] <14:15> - 24:13
brand-new [1] <14:15> - 24:13
brazen [1] <14:31> - 36:1
brief [1] <14:36> - 39:13
briefed [1] <14:21> - 28:24
briefly [3] <13:45> - 4:21 <13:45>, 5:1 <13:55>, 
12:13
bring [3] <13:56> - 13:4 <14:04>, 17:25 <14:21>, 
29:11
bringing [1] <14:06> - 19:23
brothers [1] <14:35> - 38:9
brutally [1] <14:38> - 40:21
bucks [1] <14:35> - 38:17
buddies [1] <14:30> - 35:9
bulk [1] <13:47> - 6:25
burden [3] <14:18> - 27:9 <14:21>, 29:12 
<14:37>, 39:21
Bureau [3] <14:55> - 50:16 <14:57>, 
51:17 <14:58>, 52:9
business [3] <14:32> - 36:18 <14:39>, 
41:10 <14:53>, 49:13
butchering [1] <14:41> - 42:21
C
calculated [2] <14:34> - 37:19 <14:45>, 
45:8
56
calculating [1] <13:47> - 7:9
calculation [2] <14:43> - 44:3 <14:56>, 
50:23
calculations [1] <14:33> - 37:7
Calisha [1] <13:41> - 2:13
captain [14] <14:01> - 16:17 <14:02>, 
17:1 <14:05>, 19:2 <14:06>, 19:11 <14:06>, 
19:16 <14:06>, 19:20 <14:07>, 20:5 <14:08>, 
20:25 <14:08>, 21:8 <14:10>, 22:11 <14:12>, 
23:13 <14:27>, 33:9 <14:31>, 35:24 <14:46>, 
45:13
captain's [1] <14:10> - 22:16
captains [2] <14:02> - 16:25 <14:10>, 
22:10
care [2] <14:06> - 19:13 <14:44>, 44:6
career [1] <14:46> - 45:13
carnage [1] <14:39> - 41:12
carried [1] <14:42> - 43:1
carry [1] <14:37> - 39:25
carrying [1] <13:57> - 14:3
case [24] <13:41> - 2:3 <13:41>, 2:4 <13:52>, 
11:1 <14:02>, 16:23 <14:04>, 18:9 <14:05>, 19:1 
<14:12>, 23:17 <14:18>, 27:1 <14:18>, 27:4 <14:19>, 
27:21 <14:21>, 29:2 <14:21>, 29:4 <14:23>, 
30:16 <14:24>, 30:19 <14:25>, 31:15 <14:30>, 
34:23 <14:38>, 40:17 <14:40>, 41:18 <14:41>, 
42:11 <14:42>, 42:24 <14:45>, 45:4 <14:53>, 
49:7 <14:54>, 50:6 <14:56>, 51:1
Case [1] <13:41> - 2:5
cases [1] <14:04> - 18:16
categories [2] <14:32> - 36:6 <14:32>, 
36:14
Category [1] <14:33> - 37:8
causation [1] <14:15> - 24:20
caused [1] <14:24> - 30:21
certain [1] <14:02> - 16:25
certainly [1] <14:29> - 34:14
certification [1] <13:57> - 14:4
challenge [4] <14:00> - 15:21 <14:11>, 
23:3 <14:13>, 24:6 <14:16>, 25:25
challenges [2] <14:13> - 24:3 <14:23>, 
30:6
chance [1] <14:03> - 17:19
change [1] <14:57> - 51:19
character [2] <13:44> - 4:14 <13:52>, 
11:2
characteristics [3] <13:47> - 
7:8 <13:55>, 12:18 <14:09>, 22:3
characterization [2] <13:56> - 
13:3 <13:56>, 13:16
charges [2] <13:54> - 12:8 <13:58>, 
14:11
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 56 of 68

charging [4] <13:49> - 8:13 <13:50>, 
8:25 <13:50>, 9:4 <13:50>, 9:17
charter [8] <14:06> - 19:11 <14:06>, 
19:16 <14:08>, 21:7 <14:08>, 21:12 <14:08>, 
21:14 <14:12>, 23:13 <14:35>, 38:10 <14:44>, 
44:7
check [1] <14:35> - 38:15
checked [1] <14:35> - 38:12
choices [3] <14:35> - 38:6 <14:37>, 
39:23
choose [1] <14:35> - 38:7
chop [1] <14:31> - 35:13
chopped [1] <14:38> - 40:21
chose [2] <14:35> - 38:13 <14:35>, 38:16
Circuit [2] <14:05> - 19:1 <14:09>, 22:4
Circuit's [1] <14:01> - 16:18
circumstances [4] <14:13> - 
23:25 <14:18>, 26:25 <14:44>, 44:12 <14:56>, 
50:25
citing [1] <14:20> - 28:8
citizen [1] <14:46> - 45:12
civil [3] <14:18> - 27:4 <14:19>, 27:18 <14:19>, 
28:3
claim [2] <14:06> - 20:1 <14:32>, 36:9
claimed [1] <14:32> - 36:12
claiming [2] <14:24> - 30:22 <14:32>, 
36:16
claims [1] <14:15> - 25:6
clarification [1] <14:33> - 37:6
clarified [1] <14:09> - 22:4
classification [3] <13:58> - 
14:6 <13:58>, 14:9 <13:58>, 14:13
classified [1] <13:57> - 14:1
clear [6] <13:59> - 15:11 <14:01>, 16:17 <14:20>, 
28:18 <14:26>, 32:13 <14:53>, 49:8 <14:56>, 
50:22
clearly [2] <14:23> - 30:8 <14:32>, 36:18
clerk [1] <14:57> - 52:1
closure [1] <14:59> - 53:20
club [1] <13:51> - 10:5
Coast [4] <13:57> - 14:4 <13:59>, 14:20 <13:59>, 
15:12 <14:54>, 49:25
Code [6] <13:42> - 2:25 <13:42>, 3:7 <13:43>, 
3:9 <14:18>, 26:20 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 51:3
colors [1] <13:58> - 14:10
comfortable [1] <14:44> - 44:22
coming [1] <14:28> - 33:14
commercial [2] <13:58> - 14:5 <14:04>, 
18:14
commission [5] <14:01> - 16:14 
<14:02>, 16:22 <14:06>, 19:22 <14:09>, 22:7 <14:11>, 
22:22
committed [2] <14:43> - 43:16 <14:55>, 
50:16
community [2] <14:46> - 45:15 
<14:48>, 47:13
compensate [2] <14:19> - 27:15 
<14:19>, 28:1
complaints [4] <13:52> - 10:22 
<13:54>, 11:18 <13:54>, 12:3 <14:22>, 29:19
complete [1] <14:13> - 24:4
completely [1] <13:54> - 12:6
completeness [1] <13:56> - 
13:13
comply [2] <14:58> - 52:12 <14:58>, 
52:15
conceal [2] <14:02> - 17:7 <14:10>, 
22:17
concealment [3] <14:02> - 
16:22 <14:10>, 22:8 <14:11>, 22:22
concerns [1] <14:23> - 30:10
concluded [1] <14:59> - 53:22
concludes [1] <14:59> - 53:17
concurrently [2] <14:55> - 
50:20 <14:58>, 52:7
conditions [2] <14:58> - 52:13 <14:58>, 
52:16
conduct [13] <13:53> - 11:5 <13:55>, 
12:24 <14:02>, 17:8 <14:26>, 32:16 <14:27>, 
32:25 <14:38>, 40:18 <14:39>, 41:3 <14:39>, 
41:5 <14:44>, 44:14 <14:45>, 45:8 <14:46>, 46:2 
<14:53>, 49:8 <14:55>, 50:7
conducted [1] <14:44> - 44:6
conducting [1] <14:42> - 43:8
conjured [1] <14:15> - 24:14
connection [1] <14:26> - 32:10
consequence [1] <14:45> - 
45:7
consequences [4] <14:38> - 
40:19 <14:39>, 41:12 <14:40>, 42:4 <14:47>, 
46:17
consider [4] <14:26> - 32:18 <14:37>, 
39:15 <14:41>, 42:8 <14:49>, 47:16
considerations [1] <14:45> - 
45:1
considered [2] <14:51> - 48:11 
<14:52>, 49:2
consistent [2] <13:58> - 14:6 <14:47>, 
46:8
consistently [1] <14:27> - 33:4
consists [2] <14:55> - 50:18 <14:57>, 
52:6
constitutes [1] <14:02> - 17:4
constitutional [1] <14:46> - 
45:21
constraints [1] <14:03> - 17:23
constructive [1] <14:48> - 
47:12
contain [1] <13:54> - 11:21
contained [2] <13:48> - 7:20 <13:48>, 
7:21
contains [2] <13:47> - 7:15 <14:51>, 
48:13
contemplated [1] <14:10> - 
22:13
contents [1] <13:45> - 5:8
contest [2] <13:55> - 12:16 <13:56>, 
13:4
contesting [1] <14:20> - 28:10
context [1] <14:06> - 19:15
continue [5] <13:45> - 5:11 <13:59>, 
15:1 <14:46>, 46:3 <14:48>, 47:1 <14:53>, 49:13
contrary [2] <14:15> - 25:13 <14:53>, 
49:9
contributed [1] <14:10> - 22:21
contributing [1] <14:48> - 47:13
convict [1] <14:30> - 35:4
convicted [6] <13:49> - 8:16 <13:50>, 
8:22 <13:58>, 14:19 <13:59>, 15:5 <14:18>, 
26:15 <14:25>, 31:11
convicting [2] <13:59> - 14:22 <14:25>, 
31:10
conviction [4] <13:53> - 11:8 <14:02>, 
16:24 <14:10>, 22:8 <14:59>, 53:7
convictions [1] <13:50> - 9:5
convince [5] <14:12> - 23:14 <14:30>, 
35:7 <14:31>, 35:20 <14:31>, 35:25
core [1] <14:45> - 45:4
corners [1] <14:39> - 41:8
correct [11] <13:50> - 8:23 <13:50>, 9:17 
<13:51>, 9:24 <14:03>, 17:17 <14:15>, 24:22 <14:15>, 
25:1 <14:16>, 25:21 <14:16>, 25:24 <14:34>, 
37:14 <14:36>, 39:3 <14:46>, 45:25
corrected [2] <14:45> - 45:3 <14:47>, 
46:21
correctional [1] <14:48> - 47:8
corroborated [1] <14:29> - 34:8
costs [2] <14:20> - 28:20 <14:59>, 53:9
Counsel [2] <13:41> - 2:6 <14:13>, 24:5
counsel [9] <13:43> - 3:16 <13:48>, 7:25 
<14:04>, 18:2 <14:17>, 26:5 <14:32>, 36:12 <14:51>, 
48:1 <14:53>, 49:10 <14:59>, 53:3
count [2] <14:25> - 31:12 <14:34>, 37:13
Count [4] <13:42> - 3:5 <13:59>, 14:24 <14:21>, 
29:1 <14:55>, 50:19
57
counting [5] <14:02> - 17:4 <14:06>, 
20:1 <14:10>, 22:14 <14:12>, 23:19 <14:12>, 
23:20
Counts [5] <13:49> - 8:21 <14:54>, 49:21 
<14:55>, 50:18 <14:57>, 52:6 <14:58>, 52:22
counts [7] <13:42> - 3:2 <13:42>, 3:3 <13:42>, 
3:4 <13:43>, 3:8 <13:50>, 8:22 <13:50>, 9:6 <13:51>, 
10:12
County [1] <13:45> - 5:5
couple [3] <14:24> - 30:19 <14:35>, 
38:13 <14:35>, 38:17
course [9] <13:44> - 4:14 <13:50>, 8:22 <13:52>, 
10:15 <14:18>, 27:2 <14:18>, 27:5 <14:28>, 
33:14 <14:52>, 49:3 <14:53>, 49:14 <14:54>, 
49:20
Court [24] <13:27> - 2:1 <13:41>, 2:3 <13:45>, 
5:4 <13:52>, 11:4 <13:59>, 15:11 <14:04>, 18:4 
<14:06>, 19:21 <14:15>, 25:12 <14:17>, 26:9 <14:18>, 
27:3 <14:18>, 27:5 <14:19>, 27:18 <14:26>, 
32:18 <14:37>, 39:15 <14:40>, 42:7 <14:44>, 
44:17 <14:48>, 46:24 <14:49>, 47:15 <14:49>, 
47:20 <14:51>, 48:11 <14:52>, 49:5 <14:55>, 
50:15 <14:57>, 51:15 <14:57>, 51:19
COURT [112] <13:41> - 2:2 <13:41>, 2:11 
<13:41>, 2:15 <13:42>, 2:20 <13:43>, 3:22 <13:44>, 
3:24 <13:44>, 4:8 <13:44>, 4:12 <13:45>, 4:19 <13:45>, 
4:25 <13:45>, 5:9 <13:45>, 5:11 <13:45>, 5:15 <13:46>, 
5:19 <13:46>, 6:3 <13:46>, 6:8 <13:46>, 6:11 <13:46>, 
6:14 <13:46>, 6:17 <13:47>, 7:4 <13:47>, 7:13 <13:48>, 
7:23 <13:49>, 8:5 <13:49>, 8:7 <13:49>, 8:20 <13:50>, 
9:3 <13:50>, 9:9 <13:51>, 9:23 <13:51>, 10:9 <13:53>, 
11:10 <13:53>, 11:13 <13:54>, 11:16 <13:54>, 
11:24 <13:54>, 12:1 <13:55>, 12:12 <13:56>, 
13:8 <13:57>, 13:20 <13:58>, 14:15 <13:59>, 
14:24 <13:59>, 15:1 <13:59>, 15:7 <14:00>, 
15:20 <14:00>, 16:1 <14:01>, 16:8 <14:03>, 
17:13 <14:03>, 17:17 <14:04>, 18:6 <14:06>, 
19:25 <14:08>, 20:24 <14:09>, 21:20 <14:11>, 
23:2 <14:14>, 24:10 <14:15>, 24:13 <14:15>, 
24:19 <14:15>, 24:22 <14:15>, 24:24 <14:15>, 
25:3 <14:15>, 25:9 <14:15>, 25:12 <14:16>, 
25:20 <14:16>, 25:22 <14:16>, 26:3 <14:17>, 
26:8 <14:17>, 26:11 <14:18>, 26:18 <14:18>, 
26:22 <14:18>, 27:6 <14:19>, 27:12 <14:19>, 
27:22 <14:19>, 27:25 <14:19>, 28:4 <14:21>, 
28:23 <14:22>, 29:17 <14:22>, 30:1 <14:23>, 
30:4 <14:25>, 31:21 <14:26>, 32:3 <14:26>, 32:8 
<14:27>, 33:7 <14:29>, 34:11 <14:29>, 34:14 <14:30>, 
35:11 <14:31>, 36:3 <14:33>, 36:25 <14:33>, 
37:3 <14:34>, 37:17 <14:34>, 37:19 <14:34>, 
37:25 <14:35>, 38:4 <14:36>, 38:25 <14:36>, 
39:3 <14:36>, 39:6 <14:36>, 39:10 <14:36>, 
39:12 <14:37>, 40:1 <14:37>, 40:4 <14:44>, 
44:18 <14:44>, 44:21 <14:46>, 45:25 <14:47>, 
46:20 <14:48>, 47:1 <14:49>, 47:19 <14:49>, 
47:25 <14:51>, 48:2 <14:51>, 48:5 <14:51>, 48:8 
<14:51>, 48:11 <14:52>, 48:23 <14:59>, 53:6 <14:59>, 
53:13 <14:59>, 53:15 <14:59>, 53:17
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 57 of 68

Court's [6] <13:47> - 6:20 <14:04>, 17:25 
<14:13>, 23:24 <14:34>, 37:15 <14:38>, 40:13 <14:59>, 
53:3
COURTROOM [4] <13:41> - 2:4 
<13:46>, 5:21 <13:46>, 6:2 <14:52>, 48:21
courtroom [4] <14:40> - 41:20 <14:40>, 
41:21 <14:43>, 43:21
cover [4] <14:16> - 25:25 <14:19>, 27:21 
<14:23>, 30:2 <14:33>, 36:22
covered [7] <13:43> - 3:21 <14:18>, 
26:16 <14:18>, 27:5 <14:20>, 28:18 <14:20>, 
28:22 <14:22>, 29:23 <14:22>, 29:25
covering [1] <14:15> - 24:16
covers [3] <13:43> - 3:18 <14:19>, 27:20
COVID [1] <14:43> - 44:1
COVID-era [1] <14:43> - 44:1
crashed [1] <14:05> - 19:2
credit [1] <14:39> - 41:7
crew [1] <14:53> - 49:14
crime [7] <13:59> - 14:23 <14:05>, 19:5 <14:18>, 
26:14 <14:40>, 42:4 <14:41>, 42:9 <14:42>, 
43:14 <14:47>, 46:10
crimes [3] <14:30> - 35:4 <14:43>, 43:16 
<14:43>, 44:3
criminal [9] <13:52> - 11:2 <13:53>, 11:8 
<13:54>, 12:8 <13:58>, 14:8 <14:26>, 32:11 <14:44>, 
44:14 <14:45>, 45:11 <14:46>, 46:2 <14:53>, 
49:17
Criminal [1] <14:33> - 37:8
cross [1] <14:29> - 34:3
cross-examined [1] <14:29> - 
34:3
crossed [1] <14:23> - 30:16
crucial [1] <14:40> - 41:25
cure [1] <13:54> - 12:4
current [1] <14:28> - 33:16
custodial [2] <14:45> - 45:9 <14:48>, 
47:11
custody [1] <14:58> - 52:8
customers [1] <14:08> - 21:3
cuts [1] <14:39> - 41:8
D
danger [4] <14:05> - 18:24 <14:08>, 
21:10 <14:09>, 21:18 <14:46>, 45:19
dangerous [1] <14:43> - 43:23
dangers [1] <14:38> - 40:22
date [3] <14:21> - 29:6 <14:52>, 48:19 <14:52>, 
48:23
daughter [1] <14:35> - 38:9
daylight [1] <13:50> - 9:4
days [3] <14:20> - 28:14 <14:21>, 29:7 <14:59>, 
53:8
dead [1] <14:39> - 41:2
dealing [1] <14:54> - 50:4
death [6] <14:12> - 23:17 <14:15>, 24:20 
<14:24>, 30:21 <14:30>, 35:12 <14:41>, 42:16 <14:54>, 
50:5
debt [1] <14:58> - 52:17
deception [4] <13:57> - 13:24 <14:54>, 
49:20 <14:54>, 49:22 <14:54>, 50:3
deceptive [1] <13:58> - 14:14
decide [1] <14:26> - 32:9
decided [2] <14:35> - 38:7 <14:53>, 
49:12
decision [1] <14:49> - 47:21
decisions [1] <14:37> - 39:24
DEFENDANT [5] <13:46> - 6:1 <13:46>, 
6:7 <13:46>, 6:10 <13:46>, 6:13 <13:46>, 6:16
defendant [38] <13:47> - 7:18 <13:49>, 
8:16 <13:50>, 9:8 <13:51>, 9:20 <13:51>, 10:3 <13:52>, 
10:16 <13:56>, 13:9 <13:56>, 13:16 <13:58>, 
14:19 <13:59>, 15:3 <14:01>, 16:20 <14:05>, 
18:18 <14:05>, 19:7 <14:07>, 20:9 <14:09>, 22:5 
<14:09>, 22:6 <14:17>, 26:5 <14:24>, 30:18 <14:25>, 
31:14 <14:25>, 31:19 <14:29>, 34:18 <14:30>, 
35:6 <14:32>, 36:13 <14:38>, 40:22 <14:43>, 
44:4 <14:51>, 48:1 <14:55>, 50:16 <14:56>, 51:7 
<14:56>, 51:10 <14:57>, 51:13 <14:57>, 51:23 <14:57>, 
52:4 <14:58>, 52:9 <14:58>, 52:10 <14:58>, 
52:12 <14:58>, 52:15 <14:58>, 52:20 <14:59>, 
53:2
defendant's [8] <13:55> - 12:17 
<13:55>, 13:2 <13:56>, 13:15 <13:59>, 15:11 <14:18>, 
27:9 <14:38>, 40:18 <14:41>, 42:17 <14:57>, 
51:19
defendants [1] <14:24> - 30:17
defense [12] <13:44> - 4:14 <13:55>, 
12:23 <13:56>, 13:7 <14:04>, 18:12 <14:20>, 
28:8 <14:20>, 28:15 <14:21>, 29:12 <14:27>, 
32:20 <14:29>, 34:15 <14:39>, 41:14 <14:47>, 
46:6 <14:59>, 53:15
defenses [3] <14:27> - 33:3 <14:29>, 
34:12 <14:29>, 34:13
definition [1] <13:51> - 10:5
defraud [3] <13:48> - 7:19 <13:49>, 8:9 <13:49>, 
8:21
degree [3] <14:26> - 32:17 <14:27>, 
32:23 <14:32>, 36:11
demeanor [1] <14:41> - 42:14
demonstrated [2] <14:27> - 
33:4 <14:47>, 46:8
denied [2] <13:56> - 13:10 <14:33>, 37:4
DEPUTY [4] <13:41> - 2:4 <13:46>, 5:21 
<13:46>, 6:2 <14:52>, 48:21
described [2] <14:08> - 20:25 <14:15>, 
25:4
describing [1] <13:59> - 15:2
description [1] <13:56> - 13:3
descriptions [1] <14:15> - 25:1
deserves [1] <14:47> - 46:11
design [1] <14:03> - 17:19
designated [1] <14:54> - 49:24
destroyed [2] <14:42> - 43:6
destruction [2] <14:41> - 42:9 <14:41>, 
42:10
deter [1] <14:44> - 44:14
determination [1] <14:52> - 
48:24
determine [1] <13:42> - 2:22
determined [4] <13:49> - 8:18 <14:56>, 
51:4 <14:57>, 52:1 <14:58>, 52:24
deterrence [2] <14:48> - 47:6 <14:55>, 
50:13
detrimental [1] <14:29> - 33:25
devastating [1] <14:45> - 45:7
deviate [1] <13:51> - 10:11
devoid [1] <14:27> - 33:1
died [3] <14:28> - 33:10 <14:32>, 36:16 <14:54>, 
50:1
different [6] <13:55> - 12:17 <14:05>, 
19:1 <14:05>, 19:3 <14:08>, 21:11 <14:23>, 30:7 
<14:40>, 42:6
direct [2] <13:56> - 13:13 <14:15>, 24:20
directly [1] <13:49> - 8:21
disagree [2] <13:54> - 11:16 <14:53>, 
49:18
disagrees [1] <14:04> - 18:15
discipline [4] <13:52> - 11:1 <13:54>, 
11:23 <13:54>, 12:3 <13:56>, 13:16
disclaiming [1] <14:32> - 36:15
disclosure [1] <14:58> - 52:16
discretion [3] <13:44> - 4:11 <14:38>, 
40:13 <14:52>, 49:6
discussed [2] <13:45> - 5:7 <14:13>, 
24:7
Discussion [2] <14:17> - 26:5 <14:51>, 
48:1
discussion [1] <14:22> - 29:14
discussions [1] <13:45> - 5:14
displayed [2] <14:47> - 46:9 <14:54>, 
49:21
disregard [3] <14:45> - 45:5 <14:53>, 
49:9 <14:55>, 50:10
distorts [1] <13:58> - 14:9
58
distress [1] <14:21> - 28:25
district [1] <14:58> - 52:10
disturb [1] <13:59> - 15:10
dock [1] <14:24> - 31:5
docket [7] <13:50> - 9:13 <13:55>, 12:15 
<13:58>, 14:18 <14:13>, 24:5 <14:20>, 28:7 <14:21>, 
28:24 <14:22>, 29:21
document [1] <13:50> - 9:4
documentation [1] <14:20> - 
28:16
dollars [1] <14:35> - 38:14
done [3] <14:22> - 29:19 <14:46>, 46:1 <14:54>, 
49:23
double [4] <14:02> - 17:4 <14:06>, 20:1 <14:10>, 
22:14 <14:12>, 23:20
down [1] <14:31> - 35:22
downward [1] <14:49> - 47:16
dozen [1] <14:24> - 30:17
drawing [1] <14:41> - 42:20
drew [1] <14:30> - 35:7
dropped [1] <14:24> - 31:2
drowning [2] <14:30> - 35:12 <14:38>, 
40:20
drugs [2] <14:07> - 20:5 <14:07>, 20:17
dude [1] <14:35> - 38:16
due [2] <14:04> - 18:4 <14:32>, 36:16
during [13] <13:51> - 10:3 <14:08>, 21:9 
<14:24>, 31:6 <14:24>, 31:8 <14:25>, 31:20 <14:27>, 
32:25 <14:29>, 34:18 <14:41>, 42:14 <14:42>, 
43:5 <14:42>, 43:7 <14:43>, 44:5 <14:55>, 50:8 
<14:56>, 51:5
Dustin [4] <13:41> - 2:5 <13:41>, 2:14 <14:05>, 
19:6 <14:55>, 50:16
E
early [1] <14:03> - 17:21
earned [1] <14:56> - 51:8
earnings [1] <14:57> - 51:15
earns [1] <14:56> - 51:7
easel [2] <14:30> - 35:6 <14:41>, 42:20
egregious [1] <14:07> - 20:20
element [2] <14:02> - 17:2 <14:10>, 
22:11
elements [3] <13:49> - 8:18 <13:51>, 
9:18 <13:51>, 9:21
Eleventh [2] <14:01> - 16:18 <14:09>, 
22:4
emotional [4] <14:16> - 25:18 <14:16>, 
25:23 <14:21>, 28:25 <14:37>, 39:24
emphasize [2] <13:54> - 12:2 <14:08>, 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 58 of 68

21:9
employed [2] <14:09> - 22:1 <14:12>, 
23:11
employee [6] <13:52> - 10:22 <13:54>, 
11:16 <13:54>, 11:19 <13:54>, 11:21 <13:54>, 
12:3 <13:56>, 13:15
employing [2] <14:07> - 20:15 <14:07>, 
20:22
employment [4] <13:52> - 
10:22 <13:55>, 12:18 <13:56>, 13:17 <14:22>, 
29:19
end [8] <14:20> - 28:13 <14:24>, 30:20 <14:36>, 
38:24 <14:45>, 45:2 <14:47>, 46:18 <14:47>, 
46:20 <14:47>, 46:21 <14:49>, 47:15
ended [2] <14:39> - 41:7 <14:45>, 45:7
engaged [10] <13:51> - 9:20 <13:57>, 
13:24 <14:28>, 33:13 <14:28>, 33:20 <14:28>, 
33:23 <14:29>, 33:25 <14:31>, 35:14 <14:31>, 
35:16 <14:31>, 35:19 <14:45>, 45:6
engaging [1] <14:38> - 40:23
engine [1] <14:31> - 35:18
enhancement [19] <14:00> - 
15:19 <14:01>, 16:13 <14:01>, 16:16 <14:02>, 
17:3 <14:03>, 17:10 <14:06>, 19:21 <14:07>, 
20:11 <14:07>, 20:21 <14:08>, 21:4 <14:10>, 
22:14 <14:11>, 22:24 <14:11>, 23:4 <14:12>, 
23:18 <14:13>, 23:23 <14:16>, 25:16 <14:23>, 
30:11 <14:25>, 31:18 <14:26>, 32:6 <14:31>, 
36:2
enhancements [3] <14:01> - 
16:9 <14:07>, 20:19 <14:47>, 46:12
enrich [2] <13:48> - 7:19 <13:49>, 8:9
enriched [2] <13:50> - 9:16 <13:51>, 
10:1
enrichment [1] <13:51> - 10:6
ensure [1] <14:13> - 24:6
entire [4] <14:23> - 30:14 <14:24>, 31:8 <14:25>, 
31:15 <14:42>, 43:1
entirety [1] <13:56> - 13:9
entitled [1] <13:52> - 10:16
entrusted [1] <14:44> - 44:6
entry [8] <13:50> - 9:13 <13:55>, 12:15 <13:58>, 
14:18 <14:13>, 24:5 <14:20>, 28:7 <14:21>, 
28:24 <14:22>, 29:21 <14:59>, 53:8
equal [1] <14:20> - 28:20
era [1] <14:43> - 44:1
essence [1] <14:20> - 28:7
essentially [1] <13:55> - 12:16
establish [2] <14:09> - 22:5 <14:10>, 
22:15
estimate [1] <14:20> - 28:12
evasive [1] <14:02> - 17:7
events [1] <14:54> - 50:1
evidence [17] <13:51> - 10:2 <13:52>, 
10:14 <13:55>, 12:17 <14:00>, 15:14 <14:02>, 
17:5 <14:10>, 22:19 <14:12>, 23:12 <14:15>, 
25:13 <14:19>, 27:12 <14:21>, 29:8 <14:21>, 
29:10 <14:23>, 30:5 <14:23>, 30:7 <14:28>, 
33:12 <14:45>, 45:5 <14:52>, 49:3 <14:52>, 49:4
evident [4] <14:04> - 18:7 <14:24>, 31:8 
<14:25>, 31:9 <14:46>, 46:3
exacerbated [1] <14:31> - 35:13
exactly [4] <13:51> - 10:6 <13:59>, 15:4 
<13:59>, 15:5 <14:20>, 28:8
examined [1] <14:29> - 34:3
examiner [3] <14:28> - 33:19 <14:28>, 
33:24 <14:29>, 34:9
example [3] <14:05> - 19:1 <14:07>, 
20:6 <14:08>, 21:11
exceed [1] <14:21> - 29:7
exchange [1] <13:46> - 6:5
excuse [2] <13:42> - 3:3 <14:12>, 23:20
executed [1] <14:03> - 17:9
exercise [2] <14:27> - 33:5 <14:46>, 
45:21
exhibited [2] <14:53> - 49:18 <14:55>, 
50:8
exists [1] <14:13> - 23:23
expect [1] <14:20> - 28:15
expectations [1] <14:12> - 
23:16
expenses [7] <14:16> - 25:18 <14:16>, 
25:23 <14:19>, 27:15 <14:19>, 27:21 <14:19>, 
28:1 <14:20>, 28:18 <14:21>, 28:25
experienced [1] <14:24> - 31:3
expert [1] <14:08> - 21:14
expertise [1] <14:12> - 23:15
explaining [1] <14:38> - 40:15
explicitly [1] <13:57> - 14:2
explore [1] <14:18> - 27:6
expressed [1] <14:46> - 45:16
expressedly [1] <14:09> - 21:23
extent [1] <14:41> - 42:13
extra [1] <14:15> - 25:9
extreme [6] <14:42> - 43:2 <14:53>, 49:7 
<14:53>, 49:15 <14:54>, 50:6 <14:55>, 50:15
extremely [1] <14:38> - 40:18
F
facilitate [3] <14:10> - 22:16 <14:12>, 
23:11 <14:48>, 47:11
facilitated [2] <14:02> - 16:22 <14:09>, 
22:7
facing [2] <14:03> - 17:24 <14:04>, 18:5
fact [16] <14:04> - 18:5 <14:04>, 18:14 <14:05>, 
18:21 <14:05>, 19:3 <14:06>, 19:16 <14:06>, 
19:18 <14:07>, 20:6 <14:24>, 30:23 <14:25>, 
31:13 <14:25>, 31:14 <14:28>, 33:13 <14:42>, 
42:23 <14:42>, 43:14 <14:53>, 49:19 <14:55>, 
50:11 <14:59>, 53:3
factor [2] <14:40> - 42:7 <14:42>, 43:13
factored [1] <14:43> - 43:17
factors [4] <14:44> - 44:11 <14:49>, 
47:17 <14:51>, 48:13 <14:56>, 50:25
facts [12] <13:43> - 3:12 <13:55>, 12:16 <13:55>, 
12:24 <13:55>, 13:1 <13:58>, 14:9 <14:04>, 
18:17 <14:13>, 23:25 <14:18>, 26:25 <14:23>, 
30:8 <14:24>, 30:20 <14:30>, 34:21 <14:56>, 
50:25
factual [18] <13:43> - 3:18 <13:47>, 6:23 
<13:47>, 7:5 <13:47>, 7:14 <13:51>, 10:9 <13:52>, 
10:19 <13:57>, 13:20 <14:00>, 15:16 <14:00>, 
15:21 <14:00>, 16:2 <14:00>, 16:4 <14:01>, 16:6 
<14:13>, 24:3 <14:13>, 24:6 <14:15>, 25:12 <14:23>, 
30:4 <14:23>, 30:6 <14:33>, 37:4
factually [3] <13:47> - 7:6 <14:11>, 
22:23 <14:15>, 25:10
failed [1] <14:12> - 23:16
failing [1] <13:50> - 9:4
fails [1] <14:10> - 22:15
fairly [1] <14:36> - 39:13
false [7] <13:42> - 3:5 <13:52>, 10:17 <14:26>, 
32:7 <14:26>, 32:10 <14:32>, 36:14 <14:32>, 
36:17 <14:33>, 36:19
falsely [1] <14:32> - 36:15
familiar [2] <13:43> - 3:12 <14:52>, 49:4
family [14] <13:44> - 3:25 <13:44>, 4:3 <13:45>, 
5:12 <13:55>, 12:22 <14:17>, 26:13 <14:34>, 
37:21 <14:36>, 38:21 <14:37>, 39:22 <14:42>, 
43:6 <14:46>, 45:15 <14:54>, 50:4 <14:57>, 52:3 
<14:59>, 53:18 <14:59>, 53:20
far [5] <13:44> - 4:6 <13:47>, 7:9 <13:47>, 7:15 <13:50>, 
9:16 <14:17>, 26:13
fare [2] <14:35> - 38:10 <14:35>, 38:17
fares [1] <14:35> - 38:7
fashioning [1] <14:41> - 42:8
fatal [1] <14:39> - 41:14
favor [2] <14:41> - 42:12 <14:44>, 44:15
feature [1] <14:25> - 31:13
federal [1] <13:58> - 14:7
Federal [1] <14:56> - 51:7
fell [1] <14:21> - 29:2
few [2] <13:45> - 4:19 <14:35>, 38:7
fewer [1] <13:57> - 14:3
Fifth [1] <14:05> - 19:1
59
file [5] <13:54> - 11:16 <13:54>, 11:19 <13:54>, 
11:21 <13:56>, 13:15 <14:15>, 24:15
filed [4] <13:43> - 3:15 <13:43>, 3:16 <14:03>, 
17:21 <14:59>, 53:8
filing [1] <14:03> - 17:18
filings [1] <13:43> - 3:13
final [1] <14:09> - 21:20
finally [1] <14:57> - 51:25
financial [4] <14:56> - 51:9 <14:56>, 
51:11 <14:57>, 51:22 <14:58>, 52:16
fine [6] <13:49> - 8:5 <14:34>, 37:11 <14:52>, 
48:16 <14:52>, 48:25
fines [1] <14:58> - 52:18
first [15] <13:42> - 3:4 <13:44>, 4:2 <13:47>, 7:13 
<13:47>, 7:14 <13:49>, 8:8 <14:06>, 19:14 <14:34>, 
37:20 <14:34>, 37:23 <14:38>, 40:17 <14:40>, 
41:20 <14:40>, 42:7 <14:43>, 43:24 <14:45>, 
45:10 <14:46>, 45:15 <14:52>, 48:15
first-time [1] <14:45> - 45:10
fishing [1] <14:08> - 21:12
five [3] <13:42> - 3:3 <14:24>, 31:1 <14:35>, 38:9
flagged [1] <14:15> - 24:16
flatly [1] <14:32> - 36:17
FLYNN [2] <14:36> - 39:11 <14:36>, 
39:13
Flynn [14] <13:44> - 4:5 <13:44>, 4:7 <14:05>, 
19:7 <14:05>, 19:8 <14:05>, 19:9 <14:24>, 30:22 
<14:30>, 35:8 <14:36>, 39:8 <14:39>, 41:2 <14:40>, 
41:23 <14:40>, 41:24 <14:40>, 42:5 <14:41>, 
42:15 <14:53>, 49:16
Flynn's [3] <14:36> - 39:1 <14:39>, 41:13 
<14:40>, 41:19
folks [1] <14:12> - 23:14
follow [1] <13:47> - 7:11
following [4] <13:42> - 3:2 <13:44>, 4:9 
<13:56>, 13:14 <14:58>, 52:15
follows [2] <14:33> - 37:7 <14:56>, 51:6
for-profit [1] <14:53> - 49:13
form [1] <14:29> - 34:6
forma [1] <14:59> - 53:10
formal [5] <13:53> - 11:9 <13:54>, 12:3 <13:54>, 
12:8 <13:56>, 13:15 <13:57>, 14:4
former [1] <13:52> - 10:22
forms [1] <13:59> - 15:12
forth [3] <13:48> - 7:24 <14:00>, 15:23 <14:51>, 
48:14
forward [1] <14:53> - 49:12
forwarded [2] <14:57> - 52:1 <14:57>, 
52:2
four [2] <13:51> - 9:21 <14:24>, 30:17
Frances [1] <13:41> - 2:18
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 59 of 68

FRANCIS [55] <13:41> - 2:12 <13:43>, 
3:21 <13:45>, 4:17 <13:45>, 4:23 <13:47>, 7:2 <13:47>, 
7:12 <13:47>, 7:17 <13:48>, 8:3 <13:49>, 8:6 <13:49>, 
8:12 <13:50>, 8:24 <13:50>, 9:7 <13:52>, 10:20 
<13:53>, 11:12 <13:53>, 11:15 <13:54>, 11:20 <13:54>, 
11:25 <13:54>, 12:5 <13:57>, 13:19 <13:57>, 
13:21 <14:00>, 15:17 <14:00>, 15:23 <14:01>, 
16:6 <14:01>, 16:11 <14:03>, 17:15 <14:03>, 
17:22 <14:09>, 21:22 <14:14>, 24:8 <14:15>, 
24:12 <14:15>, 24:17 <14:15>, 24:21 <14:15>, 
24:23 <14:15>, 25:2 <14:15>, 25:6 <14:15>, 
25:11 <14:16>, 25:19 <14:16>, 25:21 <14:16>, 
26:2 <14:17>, 26:6 <14:17>, 26:9 <14:22>, 29:23 
<14:23>, 30:2 <14:26>, 32:4 <14:26>, 32:15 <14:28>, 
33:17 <14:29>, 34:12 <14:33>, 36:24 <14:34>, 
37:16 <14:44>, 44:20 <14:44>, 44:23 <14:46>, 
46:4 <14:48>, 46:23 <14:48>, 47:2 <14:51>, 
48:10 <14:59>, 53:16
Francis [14] <13:41> - 2:13 <13:41>, 2:15 
<13:43>, 3:19 <13:44>, 4:15 <13:45>, 5:7 <13:47>, 6:24 
<14:09>, 21:21 <14:13>, 24:2 <14:22>, 29:21 <14:26>, 
32:3 <14:33>, 36:23 <14:34>, 37:14 <14:44>, 
44:19 <14:51>, 48:8
frankly [2] <14:31> - 35:23 <14:38>, 
40:10
fraud [7] <13:43> - 3:9 <13:50>, 9:5 <13:51>, 
10:12 <13:52>, 10:15 <13:58>, 14:11 <14:15>, 
24:25 <14:43>, 43:20
friend [2] <14:37> - 39:17
friends [2] <14:37> - 39:16
front [2] <14:30> - 35:6 <14:38>, 40:21
full [3] <13:45> - 4:16 <14:33>, 37:5 <14:52>, 49:3
fully [4] <13:43> - 3:11 <13:46>, 6:11 <14:08>, 
21:3 <14:52>, 49:4
funds [1] <13:52> - 10:16
funeral [8] <14:16> - 25:18 <14:16>, 
25:23 <14:19>, 27:15 <14:19>, 27:21 <14:19>, 
28:1 <14:20>, 28:18 <14:20>, 28:21 <14:21>, 
28:25
furtherance [1] <13:49> - 8:10
future [3] <14:21> - 29:6 <14:44>, 44:14 <14:58>, 
52:24
G
gains [1] <14:57> - 51:22
general [1] <14:55> - 50:13
generations [1] <14:35> - 38:18
Ghiz [14] <13:44> - 4:4 <13:44>, 4:6 <14:05>, 
19:7 <14:05>, 19:8 <14:20>, 28:12 <14:24>, 
30:22 <14:30>, 35:8 <14:34>, 37:24 <14:34>, 
38:3 <14:39>, 41:2 <14:39>, 41:13
GHIZ [4] <14:34> - 38:3 <14:35>, 38:5 <14:36>, 
39:2 <14:36>, 39:4
Ghiz-Flynn [5] <14:05> - 19:7 <14:05>, 
19:8 <14:24>, 30:22 <14:30>, 35:8 <14:39>, 41:2
Ghiz-Flynn's [1] <14:39> - 
41:13
gift [1] <14:36> - 39:5
given [7] <14:06> - 19:15 <14:06>, 19:16 
<14:06>, 19:17 <14:07>, 20:20 <14:09>, 21:18 <14:31>, 
35:15
God [3] <13:46> - 5:25 <14:36>, 38:22 <14:36>, 
39:5
golf [2] <13:51> - 10:5 <13:52>, 10:15
government [18] <13:43> - 3:17 
<13:48>, 7:25 <13:50>, 9:11 <13:55>, 12:14 <13:58>, 
14:17 <13:59>, 15:8 <14:01>, 16:19 <14:03>, 
17:19 <14:04>, 18:15 <14:08>, 21:6 <14:09>, 
22:5 <14:11>, 23:7 <14:19>, 28:5 <14:20>, 28:6 
<14:25>, 31:13 <14:27>, 32:21 <14:38>, 40:16 <14:57>, 
51:21
government's [3] <13:49> - 
8:13 <13:51>, 10:2 <14:38>, 40:7
gravity [2] <14:42> - 43:4
greater [1] <14:47> - 46:14
gross [1] <14:57> - 51:14
grossly [1] <14:07> - 20:23
grounding [1] <14:32> - 36:15
Guard [4] <13:57> - 14:4 <13:59>, 14:20 
<13:59>, 15:12 <14:54>, 49:25
guess [1] <13:54> - 12:2
guidance [1] <14:01> - 16:18
guideline [12] <13:47> - 7:9 <14:03>, 
17:11 <14:09>, 21:23 <14:13>, 23:22 <14:33>, 
37:9 <14:34>, 37:20 <14:38>, 40:9 <14:41>, 
42:13 <14:42>, 43:12 <14:45>, 45:2 <14:47>, 
46:12 <14:56>, 50:24
guidelines [7] <14:04> - 18:13 <14:38>, 
40:15 <14:43>, 43:17 <14:43>, 43:19 <14:43>, 
44:2 <14:44>, 44:16 <14:51>, 48:13
guilty [1] <13:42> - 3:1
H
half [1] <14:24> - 30:17
hallmark [1] <14:39> - 41:3
hand [2] <13:46> - 5:22 <13:50>, 9:15
handled [1] <14:33> - 37:4
handling [1] <13:47> - 6:25
happy [1] <14:36> - 39:5
hard [3] <14:27> - 33:8 <14:28>, 33:15 <14:46>, 
45:12
health [1] <14:58> - 52:16
hear [5] <13:46> - 6:5 <14:19>, 28:4 <14:26>, 
32:12 <14:29>, 34:17 <14:34>, 37:20
heard [4] <13:44> - 4:1 <14:05>, 19:9 <14:39>, 
41:4 <14:43>, 43:15
hearing [12] <13:42> - 2:21 <13:43>, 
3:13 <13:43>, 3:20 <13:47>, 6:25 <14:20>, 28:13 
<14:20>, 28:14 <14:21>, 29:6 <14:52>, 48:17 <14:52>, 
48:19 <14:52>, 48:24 <14:58>, 52:24 <14:59>, 
53:17
hearsay [1] <13:53> - 11:5
helm [1] <14:07> - 20:16
help [1] <13:46> - 5:25
hereby [1] <14:52> - 48:25
Hester [1] <14:30> - 34:25
hi [1] <14:34> - 38:3
highlight [2] <14:38> - 40:17 <14:40>, 
41:19
himself [7] <13:48> - 7:20 <13:49>, 8:9 <14:28>, 
33:19 <14:42>, 43:1 <14:42>, 43:8 <14:43>, 44:1 
<14:46>, 45:19
hire [2] <13:57> - 14:4 <14:08>, 21:1
history [6] <13:52> - 11:2 <13:55>, 12:18 
<13:55>, 12:22 <13:56>, 13:17 <14:45>, 45:11
History [1] <14:33> - 37:8
hold [1] <13:48> - 8:3
honestly [1] <14:40> - 42:2
Honor [61] <13:41> - 2:8 <13:41>, 2:12 <13:42>, 
2:19 <13:43>, 3:21 <13:43>, 3:23 <13:44>, 4:2 <13:44>, 
4:4 <13:44>, 4:10 <13:45>, 4:17 <13:45>, 4:23 <13:46>, 
5:18 <13:47>, 7:2 <13:47>, 7:17 <13:47>, 7:18 <13:49>, 
8:4 <13:49>, 8:12 <13:50>, 8:24 <13:50>, 9:11 <13:52>, 
10:20 <13:53>, 11:15 <13:54>, 12:5 <13:55>, 
12:10 <13:55>, 12:13 <13:59>, 14:25 <14:00>, 
15:23 <14:01>, 16:6 <14:03>, 17:15 <14:03>, 
17:22 <14:04>, 18:11 <14:10>, 22:15 <14:14>, 
24:8 <14:15>, 24:23 <14:15>, 25:6 <14:16>, 
25:19 <14:17>, 26:6 <14:17>, 26:12 <14:19>, 
28:3 <14:22>, 29:16 <14:22>, 29:23 <14:22>, 
29:25 <14:23>, 30:2 <14:24>, 31:7 <14:25>, 
31:24 <14:33>, 36:24 <14:33>, 37:2 <14:34>, 
37:16 <14:34>, 37:18 <14:34>, 37:23 <14:36>, 
39:8 <14:36>, 39:11 <14:37>, 40:3 <14:38>, 40:6 
<14:44>, 44:20 <14:44>, 44:25 <14:49>, 47:18 <14:51>, 
48:7 <14:51>, 48:10 <14:59>, 53:5 <14:59>, 
53:12 <14:59>, 53:14 <14:59>, 53:16
Honor's [1] <13:55> - 12:25
hook [1] <14:39> - 41:8
hope [1] <14:59> - 53:19
hoped [1] <14:48> - 46:22
horrible [1] <14:36> - 38:21
horrific [8] <14:38> - 40:19 <14:39>, 
41:15 <14:40>, 41:25 <14:41>, 42:16 <14:41>, 
42:21 <14:42>, 43:10 <14:42>, 43:14 <14:54>, 
50:1
horror [1] <14:40> - 41:18
horrors [1] <14:44> - 44:10
hours [1] <14:58> - 52:8
60
human [3] <14:45> - 45:6 <14:53>, 49:9 <14:55>, 
50:10
hundred [2] <14:35> - 38:14 <14:35>, 
38:17
hurt [2] <14:35> - 38:18 <14:36>, 38:19
hurts [1] <14:35> - 38:14
husband [1] <13:44> - 4:5
I
identify [1] <14:52> - 48:19
immediately [1] <14:58> - 52:21
impact [1] <14:21> - 29:1
impermissible [1] <14:02> - 
17:4
implies [1] <13:57> - 13:23
implying [1] <14:15> - 24:20
important [4] <14:04> - 18:4 <14:09>, 
21:18 <14:42>, 43:13 <14:55>, 50:13
impose [2] <14:49> - 47:15 <14:56>, 
50:22
imposed [4] <14:56> - 51:9 <14:56>, 
51:12 <14:59>, 53:2 <14:59>, 53:7
imposition [1] <14:18> - 26:24
impression [1] <14:21> - 29:2
imprisoned [1] <14:55> - 50:17
imprisonment [4] <14:33> - 
37:10 <14:48>, 47:10 <14:57>, 52:4 <14:58>, 
52:24
improper [1] <13:58> - 14:14
improperly [2] <13:58> - 14:10 <14:26>, 
32:5
inability [1] <14:42> - 43:3
inaccurate [4] <13:47> - 7:6 <13:47>, 
7:16 <13:49>, 8:17 <13:54>, 11:18
inapplicable [1] <14:11> - 22:23
incarceration [3] <14:04> - 18:7 
<14:56>, 51:5 <14:57>, 51:13
incident [3] <14:27> - 33:4 <14:35>, 38:6 
<14:46>, 45:15
incidental [1] <14:02> - 17:1
incidents [2] <13:52> - 10:25 <13:54>, 
11:22
included [6] <13:54> - 11:17 <13:55>, 
12:19 <13:56>, 13:11 <14:09>, 22:2 <14:15>, 
25:7 <14:32>, 36:15
includes [3] <13:52> - 10:23 <13:55>, 
13:2 <14:47>, 46:12
including [4] <13:43> - 3:13 <13:52>, 
10:15 <14:02>, 16:25 <14:55>, 50:12
inclusion [4] <13:52> - 11:3 <13:56>, 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 60 of 68

13:6 <14:16>, 25:18 <14:16>, 25:23
income [1] <14:57> - 51:23
inconsistent [1] <14:00> - 
15:14
incorporated [2] <14:02> - 17:3 
<14:09>, 21:25
incorrect [1] <14:00> - 15:22
increase [1] <14:43> - 43:19
indication [1] <14:55> - 50:9
indictment [3] <13:42> - 3:2 <13:42>, 
3:4 <13:51>, 9:19
individuals [1] <14:12> - 23:15
Industries [1] <14:56> - 51:8
inflame [1] <14:27> - 33:1
inflammatory [1] <14:47> - 46:7
inflicting [1] <14:48> - 47:6
information [8] <13:47> - 7:16 <13:51>, 
9:23 <13:52>, 11:3 <13:53>, 11:7 <13:53>, 11:14 
<13:55>, 12:21 <13:56>, 13:10 <14:26>, 32:10
inherently [1] <14:10> - 22:9
initial [1] <14:03> - 17:21
innocent [1] <14:54> - 50:4
insisted [1] <14:24> - 31:2
inspection [1] <13:57> - 14:4
instant [1] <13:52> - 10:24
instead [1] <14:07> - 20:22
instructions [1] <13:51> - 9:24
intended [3] <14:19> - 27:15 <14:19>, 
27:25 <14:27>, 33:1
intent [4] <13:58> - 14:8 <13:59>, 14:22 <14:15>, 
25:4 <14:45>, 45:5
intentional [3] <13:57> - 13:24 <14:25>, 
31:21 <14:29>, 34:16
intentionally [4] <13:58> - 
14:19 <13:59>, 14:21 <13:59>, 15:3 <14:32>, 
36:14
interests [1] <14:57> - 51:16
Investigation [2] <13:43> - 3:14 
<14:01>, 16:15
invites [1] <13:52> - 11:4
involved [7] <13:45> - 5:13 <14:04>, 
18:15 <14:06>, 20:2 <14:07>, 20:14 <14:46>, 
45:24 <14:47>, 46:8 <14:53>, 49:8
involves [2] <14:08> - 21:2 <14:45>, 
45:4
involving [1] <14:11> - 23:9
issue [14] <13:49> - 8:8 <13:50>, 9:15 <13:50>, 
9:16 <13:51>, 9:25 <13:51>, 10:1 <13:52>, 10:18 
<13:54>, 11:17 <13:55>, 12:12 <13:59>, 15:9 <14:02>, 
17:8 <14:12>, 23:20 <14:19>, 28:5 <14:20>, 28:7 
<14:23>, 30:7
issues [6] <14:04> - 18:3 <14:28>, 33:15 
<14:29>, 34:6 <14:53>, 49:11 <14:54>, 49:25 <14:56>, 
50:23
itemized [4] <14:25> - 31:22 <14:26>, 
32:14 <14:32>, 36:6 <14:33>, 36:20
items [6] <13:43> - 3:19 <13:47>, 6:23 <13:54>, 
11:17 <13:54>, 11:19 <13:56>, 13:15 <14:15>, 
24:14
itself [1] <14:10> - 22:18
J
Jack [1] <13:44> - 4:4
Jail [1] <13:45> - 5:5
Jennifer [1] <14:30> - 34:25
job [2] <14:56> - 51:8 <14:56>, 51:10
joke [1] <14:30> - 35:8
Josh [1] <13:44> - 4:4
Judge [57] <13:45> - 5:4 <13:47>, 7:12 <13:48>, 
7:22 <13:49>, 8:6 <13:50>, 9:7 <13:53>, 11:6 <13:53>, 
11:12 <13:54>, 11:20 <13:57>, 13:19 <13:57>, 
13:21 <13:57>, 13:23 <13:58>, 14:12 <13:58>, 
14:16 <14:00>, 15:17 <14:00>, 15:18 <14:01>, 
16:11 <14:01>, 16:12 <14:02>, 16:23 <14:02>, 
17:5 <14:03>, 17:10 <14:09>, 21:22 <14:09>, 
22:4 <14:11>, 23:1 <14:15>, 24:12 <14:15>, 
24:17 <14:15>, 24:21 <14:15>, 25:2 <14:15>, 
25:11 <14:16>, 26:2 <14:17>, 26:10 <14:19>, 
27:11 <14:20>, 28:6 <14:23>, 30:13 <14:26>, 
32:4 <14:26>, 32:15 <14:28>, 33:17 <14:28>, 
33:22 <14:29>, 34:4 <14:29>, 34:7 <14:29>, 
34:10 <14:29>, 34:18 <14:39>, 41:13 <14:40>, 
41:19 <14:40>, 42:2 <14:44>, 44:8 <14:44>, 
44:23 <14:46>, 45:18 <14:46>, 45:22 <14:46>, 
46:4 <14:47>, 46:11 <14:48>, 46:23 <14:48>, 
47:2 <14:48>, 47:3 <14:48>, 47:8 <14:49>, 47:14 
<14:49>, 47:24 <14:52>, 48:21
judgment [6] <13:46> - 6:18 <14:19>, 
28:2 <14:52>, 49:5 <14:55>, 50:15 <14:56>, 51:9 
<14:59>, 53:8
judicial [1] <14:26> - 32:7
June [1] <14:03> - 17:21
jurisdiction [1] <13:42> - 3:6
jurors [1] <14:40> - 41:17
jury [19] <13:42> - 3:2 <13:49>, 8:18 <13:50>, 
8:22 <13:50>, 9:5 <13:51>, 9:20 <13:51>, 9:24 <13:59>, 
14:22 <13:59>, 15:5 <14:00>, 15:15 <14:08>, 
21:9 <14:23>, 30:8 <14:25>, 31:10 <14:25>, 
31:15 <14:30>, 34:20 <14:30>, 35:2 <14:30>, 
35:6 <14:31>, 35:20 <14:40>, 41:23
jury's [6] <13:49> - 8:14 <13:50>, 9:1 <13:51>, 
10:11 <13:52>, 10:13 <13:59>, 15:10 <14:15>, 
25:14
justice [7] <14:16> - 25:16 <14:25>, 
31:19 <14:26>, 32:9 <14:32>, 36:5 <14:33>, 
36:21 <14:48>, 47:4 <14:57>, 51:16
justifies [1] <14:45> - 45:9
K
keep [3] <14:05> - 18:21 <14:05>, 18:22 <14:09>, 
21:15
keeping [1] <14:39> - 41:6
KELLER [26] <13:41> - 2:8 <13:43>, 3:23 
<13:44>, 4:2 <13:44>, 4:10 <13:50>, 9:11 <13:51>, 9:25 
<13:55>, 12:13 <13:58>, 14:16 <13:59>, 14:25 <13:59>, 
15:2 <14:04>, 18:11 <14:07>, 20:4 <14:08>, 21:6 
<14:20>, 28:6 <14:23>, 30:13 <14:25>, 31:24 <14:29>, 
34:18 <14:31>, 35:18 <14:33>, 37:2 <14:34>, 
37:18 <14:34>, 37:23 <14:36>, 39:8 <14:37>, 
40:3 <14:38>, 40:6 <14:51>, 48:7 <14:59>, 53:14
Keller [10] <13:41> - 2:9 <13:50>, 9:10 <13:55>, 
12:12 <13:58>, 14:15 <14:04>, 18:9 <14:12>, 
23:21 <14:23>, 30:12 <14:29>, 34:17 <14:34>, 
37:17 <14:37>, 40:2
kept [1] <14:43> - 44:1
key [1] <14:45> - 45:1
killed [3] <14:30> - 35:8 <14:39>, 40:25 <14:43>, 
43:25
kind [5] <13:52> - 11:1 <13:54>, 11:23 <13:54>, 
12:8 <14:08>, 21:11 <14:37>, 39:19
knowledge [6] <14:02> - 17:6 <14:05>, 
19:10 <14:06>, 19:11 <14:06>, 19:19 <14:09>, 
21:17 <14:10>, 22:20
knows [1] <13:45> - 5:4
L
labyrinthian [1] <14:43> - 43:18
lack [4] <14:42> - 43:2 <14:42>, 43:3 <14:53>, 
49:18 <14:55>, 50:9
language [17] <13:49> - 8:13 <13:49>, 
8:15 <13:49>, 8:21 <13:50>, 8:25 <13:50>, 9:17 
<13:51>, 9:23 <13:51>, 10:7 <13:52>, 10:13 <13:56>, 
13:7 <13:56>, 13:14 <14:00>, 15:22 <14:11>, 
23:10 <14:12>, 23:20 <14:15>, 24:20 <14:15>, 
24:25 <14:15>, 25:4
laptop [1] <13:49> - 8:4
lasting [1] <14:40> - 42:4
law [8] <13:57> - 14:2 <14:01>, 16:17 <14:20>, 
28:17 <14:42>, 43:9 <14:44>, 44:13 <14:46>, 
45:12 <14:47>, 46:19 <14:48>, 47:5
law-abiding [1] <14:46> - 45:12
lawful [2] <13:58> - 14:8 <14:45>, 45:6
lawfully [1] <13:57> - 14:1
laws [1] <14:20> - 28:19
least [6] <14:32> - 36:11 <14:32>, 36:15 <14:42>, 
43:13 <14:44>, 44:15 <14:45>, 45:2 <14:59>, 
61
53:20
leave [1] <14:59> - 53:10
leaves [1] <14:23> - 30:9
lectern [2] <14:34> - 38:1 <14:44>, 44:21
led [2] <14:37> - 39:23 <14:43>, 43:23
left [1] <14:22> - 29:21
legal [6] <13:47> - 7:7 <13:56>, 13:12 <14:23>, 
30:9 <14:27>, 33:3 <14:27>, 33:5 <14:33>, 37:5
legally [3] <13:58> - 14:6 <14:11>, 22:22 
<14:21>, 29:5
legitimate [2] <13:53> - 11:9 <13:54>, 
12:9
less [1] <14:43> - 44:5
letter [1] <14:18> - 26:14
letters [1] <14:21> - 29:1
level [17] <14:00> - 15:18 <14:01>, 16:12 
<14:02>, 17:3 <14:03>, 17:11 <14:04>, 18:13 <14:06>, 
20:2 <14:08>, 21:2 <14:09>, 21:25 <14:09>, 22:2 
<14:10>, 22:13 <14:11>, 22:24 <14:11>, 22:25 <14:11>, 
23:3 <14:11>, 23:8 <14:26>, 32:5 <14:27>, 32:23
Level [1] <14:33> - 37:8
levied [1] <14:20> - 28:11
license [1] <14:10> - 22:16
licensed [5] <14:01> - 16:16 <14:06>, 
19:17 <14:08>, 20:25 <14:12>, 23:12 <14:46>, 
45:13
licensure [1] <14:12> - 23:13
lie [6] <14:24> - 30:18 <14:24>, 30:19 <14:26>, 
32:16 <14:27>, 33:8 <14:31>, 36:1 <14:55>, 
50:14
lied [13] <14:23> - 30:15 <14:24>, 30:21 <14:24>, 
30:23 <14:24>, 30:25 <14:24>, 31:5 <14:26>, 
32:13 <14:28>, 33:18 <14:28>, 33:22 <14:29>, 
34:4 <14:30>, 34:22 <14:42>, 42:23 <14:43>, 
43:21 <14:46>, 46:1
lies [11] <13:59> - 15:12 <14:25>, 31:21 <14:25>, 
32:1 <14:29>, 34:16 <14:32>, 36:6 <14:41>, 
42:13 <14:41>, 42:14 <14:43>, 43:20 <14:43>, 
44:3 <14:44>, 44:10 <14:54>, 50:2
life [16] <14:27> - 32:24 <14:28>, 33:21 <14:29>, 
34:1 <14:35>, 38:7 <14:35>, 38:14 <14:37>, 
39:15 <14:37>, 39:25 <14:39>, 41:15 <14:41>, 
42:10 <14:42>, 43:6 <14:45>, 45:6 <14:45>, 
45:11 <14:46>, 45:16 <14:53>, 49:9 <14:53>, 
49:16 <14:55>, 50:10
likely [1] <14:54> - 50:1
linked [2] <13:53> - 11:8 <13:54>, 12:7
listed [1] <13:51> - 9:19
literally [1] <14:27> - 33:9
live [2] <14:37> - 39:22
lives [1] <14:41> - 42:10
loan [2] <13:49> - 8:17 <14:24>, 30:23
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 61 of 68

loans [3] <13:51> - 10:4 <14:30>, 34:23 <14:43>, 
44:2
look [2] <14:04> - 18:16 <14:39>, 41:12
looked [1] <14:28> - 33:20
looking [5] <13:53> - 11:10 <14:05>, 
18:20 <14:12>, 23:20 <14:13>, 24:5 <14:15>, 
24:14
loss [2] <14:46> - 45:16 <14:54>, 50:3
losses [4] <14:16> - 25:18 <14:16>, 
25:23 <14:16>, 26:1 <14:52>, 48:24
lost [2] <14:27> - 32:24 <14:53>, 49:16
low [6] <14:45> - 45:2 <14:47>, 46:18 <14:47>, 
46:20 <14:47>, 46:21 <14:48>, 47:3 <14:49>, 
47:15
Lucie [1] <13:45> - 5:5
lunch [1] <14:30> - 35:9
lying [9] <13:58> - 14:19 <13:59>, 14:21 <13:59>, 
15:3 <14:24>, 30:24 <14:25>, 31:9 <14:25>, 
31:10 <14:25>, 31:15 <14:42>, 43:7 <14:43>, 
44:1
M
ma'am [5] <13:46> - 6:1 <13:49>, 8:11 <14:34>, 
37:25 <14:35>, 38:4 <14:36>, 39:6
maintain [1] <13:57> - 14:2
maintaining [2] <14:16> - 25:17 
<14:18>, 26:24
majority [2] <14:23> - 30:6 <14:43>, 
43:16
malfunction [1] <14:28> - 33:12
malice [1] <14:45> - 45:5
mandate [1] <14:13> - 23:22
Mandatory [2] <14:18> - 26:16 <14:20>, 
28:9
mandatory [7] <14:18> - 26:19 <14:18>, 
26:21 <14:18>, 26:23 <14:20>, 28:9 <14:21>, 
29:3 <14:34>, 37:12 <14:58>, 52:13
manner [4] <14:02> - 16:21 <14:09>, 
22:7 <14:10>, 22:17 <14:59>, 53:4
manslaughter [5] <13:42> - 3:5 
<13:58>, 14:10 <14:02>, 16:24 <14:10>, 22:9 <14:18>, 
26:16
marine [1] <13:58> - 14:7
mariner [1] <14:06> - 19:17
maritime [3] <14:02> - 16:25 <14:10>, 
22:10 <14:10>, 22:16
marketed [1] <14:08> - 21:1
material [3] <13:59> - 15:12 <14:26>, 
32:10 <14:57>, 51:19
materially [1] <13:49> - 8:17
matter [3] <14:31> - 35:21 <14:38>, 
40:19 <14:38>, 40:20
matters [1] <14:05> - 18:25
McCabe [53] <13:41> - 2:5 <13:41>, 2:14 
<13:41>, 2:16 <13:42>, 2:21 <13:45>, 4:16 <13:45>, 
4:18 <13:45>, 4:22 <13:45>, 5:2 <13:45>, 5:4 <13:45>, 
5:5 <13:46>, 5:20 <13:46>, 6:4 <13:46>, 6:5 <13:57>, 
13:23 <13:58>, 14:19 <14:02>, 17:5 <14:04>, 
18:1 <14:05>, 19:6 <14:05>, 19:7 <14:06>, 19:16 
<14:08>, 21:13 <14:10>, 22:15 <14:12>, 23:12 <14:18>, 
26:15 <14:21>, 29:10 <14:23>, 30:13 <14:24>, 
30:21 <14:24>, 31:2 <14:24>, 31:5 <14:26>, 32:7 
<14:26>, 32:13 <14:26>, 32:16 <14:26>, 32:19 <14:27>, 
33:3 <14:28>, 33:18 <14:29>, 34:3 <14:31>, 
35:19 <14:32>, 36:9 <14:39>, 41:5 <14:41>, 
42:15 <14:41>, 42:17 <14:42>, 43:7 <14:43>, 
43:16 <14:45>, 45:6 <14:45>, 45:10 <14:46>, 
45:21 <14:47>, 46:16 <14:48>, 47:8 <14:49>, 
47:20 <14:51>, 48:3 <14:52>, 48:15 <14:52>, 
49:2 <14:55>, 50:16
McCabe's [6] <13:46> - 5:17 <14:01>, 
16:16 <14:02>, 17:1 <14:10>, 22:10 <14:11>, 
22:24 <14:41>, 42:13
ME's [1] <14:30> - 35:11
mean [2] <14:07> - 20:15 <14:19>, 27:17
meaning [1] <14:07> - 20:4
meaningful [2] <14:26> - 32:17 
<14:32>, 36:11
means [4] <14:07> - 20:3 <14:07>, 20:7 <14:07>, 
20:14 <14:11>, 23:9
meant [1] <14:35> - 38:11
mechanic [1] <14:29> - 34:5
medical [3] <14:28> - 33:18 <14:28>, 
33:24 <14:29>, 34:9
meet [3] <14:36> - 38:20 <14:37>, 39:19 <14:47>, 
46:14
meeting [1] <14:04> - 18:2
meets [1] <13:49> - 8:18
member [2] <14:34> - 37:21 <14:48>, 
47:13
members [4] <13:44> - 3:25 <13:44>, 
4:3 <13:45>, 5:13 <14:53>, 49:14
membership [2] <13:51> - 10:5 
<13:52>, 10:15
memorandum [4] <13:43> - 
3:16 <14:00>, 15:24 <14:03>, 17:16 <14:38>, 
40:9
mental [1] <14:58> - 52:16
merchant [2] <14:06> - 19:17
merely [1] <14:02> - 17:1
merits [1] <14:04> - 18:10
met [2] <14:02> - 16:23 <14:37>, 39:18
Miami [1] <14:57> - 52:1
microphone [2] <13:46> - 6:4 <13:48>, 
8:1
might [4] <13:59> - 15:9 <14:07>, 20:18 <14:07>, 
20:19
minimize [2] <14:27> - 32:22 <14:32>, 
36:9
minimized [1] <14:46> - 46:2
minimum [4] <14:38> - 40:16 <14:41>, 
42:12 <14:42>, 43:12 <14:56>, 51:11
minute [1] <14:16> - 26:2
mirror [2] <13:49> - 8:13 <13:50>, 8:25
misapprehension [1] <14:42> 
- 43:3
misconduct [2] <13:53> - 11:9 <13:54>, 
12:8
misleading [1] <13:58> - 14:13
mistaken [1] <14:21> - 29:2
misuse [1] <14:03> - 17:9
misused [1] <14:10> - 22:21
mitigating [1] <14:49> - 47:17
Mollie [2] <14:05> - 19:7 <14:43>, 43:25
Mollie's [2] <13:44> - 4:5 <14:41>, 42:10
moment [4] <14:04> - 18:8 <14:11>, 23:5 
<14:13>, 24:2 <14:49>, 47:24
moments [1] <14:40> - 41:25
money [2] <13:51> - 10:3 <14:19>, 27:14
monitor [1] <14:57> - 51:18
monthly [1] <14:57> - 51:14
months [6] <14:03> - 17:12 <14:38>, 
40:10 <14:55>, 50:17 <14:55>, 50:18 <14:55>, 
50:19 <14:56>, 50:23
months' [2] <14:33> - 37:9 <14:58>, 
52:23
moral [1] <14:47> - 46:11
Moran [1] <14:52> - 48:19
moreover [1] <14:02> - 17:5
morning [1] <14:23> - 30:15
most [1] <14:41> - 42:21
motion [2] <13:46> - 6:18 <13:47>, 6:21
motions [1] <13:45> - 5:14
move [1] <13:47> - 7:7
movement [1] <14:28> - 33:11
MR [43] <13:41> - 2:8 <13:43>, 3:23 <13:44>, 4:2 
<13:44>, 4:10 <13:45>, 5:4 <13:45>, 5:10 <13:45>, 5:12 
<13:46>, 5:18 <13:50>, 9:11 <13:51>, 9:25 <13:55>, 
12:13 <13:58>, 14:16 <13:59>, 14:25 <13:59>, 
15:2 <14:04>, 18:11 <14:07>, 20:4 <14:08>, 21:6 
<14:17>, 26:12 <14:18>, 26:21 <14:18>, 27:2 <14:19>, 
27:11 <14:19>, 27:17 <14:19>, 27:24 <14:19>, 
28:2 <14:20>, 28:6 <14:22>, 29:16 <14:23>, 
30:13 <14:25>, 31:24 <14:29>, 34:18 <14:31>, 
35:18 <14:33>, 37:2 <14:34>, 37:18 <14:34>, 
37:23 <14:36>, 39:8 <14:36>, 39:11 <14:36>, 
39:13 <14:37>, 40:3 <14:38>, 40:6 <14:49>, 
62
47:24 <14:51>, 48:3 <14:51>, 48:7 <14:59>, 53:5 
<14:59>, 53:14
MS [59] <13:41> - 2:12 <13:43>, 3:21 <13:45>, 
4:17 <13:45>, 4:23 <13:47>, 7:2 <13:47>, 7:12 <13:47>, 
7:17 <13:48>, 8:3 <13:49>, 8:6 <13:49>, 8:12 <13:50>, 
8:24 <13:50>, 9:7 <13:52>, 10:20 <13:53>, 11:12 
<13:53>, 11:15 <13:54>, 11:20 <13:54>, 11:25 <13:54>, 
12:5 <13:57>, 13:19 <13:57>, 13:21 <14:00>, 
15:17 <14:00>, 15:23 <14:01>, 16:6 <14:01>, 
16:11 <14:03>, 17:15 <14:03>, 17:22 <14:09>, 
21:22 <14:14>, 24:8 <14:15>, 24:12 <14:15>, 
24:17 <14:15>, 24:21 <14:15>, 24:23 <14:15>, 
25:2 <14:15>, 25:6 <14:15>, 25:11 <14:16>, 
25:19 <14:16>, 25:21 <14:16>, 26:2 <14:17>, 
26:6 <14:17>, 26:9 <14:22>, 29:23 <14:23>, 30:2 
<14:26>, 32:4 <14:26>, 32:15 <14:28>, 33:17 <14:29>, 
34:12 <14:33>, 36:24 <14:34>, 37:16 <14:34>, 
38:3 <14:35>, 38:5 <14:36>, 39:2 <14:36>, 39:4 
<14:44>, 44:20 <14:44>, 44:23 <14:46>, 46:4 <14:48>, 
46:23 <14:48>, 47:2 <14:51>, 48:10 <14:59>, 
53:16
must [5] <14:01> - 16:19 <14:11>, 22:23 <14:56>, 
51:8 <14:56>, 51:11 <14:59>, 53:8
N
name [2] <14:34> - 38:1 <14:34>, 38:3
narrative [1] <13:58> - 14:10
naturally [1] <14:28> - 33:10
nature [10] <13:59> - 15:13 <14:04>, 
18:17 <14:07>, 20:20 <14:08>, 21:7 <14:38>, 
40:18 <14:40>, 42:3 <14:40>, 42:4 <14:41>, 42:8 
<14:41>, 42:9 <14:44>, 44:12
navigable [1] <14:55> - 50:14
navigation [1] <14:02> - 17:6
navigational [1] <14:10> - 22:20
necessarily [4] <13:51> - 9:21 <14:07>, 
20:15 <14:08>, 21:2 <14:13>, 23:22
necessary [5] <13:42> - 2:24 <14:20>, 
28:20 <14:47>, 46:14 <14:48>, 47:10 <14:56>, 
50:21
necessitate [1] <14:11> - 23:10
necessity [1] <14:21> - 29:13
need [10] <13:48> - 8:1 <14:00>, 16:5 <14:15>, 
25:15 <14:22>, 29:22 <14:26>, 32:12 <14:44>, 
44:12 <14:44>, 44:13 <14:48>, 47:8 <14:55>, 
50:12
needed [3] <13:51> - 9:20 <14:43>, 44:5 
<14:44>, 44:6
negligence [1] <14:53> - 49:17
nephews [1] <14:36> - 38:19
never [9] <13:52> - 10:25 <13:54>, 11:22 
<14:24>, 30:18 <14:36>, 38:19 <14:37>, 39:16 <14:37>, 
39:18 <14:37>, 39:19 <14:53>, 49:12 <14:59>, 
53:19
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 62 of 68

new [2] <14:15> - 24:13 <14:58>, 52:17
next [4] <13:52> - 10:19 <13:57>, 13:20 <14:00>, 
15:16 <14:53>, 49:13
Nick [1] <13:44> - 4:4
nieces [1] <14:36> - 38:19
noise [1] <14:16> - 26:3
non [1] <14:22> - 29:19
non-adjudicated [1] <14:22> - 
29:19
none [2] <13:54> - 12:2 <13:56>, 13:14
normal [1] <14:41> - 42:21
North [1] <14:57> - 52:1
note [5] <13:44> - 4:2 <13:46>, 6:18 <13:50>, 
9:12 <14:16>, 25:22 <14:21>, 29:12
noted [2] <14:56> - 51:2 <14:58>, 52:18
nothing [7] <13:43> - 3:23 <13:46>, 5:25 
<14:00>, 15:14 <14:39>, 41:1 <14:46>, 45:18 <14:48>, 
47:9 <14:59>, 53:14
notice [2] <14:28> - 33:14 <14:59>, 53:7
number [4] <13:47> - 6:23 <14:15>, 25:4 
<14:22>, 29:14 <14:22>, 29:18
Number [1] <13:41> - 2:5
numerous [1] <13:48> - 7:21
O
O'Keefe [2] <14:05> - 19:1 <14:07>, 20:6
O'Sullivan [11] <13:41> - 2:13 <13:41>, 
2:16 <13:45>, 4:18 <13:45>, 4:24 <13:45>, 4:25 
<13:45>, 5:16 <13:47>, 7:1 <14:22>, 29:15 <14:26>, 
32:3 <14:51>, 48:2 <14:51>, 48:9
O'SULLIVAN [15] <13:45> - 5:4 
<13:45>, 5:10 <13:45>, 5:12 <13:46>, 5:18 <14:17>, 
26:12 <14:18>, 26:21 <14:18>, 27:2 <14:19>, 
27:11 <14:19>, 27:17 <14:19>, 27:24 <14:19>, 
28:2 <14:22>, 29:16 <14:49>, 47:24 <14:51>, 
48:3 <14:59>, 53:5
object [3] <13:55> - 12:23 <13:56>, 13:6 
<14:59>, 53:3
objected [1] <14:14> - 24:11
objecting [3] <13:47> - 7:18 <13:52>, 
10:21 <13:57>, 13:21
objection [31] <13:47> - 7:14 <13:49>, 
8:8 <13:49>, 8:11 <13:50>, 9:12 <13:50>, 9:14 <13:51>, 
10:9 <13:52>, 10:19 <13:54>, 12:4 <13:55>, 
12:14 <13:57>, 13:20 <13:58>, 14:17 <13:59>, 
15:9 <14:00>, 15:16 <14:03>, 17:14 <14:04>, 
18:10 <14:11>, 23:6 <14:13>, 24:1 <14:15>, 25:3 
<14:15>, 25:10 <14:15>, 25:15 <14:16>, 25:17 <14:16>, 
25:22 <14:18>, 26:24 <14:21>, 28:23 <14:22>, 
29:14 <14:22>, 29:17 <14:22>, 29:18 <14:23>, 
30:3 <14:23>, 30:10 <14:31>, 36:4 <14:59>, 53:5
objections [24] <13:43> - 3:14 <13:43>, 
3:17 <13:43>, 3:18 <13:44>, 4:9 <13:45>, 5:8 <13:47>, 
6:23 <13:47>, 7:3 <13:47>, 7:5 <13:47>, 7:7 <14:00>, 
15:24 <14:00>, 15:25 <14:00>, 16:2 <14:00>, 
16:4 <14:01>, 16:7 <14:03>, 17:18 <14:15>, 
24:16 <14:15>, 24:18 <14:15>, 25:12 <14:22>, 
29:24 <14:22>, 29:25 <14:23>, 30:4 <14:33>, 
36:22 <14:33>, 36:25 <14:33>, 37:4
objects [1] <13:56> - 13:16
obligations [3] <14:56> - 51:9 <14:56>, 
51:12 <14:57>, 51:24
obstructed [1] <14:26> - 32:9
obstruction [6] <14:16> - 25:16 
<14:22>, 29:22 <14:23>, 30:10 <14:25>, 31:18 <14:32>, 
36:5 <14:33>, 36:21
obstructive [1] <14:55> - 50:7
obtained [1] <13:52> - 10:16
obvious [2] <14:07> - 20:8 <14:07>, 20:9
obviously [3] <13:43> - 3:11 <14:12>, 
23:16 <14:37>, 39:23
occurred [1] <14:46> - 45:17
ocean [1] <14:28> - 33:15
October [2] <14:52> - 48:21 <14:52>, 
48:25
offender [1] <14:45> - 45:10
offending [1] <14:46> - 45:20
Offense [1] <14:33> - 37:8
offense [33] <13:42> - 3:5 <13:47>, 7:8 <13:51>, 
9:18 <13:52>, 10:24 <14:01>, 16:14 <14:02>, 
16:22 <14:02>, 16:24 <14:02>, 17:2 <14:02>, 
17:3 <14:02>, 17:8 <14:03>, 17:11 <14:04>, 
18:13 <14:06>, 19:22 <14:06>, 20:2 <14:09>, 
21:25 <14:09>, 22:2 <14:10>, 22:8 <14:10>, 
22:11 <14:10>, 22:13 <14:10>, 22:17 <14:10>, 
22:18 <14:11>, 22:22 <14:11>, 22:25 <14:11>, 
23:8 <14:12>, 23:11 <14:27>, 32:22 <14:27>, 
32:24 <14:32>, 36:10 <14:44>, 44:12 <14:53>, 
49:8 <14:54>, 50:5
offenses [1] <14:11> - 23:8
offer [1] <14:28> - 33:22
Office [2] <14:57> - 51:17 <14:57>, 51:18
office [1] <14:58> - 52:10
OFFICER [2] <13:41> - 2:18 <14:59>, 
53:12
Officer [1] <13:42> - 2:20
offset [4] <14:18> - 27:9 <14:19>, 27:13 <14:21>, 
29:11 <14:21>, 29:13
once [3] <14:20> - 28:16 <14:56>, 51:4 <14:57>, 
51:25
one [14] <13:50> - 9:15 <14:05>, 19:8 <14:05>, 
19:9 <14:08>, 21:8 <14:11>, 23:5 <14:23>, 30:9 
<14:25>, 31:25 <14:31>, 35:23 <14:33>, 37:10 <14:36>, 
38:25 <14:37>, 39:19 <14:39>, 41:3 <14:44>, 
44:15 <14:49>, 47:24
one-of-a-kind [1] <14:37> - 
39:19
ones [1] <14:25> - 31:22
operated [1] <14:54> - 49:22
operating [3] <13:57> - 13:24 <14:07>, 
20:7 <14:08>, 21:1
operation [5] <13:57> - 14:3 <14:07>, 
20:3 <14:07>, 20:14 <14:08>, 21:5 <14:11>, 23:9
operational [1] <14:32> - 36:18
opportunity [2] <13:44> - 4:13 <13:45>, 
4:16
opposite [2] <14:29> - 34:2 <14:53>, 
49:19
oral [1] <14:00> - 15:25
orally [1] <13:59> - 15:8
order [8] <13:27> - 2:1 <13:46>, 6:19 <14:05>, 
18:23 <14:06>, 19:12 <14:19>, 27:10 <14:43>, 
44:1 <14:56>, 51:12
ordered [5] <14:52> - 48:17 <14:52>, 
49:1 <14:56>, 51:2 <14:56>, 51:5 <14:58>, 52:20
organic [1] <14:28> - 33:10
otherwise [1] <14:33> - 37:4
ourselves [1] <13:45> - 5:8
outlined [1] <13:42> - 2:24
outside [2] <14:04> - 18:1 <14:43>, 
43:20
outstanding [1] <13:46> - 6:18
overlooked [1] <13:43> - 3:19
overrule [2] <13:59> - 15:8 <14:31>, 
36:4
overruled [6] <13:51> - 10:10 <14:11>, 
23:6 <14:13>, 24:1 <14:15>, 24:24 <14:15>, 25:1 
<14:23>, 30:5
oversaw [1] <14:52> - 49:3
overwhelming [1] <14:28> - 
33:12
P
p.m [1] <14:59> - 53:22
page [4] <13:50> - 9:13 <13:55>, 12:15 <13:58>, 
14:18 <14:20>, 28:7
paid [2] <14:08> - 21:1 <14:19>, 27:19
paid-for-hire [1] <14:08> - 21:1
pandemic [2] <14:43> - 44:2 <14:43>, 
44:5
paper [2] <14:30> - 35:7 <14:41>, 42:20
papers [1] <14:14> - 24:11
paragraph [11] <13:47> - 7:15 <13:52>, 
10:21 <13:53>, 11:10 <13:54>, 12:2 <13:56>, 
13:9 <13:56>, 13:14 <14:11>, 23:5 <14:23>, 
30:11 <14:25>, 31:22 <14:26>, 32:5 <14:26>, 
63
32:14
paragraphs [2] <13:57> - 13:21 
<14:14>, 24:9
parroting [1] <14:55> - 50:10
Part [2] <14:58> - 52:14 <14:58>, 52:19
part [3] <13:59> - 14:21 <14:18>, 27:3 <14:43>, 
44:2
particular [1] <14:38> - 40:23
particularly [1] <14:01> - 16:17
parties [3] <13:47> - 6:20 <14:21>, 29:7 <14:51>, 
48:12
passenger [1] <13:58> - 14:5
passengers [6] <13:57> - 14:3 <14:05>, 
18:24 <14:06>, 19:13 <14:06>, 19:18 <14:53>, 
49:15 <14:54>, 49:23
pattern [2] <14:05> - 19:3 <14:07>, 20:6
pauperis [1] <14:59> - 53:10
pay [7] <14:52> - 48:16 <14:56>, 51:8 <14:56>, 
51:11 <14:57>, 51:14 <14:57>, 51:20 <14:58>, 
52:20 <14:59>, 53:9
payable [1] <14:57> - 51:25
paying [1] <14:08> - 21:3
payment [3] <14:12> - 23:15 <14:57>, 
51:15 <14:57>, 51:18
payments [2] <14:56> - 51:6 <14:57>, 
51:21
payout [1] <14:19> - 27:25
pays [1] <14:20> - 28:20
people [7] <14:06> - 19:23 <14:24>, 31:3 
<14:24>, 31:4 <14:37>, 39:23 <14:40>, 41:16 <14:43>, 
44:5 <14:55>, 50:15
per [2] <14:34> - 37:13 <14:56>, 51:11
percent [2] <14:56> - 51:8 <14:57>, 
51:14
perhaps [2] <14:19> - 27:13 <14:31>, 
35:14
period [2] <14:03> - 17:18 <14:56>, 51:5
perjury [2] <14:15> - 25:6 <14:26>, 32:6
permissibility [1] <14:16> - 
25:25
permissible [4] <14:18> - 26:19 
<14:18>, 26:21 <14:21>, 29:5 <14:58>, 52:17
permissive [2] <14:18> - 26:23 <14:18>, 
26:25
permits [1] <13:57> - 14:2
perpetrated [2] <14:05> - 19:4 <14:43>, 
43:20
persisted [1] <14:54> - 50:2
person [10] <14:05> - 18:19 <14:05>, 
19:4 <14:07>, 20:10 <14:34>, 37:23 <14:35>, 
38:11 <14:37>, 39:20 <14:39>, 41:7 <14:40>, 
42:6 <14:41>, 42:21 <14:58>, 52:9
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 63 of 68

personal [2] <14:26> - 32:18 <14:32>, 
36:12
persons [1] <14:10> - 22:9
pertinent [1] <13:43> - 3:13
phone [2] <13:45> - 5:7 <14:41>, 42:17
phrase [2] <13:48> - 7:19 <13:49>, 8:8
picture [2] <13:43> - 3:18 <14:40>, 41:22
piece [2] <14:30> - 35:7 <14:41>, 42:20
pitch [1] <14:31> - 35:24
place [4] <13:53> - 11:13 <14:06>, 19:14 
<14:43>, 43:24 <14:52>, 48:18
placed [1] <14:57> - 52:5
places [1] <13:48> - 7:21
plenty [1] <14:29> - 34:1
podium [1] <13:48> - 7:22
point [2] <13:54> - 12:2 <14:09>, 21:23
pointing [1] <13:50> - 9:17
policy [2] <14:19> - 27:14 <14:19>, 27:23
position [17] <13:51> - 10:2 <13:51>, 
10:7 <13:55>, 12:15 <13:55>, 12:25 <14:05>, 
18:18 <14:06>, 19:13 <14:06>, 19:15 <14:20>, 
28:17 <14:20>, 28:21 <14:24>, 31:7 <14:25>, 
31:16 <14:30>, 35:5 <14:30>, 35:10 <14:31>, 
35:25 <14:42>, 42:23 <14:44>, 44:8 <14:44>, 
44:10
positions [1] <14:10> - 22:10
possessed [2] <14:01> - 16:20 <14:09>, 
22:5
posttrial [1] <13:45> - 5:13
posture [1] <14:47> - 46:10
potential [1] <14:19> - 27:20
PPP [4] <13:49> - 8:17 <13:51>, 10:4 <14:24>, 
30:23 <14:30>, 34:23
preclude [1] <14:57> - 51:21
predatory [1] <14:45> - 45:8
prefer [1] <13:44> - 4:11
preferable [1] <13:48> - 7:23
prejudicial [3] <13:50> - 9:8 <13:52>, 
11:4 <13:55>, 12:19
preparation [1] <13:46> - 6:6
prepared [1] <13:46> - 6:11
preparing [1] <14:38> - 40:11
prescribed [1] <14:28> - 33:19
present [10] <13:44> - 3:25 <14:05>, 
18:23 <14:09>, 21:19 <14:19>, 27:13 <14:21>, 
29:8 <14:23>, 30:7 <14:29>, 34:13 <14:29>, 
34:14 <14:34>, 37:21 <14:37>, 40:4
presented [2] <14:29> - 34:4 <14:49>, 
47:17
Presentence [2] <13:43> - 3:13 
<14:01>, 16:15
presentence [3] <14:51> - 
48:12 <14:58>, 52:14 <14:58>, 52:19
presents [1] <14:46> - 45:19
presided [1] <13:43> - 3:11
pretty [1] <14:04> - 18:6
previously [1] <14:00> - 16:3
Prison [1] <14:56> - 51:7
prison [1] <14:04> - 18:5
Prisons [3] <14:55> - 50:17 <14:57>, 
51:17 <14:58>, 52:9
pro [1] <14:28> - 33:22
probation [5] <13:41> - 2:17 <13:56>, 
13:13 <14:03>, 17:20 <14:58>, 52:10 <14:59>, 
53:11
PROBATION [2] <13:41> - 2:18 
<14:59>, 53:12
Probation [2] <13:42> - 2:19 <14:57>, 
51:17
probative [1] <13:52> - 11:2
problem [2] <14:06> - 19:24 <14:30>, 
35:1
proceed [3] <13:46> - 6:11 <14:17>, 26:7 
<14:53>, 49:12
proceeding [4] <13:42> - 2:22 <14:26>, 
32:11 <14:27>, 33:6 <14:59>, 53:19
proceedings [4] <14:26> - 
32:17 <14:27>, 33:2 <14:42>, 43:9 <14:59>, 
53:22
process [2] <13:45> - 4:21 <13:45>, 5:1
produces [1] <14:33> - 37:9
professional [1] <14:47> - 
46:17
professionals [1] <14:02> - 
16:25
proffer [3] <14:19> - 27:18 <14:26>, 
32:15 <14:28>, 33:17
profit [1] <14:53> - 49:13
profound [1] <14:40> - 42:5
prohibits [1] <14:09> - 21:24
prolong [1] <14:27> - 33:1
prolonged [1] <14:48> - 47:9
promote [3] <14:44> - 44:12 <14:47>, 
46:19 <14:48>, 47:4
pronounced [1] <14:59> - 53:4
propeller [8] <14:28> - 33:11 <14:28>, 
33:14 <14:28>, 33:19 <14:28>, 33:23 <14:31>, 
35:14 <14:31>, 35:16 <14:31>, 35:19 <14:38>, 
40:24
propellers [5] <14:05> - 18:23 <14:08>, 
21:11 <14:09>, 21:17 <14:09>, 21:19 <14:30>, 
35:1
proper [1] <13:56> - 13:11
properly [3] <13:56> - 13:11 <14:13>, 
23:24 <14:54>, 49:23
proposes [1] <13:56> - 13:7
prosecutor [1] <14:40> - 42:2
prosecutorial [1] <14:15> - 
24:25
prospect [1] <14:04> - 18:7
protect [1] <14:48> - 47:10
prove [4] <14:10> - 22:12 <14:18>, 27:9 <14:19>, 
27:12 <14:21>, 29:12
proven [3] <13:51> - 9:22 <13:59>, 15:4 
<13:59>, 15:13
provide [1] <13:46> - 6:4
provided [3] <13:51> - 10:2 <14:03>, 
17:15 <14:20>, 28:12
provides [1] <14:59> - 53:19
providing [1] <14:26> - 32:10
provision [2] <14:13> - 23:22 <14:21>, 
29:3
PSI [32] <13:43> - 3:17 <13:44>, 4:9 <13:45>, 4:16 
<13:45>, 4:22 <13:45>, 5:2 <13:45>, 5:6 <13:45>, 5:8 <13:47>, 
6:23 <13:47>, 7:6 <13:47>, 7:14 <13:51>, 10:7 <13:52>, 
10:13 <13:55>, 12:17 <13:55>, 12:20 <13:55>, 
13:1 <13:56>, 13:12 <13:59>, 15:2 <14:00>, 
15:14 <14:00>, 15:22 <14:03>, 17:14 <14:03>, 
17:18 <14:10>, 22:15 <14:11>, 23:5 <14:13>, 
24:3 <14:21>, 28:25 <14:23>, 30:10 <14:31>, 
36:4 <14:32>, 36:6 <14:33>, 36:20 <14:33>, 
36:22 <14:33>, 37:4 <14:33>, 37:5
PSR [9] <13:48> - 7:20 <13:52>, 10:21 <13:53>, 
11:7 <13:54>, 12:7 <13:57>, 13:22 <13:57>, 
13:23 <13:58>, 14:14 <14:00>, 15:25 <14:15>, 
25:7
public [3] <14:46> - 45:14 <14:46>, 45:19 
<14:48>, 47:10
pulled [1] <14:30> - 35:6
punishment [2] <14:47> - 46:13 
<14:48>, 47:5
purported [1] <13:59> - 15:13
purpose [8] <13:42> - 2:22 <13:53>, 
11:9 <13:54>, 12:9 <13:59>, 14:20 <13:59>, 15:3 
<14:43>, 43:22 <14:47>, 46:14 <14:55>, 50:13
purposes [2] <13:42> - 2:24 <14:56>, 
50:21
pursuant [1] <14:56> - 51:2
pursue [2] <14:27> - 32:20 <14:46>, 46:5
put [4] <14:00> - 15:23 <14:05>, 19:8 <14:06>, 
19:12 <14:36>, 38:21
putting [1] <14:06> - 19:19
Q
quantity [1] <14:21> - 29:9
64
quarter [1] <14:56> - 51:11
questions [4] <13:45> - 4:20 <13:45>, 
5:3 <13:46>, 5:17 <13:46>, 6:15
quite [2] <14:26> - 32:13 <14:53>, 49:19
quote [1] <14:20> - 28:20
R
raise [3] <13:46> - 5:21 <14:00>, 16:2 <14:33>, 
36:25
raised [5] <14:00> - 16:3 <14:04>, 18:3 <14:13>, 
24:3 <14:13>, 24:7 <14:52>, 49:5
ran [1] <14:24> - 30:25
random [1] <14:41> - 42:22
range [16] <13:47> - 7:10 <14:03>, 17:12 
<14:33>, 37:9 <14:33>, 37:10 <14:34>, 37:11 <14:34>, 
37:20 <14:43>, 43:19 <14:45>, 45:2 <14:45>, 
45:3 <14:47>, 46:18 <14:47>, 46:21 <14:48>, 
46:24 <14:48>, 47:4 <14:49>, 47:16 <14:56>, 
50:24
rate [1] <14:57> - 51:14
re [1] <14:46> - 45:20
re-offending [1] <14:46> - 45:20
reach [1] <14:20> - 28:15
reached [1] <13:50> - 9:5
ready [1] <14:17> - 26:6
reality [1] <14:28> - 33:16
really [3] <14:08> - 21:8 <14:25>, 31:19 <14:30>, 
35:5
realm [1] <14:28> - 33:16
reason [4] <13:50> - 9:3 <14:05>, 18:25 <14:07>, 
20:18 <14:42>, 43:11
reasonable [4] <13:42> - 2:23 <13:51>, 
10:5 <14:52>, 49:6 <14:55>, 50:20
reasons [8] <13:51> - 10:10 <13:59>, 
15:7 <14:11>, 23:6 <14:12>, 23:21 <14:33>, 
36:19 <14:49>, 47:14 <14:53>, 49:12 <14:55>, 
50:12
rebuttal [1] <14:25> - 31:14
received [2] <14:00> - 15:15 <14:19>, 
27:14
recess [1] <14:59> - 53:21
reckless [6] <14:07> - 20:3 <14:07>, 
20:14 <14:07>, 20:23 <14:08>, 21:5 <14:11>, 
23:9 <14:38>, 40:18
recklessly [2] <14:07> - 20:7 <14:07>, 
20:16
recognition [1] <14:47> - 46:8
recognized [1] <13:58> - 14:9
recommendation [1] <14:38> - 
40:8
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 64 of 68

recommended [1] <14:34> - 
37:12
recommending [1] <14:38> - 
40:9
record [8] <13:41> - 2:6 <13:50>, 9:12 <14:13>, 
24:4 <14:26>, 32:13 <14:32>, 36:8 <14:32>, 
36:10 <14:33>, 37:6 <14:46>, 46:3
recreational [3] <13:57> - 13:25 
<13:57>, 14:1 <13:59>, 15:13
rectify [1] <14:29> - 34:6
reduce [1] <14:11> - 22:24
reduced [1] <14:03> - 17:12
referenced [1] <14:58> - 52:14
references [4] <13:44> - 4:14 <13:52>, 
10:22 <13:58>, 14:13 <14:21>, 28:25
referring [1] <13:59> - 14:24
reflect [2] <13:49> - 8:16 <14:45>, 45:8
reflected [2] <14:11> - 23:5 <14:47>, 
46:10
reflects [1] <14:26> - 32:17
refrained [1] <14:47> - 46:7
regarding [2] <13:46> - 6:6 <13:52>, 
11:2
regardless [1] <14:56> - 50:23
regulations [1] <13:58> - 14:7
reintegration [1] <14:48> - 
47:11
rejected [3] <14:23> - 30:8 <14:30>, 
34:20 <14:30>, 35:2
related [3] <13:45> - 5:3 <13:52>, 11:1 <14:20>, 
28:21
relates [1] <14:09> - 21:16
relating [3] <13:55> - 12:22 <14:20>, 
28:16 <14:21>, 29:1
relationship [3] <14:05> - 19:4 <14:05>, 
19:6 <14:07>, 20:9
relative [1] <14:59> - 53:18
release [6] <14:33> - 37:10 <14:57>, 
51:13 <14:57>, 52:4 <14:57>, 52:5 <14:58>, 52:8 
<14:58>, 52:25
released [1] <14:58> - 52:11
relentlessly [1] <14:24> - 31:5
reliability [1] <13:54> - 11:18
relied [1] <14:05> - 19:10
relive [1] <14:40> - 41:21
rely [1] <13:52> - 11:4
relying [2] <14:09> - 21:15 <14:25>, 
31:22
remain [1] <13:55> - 13:1
remaining [1] <14:23> - 30:9
remains [1] <14:56> - 51:4
remand [1] <14:04> - 18:8
remarkably [1] <14:12> - 23:16
remind [1] <14:47> - 46:20
remorse [5] <14:42> - 43:2 <14:42>, 
43:3 <14:46>, 45:16 <14:53>, 49:18 <14:55>, 
50:9
removal [1] <14:11> - 22:24
remove [2] <13:56> - 13:12 <14:21>, 
28:24
removed [2] <13:58> - 14:14 <14:11>, 
22:23
repeatedly [3] <13:57> - 13:23 <14:06>, 
19:18 <14:46>, 46:1
replaced [1] <13:49> - 8:15
Report [2] <13:43> - 3:14 <14:01>, 16:15
report [8] <13:43> - 3:14 <13:58>, 14:14 
<14:15>, 25:7 <14:51>, 48:12 <14:57>, 51:19 <14:58>, 
52:9 <14:58>, 52:14 <14:58>, 52:19
reprimands [3] <13:52> - 10:23 
<13:54>, 11:21 <13:56>, 13:5
reputation [1] <14:12> - 23:14
reputational [1] <14:47> - 46:17
request [4] <13:49> - 8:14 <13:49>, 8:15 
<13:56>, 13:10 <14:21>, 28:24
requesting [2] <13:58> - 14:12 <14:18>, 
26:14
requests [1] <13:56> - 13:8
required [4] <14:10> - 22:12 <14:10>, 
22:18 <14:46>, 45:13
requirement [1] <14:58> - 52:17
resolution [1] <13:44> - 4:9
resolved [6] <13:46> - 6:19 <14:00>, 
16:5 <14:15>, 25:10 <14:22>, 29:17 <14:22>, 
29:18 <14:33>, 37:3
respect [14] <13:49> - 8:7 <13:56>, 13:8 
<13:59>, 15:12 <14:06>, 19:25 <14:11>, 23:3 <14:21>, 
29:8 <14:27>, 33:8 <14:30>, 35:11 <14:42>, 43:9 
<14:42>, 43:10 <14:44>, 44:13 <14:47>, 46:19 <14:48>, 
47:4
respectful [1] <14:27> - 32:25
respectfully [3] <14:04> - 18:15 
<14:46>, 45:22 <14:46>, 46:1
respond [2] <14:03> - 17:20
responded [4] <13:43> - 3:17 <13:50>, 
9:11 <13:55>, 12:14 <14:20>, 28:6
responds [1] <13:58> - 14:17
response [1] <13:58> - 14:18
responses [1] <13:50> - 9:14
responsibility [3] <14:27> - 
33:4 <14:32>, 36:12 <14:46>, 45:14
rest [1] <14:37> - 39:25
restitution [28] <14:16> - 25:25 <14:17>, 
26:13 <14:18>, 26:14 <14:18>, 26:25 <14:18>, 
27:3 <14:19>, 27:10 <14:19>, 27:20 <14:19>, 
28:5 <14:20>, 28:10 <14:20>, 28:13 <14:20>, 
28:19 <14:20>, 28:22 <14:21>, 29:2 <14:21>, 
29:3 <14:21>, 29:5 <14:21>, 29:6 <14:21>, 29:9 
<14:52>, 48:16 <14:52>, 48:17 <14:56>, 51:2 <14:56>, 
51:4 <14:56>, 51:5 <14:57>, 51:14 <14:57>, 
51:18 <14:57>, 51:23 <14:57>, 51:25 <14:58>, 
52:18 <14:58>, 52:24
Restitution [2] <14:18> - 26:16 <14:20>, 
28:9
restrained [1] <14:27> - 32:25
restriction [1] <14:58> - 52:17
result [5] <13:52> - 10:25 <13:54>, 11:23 
<13:55>, 12:11 <14:47>, 46:13 <14:53>, 49:16
resulted [4] <13:54> - 12:3 <13:56>, 
13:15 <14:12>, 23:17 <14:39>, 41:13
resume [1] <14:48> - 47:12
return [2] <14:01> - 16:10 <14:13>, 24:2
revealed [1] <14:28> - 33:24
review [4] <13:45> - 4:16 <13:45>, 4:22 <13:45>, 
5:2 <14:13>, 23:24
reviewed [2] <13:43> - 3:12 <13:45>, 
4:17
revised [1] <13:58> - 14:14
ridiculous [2] <14:31> - 35:22 <14:55>, 
50:10
rights [1] <14:46> - 45:21
risk [3] <14:46> - 45:19 <14:53>, 49:15 <14:55>, 
50:15
role [5] <14:02> - 17:1 <14:05>, 18:22 <14:06>, 
19:20 <14:10>, 22:10 <14:48>, 47:12
ruining [1] <14:41> - 42:10
rules [1] <14:54> - 49:24
ruling [1] <13:47> - 6:20
rulings [1] <14:34> - 37:15
run [1] <14:58> - 52:7
running [2] <14:24> - 31:2 <14:32>, 
36:14
S
safe [3] <14:05> - 18:21 <14:05>, 18:22 <14:09>, 
21:16
safety [1] <14:39> - 41:11
sat [3] <14:31> - 36:3 <14:40>, 42:1 <14:44>, 44:8
satisfaction [2] <13:46> - 5:17 <13:46>, 
6:15
satisfy [1] <14:57> - 51:23
saved [2] <14:28> - 33:21 <14:29>, 34:1
saw [6] <14:39> - 41:13 <14:40>, 41:16 <14:44>, 
44:9 <14:44>, 44:10
65
schedule [1] <14:57> - 51:16
scheme [8] <13:48> - 7:19 <13:49>, 8:9 <13:49>, 
8:10 <13:49>, 8:20 <13:50>, 9:15 <13:50>, 9:16 
<13:51>, 9:20 <13:51>, 9:25
score [1] <14:43> - 43:18
scuba [9] <14:06> - 19:11 <14:06>, 19:16 
<14:08>, 21:7 <14:08>, 21:10 <14:08>, 21:14 <14:12>, 
23:12 <14:44>, 44:6
sea [1] <14:31> - 35:24
seaman's [4] <13:42> - 3:4 <14:02>, 
16:24 <14:10>, 22:9 <14:18>, 26:15
seamanship [1] <14:02> - 17:7
Sean [7] <13:41> - 2:5 <13:41>, 2:14 <13:44>, 4:5 
<13:44>, 4:6 <14:05>, 19:9 <14:36>, 38:22 <14:55>, 
50:16
search [1] <14:58> - 52:17
seat [2] <13:46> - 6:3 <14:36>, 39:6
seated [1] <13:41> - 2:2
second [3] <13:42> - 3:5 <14:41>, 42:11 
<14:42>, 43:11
Section [6] <13:42> - 2:25 <13:43>, 3:8 <13:43>, 
3:10 <14:18>, 26:20 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 
51:3
secure [1] <14:43> - 44:1
see [10] <13:49> - 8:8 <13:50>, 9:4 <13:51>, 
10:11 <13:53>, 11:13 <13:56>, 13:12 <14:12>, 
23:19 <14:27>, 33:8 <14:28>, 33:15 <14:40>, 
41:17 <14:44>, 44:23
seek [1] <14:27> - 32:22
self [4] <14:04> - 18:7 <14:24>, 31:8 <14:25>, 
31:9 <14:46>, 46:3
self-evident [4] <14:04> - 18:7 <14:24>, 
31:8 <14:25>, 31:9 <14:46>, 46:3
selling [1] <14:25> - 31:11
sense [1] <13:59> - 14:23
sentence [26] <13:42> - 2:23 <14:03>, 
17:24 <14:19>, 28:3 <14:25>, 31:17 <14:38>, 
40:10 <14:38>, 40:12 <14:38>, 40:16 <14:41>, 
42:8 <14:41>, 42:13 <14:42>, 43:12 <14:44>, 
44:13 <14:44>, 44:15 <14:45>, 45:1 <14:45>, 
45:10 <14:47>, 46:12 <14:47>, 46:17 <14:48>, 
47:3 <14:48>, 47:11 <14:49>, 47:15 <14:54>, 
50:6 <14:55>, 50:20 <14:56>, 50:22 <14:58>, 
52:23 <14:59>, 53:2 <14:59>, 53:4 <14:59>, 53:7
sentencing [9] <13:42> - 2:21 <13:43>, 
3:15 <13:45>, 5:3 <13:46>, 6:12 <14:37>, 40:5 <14:38>, 
40:8 <14:38>, 40:11 <14:47>, 46:15 <14:49>, 
47:21
sentencing-related [1] 
<13:45> - 5:3
separate [2] <14:18> - 27:4 <14:19>, 
27:18
seriousness [4] <14:27> - 32:22 
<14:27>, 32:24 <14:32>, 36:10 <14:54>, 50:5
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 65 of 68

serve [4] <13:42> - 2:24 <14:48>, 47:5 <14:55>, 
50:13 <14:56>, 50:21
served [1] <14:55> - 50:19
serves [2] <13:53> - 11:9 <13:54>, 12:9
service [1] <14:08> - 21:2
services [1] <14:20> - 28:21
set [4] <14:20> - 28:14 <14:21>, 29:6 <14:51>, 
48:13 <14:52>, 48:25
sets [1] <14:06> - 20:2
setting [2] <14:52> - 48:17 <14:52>, 
48:23
settlement [1] <14:18> - 27:4
seven [1] <14:44> - 44:9
seven-day [1] <14:44> - 44:9
several [2] <13:45> - 5:6 <14:45>, 45:1
severe [1] <14:45> - 45:9
severity [4] <14:03> - 17:24 <14:47>, 
46:10 <14:48>, 47:7 <14:53>, 49:7
shall [10] - 5:24 <14:56>, 51:6 <14:57>, 
51:13 <14:57>, 51:18 <14:57>, 51:25 <14:57>, 
52:4 <14:58>, 52:9 <14:58>, 52:12 <14:58>, 
52:15 <14:58>, 52:20
shape [1] <14:29> - 34:6
shift [3] <14:01> - 16:9 <14:29>, 34:7 <14:46>, 
45:23
shifting [1] <14:27> - 32:20
shorter [1] <14:48> - 47:10
show [4] <13:52> - 10:14 <14:01>, 16:19 
<14:19>, 27:13 <14:20>, 28:16
showed [3] <14:42> - 43:2 <14:42>, 43:8
sic [3] <13:58> - 14:7 <14:28>, 33:22 <14:47>, 
46:13
side [2] <14:21> - 29:10 <14:29>, 34:2
significant [2] <14:47> - 46:16 <14:54>, 
50:6
significantly [3] <14:02> - 16:21 
<14:09>, 22:7 <14:10>, 22:21
silence [2] <14:40> - 41:24 <14:40>, 42:1
simple [1] <14:30> - 35:5
simply [1] <13:58> - 14:8
sincere [1] <14:46> - 45:16
single [2] <14:24> - 30:18 <14:25>, 31:12
sister [4] <14:35> - 38:8 <14:36>, 39:1 <14:36>, 
39:4
sister's [1] <14:35> - 38:14
sitting [5] <14:40> - 41:23 <14:41>, 42:15 
<14:41>, 42:17 <14:41>, 42:18
situation [3] <14:07> - 20:10 <14:36>, 
38:21 <14:43>, 43:23
six [2] <13:42> - 3:3 <13:57>, 14:3
skill [20] <14:01> - 16:14 <14:01>, 16:20 <14:02>, 
16:21 <14:02>, 17:2 <14:03>, 17:9 <14:06>, 
19:22 <14:07>, 20:8 <14:07>, 20:16 <14:07>, 
20:22 <14:08>, 20:24 <14:09>, 21:24 <14:09>, 
22:2 <14:09>, 22:6 <14:10>, 22:20 <14:11>, 23:4 
<14:12>, 23:11 <14:12>, 23:18 <14:13>, 23:23 <14:46>, 
45:14
slight [1] <14:33> - 37:6
society [2] <14:43> - 44:4 <14:48>, 47:12
solemnly [1] <13:46> - 5:23
someone [14] <14:05> - 18:18 <14:05>, 
18:19 <14:05>, 19:2 <14:07>, 20:7 <14:07>, 
20:13 <14:08>, 21:13 <14:09>, 21:15 <14:38>, 
40:20 <14:38>, 40:22 <14:39>, 40:25 <14:39>, 
41:7 <14:42>, 43:5 <14:43>, 43:21
sorry [1] <14:01> - 16:13
sought [2] <14:04> - 18:1 <14:19>, 27:16
speaking [3] <13:44> - 4:6 <13:44>, 4:7 
<13:45>, 5:12
special [18] <14:01> - 16:14 <14:01>, 
16:20 <14:03>, 17:9 <14:06>, 19:22 <14:09>, 
21:24 <14:09>, 22:6 <14:10>, 22:20 <14:11>, 
23:4 <14:11>, 23:10 <14:12>, 23:18 <14:12>, 
23:19 <14:13>, 23:23 <14:34>, 37:12 <14:58>, 
52:15 <14:58>, 52:18 <14:58>, 52:21 <14:58>, 
52:25
specialized [7] <14:02> - 17:6 <14:05>, 
19:10 <14:07>, 20:15 <14:07>, 20:22 <14:08>, 
20:24 <14:09>, 21:18 <14:10>, 22:19
specific [9] <13:47> - 7:8 <13:47>, 7:15 <13:59>, 
14:22 <14:05>, 18:21 <14:07>, 20:21 <14:09>, 
21:16 <14:09>, 22:2 <14:25>, 31:21 <14:26>, 
32:7
specifically [5] <14:08> - 21:8 <14:09>, 
21:15 <14:09>, 21:16 <14:19>, 28:5 <14:20>, 
28:19
spent [4] <13:51> - 10:4 <14:25>, 31:14 <14:43>, 
43:15 <14:45>, 45:11
spoken [1] <13:45> - 5:7
spots [1] <13:48> - 8:2
spouse [1] <14:38> - 40:21
St [1] <13:45> - 5:5
stand [3] <13:46> - 5:21 <14:25>, 31:20 <14:46>, 
46:1
standard [2] <14:02> - 16:23 <14:58>, 
52:13
standing [1] <13:45> - 4:19
start [2] <13:47> - 7:5 <14:23>, 30:12
starting [1] <13:41> - 2:7
state [2] <13:41> - 2:6 <14:33>, 37:6
statement [2] <13:42> - 3:6 <14:34>, 
38:2
statements [6] <13:44> - 4:9 <13:52>, 
10:17 <14:36>, 39:7 <14:37>, 40:2 <14:51>, 48:4 
<14:51>, 48:12
States [19] <13:41> - 2:4 <13:41>, 2:7 <13:41>, 
2:10 <13:42>, 2:25 <13:42>, 3:7 <13:43>, 3:9 <13:43>, 
3:22 <13:51>, 10:11 <14:01>, 16:18 <14:01>, 
16:19 <14:18>, 26:20 <14:33>, 37:1 <14:34>, 
37:21 <14:51>, 48:6 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 
51:3 <14:58>, 52:21 <14:59>, 53:13
status [3] <14:01> - 16:16 <14:10>, 22:12 
<14:12>, 23:13
statute [1] <14:09> - 22:3
Statute [1] <14:01> - 16:13
statutory [3] <13:42> - 2:24 <14:51>, 
48:13 <14:56>, 50:21
stay [3] <13:45> - 4:19 <13:48>, 7:23 <13:48>, 
7:25
sticking [1] <14:14> - 24:10
Stiehl [1] <13:41> - 2:9
stiff [1] <14:44> - 44:15
still [7] <14:15> - 25:15 <14:16>, 25:17 <14:18>, 
26:24 <14:22>, 29:22 <14:31>, 35:18 <14:47>, 
46:18 <14:48>, 47:4
stipulate [1] <14:46> - 46:5
stipulated [1] <14:26> - 32:19
stipulation [1] <14:20> - 28:15
stop [1] <14:39> - 41:11
story [8] <14:27> - 32:23 <14:27>, 33:6 <14:27>, 
33:7 <14:29>, 34:8 <14:32>, 36:13 <14:32>, 
36:14 <14:55>, 50:10
strategy [1] <14:27> - 32:20
stricken [3] <13:53> - 11:7 <13:54>, 12:6 
<13:55>, 12:10
strike [1] <13:56> - 13:9
strong [1] <14:46> - 45:15
structure [1] <13:47> - 7:11
stuff [3] <13:55> - 12:21 <14:15>, 25:9 <14:30>, 
35:2
subject [2] <13:57> - 13:18 <14:55>, 
50:14
subjecting [1] <14:53> - 49:14
subjects [1] <14:26> - 32:14
submit [4] <13:53> - 11:6 <14:25>, 32:1 <14:42>, 
43:11 <14:44>, 44:16
submitted [2] <14:18> - 26:14 <14:24>, 
30:23
submitting [2] <13:49> - 8:16 <14:30>, 
34:24
subsection [1] <14:25> - 31:23
sucked [1] <14:24> - 30:22
suffered [1] <14:47> - 46:16
sufficient [3] <14:06> - 19:20 <14:25>, 
31:25 <14:48>, 47:6
suggesting [2] <13:58> - 14:7 <14:15>, 
66
25:4
suggestion [1] <13:55> - 12:25
suggestions [1] <14:53> - 49:9
suggests [2] <14:46> - 45:18 <14:48>, 
47:9
suit [2] <14:19> - 27:18 <14:31>, 35:17
Sullivan [2] <14:17> - 26:9 <14:17>, 
26:11
superficial [1] <14:28> - 33:21
supervised [3] <14:33> - 37:10 
<14:57>, 52:5 <14:58>, 52:25
supervision [2] <14:58> - 52:12 
<14:58>, 52:13
support [2] <14:21> - 29:11 <14:45>, 
45:1
supported [1] <14:32> - 36:7
supposed [1] <13:55> - 12:20
survived [1] <14:31> - 35:14
swear [2] <13:46> - 5:20 <13:46>, 5:23
switch [1] <13:48> - 8:2
system [1] <14:43> - 43:18
T
table [1] <14:40> - 41:22
tactics [3] <14:02> - 17:7 <14:27>, 33:1 <14:47>, 
46:7
talks [3] <14:04> - 18:12 <14:39>, 41:14 <14:40>, 
42:5
Tanner [1] <13:41> - 2:9
technical [1] <14:46> - 45:14
term [4] <14:48> - 47:9 <14:55>, 50:18 <14:57>, 
52:5 <14:57>, 52:6
terms [3] <13:49> - 8:13 <14:06>, 20:1 <14:58>, 
52:7
Terrence [2] <13:41> - 2:13 <13:45>, 
4:18
testified [6] <14:05> - 18:20 <14:06>, 
19:18 <14:23>, 30:13 <14:23>, 30:14 <14:26>, 
32:2 <14:31>, 36:2
testify [3] <13:56> - 13:5 <14:05>, 19:9 <14:24>, 
31:1
testifying [3] <14:32> - 36:17 <14:41>, 
42:16 <14:41>, 42:19
testimony [13] <13:46> - 5:23 <14:24>, 
31:6 <14:26>, 32:7 <14:28>, 33:18 <14:28>, 
33:23 <14:29>, 34:1 <14:29>, 34:2 <14:29>, 34:5 
<14:30>, 35:12 <14:33>, 36:20 <14:34>, 37:22 <14:40>, 
41:19 <14:55>, 50:8
THE [119] <13:41> - 2:2 <13:41>, 2:11 <13:41>, 
2:15 <13:41>, 2:18 <13:42>, 2:20 <13:43>, 3:22 
<13:44>, 3:24 <13:44>, 4:8 <13:44>, 4:12 <13:45>, 4:19 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 66 of 68

<13:45>, 4:25 <13:45>, 5:9 <13:45>, 5:11 <13:45>, 5:15 
<13:46>, 5:19 <13:46>, 6:1 <13:46>, 6:3 <13:46>, 6:7 <13:46>, 
6:8 <13:46>, 6:10 <13:46>, 6:11 <13:46>, 6:13 <13:46>, 
6:14 <13:46>, 6:16 <13:46>, 6:17 <13:47>, 7:4 <13:47>, 
7:13 <13:48>, 7:23 <13:49>, 8:5 <13:49>, 8:7 <13:49>, 
8:20 <13:50>, 9:3 <13:50>, 9:9 <13:51>, 9:23 <13:51>, 
10:9 <13:53>, 11:10 <13:53>, 11:13 <13:54>, 
11:16 <13:54>, 11:24 <13:54>, 12:1 <13:55>, 
12:12 <13:56>, 13:8 <13:57>, 13:20 <13:58>, 
14:15 <13:59>, 14:24 <13:59>, 15:1 <13:59>, 
15:7 <14:00>, 15:20 <14:00>, 16:1 <14:01>, 16:8 
<14:03>, 17:13 <14:03>, 17:17 <14:04>, 18:6 <14:06>, 
19:25 <14:08>, 20:24 <14:09>, 21:20 <14:11>, 
23:2 <14:14>, 24:10 <14:15>, 24:13 <14:15>, 
24:19 <14:15>, 24:22 <14:15>, 24:24 <14:15>, 
25:3 <14:15>, 25:9 <14:15>, 25:12 <14:16>, 
25:20 <14:16>, 25:22 <14:16>, 26:3 <14:17>, 
26:8 <14:17>, 26:11 <14:18>, 26:18 <14:18>, 
26:22 <14:18>, 27:6 <14:19>, 27:12 <14:19>, 
27:22 <14:19>, 27:25 <14:19>, 28:4 <14:21>, 
28:23 <14:22>, 29:17 <14:22>, 30:1 <14:23>, 
30:4 <14:25>, 31:21 <14:26>, 32:3 <14:26>, 32:8 
<14:27>, 33:7 <14:29>, 34:11 <14:29>, 34:14 <14:30>, 
35:11 <14:31>, 36:3 <14:33>, 36:25 <14:33>, 
37:3 <14:34>, 37:17 <14:34>, 37:19 <14:34>, 
37:25 <14:35>, 38:4 <14:36>, 38:25 <14:36>, 
39:3 <14:36>, 39:6 <14:36>, 39:10 <14:36>, 
39:12 <14:37>, 40:1 <14:37>, 40:4 <14:44>, 
44:18 <14:44>, 44:21 <14:46>, 45:25 <14:47>, 
46:20 <14:48>, 47:1 <14:49>, 47:19 <14:49>, 
47:25 <14:51>, 48:2 <14:51>, 48:5 <14:51>, 48:8 
<14:51>, 48:11 <14:52>, 48:23 <14:59>, 53:6 <14:59>, 
53:12 <14:59>, 53:13 <14:59>, 53:15 <14:59>, 
53:17
themselves [1] <14:06> - 19:12
theory [4] <14:23> - 30:8 <14:27>, 33:9 <14:28>, 
33:16 <14:31>, 35:22
therefore [4] <13:59> - 15:5 <14:02>, 
17:4 <14:11>, 22:22 <14:58>, 52:23
thinking [1] <14:31> - 35:24
third [1] <14:42> - 43:13
three [9] <13:43> - 3:8 <13:50>, 8:22 <13:50>, 
9:5 <14:33>, 37:10 <14:38>, 40:17 <14:42>, 
43:14 <14:57>, 52:5 <14:57>, 52:6 <14:58>, 
52:25
throughout [4] <14:26> - 32:17 
<14:37>, 39:15 <14:42>, 43:1 <14:47>, 46:10
thrust [1] <14:28> - 33:11
ties [1] <14:46> - 45:15
Tiffany [5] <13:44> - 4:3 <13:44>, 4:6 <14:20>, 
28:12 <14:34>, 37:24 <14:34>, 38:3
timely [1] <14:03> - 17:14
Title [6] <13:42> - 2:25 <13:42>, 3:7 <13:43>, 3:9 
<14:18>, 26:20 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 51:3
today [15] <13:44> - 3:25 <13:46>, 6:6 <13:46>, 
6:11 <13:46>, 6:19 <14:00>, 15:25 <14:00>, 16:3 
<14:13>, 24:7 <14:20>, 28:17 <14:21>, 29:7 <14:22>, 
29:20 <14:22>, 29:22 <14:32>, 36:12 <14:40>, 
41:20 <14:49>, 47:15 <14:52>, 49:5
today's [4] <13:42> - 2:22 <13:43>, 3:13 
<13:43>, 3:20 <13:47>, 6:25
toll [1] <14:37> - 39:25
took [2] <14:25> - 31:20 <14:35>, 38:9
top [9] <13:50> - 9:13 <14:38>, 40:9 <14:38>, 
40:15 <14:41>, 42:12 <14:42>, 43:12 <14:42>, 
43:14 <14:43>, 43:25 <14:44>, 44:15 <14:52>, 
48:16
total [7] <13:42> - 3:3 <14:03>, 17:11 <14:11>, 
22:25 <14:33>, 37:7 <14:34>, 37:13 <14:58>, 
52:22 <14:58>, 52:23
toward [2] <14:56> - 51:9 <14:56>, 51:11
tragedy [1] <14:47> - 46:8
tragic [2] <14:02> - 17:8 <14:45>, 45:4
train [1] <14:54> - 49:22
training [2] <14:02> - 17:6 <14:10>, 
22:16
transportation [5] <14:07> - 
20:3 <14:07>, 20:8 <14:07>, 20:14 <14:08>, 21:5 
<14:11>, 23:9
trauma [1] <14:44> - 44:9
treatment [2] <14:48> - 47:9 <14:58>, 
52:16
treats [1] <14:39> - 41:6
trial [38] <13:42> - 3:2 <13:43>, 3:11 <13:51>, 
10:3 <13:59>, 15:4 <14:00>, 15:14 <14:08>, 21:9 
<14:10>, 22:12 <14:12>, 23:12 <14:15>, 25:13 <14:23>, 
30:5 <14:23>, 30:7 <14:23>, 30:14 <14:25>, 
31:20 <14:26>, 32:19 <14:27>, 32:25 <14:27>, 
33:6 <14:29>, 34:12 <14:29>, 34:18 <14:31>, 
36:3 <14:32>, 36:7 <14:39>, 41:4 <14:40>, 41:16 
<14:40>, 41:21 <14:40>, 42:6 <14:41>, 42:11 <14:41>, 
42:14 <14:41>, 42:15 <14:42>, 43:1 <14:42>, 
43:5 <14:42>, 43:7 <14:43>, 43:16 <14:44>, 44:9 
<14:46>, 45:22 <14:46>, 46:3 <14:46>, 46:5 <14:52>, 
49:3 <14:55>, 50:8
tried [2] <14:08> - 21:9 <14:29>, 34:5
true [1] <14:30> - 35:2
trust [9] <13:47> - 6:20 <14:05>, 18:19 <14:05>, 
19:8 <14:06>, 19:19 <14:07>, 20:9 <14:08>, 21:2 
<14:09>, 22:1 <14:46>, 45:14 <14:53>, 49:16
trusted [2] <14:12> - 23:15 <14:53>, 
49:15
truth [3] - 5:24 <13:46>, 5:25
truthfulness [1] <13:55> - 12:24
try [2] <14:24> - 30:20 <14:31>, 35:23
trying [5] <14:08> - 21:3 <14:29>, 34:6 <14:30>, 
35:7 <14:31>, 35:20
Tuesday [1] <14:41> - 42:22
tugboat [2] <14:05> - 19:2 <14:07>, 20:5
turn [1] <14:16> - 26:3
turning [1] <14:38> - 40:24
twist [1] <14:24> - 30:20
two [6] <13:50> - 9:14 <14:00>, 15:18 <14:01>, 
16:12 <14:11>, 22:24 <14:11>, 23:3 <14:26>, 
32:5
two-level [5] <14:00> - 15:18 <14:01>, 
16:12 <14:11>, 22:24 <14:11>, 23:3 <14:26>, 
32:5
type [6] <13:53> - 11:8 <13:55>, 12:20 <14:10>, 
22:20 <14:38>, 40:23 <14:45>, 45:8 <14:47>, 
46:7
types [1] <13:55> - 12:17
typically [1] <14:45> - 45:9
U
U.S [4] <13:42> - 2:19 <14:57>, 51:17 <14:57>, 
51:18
U.S.C [2] <13:49> - 8:19 <14:44>, 44:11
ultimate [1] <13:54> - 11:18
ultimately [4] <14:00> - 15:15 <14:12>, 
23:17 <14:31>, 35:15 <14:57>, 52:2
unable [2] <14:31> - 35:15 <14:59>, 53:9
under [17] <13:51> - 10:5 <13:57>, 14:2 <14:00>, 
15:19 <14:01>, 16:13 <14:01>, 16:17 <14:18>, 
26:15 <14:18>, 26:19 <14:18>, 26:25 <14:21>, 
29:1 <14:21>, 29:5 <14:24>, 30:23 <14:32>, 36:5 
<14:43>, 43:18 <14:44>, 44:11 <14:52>, 49:6 <14:54>, 
49:24
underlying [1] <14:54> - 49:20
understood [2] <13:48> - 8:3 <14:47>, 
46:9
unduly [1] <13:55> - 12:19
unexpected [1] <14:57> - 51:22
unfairly [1] <13:52> - 11:4
unfathomable [1] <14:54> - 
50:3
unforeseen [1] <14:45> - 45:7
unhinged [1] <14:31> - 35:15
UNICOR [1] <14:56> - 51:10
United [19] <13:41> - 2:4 <13:41>, 2:7 <13:41>, 
2:10 <13:42>, 2:25 <13:42>, 3:7 <13:43>, 3:9 <13:43>, 
3:22 <13:51>, 10:11 <14:01>, 16:18 <14:01>, 
16:19 <14:18>, 26:20 <14:33>, 37:1 <14:34>, 
37:21 <14:51>, 48:6 <14:51>, 48:14 <14:56>, 
51:3 <14:58>, 52:21 <14:59>, 53:13
unjust [1] <13:51> - 10:6
unjustly [2] <13:50> - 9:16 <13:51>, 10:1
unless [1] <13:41> - 2:2
unnecessary [1] <14:48> - 47:6
unpaid [1] <14:58> - 52:18
unrelated [1] <13:52> - 10:23
67
unresolved [2] <13:47> - 6:22 <13:47>, 
7:14
untimeliness [1] <14:04> - 18:3
untimely [2] <13:43> - 3:16 <14:04>, 
18:10
unverified [1] <13:53> - 11:5
up [11] <14:15> - 24:14 <14:18>, 27:2 <14:18>, 
27:5 <14:28>, 33:13 <14:30>, 35:6 <14:31>, 
35:13 <14:31>, 35:22 <14:34>, 38:1 <14:38>, 
40:21 <14:39>, 41:7 <14:41>, 42:19
UPVA [1] <13:57> - 14:2
upward [2] <14:07> - 20:19 <14:52>, 
49:6
USSG [1] <14:00> - 15:19
V
value [1] <13:52> - 11:2
variance [3] <14:07> - 20:20 <14:49>, 
47:16 <14:52>, 49:6
various [2] <14:32> - 36:6 <14:32>, 
36:14
vast [1] <14:43> - 43:15
verdict [6] <13:42> - 3:3 <13:49>, 8:14 <13:50>, 
9:1 <13:52>, 10:14 <14:15>, 25:5 <14:15>, 25:14
vessel [18] <13:57> - 13:25 <13:57>, 14:1 
<13:58>, 14:5 <13:58>, 14:9 <13:58>, 14:13 <13:59>, 
14:20 <13:59>, 15:4 <13:59>, 15:13 <14:02>, 
17:1 <14:04>, 18:14 <14:08>, 21:1 <14:10>, 
22:11 <14:24>, 30:25 <14:24>, 31:2 <14:53>, 
49:11 <14:54>, 49:24
vessels [1] <13:57> - 14:3
victim [13] <13:44> - 3:25 <13:44>, 4:3 <14:05>, 
19:3 <14:05>, 19:7 <14:07>, 20:10 <14:12>, 
23:17 <14:21>, 29:1 <14:27>, 32:21 <14:32>, 
36:16 <14:46>, 45:23 <14:47>, 46:6 <14:54>, 
50:1 <14:57>, 52:2
Victim [1] <14:18> - 26:16
victim's [2] <14:17> - 26:13 <14:59>, 
53:18
victims [1] <14:43> - 43:15
victims' [1] <14:52> - 48:24
view [2] <14:23> - 30:8 <14:47>, 46:21
violated [1] <14:53> - 49:15
violation [2] <13:42> - 3:7 <13:43>, 3:9
vision [1] <14:39> - 41:9
visited [1] <13:45> - 5:5
W
wages [2] <14:56> - 51:7 <14:56>, 51:8
walk [3] <13:45> - 4:21 <13:45>, 5:1 <14:34>, 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 67 of 68

38:1
wants [3] <14:38> - 40:16 <14:39>, 41:8 <14:39>, 
41:9
ward [2] <14:01> - 16:18 <14:01>, 16:19
warned [2] <14:35> - 38:15 <14:53>, 
49:11
warning [1] <14:06> - 19:24
warranted [5] <14:12> - 23:19 <14:18>, 
27:9 <14:19>, 27:13 <14:29>, 34:12 <14:53>, 
49:7
warrants [1] <14:54> - 50:6
waters [1] <14:55> - 50:14
waves [5] <14:24> - 30:22 <14:28>, 33:11 
<14:30>, 35:7 <14:31>, 35:22 <14:41>, 42:20
weigh [1] <14:44> - 44:14
weighs [1] <14:41> - 42:12
weight [1] <14:47> - 46:11
Weisberg [1] <13:41> - 2:18
whatnot [1] <13:56> - 13:6
white [1] <14:16> - 26:3
whole [2] - 5:24 <14:41>, 42:14
wife [2] <14:35> - 38:9 <14:41>, 42:16
willful [2] <14:45> - 45:5 <14:53>, 49:8
willingness [1] <14:55> - 50:9
windmilling [3] <14:31> - 35:21 
<14:32>, 36:17 <14:55>, 50:11
wire [2] <13:43> - 3:8 <13:50>, 9:5
wish [9] <13:44> - 4:1 <13:44>, 4:8 <14:21>, 29:8 
<14:34>, 37:21 <14:36>, 38:22 <14:44>, 44:21 <14:49>, 
47:21 <14:49>, 47:23 <14:55>, 50:14
wishes [2] <13:44> - 4:12 <14:21>, 29:11
witness [3] <13:56> - 13:5 <14:39>, 41:4 
<14:39>, 41:5
witnesses [4] <13:44> - 4:14 <14:24>, 
31:1 <14:27>, 32:21 <14:47>, 46:6
woman [2] <14:28> - 33:10 <14:54>, 50:4
words [2] <13:47> - 7:7 <14:00>, 15:22
wound [2] <14:28> - 33:13 <14:31>, 
35:13
wounds [4] <14:28> - 33:20 <14:29>, 
33:25 <14:31>, 35:13 <14:39>, 41:14
wrapped [1] <14:31> - 35:16
wreckage [1] <14:54> - 50:4
writing [1] <13:59> - 15:8
written [4] <13:46> - 6:19 <13:56>, 13:11 
<14:15>, 24:16 <14:15>, 24:17
wrongdoing [1] <13:57> - 13:24
wrought [1] <14:41> - 42:9
68
Y
year [1] <14:45> - 45:11
years [7] <14:06> - 19:12 <14:33>, 37:10 
<14:36>, 39:14 <14:38>, 40:24 <14:57>, 52:5 <14:57>, 
52:6 <14:58>, 52:25
yesterday [1] <14:03> - 17:16
yourself [1] <14:36> - 38:23
Z
Zachary [1] <13:41> - 2:9
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 128   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2025   Page 68 of 68

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.128.0.pdf
Size
1,103,877 bytes
SHA-256
5859a938a10a59760970973dd12ed8225c2ca58e122c548b58ce7fcaa2f9997a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.128.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top