Amended Order re 88 Order on Motion to Reduce Sentence — USA v. Casseus (Dkt. 89, M.D. Fla.)

Summary

An amended AO 247 order regarding a motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States of America v. Denis Casseus, Case No. 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, dated September 6, 2024 and filed as Document 89. On the defendant's motion for a reduction based on a guideline range later lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission, the order states that the motion is denied for the reasons in probation's memorandum (Doc. 78) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 83). All provisions of the judgment dated October 27, 2023 remain in effect. The printed name is Thomas P. Barber, U.S. District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 
Page 1 ofl 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
for the 
Middle District of Florida 
United States of America 
V. 
Denis Casseus 
Date of Original Judgment: 
October 27, 2023 
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: _____ _ 
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) 
) 
) 
) Case No:
) USMNo: 
Sonthonax B. SaintGermain, AFPD 
2:23-cr-9-TPB-KCD
42013-510 
) 
) 
Defendant's Attorney 
AMENDED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE 
REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 
Upon motion of l the defendant O the Director of the Bureau of Prisons O the court under 18 U.S.C. 
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § lBl.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: 
IXI DENIED for the reasons stated in probation's memorandum (Doc. 78) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 83). 
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted) 
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 
October 27, 2023 shall remain in effect. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Order Date: 
Effective Date: 
September 6, 2024 
---------
(if diferent from order date) 
Judge's signature 
Printed name and title 
THOMAS P. BARBER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 89     Filed 09/06/24     Page 1 of 1 PageID 421

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.89.0.pdf

Size

627,012 bytes

SHA-256

b8572bf17f5d83ae026be33e75b08029157b5b89e20ac08a13ffde261719de2c

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.89.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)