Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Denis Casseus Transcript of Sentencing Proceedings (October 20, 2023) — United States v. Denis Casseus

Court filing

Transcript of Sentencing Proceedings (October 20, 2023) — United States v. Denis Casseus

No. 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF · Doc. 72 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 1 of 46 PageID 312


                     IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                             FORT MYERS DIVISION
       ________________________________
                                       )
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )
                 Plaintiff,            )
                                       )
       v.                              ) Case No.: 2:23-CR-3
                                       )
       ISMAELLE MANUEL,                )
                 Defendant.            )
       ________________________________)
                                       )
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )
                 Plaintiff,            )
                                       )
       v.                              ) Case No.: 2:23-CR-9
                                       )
       DENIS CASSEUS,                  )
                 Defendant.            )
       ________________________________)


                              SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS
                      BEFORE THE HONORABLE THOMAS P. BARBER

                                  October 20, 2023
                               9:01 a.m. to 10:01 a.m.

       APPEARANCES:
       FOR THE PLAINTIFF:             YOLANDE G. VIACAVA, ESQUIRE
                                      Office of the United States Attorney
                                      2110 First Street
                                      Room 3-137
                                      Fort Myers, Florida 33901

       FOR THE DEFENDANTS:            ZELJKA BOZANIC, ESQUIRE
                                      Bozanic Law, PA
                                      17100 Royal Palm Boulevard
                                      Suite 1
                                      Weston, Florida 33326

       ALSO PRESENT:                  ISMAELLE MANUEL, DEFENDANT
                                      DENIS CASSEUS, DEFENDANT


       (Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript
       produced by computer-aided transcription.)

                                   REPORTED BY:
                          Rebekah M. Lockwood, RDR, CRR
                             Official Court Reporter
                    (813) 301-5380 | r.lockwooduscr@gmail.com
                      P.O. Box 173496, Tampa, Florida 33672
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 2 of 46 PageID 313
                                                                                     2

   1          (Call to Order of the Court at 9:01 a.m.)

   2               THE COURT:      We're going to do these two cases

   3   together, I think, right, that are here?                Everybody is wearing

   4   red.   What is this, a coordinated deal here?

   5               MS. BOZANIC:      Judge, it was not coordinated, but I

   6   laughed when I saw my clients.

   7               THE COURT:      They coordinated with each other, but you

   8   didn't coordinate with them.

   9               MS. BOZANIC:      I did not coordinate with them.

  10               THE COURT:      We're doing two cases, United

  11   States v. Ismaelle Manuel and Denis Casseus, Case Numbers

  12   23-CR-3 and 23-CR-9.

  13               They are not legally married, but functioning as a

  14   married couple.       We'll do them together sort of.            There's some

  15   parts we'll have to break up.          So who's representing the United

  16   States in these cases?

  17               MS. VIACAVA:      Good morning.       Yvette Viacava with the

  18   United States.        And with me at counsel's table is Special Agent

  19   Brian Kirby with the United States.

  20               THE COURT:      Good morning.

  21               MS. BOZANIC:      Good morning.       Zeljka Bozanic on behalf

  22   of Denis Casseus and Ismaelle Manuel.

  23               THE COURT:      Yeah.     Just sit and put the mic close to

  24   your face.

  25               Both of y'all, raise your right hands for me.


                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 3 of 46 PageID 314
                                                                                 3

   1         (The defendants are sworn.)

   2               THE COURT:    They both have been sworn.         So let's

   3   see -- looks like Ms. Manuel pled guilty May 23, 2023 to

   4   Counts 1 through 3 in an indictment, charging her with bank

   5   fraud, in violation of Title 18 U.S. Code Section 344 and 2.                   I

   6   accepted her plea and adjudicated her guilty.

   7               Then we've got on the same day, Mr. -- am I saying

   8   your name right?      Casseus?

   9               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:      Yes, sir.

  10               THE COURT:    Mr. Casseus pled guilty to Count 1 and 2

  11   of an indictment, charging him with bank fraud, in violation of

  12   Title 18 U.S. Code Section 1344 and 2 and Count 5 of the

  13   indictment charging him with illegal monetary transaction in

  14   violation of Title 18 U.S. Code Section 1957.            So he has a

  15   charge and she doesn't.      Is that what I'm seeing here?

  16               MS. VIACAVA:    Yes, Your Honor.

  17               THE COURT:    So here we are.      First thing we have to

  18   do is figure out the application of the Sentencing Guidelines.

  19               So we'll start with the prosecutor.          Have you had the

  20   opportunity to read and discuss the presentence report, and do

  21   you have any objections to the factual accuracy or Guideline

  22   calculations?

  23               MS. VIACAVA:    Yes.    The government has read the

  24   presentence report as well as we have no objections to the

  25   Guidelines -- sorry.      We have no objection to the Guideline


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24     Page 4 of 46 PageID 315
                                                                                   4

   1   calculation.

   2               And just to remind the Court, on September 15th of

   3   2023, we began the sentencing proceedings.             We ended up

   4   continuing the sentencing proceedings so that we can deal with

   5   the issue of restitution in this case.

   6               THE COURT:    Yeah, I remember.          I just don't know how

   7   far we got in terms of the -- let's say the script of where we

   8   are.

   9               So what about on the defense side of things?              Have

  10   you read the presentence report and gone over it with your

  11   clients?

  12               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, I have.      We went over it, and I

  13   can remind the Court that we went through my previous

  14   objection.    Your Honor overruled my objection of the two levels

  15   for zero-point history, and you stated that even though it's

  16   not November 1st yet, that you will just give the appropriate

  17   sentence that you think is appropriate.

  18               And then the other objection was for the two levels

  19   based on the fact it involved the Economic Aid Act, and Your

  20   Honor overruled that objection as well.

  21               So I think we just ended up at the restitution.

  22   There was an issue with the question of where the money went.

  23               THE COURT:    Yeah, yeah.     That's what we're here to

  24   talk about.    Let me make sure we cross the Ts and dot the Is on

  25   this.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 5 of 46 PageID 316
                                                                                    5

   1               So she's at a total offense level 18.              Is that right?

   2               Okay.     Well, him, that's fine.          He's at -- I want to

   3   make sure this is clear.       He's at level 19; criminal history

   4   category I; advisory range of 30 to 37 months; and supervised

   5   release, 2 to 5 on Count 1 and 1 to 3 on Count 5; restitution,

   6   298,875; possible fine, 10,000 to 2 million; and a 300-dollar

   7   special assessment.       Right?

   8               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        Correct, Your Honor.

   9               THE COURT:     And then she -- let me know when you're

  10   on hers.

  11               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        I'm ready, Your Honor.

  12               THE COURT:     Hers is 18; criminal history category I;

  13   27 to 33; 2 to 5 years' supervised release; restitution,

  14   411,417; fine, 10,000 to 3 million; and a 300-dollar special

  15   assessment.    Right?

  16               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        Correct, Your Honor.

  17               THE COURT:     So we got that all figured out.            And

  18   then, you know, my questions were, what happened to the money,

  19   and, you know, how much can they sell to pay back, and where

  20   are we in terms of dollars and cents on this thing?                So I don't

  21   know who wants to talk first on this.

  22               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, if I may.          Last time we

  23   were here on September 15th, defense counsel indicated that the

  24   bank had seized some money.          The government represented to the

  25   Court that the government had not been involved and would not


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24     Page 6 of 46 PageID 317
                                                                                   6

   1   seek the warrant such as the bank who did so.

   2               Since then, Special Agent Brian Kirby has been in

   3   contact with Fifth Third Bank, based on information that

   4   defense counsel was able to provide subsequent to that hearing.

   5   The government has provided new restitution amounts, at least

   6   pertaining to Mr. Casseus.

   7               THE COURT:    Meaning what?     That you got that money?

   8               MS. VIACAVA:    Meaning the bank seized -- in his case,

   9   the PPP loans had not been forgiven, so the money was still

  10   owed to Fifth Third Bank.      When they found the accounts that

  11   had money in it belonging to him, they seized those funds.

  12   They used those moneys to offset what was owed to them.

  13               THE COURT:    Good.

  14               MS. VIACAVA:    So Fifth Third Bank indicated that they

  15   had --

  16               THE COURT:    Now, do they pay the federal government

  17   back, or do they get to keep the money?

  18               MS. VIACAVA:    They had not received the loan.             The

  19   SBA was not the one who lent the money.              At this point, Fifth

  20   Third was -- they were stuck without the money.               So as a

  21   result, what they have indicated is for one of the accounts,

  22   they were able to offset $92,125 for the PPP loan belonging to

  23   the Best Cars Dealer, Inc., and for the other for, the Best

  24   Filing Tax and Multi Services, Inc., they offset the amount by

  25   $90,254.55.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 7 of 46 PageID 318
                                                                                   7

   1               As a result, they provided what they are still owed

   2   on those PPP loans for the Best Cars Dealer, Inc. is 57,500 and

   3   for the Best Filing Tax and Multi Services, Inc. is $58,995.45

   4   for a total payment owed of $116,495.45, owed to Fifth Third

   5   Bank.

   6               The government has provided this request to probation

   7   with these numbers as well as to the defense counsel, and I

   8   believe they are in agreement with the numbers that we were

   9   able to confirm.

  10               THE COURT:     That's his restitution, the 116,495.

  11   Everybody agrees to that.       Yes?

  12               MS. BOZANIC:     Yes, Your Honor.

  13               THE COURT:     Okay.     So you've got that down?

  14               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        I do, Your Honor.

  15               THE COURT:     Okay.     Good.   Well, that changes it.

  16   Instead of -- that was my question last time, what did he do

  17   with 300 grand?       So we got that figured out.

  18               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, if I may, in terms of

  19   Ms. Manuel, defense counsel indicated there was money that was

  20   frozen.    In her case, all the PPP loans had been forgiven,

  21   which means the money is now owed to the SBA.

  22               As a result, Special Agent Brian Kirby was able to

  23   confirm with the bank that they did in fact seize approximately

  24   $52,000 that they were holding onto.            They hadn't -- they

  25   didn't offset anything because they were not owed anything by


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 8 of 46 PageID 319
                                                                                  8

   1   Fifth Third because they had been forgiven.             But they had not

   2   turned it over to the SBA.        So they have that money.         The agent

   3   has been speaking with the bank.

   4               I know that defense counsel indicated their client

   5   was willing to sign whatever they had to to get the money back

   6   to the SBA.    As of this morning, the agent again spoke with

   7   Fifth Third Bank.      They indicated they have determined which

   8   PPP loan they would put the money towards to the SBA, so

   9   they're in the process of returning the money to the SBA.                As

  10   of right now, there's been no money returned to the SBA.                We

  11   indicated that once we get confirmation that has been done, we

  12   would notify probation.

  13               So at this time, we'll be seeking the entire amount

  14   for Ms. Manuel, because SBA has not been made whole yet.                But

  15   we do anticipate there will be a credit hopefully in the next

  16   few weeks.

  17               THE COURT:    Okay.     But what's -- what's the bottom

  18   line going to be?      Let's assume that happens.         That's a bunch

  19   of accounting and paperwork and such.           I'm sentencing her for

  20   the amount of money she stole.         I want to make sure I know what

  21   that real number is.      So how does that all work out?

  22               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, what we anticipate is we

  23   would be asking for a restitution amount of $411,417, which is

  24   the amount of the three PPP loans that she obtained

  25   fraudulently.     We anticipate that in a short order, SBA will be


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 9 of 46 PageID 320
                                                                                    9

   1   given approximately 52,000 that Fifth Third Bank was able to --

   2               THE COURT:     I understand all that.          I'm just asking

   3   you to do the math.       What is the number?

   4               MS. BOZANIC:     Judge, while the government is doing

   5   that, may I remind the Court, there was a house that was

   6   purchased by Ms. Casseus and Ms. Manuel.               That house, it has

   7   now been forfeited.       It is owned by the United States

   8   government and is worth 500,000.

   9               THE COURT:     That's good.      We'll come to that in a

  10   second.

  11               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, if my math is correct, I

  12   believe it will be $359,417.         If anyone else in the court would

  13   like to do the math, it is approximately 52,000, so it would be

  14   roughly that amount.

  15               THE COURT:     Okay.     Now let's keep doing the math

  16   equations here.       None of us were math majors.          That's why we

  17   went to law school.       So we've got to keep this all very simple.

  18               So when all this stuff happens, she owes 359,417.                He

  19   owes 116,495.     But now they -- the money that they stole, they

  20   plugged into a house, which is now being forfeited.

  21               And this is always an interesting little dynamic

  22   where people steal money.       It goes both ways.          I've seen this

  23   over the years.       People will steal money.         If they buy a house

  24   and the house goes up in value, they can then sell it and

  25   actually pay back what they stole.           Sometimes it goes the other


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72   Filed 03/08/24    Page 10 of 46 PageID 321
                                                                                   10

   1    way, where they steal money, they put it in the house, and then

   2    the market declines, and the government -- you know, you could

   3    sell it, but they still owe money.

   4               So where is that coming into play here?

   5               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, in this instance, the house

   6    is subject to forfeiture.       Forfeiture is still separate from

   7    restitution.

   8               THE COURT:     I understand.      But justice is what I'm

   9    doing, not technical legal stuff.         So what's the value of that

  10    going to be?

  11               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, at this time, the Court has

  12    granted a forfeiture in terms of the house.             In Ms. Manuel's

  13    case, in particular, it is at Document 53.             We're asking that

  14    that be made part of the record.         With that, in Document

  15    Number 53, the Court indicated that the net proceeds from the

  16    forfeited property will be credited towards the satisfaction of

  17    the defendant's order of forfeiture.

  18               At this time, the government -- the house has not

  19    been sold.    So at this time, the government does not know what

  20    the value would be.

  21               THE COURT:     Put it in Zillow.          Let's see what it is.

  22               MS. BOZANIC:     Judge, I can tell you what it is.            It's

  23    about 500,000.       The PSI has it at 459.      I don't know if the

  24    probation officer -- what values they use.             They have it at

  25    459.   I have -- after our last sentencing or the sentencing, I


                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 11 of 46 PageID 322
                                                                                  11

   1    have reached out to the forfeiture attorney, Mr. Muench.               I

   2    have asked him whether my client can list the house, because

   3    we're attempting to give back as much money, cash money back to

   4    the government, and Mr. Muench's response was the government

   5    now owns the house and will be selling it.

   6                THE COURT:    I hate that.      That's the second time I've

   7    seen that.    Okay.    When the house could get sold and the money

   8    put in the victim's pocket, no, no, no, no, we've already

   9    started forfeiture.      We have to do it our way.         And it adds a

  10    year to it.    And it -- and, ultimately, the victims don't get

  11    their money back as they should.

  12                And that bothers me.      And there's not a lot I can do

  13    about it.    But if that had happened, I would have said sell

  14    that house to the first buyer that walks through the door,

  15    okay, at whatever price it happens to be, and that money right

  16    now would be back in the government's pocket.             But now we're

  17    going to do forfeiture, and that's going to be sold who knows

  18    when.   Anybody have any idea when that will ever happen?              No.

  19    And so here we are.

  20                But what is the zip -- what is the Zillow value?

  21    Just go on Zillow and do it.        Does somebody have the address?

  22    The reason I'm processing all these numbers like this, this

  23    comes from my experience as a divorce court judge when people

  24    have houses, and they come up with all these crazy values for

  25    it.


                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 12 of 46 PageID 323
                                                                                 12

   1               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, we have a real property --

   2    the real property address is 132 Southwest 10th Place, Cape

   3    Coral, Florida 33991.

   4               THE COURT:    Okay.     I think, Madam Probation Officer

   5    is looking that up.

   6               MS. VIACAVA:    I don't know if the defendants might be

   7    able to speak to whether or not this house was damaged at all

   8    after the hurricane.

   9               THE COURT:    Good question.      What happened with the

  10    hurricane?    That's an easy question.

  11               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:      There's not too much.        The fence

  12    was working.    I fix it 70 percent.       And not that much.

  13               THE COURT:    Did you have a homeowner's policy you've

  14    made claims on or anything?

  15               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:      No.

  16               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        Your Honor, according to

  17    Zillow, the estimated market value is 447,000.

  18               THE COURT:    Okay.     Where is it at?     Is that Cape

  19    Coral?   Where is it?    Lehigh?

  20               THE PROBATION OFFICER:        Cape Coral.

  21               THE COURT:    What's the values like in Cape Coral?            Is

  22    that -- I mean --

  23               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, at this time, it depends on

  24    if the house has been damaged.       Most houses -- many houses in

  25    Cape Coral still have tarps on roofs, flooding.            Depends on


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 13 of 46 PageID 324
                                                                                 13

   1    where the house is located and what happened to them.             There

   2    were a lot of houses that did stand damage from wind, rain,

   3    flooding, things of that nature.

   4               THE COURT:    Zillow has a picture of it on there?

   5               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       Yes, Your Honor.

   6               THE COURT:    Any damage?     Sometimes those pictures are

   7    really current.

   8               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       I can show you, Your Honor.

   9               THE COURT:    Yeah.

  10               MS. VIACAVA:    The case agent --

  11               MR. KIRBY:    Your Honor, it doesn't appear to be any

  12    significant damage.

  13               THE COURT:    Looks pretty good on here.

  14               MR. KIRBY:    Yes, sir.

  15               THE COURT:    That's probably close to a real number.

  16               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, I tell you, my client has told

  17    me there was an inspection after, and there was no real damage.

  18    FEMA apparently came out after the hurricane and was no damage.

  19    They also put in about $30,000 from when they bought the house

  20    to fix it up and buy things.

  21               THE COURT:    I just don't want to find out they've

  22    made a homeowner's claim and then the government owns the house

  23    now and they get a check on the side that nobody knew about.

  24    All right?

  25               Okay.     Well, you know what?      We're not that far apart


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF    Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 14 of 46 PageID 325
                                                                                  14

   1    now.    Okay.   Let's assume that that gets 447.          By what I'm

   2    seeing, they owe 475.      All right.     I'm glad we're doing it this

   3    way.    At the end of the day, the difference, when you figured

   4    it all out, is around $28,000, if I'm doing the math right.                So

   5    here we are.

   6               So what do you want to do with them now that we see

   7    kind of how the numbers net out?         What do you think is

   8    appropriate?

   9               MS. VIACAVA:     Your Honor, this particular instance,

  10    the numbers that the Court is considering go towards

  11    restitution.    It does not -- in terms of the advisory Guideline

  12    range, it is the actual loss or the intended loss.              In this

  13    instance, you have these two individuals that, one, Mr. Casseus

  14    received two PPP loans, Ms. Manuel received three PPP loans

  15    that they did not use for its intended purpose.

  16               THE COURT:     I know that.      I'm not saying what they

  17    did was legal.       What I'm saying is, if you get most of the

  18    money back, that's different than people that take the money

  19    and go to the Indian casino or go on a cruise, and they spend

  20    it all and nobody gets paid back.         I get it.     I mean, they got

  21    be punished.    I'm just saying I punish people differently who

  22    pay the money back than people who blow it and -- you know,

  23    like that lady we have -- is that your case that ripped off the

  24    little, old lady who bought a 7000-dollar big screen TV with

  25    that?   I bumped the Guidelines on her.          But this is a


                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 15 of 46 PageID 326
                                                                                 15

   1    different, you know, scenario.       So keep going.

   2               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, in this particular case,

   3    the government would be requesting a Guideline sentence at the

   4    low end of the Guidelines, ask for each individual.             Therefore,

   5    for Ms. Manuel, the government would be requesting that she be

   6    sentenced to 27 months, which is a low end, with three years'

   7    supervised release to follow, as well as we'd be asking for the

   8    forfeiture that the Court has ordered in Docket Number 53 and

   9    44 be included as part of the judgments.

  10               We would be asking for restitution at this time with

  11    the $411,417 to be made payable to the SBA.           Again,

  12    understanding the caveat that Fifth Third Bank has

  13    approximately $52,000 that may go towards that.            She will get

  14    credited towards that restitution amount once that money is

  15    turned over to the SBA.

  16               We also recommend mental health treatment based on

  17    the information contained in the presentence report.

  18               That would be the government's recommendation as a

  19    reasonable sentence in her case.

  20               In terms of -- in addition, pursuant to the plea

  21    agreement, the government would be move to dismiss Counts 4

  22    through 6 and Count 7, so 4 through 7, actually.

  23               THE COURT:    Okay.

  24               MS. VIACAVA:    And for Mr. Casseus, the government

  25    would be seeking a low end of the advisory Guideline range,


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 16 of 46 PageID 327
                                                                                 16

   1    which is 30 months.     We would be recommending three years'

   2    supervised release.

   3               We would ask for the forfeiture, Document 42, be

   4    included as part of the judgment in this case.

   5               We would be asking for restitution made payable to

   6    Fifth Third Bank in the amount of $116,495.45.

   7               We'd also be asking for alcohol treatment, as

   8    recommended or suggested in the pretrial service report, as to

   9    Mr. Casseus.

  10               That's the government's recommendation based on what

  11    these two individuals, the offense that they committed.              In

  12    this instance, the restitution, Fifth Third Bank took upon

  13    themselves to offset what was owed.         They found money, they

  14    collected it for themselves.       So the restitution amount has

  15    been lowered.

  16               But in terms of the intended loss, the government

  17    would still be arguing that this sentence would be reasonable

  18    based on the advisory Guideline range, and that would be the

  19    recommendation of the government in terms of the sentence.

  20               THE COURT:    Okay.     Talk to me about this.       Do you

  21    know -- have a sense of who masterminded this?            Is one more

  22    culpable than the other?      I mean, we can look at the numbers

  23    and stuff, but that doesn't necessarily tell us -- who -- did

  24    you have the case -- I sentenced a husband and wife with little

  25    kids, very similar, very similar, ages like ten, nine, eight,


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 17 of 46 PageID 328
                                                                                 17

   1    seven, something like that.        And then the mom got pregnant in

   2    the middle of the case.      Was that yours?

   3               MS. VIACAVA:    No.

   4               THE COURT:    That was your case?

   5               MR. KIRBY:    Yes, sir.     I believe that was me.        The

   6    couple moved to North Carolina.

   7               THE COURT:    They blew all the money on ATVs and

   8    stuff.   They're both in prison now.

   9               MR. KIRBY:    Yes, sir, that was me.

  10               THE COURT:    But that was the mom was the mastermind

  11    of that whole thing.     We went back and forth about which, you

  12    know -- what to do about that.       Ultimately, I think it was a

  13    wash, and I just sent them both.        But what do you know here in

  14    terms of -- is one more culpable than the other?            You can

  15    answer if you know.

  16               MR. KIRBY:    Just based on the investigation, a lot of

  17    the phone calls that I obtained from the bank, like where

  18    Mr. Casseus would call and make changes to certain accounts,

  19    the majority of the time, it was always Mr. Casseus calling the

  20    banks and arranging different changes on the accounts,

  21    addresses, and verifying passwords, and things like that.              Very

  22    rarely was it Ms. Manuel.      Based on my investigation, I think

  23    it would be more the responsibility of Mr. Casseus than

  24    Ms. Manuel.

  25               THE COURT:    Okay.     She's sending you a note now.         You


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 18 of 46 PageID 329
                                                                                 18

   1    can just say it.     I mean, it's okay.

   2               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, in addition, last time we

   3    were here, the Court asked the agent where money was being

   4    spent.   And the agent has since looked through the records to

   5    give the Court an idea of where money was being spent.              And he

   6    does have that information.        That's why we're.

   7               THE COURT:    We're down to about 28 grand now

   8    that's -- once you put the money in the house, and then the

   9    money the bank captured, so --

  10               MR. KIRBY:    Right.    So this was just over the course

  11    of a year, the account was small, sample size, which I analyze

  12    the bank account or some of the accounts.           So over the --

  13    between April of 2020 and April of 2021 was approximately

  14    $164,000 sent from these accounts by way of Zelle to numerous

  15    people, to include themselves, family members, and friends for

  16    no apparent --

  17               THE COURT:    Sharing the wealth.

  18               MR. KIRBY:    -- business reasons.        There were $104,000

  19    in cash withdrawals at various banks in the North Fort Myers,

  20    Cape Coral area.     Those withdrawals range from $300 to $9,000

  21    at a time.    There were $36,000 in checks written to the same

  22    people that obtained some of the Zelle payments.            There were

  23    $10,000 in PayPal, eBay purchases.         Some of those PayPal

  24    purchases were actually cash transfers to unknown individuals.

  25    There was $15,000 in purchases from a website called


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 19 of 46 PageID 330
                                                                                  19

   1    alibaba.com.

   2               THE COURT:    Alibaba?

   3               MR. KIRBY:    Just from research, looks like a -- like

   4    a -- almost like a Chinese -- or a version of Amazon or

   5    something like that.     And then there was an additional $5,000

   6    in furniture from Badcock & More Furniture in Cape Coral that

   7    they used to furnish the home.        There was over the course of

   8    year to a year and a half, it was just random -- that was the

   9    majority of the transaction there, other than the purchase of

  10    the house.

  11               MS. VIACAVA:    The Court will recall the government

  12    wasn't aware of these bank accounts.          Since we finished the

  13    investigation, those accounts were empty.            So we were hearing

  14    that now the bank found accounts that had money in it.               And

  15    they --

  16               THE COURT:    Yeah.     They admitted to accounts that you

  17    guys hadn't found yet.     Right?     So it is what it is.

  18               All right.    So in light of everything we've talked

  19    about, what do you -- are you manning up on this and saying

  20    this was your idea mostly?         Are you going to do that, or are

  21    you going to blame her, or what's going on?

  22               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:       Your Honor, she knew nothing.

  23    She didn't know because --

  24               THE COURT:    Do one thing for me.         My ears, as an

  25    American, listen very slowly.        So speak about half as fast as


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 20 of 46 PageID 331
                                                                                 20

   1    you're used to speaking, and I'll be able to understand you.

   2    If you speak at your normal speed, it's hard for me.             Go ahead.

   3                DEFENDANT CASSEUS:     Okay.    So I'm the one that old

   4    friend called me to open the PPP loan.          She don't know nothing

   5    about it.

   6                THE COURT:   She knew nothing about it?

   7                DEFENDANT CASSEUS:     I'm the one who -- but she -- she

   8    don't know nothing.      The old friend called me to ask me to get

   9    the PPP loan.    At the first place, we don't want to do it.              I

  10    tell her she don't want to do it.        Then they call me and keep

  11    saying, it's something for the COVID-19.            It's nothing because

  12    you are referred to it, and then people convince me, and then,

  13    yes, I agree, but it's not --

  14                THE COURT:   Well, I would say you're lucky she

  15    doesn't divorce you, but you haven't been married yet.              Are

  16    you-all staying together through this?

  17                DEFENDANT CASSEUS:     Yes, Your Honor.

  18                THE COURT:   That's what you say.        She didn't say

  19    that.   I'm not sure if what you just said is true and you did

  20    all this and you've got her now in federal court looking at

  21    going to prison, I'm not sure she wants to stay with you.              But

  22    that's a personal matter.      It's none of my business.

  23                I'm just -- is that right?       Is what he just said

  24    right, that that was all his idea?

  25                DEFENDANT MANUEL:      Yes, Your Honor.      I tried to tell


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 21 of 46 PageID 332
                                                                                 21

   1    him not to do it, but he convinced me that the money was for

   2    the business, and we did spend a lot of money in businesses, so

   3    I just do what he asked me to do.

   4               THE COURT:    Well, yeah, you spent the money, too,

   5    knowing it was stolen.     Right?

   6               DEFENDANT MANUEL:       Yes, Your Honor.

   7               THE COURT:    All right.     Anything you want to say on

   8    this?

   9               MS. BOZANIC:    Yes, Your Honor.         Can I use the podium?

  10               THE COURT:    Yeah.

  11               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, so first of all, you know, I'm

  12    glad that my client, Mr. Casseus, owned up to it.             I

  13    understand, based on the investigation, it was his initial

  14    idea.

  15               Ms. Manuel initially thought, well, she has a

  16    different nursing licenses or whatever you call them.             It's a

  17    certified nursing assistant license and assisted living

  18    facility administrative license.        Both of their intention was

  19    initially take the money and open up one of those homes.              She

  20    even transferred money because AHCA needed to see at least

  21    $50,000 in the account.      They previously to this tried to open

  22    a business, were paying rent, $5,000 a month.            They couldn't

  23    get AHCA to approve it because there was a generator missing.

  24               It's long history, Judge.        Most of these -- most of

  25    the money -- you know, this is not a couple that spent money on


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 22 of 46 PageID 333
                                                                                 22

   1    Ferraris or anything like that.        Most of the money they

   2    actually spent, it was going towards opening this business.

   3    Now, logistically, they --

   4               THE COURT:    Are you standing on something?

   5               MS. BOZANIC:    No.

   6               THE COURT:    It just seems --

   7               MS. BOZANIC:    Do I seem to?

   8               THE COURT:    Maybe you're much taller than you seem

   9    when you're sitting.

  10               MS. BOZANIC:    I am.    I'm 6'2".

  11               THE COURT:    When you're sitting, you look like

  12    you're, you know, 5'2".      Just seems like -- sorry, go ahead.

  13               MS. BOZANIC:    So, Judge, this is not a couple that

  14    used money.    Most of these cases I see, people use -- they buy

  15    a fancy car.    They own a 2007 car.       That's what they drive.

  16               THE COURT:    7000-dollar flat-screen TV.          I didn't

  17    even know that existed, but that's what they're doing with the

  18    money, some of the people I've seen.

  19               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, they tried to make this -- they

  20    were going to live in this home.        They bought a home because

  21    they wanted to open this nursing aid or facility where elderly

  22    people live.    She has a license.      She would be the one taking

  23    care of them.    They figured they would live there, too, and she

  24    would have a business.     It just didn't work out.         Obviously,

  25    they couldn't just take the PPP loan to use it towards that.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 23 of 46 PageID 334
                                                                                 23

   1               So we all understand they committed a crime.              I think

   2    Ms. Ismaelle has some of the 3553 factors that Mr. Casseus

   3    doesn't have.    They can look at the Page 55 of the PSI.

   4    Between the age of eight to 17, and there's no family in the

   5    courtroom, so I'll say she had some -- she was molested from

   6    the age of eight to 17.

   7               She came to the US at age of 18.          She had a very hard

   8    life.   She came here, lived with a cousin.          Kicked out at age

   9    of 18 on her own, because she was -- somebody -- a cousin tried

  10    to molest her again, and no one believed her.

  11               She came to Port Charlotte in 2011.           She was only 20

  12    years old.    She has three children with Mr. Casseus.           One is

  13    five years old.      The other one is three years old.         She

  14    actually had a baby.     She took a plea in this case when she was

  15    nine months pregnant.     She had a baby in May.         The baby is four

  16    months old.

  17               She has various health issues.           She was depressed.

  18    She had depression during pregnancy.         She was receiving mental

  19    health therapy at the Dna Comprehensive Therapy Services.              She

  20    was diagnosed with adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and

  21    depressed mood.      She received her high school diploma in 2023.

  22    She started a nursing program in 2021, and she plans to

  23    continue at Rasmussen College.       That's where she started.         She

  24    has a certified nursing assistance license and medication

  25    certification and assisted living administrative license.              She


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 24 of 46 PageID 335
                                                                                  24

   1    has also a real-estate license with Century 21.             So she's a

   2    licensed real-estate agent.        I'm not sure if she'll be able to

   3    keep that after this case.         But she's tried.     She had a hard

   4    life.    She's tried.

   5               I think probation in her case is appropriate, Your

   6    Honor, based on the circumstances of the 3553 factors.               I also

   7    want to mention that even though her Guidelines do show 27 to

   8    33, if we were to look at it with the new Guidelines, they

   9    would be 21 to 27 with the two points.           And I guess just kind

  10    of make it easier to go down to probation.

  11               As far as Mr. Casseus, Mr. Casseus is 44 years old

  12    now.    He has never been arrested.       No criminal history

  13    whatsoever.    He is the type of a guy who works hard.            He works

  14    at a Palm Beach law firm where -- or, actually, I'm sorry, not

  15    a law firm, but a tire facility.         He's an administrative

  16    manager, and he drives people around.           He makes about $4,000 a

  17    month.

  18               He's always been an entrepreneur.           He wanted to make

  19    money.   Somebody came to him with this idea.           And even though

  20    it's wrong, and, yes, people, as we know, in all these cases

  21    use falsified documents to submit these loans and get them, I

  22    think the idea wasn't to go and blow the money on flat-screen

  23    TVs or cars or whatever.      They tried to do a business.

  24               So I think they differ from other people who commit

  25    these crimes in that they actually tried to do a business and


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 25 of 46 PageID 336
                                                                                   25

   1    invest this money and use it for the purposes of the business

   2    that they got it under.      Now, they ended up buying a house.

   3    The government obviously forfeited the house.              They have it.

   4                Since Mr. Casseus has no criminal history, I think

   5    there's -- He's obviously working hard.              He has to support a

   6    family.    He has also two older daughters.           They're 19 and 17.

   7                He just told me that he can pay back the $28,000 and

   8    has to pay back the $28,000 as soon as possible.

   9                Judge, I think variance is appropriate in

  10    Mr. Casseus' case as well.         And while I understand that Your

  11    Honor may not be open to, I guess, giving both of them a break,

  12    aside from Ms. Manuel, if I was just arguing for Mr. Casseus, I

  13    would argue for him to get some type of house arrest.               The

  14    reason why, Judge, is, you know, the government is getting most

  15    of their money back.     He didn't go and blow it on what I just

  16    spoke about.    He's willing to pay back, and he has at least a

  17    job.   He makes decent money, and he actually can afford to pay

  18    it back.    He has three minor children, five, three, and four

  19    months old out there.

  20                Ms. Manuel has all these health conditions.             She has

  21    issues with her gallbladder, the depression, sugar.               She just

  22    keeps having medical issues, and I think that he can be there

  23    as a man to help her.     I know -- we all know he needs to get

  24    punished.   And I know that deterrence is one of the 3553

  25    factors.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 26 of 46 PageID 337
                                                                                 26

   1               Considering that he has never had a case before, he's

   2    never been arrested before -- he also came here as an

   3    immigrant, and in 2007 at 20-something years old, has worked

   4    hard, and you can see that from his PSI.            He's worked hard all

   5    of his life.    And he's in that kind of environment where people

   6    come and say, hey, let's do this.        And he went along with it,

   7    because it was a friend who knew how to do these loans.              And I

   8    don't think he really thought it through.

   9               Nevertheless, he now is a convicted felon that will

  10    follow him for the rest of his life, both of them.             I just

  11    think that it can -- it carries a lot, the fact that they did

  12    not get rich and blow the money, and he has the ability to pay

  13    the government back.

  14               For those reasons, I would ask for Your Honor to

  15    consider giving him some type of a house arrest so he can be

  16    there for his -- so he can work.        I would also ask that at some

  17    point when he's on supervised release, he be able to travel to

  18    the Southern District of Florida, because he works there a lot,

  19    and his family is there as well.

  20               And as far as the restitution and forfeiture, Judge,

  21    I wanted to address that.      I know that when the government

  22    forfeits a property, they usually consider that to be

  23    forfeiture.    In this case, if they sell the property for

  24    500,000, 500,000 in their pocket.        That would be --

  25               THE COURT:    Just a second.      I didn't ask this


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 27 of 46 PageID 338
                                                                                  27

   1    question.   I talked about the concept, but I never asked the

   2    question to get the information.         How much did they pay for it?

   3                MS. BOZANIC:   275.

   4                THE COURT:   275.

   5                MS. BOZANIC:   Plus closing costs.

   6                THE COURT:   Aha.      So they paid 275, but they're

   7    getting credit for whatever it sells for for 447.              So there is

   8    stolen money in there that they blew that is getting covered by

   9    this market increase, which is fine.

  10                MS. BOZANIC:   I can tell you where the money went.

  11                THE COURT:   Well, he did.

  12                MS. BOZANIC:   Well, I actually calculated, so I can

  13    kind of break it down, because a lot of the stuff that the

  14    government is looking at -- Alibaba is a website where you can

  15    buy things for the ALF or whatever you want to call it.

  16                THE COURT:   Have you ever done that website?

  17                MS. BOZANIC:   Yes.     Alibaba is sort of like Amazon,

  18    but you buy equipment.     You buy bigger stuff from China.            A lot

  19    of people right now buy that stuff from Alibaba and resell and

  20    make money.    I know a lot of people who do that.

  21                THE COURT:   And it comes from China and it's not

  22    messed up or anything like that?

  23                MS. BOZANIC:   Not at all.       You can buy -- if you want

  24    to buy a foreign car, my husband has --

  25                THE COURT:   You bought a car from Alibaba?


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 28 of 46 PageID 339
                                                                                   28

   1                MS. BOZANIC:   No, no, no.       If you want to buy a kit.

   2    Let's say you bought a Range Rover.          Right?     And you want to

   3    put a skirt and, you know, a nice kit, or if you have a

   4    Mercedes and you want to buy --

   5                THE COURT:   I don't have a Range Rover or Mercedes,

   6    but that's another story.

   7                MS. BOZANIC:   That is something that costs $50,000.

   8    Alibaba will sell it to you for 15, 20.              It won't be the

   9    original.   But you can make the car look nice and resell it.

  10    Mr. Casseus does have a car dealer, and I know a lot of clients

  11    of mine who have car dealerships, and that's what they do.

  12                So, Judge, back to where the money went.             I can tell

  13    you, Mr. Casseus invested about 120.          So Mr. Casseus straight

  14    from his account set the 120,000, that's in the B side, towards

  15    the purchase of the house.         And the bank took back $183,000.

  16    So the difference is 116.      He actually should not even

  17    technically owe any money.         He did not spend any money.         He

  18    actually overpaid $4,000, if you look at it that way.

  19                THE COURT:   If you look at it that way.

  20                MS. BOZANIC:   So what I'm saying is, nothing out of

  21    his account went towards anything else.              There was 120 for the

  22    house and the bank got back 180.

  23                As far as Ms. Ismaelle, 411, the house was purchased

  24    275 plus closing costs, putting at 300,000.             She paid about 180

  25    out of her account.      52,000 is still in the bank, frozen.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 29 of 46 PageID 340
                                                                                 29

   1    That's going to go back.      The repairs in the house were about

   2    $30,000, which is, I can tell you they paid 10 percent

   3    commission to the person who did the loan.           That's about

   4    $70,000.    Those people who do loans for you, they charge

   5    10 percent.    I've seen them as high as 30 percent.

   6                There's a check in the discovery that goes to -- and

   7    the government knows about it.       Mr. Casseus, in addition, I

   8    forgot to mention as a 3553 factor, he met with the agents, and

   9    he attempted to cooperate and provided this information.

  10    There's a copy of the check for his commission that was paid.

  11    I don't think the agents were able to do anything with it.

  12    Nobody got arrested.     That's also one of the factors to

  13    consider.

  14                So the way I see it, there's an $80,000 difference

  15    that I can't account for.      And based on my review of the

  16    statements, I can see a lot of Walmart purchases, Sam's Club,

  17    and what the agent was stating, and it definitely didn't go on

  18    anything fancy or any hiding of the money.

  19                Ms. Manuel also does help her family.          She helps

  20    everybody.    Her mom lives with her, and her mom does not work.

  21    She supports her mother and some other family members.

  22                So for what it's worth, Judge, I -- I've known them

  23    for a few months now, ever since the beginning of this case.

  24    They are a very decent family.       They're very nice people.         I

  25    know they committed a crime.       I know they have to be punished,


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 30 of 46 PageID 341
                                                                                  30

   1    Judge.

   2               But Mr. Casseus, specifically, with no prior record,

   3    he tried to do everything.         He tried to turn over the person

   4    who put him up to this and who helped him and who got the

   5    $70,000 in commissions.      Nothing came out of it.         I think his

   6    intended loss is obviously much larger than what the actual

   7    loss is.

   8               So for those reasons, I would ask Your Honor to

   9    consider giving him a non-incarceration sentence.

  10               And, Judge, as far as the forfeiture, this is the

  11    last point I want to make.         There's this rule that the

  12    government does, if they forfeiture the money, it doesn't go

  13    towards restitution, because they consider it to be a penalty.

  14    So the government will have about $500,000 in forfeiture for

  15    this house.    Let's call it 470 or 450 or whatever it is.             That

  16    will never get applied towards restitution.

  17               Once you enter an order of restitution for $168,000

  18    for Mr. Casseus and 350 or so or if it's 411 for Ms. Manuel,

  19    that $500,000 will never get credited towards it.              They will

  20    still have that, just because of the way the government does

  21    that.    I think the government can confirm that.           So I don't

  22    know if Your Honor would be willing to kind of figure out the

  23    restitution amount in a little unconventional way, considering

  24    that they are actually getting the house, and they were not

  25    able to sell it, even though we offered.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24    Page 31 of 46 PageID 342
                                                                                  31

   1               THE COURT:    Well, they also get around 200 grand, an

   2    increase in value that's credited to this overall concept.                So

   3    it's -- it's not as clean as it really should be, in my

   4    opinion, but --

   5               MS. BOZANIC:    Understood, Judge.

   6               THE COURT:    All right.     Thank you.

   7               MS. BOZANIC:    Just to let you know, their daughter,

   8    or Mr. Casseus's older daughter wanted to speak on their

   9    behalf.   She was here the last time.        She kind of got cold

  10    feet.   I spoke to her the last time we were here.             She wanted

  11    to tell me about how her father put her through college and how

  12    Ismaelle has been with her since she was nine years.              They are

  13    both great parents.     Her mom actually lives in Haiti and has

  14    now been like a second mother to her.          She's just very nervous

  15    and didn't want to come today.

  16               THE COURT:    Hope I didn't scare her.          I'm pretty easy

  17    to deal with.

  18               MS. BOZANIC:    I know you are, Judge.          She's 19 years

  19    old.

  20               THE COURT:    Maybe you scared her.

  21               MS. BOZANIC:    Maybe.

  22               THE COURT:    All right.     I'm just teasing you.

  23               What do you guys want to say?            You want to say

  24    anything else?

  25               DEFENDANT MANUEL:       I just want to say that to Your


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 32 of 46 PageID 343
                                                                                  32

   1    Honorable Judge Thomas Barber that we are very sorry for what

   2    we did.    We know it's wrong, and we take full responsibility

   3    for it, and we learned from it.         And I hope he's never going to

   4    do that again, and I will not.        And I also want to say I'm

   5    sorry to the United States government.           We just did, and we are

   6    deeply sorry.    And I know sorry not going to fix it.            But

   7    there's nothing we can do about it, because it's already done.

   8               THE COURT:    Okay.

   9               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:       Your Honor, because things

  10    happen.    I always try to help my family, working for my family,

  11    but the guy come to me to force me to do that.             I do it, and

  12    then I never knew that was going to go through that today,

  13    because they told me it's COVID-19.          I can't go back, so I will

  14    ask you to give us a second chance.          You're not going to see us

  15    anymore.   And I'm sorry for the government, because we earned

  16    nothing to help nobody.      That's why we know that.          We don't

  17    want to do that.     I'm really sorry.

  18               THE COURT:    All right.      I think we've said as much as

  19    needs to be said here.     Kind of gotten all the information out.

  20    Anything else anybody wants to say?

  21               MS. VIACAVA:    Your Honor, the government would just

  22    indicate that although from what defense counsel said, that

  23    they were trying to open business, the problem is they obtained

  24    the PPP loans, telling the government they already had

  25    up-and-running businesses.         They had employees.      The money was


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24    Page 33 of 46 PageID 344
                                                                                  33

   1    given to them for those purposes to assist in protecting

   2    individual paychecks, meaning employees' paychecks.              Instead,

   3    they bought a house.     They bought a house in full.

   4               So even if they intended to open a business, that was

   5    not the purpose of the money, and they bought the house for

   6    themselves.    No mortgage payments.       They were able to have a

   7    house outright for themselves.       That's what they chose to do

   8    between the two of the five PPP loans they obtained.

   9               Looking at the factors set forth in

  10    Title 18 Section 3553, we would ask that the Court sentence

  11    them, considering the sentence, reflect the seriousness of the

  12    offense and respect for the law and provide just punishment for

  13    the offense.

  14               In this particular case, the restitution, that goes

  15    down because the bank was able to locate money and help

  16    themselves.    These are not payments that the defendants

  17    willingly made to pay down these loans.             These were moneys that

  18    were offset based on the bank locating the funds and recouping

  19    themselves.

  20               THE COURT:    Paying the money back doesn't change the

  21    fact that it was stolen.      I understand that.        But it does

  22    figure into the overall appropriate sentence in a way.               So I'll

  23    handle that.

  24               All right.    So I've heard from everybody that wants

  25    to speak at this point.      And some of this will be joint, some


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 34 of 46 PageID 345
                                                                                 34

   1    of it will be separate, but let's just start with -- with

   2    Ms. Manuel -- well, actually, in terms of both of them.              I've

   3    heard from everyone that wanted to speak.           I've reviewed the

   4    presentence report and everything else that's been submitted.

   5               Pursuant to Title 18 United States Code Section 3551

   6    and 3553, it is my judgment that Ms. Manuel will be committed

   7    to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term I will

   8    announce momentarily and -- well, actually not.            Because what

   9    I'm going to do in this case -- let me start with Mr. Casseus

  10    first.   What will happen in his case is, he will be committed

  11    to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term I'll

  12    announce momentarily.

  13               Upon release, he shall serve three years of

  14    supervised release.     This term consists of three year as to

  15    Counts 1, 2, and 5, and all such terms to run concurrently.               He

  16    must comply with the mandatory and standard conditions adopted

  17    in the Middle District of Florida.         And that's found in the

  18    federal Sentencing Guidelines Section 5B1.3.

  19               You also have to participate in a substance abuse

  20    program, outpatient or inpatient, follow the probation

  21    officer's instructions regarding that, and you must contribute

  22    to the cost of that in an amount determined reasonable.              During

  23    and upon completion of that, you must submit to random alcohol

  24    testing.

  25               You have to show all financial transactions, all


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 35 of 46 PageID 346
                                                                                 35

   1    books and records to the probation officer, if they want to

   2    check those out.     And you're prohibited from incurring new

   3    credit charges, opening additional lines of credit, or

   4    obligating yourself for any major purchases without the

   5    approval of the probation officer.

   6               You have to give up DNA since you've been convicted

   7    of a qualifying felony.

   8               Mandatory drug testing requirements of the Violent

   9    Crime Control Act are suspended, but you have random drug tests

  10    not to exceed 104 per year.

  11               I'm accepting the plea agreement because I'm

  12    satisfied it adequately reflects the seriousness of the actual

  13    offense and accepting the plea agreement will not undermine the

  14    statutory purposes of sentencing.

  15               Under the plea agreement, he's pled guilty to

  16    Counts 1, 2, and 5 in return for dismissal of Counts 3 and 4.

  17    In accordance with the plea agreement, those counts are

  18    dismissed.

  19               If your plea agreement allows you to appeal, which

  20    they don't usually do, but if yours does, you have do that

  21    within 14 days.      That applies to both of you.        You have to

  22    appeal within 14 days, if you want to try do that.             Most of the

  23    time, the plea agreements say you lose your right to appeal.

  24    But if you want to try, it has to be done 14 days or you lose

  25    your right to appeal.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 36 of 46 PageID 347
                                                                                 36

   1                If you can't afford a lawyer, you can get a lawyer

   2    for free.   If you can't afford the filing fee, they'll do your

   3    appeal for free that.      That applies to both of y'all.

   4                Forfeiture, I've already signed a forfeiture order.

   5    We've already talked about that.        So that's going to be handled

   6    that way.

   7                I'm not imposing a fine on Mr. Casseus, because I

   8    want him to use his money to pay restitution.

   9                He does have the 300-dollar special assessment, which

  10    is due immediately.

  11                Now, the restitution amount is what for him?

  12                MS. VIACAVA:   $116,495.45.

  13                THE COURT:   That's the amount.         That's payable to

  14    Fifth Third Bank.

  15                MS. VIACAVA:   Yes, Your Honor.

  16                THE COURT:   Okay.     This obligation -- well, it's due

  17    to Fifth Third Bank, but it's payable to the Clerk of the U.S.

  18    District Court for distribution to that victim.

  19                While in custody, you shall either pay $25 quarterly

  20    if you have a nonUNICOR job or 50 percent of your monthly

  21    earnings if you have a UNICOR job.         Upon release, you're

  22    ordered to begin making payments of a hundred dollars a month.

  23    This payment is going to continue until you get it paid off.

  24                If you need the change that, let somebody know, and

  25    we can revisit that.     If you get it paid off early, there's a


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24    Page 37 of 46 PageID 348
                                                                                  37

   1    possibility of early termination, if everything is paid.

   2    That's an incentive to get it paid.         If you can get that done,

   3    you can take yourself off of probation.             So your lawyer will

   4    explain that to you.

   5               Let's see.    I find that the defendant does not have

   6    the ability to pay interest, so we don't worry about that.

   7               Let's see.    That's the restitution.          I think I've

   8    covered everything on him.

   9               Now, we'll go over to her, and since I'm going to be

  10    giving him some time here in custody, and she is not as

  11    culpable as him, I will be giving her a probation sentence, not

  12    supervised release.     I want to make sure I don't mess that up

  13    and use the wrong terminology.       So what's the maximum she's

  14    looking at, three years?

  15               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       Your Honor, it would be five

  16    years' probation would be the math.

  17               THE COURT:    All right.     So she's going to be

  18    sentenced to five years' probation, which is a below-Guideline

  19    sentence and will not require her to go to jail.             She has many

  20    mitigating factors, health issues, including mental health and

  21    physical issues.

  22               Most importantly, she's not as culpable, although she

  23    knew what she was doing, and she knew what the money was going

  24    for.   She knew it was stolen.      She's -- most of the money has

  25    been paid back, which is a very important factor to me.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 38 of 46 PageID 349
                                                                                 38

   1               She has no criminal record.         I agree that the money

   2    was not flagrantly blown on luxury items and thing like that

   3    that I see in many of these cases, although it's still stolen

   4    money.   She cooperated and accepted responsibility.            She

   5    doesn't have much of a criminal record.

   6               The other thing I'm impressed with, both of the

   7    defendants in this case have come here from Haiti.             It's the

   8    poorest country in the western hemisphere, and they've worked

   9    hard and gotten involved in businesses, and for the most part,

  10    have worked harder than more than most Americans do to take

  11    advantage of the capitalist system that allows people to come

  12    here and succeed and have nice things.

  13               Unfortunately, they messed this up pretty badly.              But

  14    other than that, they've led really, really wonderful lives,

  15    coming here and doing good things and taking care of their

  16    family, putting a daughter through college.           Like I said, most

  17    of the Americans I see don't do anything -- I mean, native-born

  18    Americans don't do anywhere near as well as they have done.

  19    She's got a real-estate license, and so I just don't think it's

  20    appropriate to put her behind bars for this.           So I'm not -- and

  21    those are the reasons for that.

  22               Now, the conditions of your probation are the

  23    standard conditions in the Middle District of Florida found in

  24    the US Sentencing Guidelines Section 5B1.           Those are the

  25    mandatory and standard conditions.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 39 of 46 PageID 350
                                                                                 39

   1               You also have to participate in a mental health

   2    treatment program, outpatient or inpatient, follow the

   3    probation officer's instructions regarding that, contribute to

   4    the cost of that in an amount determined reasonable.

   5               You're also prohibited from engaging in or incurring

   6    new credit charges, opening additional lines of credit, or

   7    obligating yourself for any major purchases without the

   8    approval of the probation officer.         You have to give the

   9    probation officer full access to all of your financial

  10    information.

  11               You have to give up DNA.

  12               Mandatory drug testing requirements of the Violent

  13    Crime Control Act are suspended, but you do have to submit to

  14    random drug tests not to exceed 104 per year.

  15               Your restitution is what?

  16               MS. VIACAVA:    $411,417.

  17               THE COURT:    To the Small Business Administration.

  18    This obligation is payable to the Clerk of the U.S. District

  19    Court for distribution to victims.

  20               How much money does she have to pay toward this

  21    monthly?   What's a reasonable number?

  22               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       Your Honor, I believe that we

  23    had set that out to be a hundred dollars a month.

  24               THE COURT:    Hundred dollars a month.         If you can pay

  25    more, great.    Tell yourself you get off probation earlier.             But


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 40 of 46 PageID 351
                                                                                 40

   1    that's a minimum.

   2                There is no fine so that the money is used to pay

   3    restitution.    Forfeiture order has already been signed.

   4                She has a 300-dollar special assessment, which is due

   5    immediately.

   6                I've already given the reasons for the sentence and

   7    the 3553(a)(1) through (7) factors.         I find that sentence is

   8    sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the

   9    statutory purposes of sentencing.

  10                I've accepted the plea agreement because I'm

  11    satisfied it adequately reflects the seriousness of the actual

  12    offense and accepting the plea agreement will not undermine the

  13    statutory purposes of sentencing.

  14                According to her plea agreement, Counts 4 through 7

  15    are dismissed.

  16                I already told her about her right to appeal.

  17                And so that's that with her.        Have I forgot anything

  18    with her?

  19                THE PROBATION OFFICER:      No, Your Honor.

  20                THE COURT:   All right.     So only thing I have left is

  21    back to Mr. Casseus, and I said he was going to be going to

  22    jail or prison here.

  23                On the negative factors, it was a lot of money stolen

  24    here.   He knew what he was doing.       He's a businessman.        He knew

  25    after he got into it that he shouldn't have done it.             And then


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 41 of 46 PageID 352
                                                                                  41

   1    he did it more than once also.        It wasn't a one-time thing,

   2    some friend told him to do it and he did it and he stopped.                He

   3    did it more that be once.      So that's not good.         He knew it was

   4    wrong.   He knew he had a family that he had to take care of,

   5    and he was jeopardizing his ability to do that by committing a

   6    crime.   So that's bad.

   7               And the total loss amount, we've gotten it down to a

   8    real number.    But the number under the Federal Sentencing

   9    Guidelines is pretty high.         And so that's a serious offense in

  10    terms of the Sentencing Guidelines.

  11               On the positive side, doesn't have a record to speak

  12    of.   Paid most of the money back in one way or another.              Like I

  13    said with her, the money was not blown on, for the most part,

  14    luxury items.    It was used for day-to-day stuff and trying to

  15    do some businesses, I agree with that.           He cooperated, accepted

  16    responsibility.      Like her, he's an industrious guy.          How many

  17    businesses are you involved?

  18               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:       Me?

  19               THE COURT:    Yeah.

  20               DEFENDANT CASSEUS:       More than two business.

  21               THE COURT:    Yeah.     Which is taking advantage of the

  22    American freedom of our system.         He works hard to support a

  23    family, for the most part, as far as I can tell.

  24               So the question is, she's getting no time behind

  25    bars, because he was the -- he was the force on this thing.


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 42 of 46 PageID 353
                                                                                 42

   1    But you've got -- he's got to do some time.           There has to be a

   2    punishment.    I'm not doing house arrest.          But I'm going to go

   3    pretty low on this and say 24 months, 24 months, which is also

   4    a below-Guideline sentence.        But I can't go any lower than

   5    that.   You can turn yourself in in 30 days.

   6               What's the turn-in date?

   7               THE COURTROOM DEPUTY:       November 21st.

   8               THE COURT:    November 21st, turn yourself in.           She'll

   9    tell you how to do it.     You need to do that time, get it over

  10    with, and you'll get out and go back to your family.             But there

  11    has to be a punishment aspect to this, because there's too much

  12    money involved.

  13               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       Your Honor, may I --

  14               THE COURT:    Yes.

  15          (Bench Conference off the record.)

  16               THE COURT:    So we just have a terminology problem.

  17    Listen to this carefully now.       Ms. Manuel's sentence is not

  18    probation.    It's time served followed by everything I said as

  19    supervised release.     That's just a distinction under the

  20    federal terminology.     Okay?

  21               Go ahead and say anything you want to say,

  22    objections, such.     Go ahead.    Government objects to the

  23    below-Guideline sentences for both defendants.

  24               MS. VIACAVA:    The government objects to the

  25    below-Guideline sentence.       Additionally, the government would


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24   Page 43 of 46 PageID 354
                                                                                  43

   1    request to make it clear for the judgment, as is required, that

   2    for Mr. Casseus that Document 42, the forfeiture, be made part

   3    of the judgment, and for Ms. Manuel, the documents for

   4    forfeiture, Document 44 and 53, be made part of the judgment.

   5                THE COURT:   Okay.

   6                MS. VIACAVA:   Thank you.

   7                THE COURT:   Go ahead.      Defense, make your objections.

   8                MS. BOZANIC:   Judge, as far as -- first of all, with

   9    respect for Thanksgiving, but that's not the issue, Mr. Casseus

  10    is asking for more time, so he can get his family -- they have

  11    to move out of this house.         He's asking for 60 days so he can

  12    make sure his wife and all the kids --

  13                THE COURT:   How much, when?

  14                MS. BOZANIC:   Sixty days, Your Honor.

  15                THE COURT:   Then it goes on Christmas.

  16                MS. BOZANIC:   I know.      That's right before Christmas

  17    and it's right before Thanksgiving.          But she's --

  18                THE COURT:   Fine.     Fine.    Fine.    I'll do 60.     That's

  19    fine.

  20                MS. BOZANIC:   Judge, that's one thing.

  21                The other thing I would ask is for the RDAP

  22    recommendation and the Middle District of Florida as close as

  23    possible.

  24                THE COURT:   He's not going to qualify for that.

  25                MS. BOZANIC:   The 24 months, I think he gets six


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 44 of 46 PageID 355
                                                                                 44

   1    months off.

   2               The other thing, Judge, I wanted to bring up, and not

   3    to go back on your ruling, but if you were to add the two

   4    points that he would be eligible for in November, his

   5    Guidelines would be 24 months, which is about --

   6               THE COURT:    All right.     So --

   7               MS. BOZANIC:    If Your Honor intended to do any

   8    additional variance, I would ask possibly that Your Honor apply

   9    the additional variance.

  10               THE COURT:    No.   Because, ultimately, we know under

  11    the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, they're just Guidelines.

  12    And so I do what I'm required to do under the law, which is

  13    give people what I think they deserve, using the Guidelines as

  14    a guideline.    And I think that's what he deserves here.            If

  15    there were -- I should say this.        If there were no Guidelines,

  16    I gave them both what I think they actually deserve.

  17               MS. BOZANIC:    Fair enough.

  18               THE COURT:    So I think that's -- that's the valid

  19    point, but that's my answer to it, so --

  20               MS. BOZANIC:    Yes, Your Honor.

  21               THE COURT:    -- I think that's the right outcome for

  22    everybody.

  23               THE PROBATION OFFICER:       Just for clarity purposes,

  24    since Ms. Manuel is being sentenced to a term of supervised

  25    release, all the conditions you formerly imposed --


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72    Filed 03/08/24    Page 45 of 46 PageID 356
                                                                                   45

   1               THE COURT:    Yeah, yeah, yeah.           It's all the same.

   2               THE PROBATION OFFICER:         Thank you.

   3               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, I would ask for the RDAP

   4    recommendation.      I think when you have a 24 sentence, you get

   5    six months off, the last time I checked.

   6               THE COURT:    But you've got to have a serious drug

   7    problem for RDAP.     He doesn't have a drug problem.

   8               MS. BOZANIC:    You have to have a drug or alcohol

   9    problem.   I think there's some basis for it in the PSI, but

  10    it's up to them.

  11               THE COURT:    Yeah.     So that's what I'm saying.          He's

  12    not going to qualify for it.        He doesn't have that kind of a

  13    problem.

  14               MS. BOZANIC:    Judge, the Middle District of Florida,

  15    would you allow that recommendation?

  16               THE COURT:    Yes.

  17               MS. BOZANIC:    For him to serve as close as possible?

  18               THE COURT:    Yes.      Yes.   Good luck.

  19               MS. BOZANIC:    Thank you, Your Honor.

  20               THE COURT:    Good luck.       Thank you.

  21          (Proceedings adjourned at 10:01 a.m.)

  22

  23

  24

  25


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF   Document 72   Filed 03/08/24   Page 46 of 46 PageID 357
                                                                                 46

   1                           CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER

   2    STATE OF FLORIDA

   3    COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

   4                I, Rebekah M. Lockwood, RDR, CRR, do hereby certify

   5    that I was authorized to and did stenographically report the

   6    foregoing proceedings; and that the foregoing pages constitute

   7    a true and complete computer-aided transcription of my original

   8    stenographic notes to the best of my knowledge, skill, and

   9    ability.

  10          I further certify that I am not a relative, employee,

  11    attorney, or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative

  12    or employee of any of the parties' attorneys or counsel

  13    connected with the action, nor am I financially interested in

  14    the action.

  15          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand at Tampa,

  16    Hillsborough County, Florida, this 8th day of March 2024.

  17

  18

  19

  20
                                             _______________________________
  21                                           REBEKAH M. LOCKWOOD, RDR, CRR
                                               Official Court Reporter
  22                                           United States District Court
                                               Middle District of Florida
  23

  24

  25


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.72.0.pdf
Size
508,798 bytes
SHA-256
23e963cf1c8337303a45b122869f44eeb7c07ed0ada42dc873901e0a2f9da0c8
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.72.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top