Order denying 64 Motion to Reduce Sentence re Amendment 821 as to Denis Casseus — USA v. Casseus (Dkt. 88, M.D. Fla.)

Summary

An AO 247 Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States v. Denis Casseus, Doc. 88, filed September 6, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (header case number 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF; form case number 2:23-cr-9-TPB-KCD). The form names Sonthonax B. SaintGermain, AFPD, as the defendant's attorney. The order states that the motion is DENIED for the reasons stated in probation's memorandum (Doc. 78) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 83). It states that all provisions of the judgment remain in effect, with an order date of September 6, 2024.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 2:23-cr-O0009-KCD-DNF Document 88 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 1PagelD 419

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Middle District of Florida

United States of America

v. )
Denis Casseus Case No: 2:23-cr-9-TPB-KCD
) USM No: 42013-510
Date of Original Judgment: October 27,2023)
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ) Sonthonax B. SaintGermain, AFPD
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of ® the defendant © the Director of the Bureau of Prisons © the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
&} DENIED for the reasons stated in probation's memorandum (Doc. 78) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 83).

(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts Iand II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated October 27. 2023 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: September 6, 2024

Judge’s signature

Effective Date:

(if differentfrom order date) Printed name and title


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.88.0.pdf

Size

699,297 bytes

SHA-256

f050bfbe9e146fb5ec870431e631c60aea95c7192ae05d781491864ecce7e413

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.88.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)