Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Casseus USA v. Casseus — U.S. District Court, M.D. Fla., Fort Myers Division Response in Opposition by USA as to Denis Casseus — USA v. Casseus (Dkt. 86, M.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Response in Opposition by USA as to Denis Casseus — USA v. Casseus (Dkt. 86, M.D. Fla.)

Filed June 3, 2024 in USA v. Casseus; one of 53 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2024-06-03

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF · Doc. 86 · 2024-06-03 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
FORT MYERS DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
CASE NO. 2:23-cr-9-TPB-KCD 
 
DENIS CASSEUS 
 
 
UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO 
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE BASED ON 
RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT 821 (DOC. 64) 
 
 
The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant 
United States Attorney, files this response in opposition to defendant’s motion to 
reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 821 of the 
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Doc. 64. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s 
motion is due to be denied. 
 
1. 
On May 23, 2023, defendant, Denis Casseus, pleaded guilty to Counts 
One and Two (bank fraud) and Count Five (illegal monetary transaction) of the 
Indictment in this case pursuant to a written plea agreement. Doc. 30. On May 26, 
2023, this Court accepted defendant’s guilty plea and adjudicated him guilty of 
Counts One, Two, and Five. Doc. 38.  
 
2. 
The presentence investigation report dated August 11, 2023 (PSR) 
correctly stated, and the Court ultimately determined, that defendant’s advisory 
sentencing guideline range 30-37 months’ imprisonment, based on a total offense 
level of 19 and a criminal history category of I. See, e.g., PSR (Doc. 45) at ¶ 75. On 
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 86     Filed 06/03/24     Page 1 of 5 PageID 409

2 
October 20, 2023, this Court sentenced defendant to a term of 24 months’ 
imprisonment, which constituted a downward variance. Docs 59, 60.   
 
3. 
On December 15, 2023, defendant filed a motion for a reduction in his 
sentence, seeking a two-level downward adjustment under Amendment 821 of the 
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.1 In his motion, defendant argues that he is a “zero-
point” offender and satisfies all of the criteria under U.S.S.G. §4C1.1(a) for the 
retroactive application of Amendment 821 and resulting two-level downward 
departure in his total offense level. Doc. 64 at 2-3.   
 
4. 
On May 1, 2024, the United States Probation Office filed its 
Amendment 821 Memorandum pursuant to the Court’s Order Regarding 
Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, Case No. 3:21-mc-1-
TJC (doc. 115). Doc. 78. In this memorandum, the assigned Probation Officer noted: 
Retroactive application of Amendment would lower the defendant’s 
applicable guideline range; however, the defendant received a sentence that 
was equal to or less than the minimum of the amended guideline range as 
adjusted by a comparable substantial assistance departure, if applicable. 
Pursuant to USSG §1B1.10(b)(2)(A), except as provided in USSG 
§1B1.10(b)(2)(B), the court shall not reduce the defendant’s term of 
imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and §1B1.10 to a term that is less 
than the minimum of the amended guideline range. 
 
 
1 This motion was filed by defendant’s retained counsel. The Federal Public Defender’s 
Office was subsequently appointed to represent defendant in these Amendment 821 proceedings, 
and retained counsel was permitted to withdraw. Doc. 77. On May 20, 2024, court-appointed 
counsel filed a notice indicating, among other things, that defendant “would like the Court to rule 
on [Doc. 64] and will represent himself pro se if necessary.” Doc. 83 at 3. On May 29, 2024, the 
Federal Public Defender’s Office filed a motion to terminate representation. Doc. 84. On June 3, 
2024, the Court granted the Federal Public Defender’s Office’s motion and discharged it from its 
representation of defendant. Doc. 85.   
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 86     Filed 06/03/24     Page 2 of 5 PageID 410

3 
Id. at 3. The Amendment 821 Memorandum further states that “[r]etroactive 
application of … Part B, subpart 1, of Amendment 821 provides for a range of 24 to 
30 months’ imprisonment, and the defendant was previously sentenced to a 24 
month term of imprisonment.” Id. Accordingly, the Probation Officer concluded that 
defendant is ineligible any further relief under Amendment 821. Id. at 1.  
 
5. 
The Probation Officer’s analysis is correct. Although defendant has zero 
criminal history points, the Court awarded defendant a downward variance at 
sentencing to the equivalent what would have been defendant’s amended guideline 
range, that is, 24-30 months’ imprisonment. See also Doc. 83 at 2. The statement of 
reasons suggests that this Court likely did so to give defendant “advance” credit for 
the “zero point” status departure of Amendment 821, which was to take effect 11 
days after the sentencing hearing. See Doc. 60 at 4, VIII.    
 
6. 
Accordingly, defendant does not qualify for retroactive application of 
Amendment 821 and the resulting two-level downward departure, and his motion 
should be denied. 
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that this Court deny 
defendant’s response in opposition to defendant’s motion to reduce his sentence  
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 86     Filed 06/03/24     Page 3 of 5 PageID 411

4 
 
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 821 of the U.S. Sentencing 
Guidelines (Doc. 64).  
Respectfully submitted, 
 
ROGER B. HANDBERG 
United States Attorney 
 
 
By:  s/ D. Rodney Brown  
 
 
D. RODNEY BROWN 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 0906689 
300 N. Hogan Street, Suite 700 
Jacksonville, Florida 32202 
Telephone: (904) 301-6300 
Facsimile: 
(904) 301-6310 
E-mail: Rodney.Brown@usdoj.gov 
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 86     Filed 06/03/24     Page 4 of 5 PageID 412

5 
United States v. Casseus 
Case No. 2:23-cr-9-TPB-KCD 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that on June 3, 2024, I electronically filed this document with 
the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of 
electronic filing to the following:  
 
 
 
 
 
Laura Ferro, Esq. 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant Federal Public Defender 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Zeljka Bozanic, Esq. 
 
 
 
I also certify that on June 3, 2024, a correct copy of this document and the 
notice of electronic filing were sent by United States Mail to the following: 
 
 
Denis Casseus, Register No. 42013-510 
 
 
FPC Pensacola 
 
 
 
Federal Prison Camp 
 
 
P.O. Box 3949 
 
 
Pensacola, FL 32516 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ D. Rodney Brown 
 
 
 
 
D. RODNEY BROWN 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
Case 2:23-cr-00009-KCD-DNF     Document 86     Filed 06/03/24     Page 5 of 5 PageID 413

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.86.0.pdf
Size
103,263 bytes
SHA-256
e49a23e7528e87c65523b95dd0f37c99dac6116299d26e0c23fb293092025c61
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.410213.86.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top