Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thomas - Chad Brandon Thomas USA v. Thomas — U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee Order as to Chad Brandon Thomas denying 49 Motion Release — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 58, E.D. Tenn.)

Court filing

Order as to Chad Brandon Thomas denying 49 Motion Release — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 58, E.D. Tenn.)

Filed April 11, 2023 in USA v. Thomas; one of 68 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Filed2023-04-11

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee · No. 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW · Doc. 58 · 2023-04-11 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
AT GREENEVILLE 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
No.  2:22-CR-76 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
CHAD BRANDON THOMAS 
 
 
) 
 
ORDER 
 
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s pro se Motion to Proceed Pro Se with Elbow 
Counsel and to Withdraw Plea Agreement [Doc. 41], Counsel for Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw 
[Doc. 48], and the Government’s Motion for Release of CJA Documents [Doc. 49]. The parties 
appeared before the Court for a hearing on these Motions on April 10, 2023. Based on the 
representations made by Defendant and his counsel during the hearing, and for the reasons stated 
on the record, Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw [Doc. 48] is GRANTED.  
Defendant represented to the Court at the hearing that he wished to proceed with counsel. 
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion [Doc. 41], to the extent he seeks to proceed pro se with elbow 
counsel, is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court appoints CJA-counsel Donna Bolton, Esq., to 
represent Defendant. The Court will RESERVE RULING on Defendant’s Motion [Doc. 41] with 
respect to withdrawing his plea agreement.  
The parties are required to attend a hearing on June 20, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. If Defendant 
elects to proceed with his Motion to Withdraw Plea Agreement, the Court will hear argument on 
the Motion at that time. Ms. Bolton is ORDERED to provide Defendant with copies of all relevant 
documents related to his Motion to Withdraw Plea Agreement, including but not limited to the 
Information [Doc. 1], Plea Agreement [Doc. 3], and Change of Plea Hearing Transcript [Doc. 50]. 
Case 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW     Document 58     Filed 04/11/23     Page 1 of 2     PageID
#: 283

2 
 
However, if upon review of the record and discussion with counsel Defendant wishes to proceed 
to sentencing and withdraw his Motion to Withdraw, he must notify the Court on or before May 
10, 2023, and the Court will conduct his sentencing on June 20 instead. If Defendant proceeds to 
sentencing, objections to the Presentence Investigation Report must be filed on or before May 16, 
2023. 
Additionally, the Government’s Motion for Release of CJA Documents [Doc. 49] is 
DENIED. The Government seeks billing materials and invoices, namely detailed time entries, 
from Defendant’s former counsel relevant to the negotiation of Defendant’s plea agreement. 
Volume 7 of the Guide to Judiciary Policy, which sets forth the guidelines for administering the 
CJA and related statutes, explicitly states that “[d]ocumentation submitted in support of, or 
attached to, payment may not be disclosed at any time.” Guide to Judiciary Pol’y, Vol. 7 § 
520.20(b) 
(2022), 
https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/judiciary-policies/cja-
guidelines/chapter-5-ss-520-disclosure-information-payments; see also United States v. Davis, 
No. 5:14-CR-240-BR, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39735, at *10 (citing to § 520.20(b) when denying 
disclosure of CJA billing records). Even if the Government was primarily seeking the fee amounts 
related to former counsel’s representation, which it is not, the Court still would have to “redact 
any detailed information on the payment voucher provided by defense counsel to justify the 
expenses to the court.” 18 U.S.C. §  3006A(d)(4)(B)(i). Accordingly, the Court cannot disclose the 
billing entries the Government seeks, and so the Government’s Motion [Doc. 49] is DENIED. 
So ordered.  
 
ENTER: 
 
            s/J. RONNIE GREER 
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW     Document 58     Filed 04/11/23     Page 2 of 2     PageID
#: 284

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.tned.105535.58.0.pdf
Size
116,655 bytes
SHA-256
770d7bc47fd21852ea1cb43c44fb81307130eaaf41c62fdff9b1163f3bae9fac
Our copy
gov.uscourts.tned.105535.58.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top