Court filing
Exhibit 5 [Redacted] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130-6, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)
Summary
Exhibit 5 (Redacted), Document 130-6, filed 11/09/22 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, nine pages. Its first pages carry only page stamps, followed by a letter dated June 23, 2022 titled Deposition Errata for the Deposition of Dorian Buckethal (Transcript dated May 18, 2022) in Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, United States District Court, Northern District of California. The letter states that the deponent has reviewed the transcript and attaches a list of errata, and it carries /s/ Dorian Buckethal. The errata sheet lists page and line numbers with existing testimony, corrected testimony and a reason such as transcription error or misstatement.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed November 9, 2022 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 443 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-11-09 |
Cite this document
“Exhibit 5 [Redacted] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130-6, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 130-6, filed 2022-11-09. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-11-09-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-130-6-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-130-6/
, SHA-256 b7e6fc3f8e8893bd5c62019fd25ea7dc955f35feb5927520418afae77f08e24d.Full text
EXHIBIT 5 (Redacted) Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 3 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 4 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 5 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 6 of 9 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 7 of 9 June 23, 2022 Re: Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, USDC Northern District of California - San Francisco Division Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Deposition Errata for the Deposition of Dorian Buckethal (Transcript dated May 18, 2022) To whom it may concern: I, Dorian Buckethal, have reviewed the transcript of my deposition in Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, taken on May 18, 2022. Attached hereto is a list of errata identified in the deposition transcript. /s/ Dorian Buckethal June 23, 2022_____________ DORIAN BUCKETHAL DATE Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 8 of 9 Dorian Buckethal Deposition Errata Sheet Page:Line(s) Existing Testimony Corrected Testimony Reason 14:12 ´job that he was passing my e-mail - - my resum髵 ´job that he was passing my resuméµ Misstatement 22:10 ´account managerµ ´account managersµ Transcription error 28:22 ´Steve Brubelyµ ´Steve Rubelyµ Transcription error 30:17 ´I don·t -- I don·t recallµ ´I don·t recallµ Misstatement 35:3 ´marketing manµ ´marketing managerµ Transcription error 37:3-4 ´product into the corp -- our corporate«µ ´product into our corporate«µ Misstatement 42:9 ´Buquette Bysettµ ´Buket Bayasetµ Transcription error 45:5 ´marketµ ´marketingµ Transcription error 171:20-22 ´I don·t know how to answer that question. I don·t know how to answer that question.µ ´I don·t know how to answer that question.µ Transcription error 182:8 ´reasonable, but that·s«µ ´reasonable, that·s«µ Transcription error 247:1 ´The every major«µ ´That every major«µ Transcription error Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-6 Filed 11/09/22 Page 9 of 9
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.130.6.pdf
- Size
- 1,350,422 bytes
- SHA-256
- b7e6fc3f8e8893bd5c62019fd25ea7dc955f35feb5927520418afae77f08e24d
- Original
- PACER (login required)