Court filing
Exhibit 6 [Redacted] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130-7, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)
Filed November 9, 2022 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 127 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-11-09 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 130-7 · 2022-11-09 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
EXHIBIT 6 (Redacted) Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 3 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 4 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 5 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 6 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 7 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 8 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 9 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 10 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 11 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 12 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 13 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 14 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 15 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 16 of 19 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 17 of 19 - 1 - June 10, 2022 Re: Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, USDC Northern District of California - San Francisco Division Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC: Defendant’s Deposition Errata (Paul Godlewski Deposition Transcript dated May 6, 2022) To whom it may concern: I, Paul Godlewski, have reviewed the transcript of my deposition in Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, taken on May 6, 2022. Attached hereto is a list of errata identified in the deposition transcript. ___________________________ _______________ PAUL GODLEWSKI DATE 6/10/2022 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 18 of 19 - 2 - Godlewski Deposition Errata Sheet Page : Line(s) Existing Testimony Corrected Testimony Reason 30:21 “Basic, and as I alluded to earlier in my. . .” “Basically, and as I alluded to earlier in my. . .” Transcription error 33:6 “. . . we are faced with so that, yes, Thomson Reuters. . .” “. . . they are faced with so that, yes, Thomson Reuters. . .” Transcription error 43:7 “I’m sorry.” “I’m sorry, I can’t recall.” Transcription error 63:21, 63:25, 64:10, 64:13- 14 “John Koske” / “John McKoske” “John Koski” Transcription error 68:21 “. . .access to that product as a marketer. . .” “. . .access to that process as a marketer. . .” Transcription error 71:22 “. . .but I’d to look at in detail to answer specific. . .” “. . .but I’d like to look at in detail to answer specific. . .” Transcription error 100:6 “Judge Tens’” “Judge Chen’s” Transcription error 126:19 “. . .a cell sheet of sorts. . .” “. . .a sellsheet of sorts. . .” Transcription error 175:12 “. . .I do not train.” “. . .I do not train customers.” Transcription error 182:23-24 “Well, Brook Martin, but he works for Kevin Appold.” Strike sentence: “Well, Brook Martin, but he works for Kevin Appold.” Transcription error with no known substitution. Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 19 of 19
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.130.7.pdf
- Size
- 1,785,848 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8e7ca5f65c320e635651ea19445b1a0bc63203028e96d890df92a6334b8d6672
- Original
- PACER (login required)