Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. Exhibit 1 [REDACTED] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130.4)

Court filing

Exhibit 1 [REDACTED] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130.4)

Summary

Steven Fox's deposition errata letter dated June 17, 2022, filed as Exhibit 1 (Redacted), document 130-4 in Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, states that he reviewed the transcript of his May 16, 2022 deposition and attaches a list of errata. The errata sheet lists corrections at 43:22 (SCRA to FCRA), 112:21 and 116:17 (FDP to FTP), each with the reason Transcription error; the sheets before the letter print only the case header.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2022-11-09

Cite this document

“Exhibit 1 [REDACTED] — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130.4).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 130-4, filed 2022-11-09. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-11-09-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-130-4-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-130-4/, SHA-256 3d4b1e0c72d1081f2057c6e9ea794a1cb965ec27b3cb8ae986abc297537ec680.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

EXHIBIT 1
(Redacted)
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 1 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 2 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 3 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 4 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 5 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 6 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 7 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 8 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 9 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 10 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 11 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 12 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 13 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 14 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 15 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 16 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 17 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 18 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 19 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 20 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 21 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 22 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 23 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 24 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 25 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 26 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 27 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 28 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 29 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 30 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 31 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 32 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 33 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 34 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 35 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 36 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 37 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 38 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 39 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 40 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 41 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 42 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 43 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 44 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 45 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 46 of 49

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 47 of 49

June 17, 2022 
Re:  
Brooks et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, USDC Northern District of  
 
California - San Francisco Division Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC:  Defendant¶s 
 
Deposition Errata (Steven Fox Deposition Transcript dated May 16, 2022) 
To whom it may concern: 
I, Steven Fox, have reviewed the transcript of my deposition in Brooks et al. v. Thomson 
Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, taken on May 16, 2022.  Attached hereto 
is a list of errata identified in the deposition transcript. 
/s/ Steven Fox______________ 
 
 
 
June 17, 2022_____________ 
STEVEN FOX  
 
 
 
 
 
DATE 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 48 of 49

Steven Fox Deposition Errata Sheet 
Page:Line(s) 
Existing Testimony 
Corrected 
Testimony 
Reason 
43:22 
³...SCRA, DPPA, 
GLB, HIPAA, et 
cetera.´  
³..FCRA, DPPA, 
GLB, HIPAA, et 
cetera.´  
Transcription error 
112:21 
 
³Does not.´ 
³It does not.´ 
Transcription error 
116:17 
³«again, based on 
previous testimony, 
usually by FDP,«´ 
³«again, based on 
previous testimony, 
usually by FTP,«´ 
Transcription error 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 130-4     Filed 11/09/22     Page 49 of 49

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.130.4.pdf
Size
3,684,398 bytes
SHA-256
3d4b1e0c72d1081f2057c6e9ea794a1cb965ec27b3cb8ae986abc297537ec680
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.130.4.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top