Court filing
Exhibit HX 51 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 675-3, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)
Filed February 20, 2026 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-02-20 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 675-3 · 2026-02-20 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
HX 51
REDACTED VERSION
OF DOCUMENT
SOUGHT TO BE
SEALED PURSUANT
TO STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58836
Page 1 of 14
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN DIEGO DIVISION
- - -
4
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA : CASE NO.
5
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT : 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB
6
BENEFITS LITIGATION :
7
__________________________
8
9
10
11
Oral deposition of JAY
12
MINNUCCI, taken pursuant to Notice,
13
held at Goodwin Proctor LLP, 3025
14
John F. Kennedy Boulevard, 8th
15
Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
16
19104, beginning at approximately
17
9:30 a.m., before Mary Hammond, a
18
Certified Shorthand Reporter and
19
Notary Public in the state of
20
Pennsylvania, April 23, 2025.
21
22
23
JOB No. 7288941
24
PAGES 1 - 460
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58837
Page 2 of 14
1
clients that I -- you know, that I wouldn't
2
necessarily call consulting, but they would
3
ask a question.
4
I've always told my clients, "Look,
5
you got to" -- "you need an hour of my time"
6
-- if it's a past client, that's -- it comes
7
free of charge, you know, so I'll answer
8
their questions. So if I included those, it
9
would be a fair bit more.
10
Q. Do you recall which clients
11
specifically to the extent you're able to say
12
that you consulted with during that time
13
period, March 2020 through the end of 2020?
14
A. Well -- well, I have non-disclosure
15
agreements, so I can't say who.
16
Q. Generally, can you say what
17
industries they were in?
18
A. I spoke with people in property and
19
casualty insurance companies, utilities, the
20
-- the telecom providers, mobile network
21
operators, I guess, would be a greater
22
description.
23
Q. Okay.
24
Any large Bank's -- Bank's or
Page 60
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58838
Page 3 of 14
1
financial institutions, like Bank of America,
2
during that time period, March 2020 through
3
the end of 2020?
4
A. During that time period, I don't
5
recall that, no.
6
Q. Okay.
7
Do you know or recall approximately
8
how large those six to eight call centers
9
that you may have consulted with in
10
March 2020 through the end of 2020 were in
11
terms of FTEs, Full Time Equivalents?
12
A. Sure.
13
Most -- most all of them were in
14
the hundreds. I don't think any were over a
15
thousand. And that's combined. It includes,
16
you know, various call centers, some of which
17
include claim call centers in those as well.
18
Q. What types of claims?
19
A. Well --
20
Q. Property casualty claims?
21
A. But in this -- in this case, it
22
would have been property casualty claims.
23
That industry utilizes what they call First
24
Notice Of Laws, FNOL, call centers that
Page 61
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58839
Page 4 of 14
1
teams, and, so, had to do some ramping up and
2
had to consider strategies to get them
3
through what could have amounted to a
4
one-week, a two-week, possibly even a
5
four-week period to stabilize the volume --
6
to -- to stabilize performance as their
7
capacity caught up and -- and their volume
8
level down.
9
Q. Okay.
10
And did any of those call centers
11
already have any work-from-home arrangements
12
in place for -- for some or all of their --
13
their Customer Service Representatives?
14
A. Yeah.
15
If memory serves me correctly, all
16
of them did. You know, by 2020 it was fairly
17
common to at least have some people at home,
18
but that doesn't necessarily mean
19
100 percent. You know, there were a few call
20
centers that had 100 percent, but they were
21
more the exception at that time than the
22
norm. It was somewhat smaller than 100
23
percent.
24
Q. Do you know if that was common in
Page 65
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58840
Page 5 of 14
1
2020 for financial institutions or
2
regulated -- regulated Bank's, like Bank of
3
America?
4
A. Well, I know certainly some
5
financial institutions -- it depends, you
6
know, what you put in under financial
7
institutions, but, you know, 401K operators,
8
and organizations like that, I know had some
9
work-from-home people.
10
Q. How about -- how about national
11
banks, like -- like Bank of America?
12
A. Well, again, I -- during that time
13
period, I -- I did not speak to any clients
14
that were in the banking field. I spoke to
15
clients in, you know, related industries,
16
insurance, and those types of financial
17
organizations.
18
Q. Okay.
19
So turning back to -- to the extent
20
any of your clients had call volume spikes,
21
how -- do you recall how large and how
22
extended those call volumes spikes were, can
23
you give us by days, weeks, months?
24
A. So it varied. I know one client
Page 66
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58841
Page 6 of 14
1
that.
2
Q. Sure.
3
Have you ever consulted for a
4
client whose call center experienced a 30 or
5
X increase in call volume and over the course
6
of weeks or -- or months?
7
MR. JONES: Objection. Vague.
8
THE WITNESS: So the only
9
situation that might fit that is if
10
I was in a call center that had
11
just started up. So I -- the
12
answer is probably, but I -- but I
13
can't -- I can't recall one at this
14
point in time.
15
I know I've dealt with people
16
that really had no known -- had no
17
way of knowing, you know, how many
18
calls may be arriving, so we'd have
19
to get creative on determining what
20
the workforce planning strategy
21
should be.
22
MR. RIFFEE: Okay.
23
BY MR. RIFFEE:
24
Q. But you haven't consulted with or
Page 114
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58842
Page 7 of 14
1
worked with a call center -- an existing call
2
center that experienced a 30 to 40 X increase
3
in call volume over the span of weeks or
4
months, correct?
5
MR. JONES: Objection. Vague.
6
THE WITNESS: Yeah, I -- I
7
believe that to be correct.
8
BY MR. RIFFEE:
9
Q. To your knowledge, had you ever
10
managed -- or, I'm sorry.
11
To your knowledge, have you ever
12
consulted with a client whose call center was
13
specifically being targeted by criminals or
14
fraudsters?
15
MR. JONES: Objection. Vague.
16
THE WITNESS: Yeah, I think
17
many of the call centers I've
18
consulted with have -- have to deal
19
with criminals and -- and
20
fraudsters.
21
BY MR. RIFFEE:
22
Q. To your knowledge, have you ever
23
consulted or worked with a client that over
24
the course of -- of months or a year was
Page 115
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58843
Page 8 of 14
Page 193
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
I
•
1111
I
I
1111
I
•
I
I
I
-
I
I •
• •
•
1111 -
-
1111
1111 1111
-
1111•
-
1111 •
-
1111 -
1111
• --···-·
-
•
1111----•1111
• -·-·-·
• • • . -
• •
•
1111•1111----
•
-
-
1111 1111
1111 1111 •
1111•
. -
•
1111 -
1111
. ·-
---
•
• • • •
• • •
--
-•--1111
-
1111 -
-
1111
-····
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58844
Page 9 of 14
m
Page 194
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
I
--
I
I
---
-
I
1111 -
I
1111 1111 -
1111 1111
I
1111
■-
I
I
--■1111--
I
■
■
■
-
-
1111 1111 -
■
-■
I
1111-
■
1111-
■
■
-
-
■ ■ 1111
■
■ 1111 1111 -
■
■-
■ ■-
-1111
-
■ -
1111 ■ 1111
■-
■
■
1111 -
■
1111
■
1111
■ 1111 -
■
1111 -
■ ■ 1111
■
-
·--1111
■
1111
1111 ■ 1111 1111
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58845
Page 10 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-I-0-N
I hereby certify that the
witness was duly sworn in for this
deposition matter by the Court
Reporter .
Mary Hammond
April 23, 2025
(The foregoing certification of
this transcript does not apply to
any reproduction of the same by any
means, unless under the direct
control and/or supervision of the
Certified Shorthand Reporter . )
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Page 458
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58846
Page 11 of 14
Pa e #
11
28
30
30
30
38
44
50
51
56
60
61
62
62
73
93
118
120
123
140
145
146
154
155
156
163
In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-LAB-GPC
Errata Sheet for April 23, 2025 Deposition of Jay Minnucci
Line #
Reason:
20
Transcri tion enor
1
Transcri tion enor
7
Transcri tion enor
12
Confo1m to facts
21
Transcri tion enor
22
Transcri tion enor
7-8
Clarification
8
Transcription
en or/ clarification
1
Transcription enor
5
Clarification
21
Transcription
·eater"
en or/ clarification
24
"Notice of Laws"
"Notice of Loss"
Transcri tion Enor
11
"cuein "
"
,,
Transcri tion Enor
21
"need a brown"
"need a loan"
Transcri tion enor
11
"financiality"
"under
Transcription Enor
confidentiali ,,
23
"keep calls down"
"keep costs down"
Transcription
en or/ clarification
4
"!delta"
"I had"
Transcri tion Enor
3
"four cases lived
"four cases listed
Transcription Enor
here"
here"
5
"Dilbe1i "
"Daube1i"
Transcri tion Enor
13
Confo1m to facts
15
Clarification
16
Clarification
3
Clarification
11
Clarification
3
Confo1m to facts
23-24
Transcription enor
1
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58847
Page 12 of 14
Pa e # Line#
Reason:
180
8-11
Clarification
188
21-24
Clarification
192
9
Transcri tion Enor
201
24
Transcription
en or/ clarification
216
2
"P-and-C"
Transcri tion enor
216
11
"P-and-C"
Transcri tion enor
232
7
--
Transcription
en or/ clarification
237
24
Clarification
243
10
Clarification
258
11
Transcri tion enor
260
14
Clarification
275
7
Clarification
281
4
Transcription
en or/ clarification
330
2
Transcri tion enor
344
5
Transcription enor
354
18
Transcri tion Enor
368
22
Clarification
375
12
Transcri tion Enor
378
11
Transcri tion Enor
378
15-16
Transcription Enor
2
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58848
Page 13 of 14
Pa e # Line #
Reason:
379
8-9
Transcription Enor
379
17
Transcription Enor
380
6
381
392
23
398
21
In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, I have read the entire transcript
of my testimony. I have listed my changes on the above errata sheet and the reasons for making
them. I request that these changes be entered as paii of the record of my testimony, and I request
and authorize that this e1rnta sheet be appended to the transcript of my testimony and be
inco1porated therein.
3
Jay Minnucci
July 3, 2025
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 675-3 Filed 02/20/26 PageID.58849
Page 14 of 14File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.casd.709615.675.3.pdf
- Size
- 689,871 bytes
- SHA-256
- 417e115c18c88d826e0b55926897d1fd97c684073dd471a1f49832a4689b2348
- Original
- PACER (login required)