Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Exhibit 35 - Expert Report of David Levine — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 593-1, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Exhibit 35 - Expert Report of David Levine — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 593-1, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Filed October 20, 2025 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-10-20

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 593-1 · 2025-10-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

HX 35
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43169 
Page 1 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
i 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
In re Bank of America California 
Unemployment Benefits Litigation, 
This Document Relates to All Actions 
Case No. 3-21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
EXPERT REPORT OF 
DAVID I. LEVINE 
March 4, 2025 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43170 
Page 2 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
ii 
 
 
Table of Contents 
I. 
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 
A. 
Qualifications ...................................................................................................................... 1 
B. 
Summary of Assignment ..................................................................................................... 1 
C. 
Summary of Opinions ......................................................................................................... 2 
I. 
Use of a Compound Interest Rate is an Appropriate Measure of the Opportunity Cost 
of Delayed UI Benefits .................................................................................................................. 3 
II. The Credit Card Interest Rate is a Conservative Measure of the Opportunity Costs of 
Depriving UI Recipients of Their Benefits .................................................................................. 8 
III. The Minimum Wage is an Appropriate Measure of the Value of Lost Time for the 
Customer Service Class .............................................................................................................. 14 
Appendices ................................................................................................................................... 17 
Appendix A: CV ........................................................................................................................ 17 
Appendix B: Materials Considered ........................................................................................... 38 
Case Materials ....................................................................................................................... 38 
Research ................................................................................................................................. 38 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43171 
Page 3 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
1 
 
 
I. 
Introduction 
A. Qualifications 
1. I am the Trefethen Professor at the Haas School of Business, University of California, 
Berkeley.   
2. I received my Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, and I have been a professor 
at UC Berkeley since 1987. I have held visiting positions at the Sloan School, MIT, the U.S. 
Department of Labor and as a Senior Economist at the President’s Council of Economic 
Advisors.  
3. I have published widely in labor economics and the economics of households, with a 
focus on decisions and risk. I have approximately 100 refereed publications, as well as several 
books, chapters, and popular articles. My CV, attached as Appendix A, includes a list of my 
recent publications. 
B. Summary of Assignment 
4. Class Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) brought this proposed class action against Defendant Bank 
of America, N.A. (“the Bank”), In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits 
Litigation, Case No. 3-21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, on behalf of themselves and other similarly 
situated individuals whose California unemployment insurance benefits were distributed on 
prepaid debit cards by the Bank, and whose receipt of those benefits was adversely impacted by 
the Bank’s policies and practices during the class period in 2020-2021. 
5. I was retained by Plaintiffs’ counsel to opine on two topics: (1) an appropriate 
methodology for determining the value of the lost opportunity costs to the class members whose 
access to UI benefits was delayed or denied by the Bank’s challenged policies and practices, and 
(2) an appropriate methodology for calculating the value of the time lost by class members who 
telephoned the Bank’s customer service number for California UI recipients during the class 
period and were required to wait in excess of industry-standard wait times before the Bank 
answered their calls.  
6. I am being compensated for my work in this matter at the rate of $1,175 per hour. 
7. My analysis and opinions are based on my 40 years in academia and research in the field 
of labor economics, which includes my experience with the common practice in my field of 
using a measure of aggregate harm to estimate the effects of a policy.  
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43172 
Page 4 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
2 
 
 
8. During the course of my analysis, I have relied upon documents and information 
produced in discovery in this case as well as publicly available documents and information. I 
have relied upon the materials cited in this report and those materials cited in Appendix B. 
C. Summary of Opinions 
Use of a Compound Interest Rate is an Appropriate Measure of the Opportunity Cost of Delayed 
UI Benefits 
9. Using an aggregate measure of harm is common practice in the field of economics, and 
aggregates are an appropriate way to represent classwide harm. 
10. The harm suffered by class members who were deprived of their UI benefits cannot be 
represented only by the principal amount of the benefits they were denied. UI recipients who 
were denied their benefits also suffered harm caused by the delay itself, which can be described 
as the “opportunity cost” faced by individuals in the absence of UI. 
11. In my opinion, a compound interest rate is an appropriate way of measuring this 
opportunity cost. Specifically, a compound interest rate, applied to the principal amount of 
delayed funds and the length of time those funds were inaccessible, is an appropriate way to 
measure the harm caused by the Bank’s policies and practices. 
The Credit Card Interest Rate is a Conservative Measure of the Opportunity Costs of Depriving 
UI Recipients of Their Benefits 
12. It is my opinion that the credit card interest rate is an appropriate proxy to represent the  
class-wide harm suffered due to delays in receiving UI payments during COVID. The credit card 
rate represents the cost to the typical class member of not receiving their benefits, because UI 
benefits are typically used for essential expenses. When UI payments disappear, most UI 
recipients turn to credit cards to cover those expenses. 
13. Because the alternative sources of funds available to most class members are higher  
cost than the cost of credit-card borrowing, in my opinion the credit card interest rate is a 
conservative measure of the opportunity cost of lost funds to the proposed class members.  
The Minimum Wage is a Conservative Measure of the Value of Lost Time for the Customer 
Service Class 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43173 
Page 5 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
3 
 
 
14. The harm suffered by members of the Customer Service Class can be calculated using the 
California state minimum wage. Economists frequently use wage data to represent the value of 
time, and the minimum wage is a conservative estimate of the average value of time for those 
waiting for customer service from the Bank. 
I. 
Use of a Compound Interest Rate is an Appropriate Measure of the Opportunity 
Cost of Delayed UI Benefits 
15. It is my understanding that, as a result of the Bank’s challenged policies and practices, 
class members were denied access to their UI funds in the form of either unauthorized 
transaction claims that should have been reimbursed within 10 business days (Claim Denial 
Class), rescinded permanent credits on unauthorized-transaction claims that the Bank debited 
from class members’ accounts (Credit Rescission Class), UI funds frozen in their accounts 
(Account Freeze Class), or delayed payment of continuing UI benefits because EDD was unable 
to deposit funds into their frozen accounts (Account Freeze Class).  
16. It is my opinion that an appropriate measure of damages should include not only the 
principal amounts of the UI funds that class members were due, but also the value of receiving 
those UI benefits at the time they were due. The “time value” or “opportunity cost” of money is a 
well-established concept in economics. In measuring an appropriate time value or opportunity 
cost of UI funds, it is important to consider the purpose for which UI benefits are issued and the 
likely consequences of deprivation. For most UI recipients entitled to benefits, a dollar of UI 
benefits at the time the benefit is due is far more valuable than a dollar of UI benefits one month, 
or six months, or a year later.  
17. Based on economic studies about how recipients use UI benefits and what alternative 
options are available to recipients who are denied access to their funds, it is my opinion that a 
lower bound on the average cost of losing access to UI can be measured by a compound interest 
rate that calculates the ongoing harm of being denied benefits over time. The appropriateness of 
using this opportunity cost of delayed benefits is supported by my review of the economic 
literature that makes clear UI benefits are used for essential expenses, and that individuals face 
harm over time when their sources of funds for these expenses are abruptly cut off. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43174 
Page 6 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
4 
 
 
18. A compound interest rate is an appropriate proxy for the opportunity cost of losing access 
to UI.  
19. UI is a crucial social safety net in the United States, designed to provide temporary 
financial assistance to workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.1 The 
program plays a vital role in mitigating the economic and social consequences of unemployment, 
which can include lower consumption, increased food insecurity, and reliance on high-cost 
borrowing. 
20. Job loss leads to a significant decrease in household income, forcing individuals and 
families to cut back on essential expenses like food, transportation, and childcare.2 Families 
typically prioritize fixed costs such as rent and mortgage, putting additional pressure on items 
such as nutrition. UI helps to mitigate this negative cycle by providing partial income 
replacement, helping unemployed individuals cover their essential expenses.3 
21. One study, which estimated that consumption would fall by 22.2% in the absence of UI, 
demonstrates that when individuals experience a loss of income,4 they incur a cost that is greater 
than just the loss of the income itself, as they are forced either to cut back on consumption and 
 
1 See generally Pavoni, Nicola, and Giovanni L. Violante, "Optimal Welfare-to-Work Programs," The 
Review of Economic Studies 74, no. 1 (2007): 283-318 (providing an overview of UI programs and their 
role in social welfare systems), 
https://violante.economics.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf5621/files/documents/Optimal%20Welfare-to-
Work%20Programs.pdf. 
2 See, e.g., Gruber, Jonathan. "The Consumption Smoothing Benefits of Unemployment Insurance." The 
American Economic Review 87, no. 1 (1997): 192-205 (estimating the decline in consumption following 
job loss in the absence of UI); Browning, Martin, and Thomas F. Crossley, "The Life-Cycle Model of 
Consumption and Saving," Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, no. 3 (2001): 3-22 (analyzing how UI 
helps smooth consumption, with effects varying based on replacement rates, benefit duration, and 
liquidity constraints), https://www.jstor.org/stable/2950862. 
3 See Ganong, Peter, and Pascal Noel. 2019. "Consumer Spending During Unemployment: Positive and 
Normative Implications." American Economic Review 109 (7): 2383–2424, at 2404 (finding that UI 
benefits have a significant positive effect on consumption, with each additional dollar of UI benefits 
leading to an increase in the total bank account outflows by 83 cents), 
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20170537. See Fang, Di, Michael R. Thomsen, Rodolfo 
M. Nayga, and Wei Yang. "Food Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Survey of 
Low-Income Americans," Food Security (2022): 165-183 (analyzing how COVID exacerbated food 
insecurity among low-income Americans and how UI benefits improve food security), 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34254010/. 
4 Gruber, supra note 2 at 195. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43175 
Page 7 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
5 
 
 
other expenses or to turn to alternative sources of replacement funds, such as credit cards and 
other forms of consumer borrowing, that typically impose substantial interest rates. Other 
consequences of being denied UI can include eviction, default on mortgage, and missing 
payments on other bills5 (which can result in late fees that increase overall debt and can further 
damage future job or housing opportunities).6 Unemployed individuals are also more likely to 
forego healthcare, which is associated with increased health hardships in the future.7   
22. UI can help to ameliorate these harms by providing a temporary source of income for the 
unemployed. UI helps individuals cover essential expenses, such as food, housing, and utilities, 
and can also help them to avoid incurring credit card debt and other higher-cost borrowing 
options, such as payday loans. UI also helps individuals maintain their health insurance and 
avoid having to forego necessary medical care.8 
23. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of UI in California and elsewhere was even 
more important. The pandemic and ensuing economic crisis caused unprecedented job losses and 
financial hardship for millions of Americans.9 In this context, the availability of UI benefits 
 
5 See Foote, Christopher L., Kristopher S. Gerardi, and Paul S. Willen, "Negative Equity and Foreclosure: 
Theory and Evidence," Journal of Urban Economics 64, no. 2 (2008): 234-45, at 237 (finding that 
unemployment is a major risk factor for mortgage default), 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119008000673. 
6 Fellowes, Matt, and Mia Mabanta. “Borrowing to Get Ahead, and Behind: The Credit Boom and Bust in 
Lower-Income Markets,” Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program (2007), 
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/borrowing-to-get-ahead-and-behind-the-credit-boom-and-bust-in-
lower-income-markets/. 
7 Huang, Jin, Birkenmaier, Julie, and Kim, Youngmi, "Job Loss and Unmet Health Care Needs in the 
Economic Recession: Different Associations by Family Income," American Journal of Public Health 104, 
no. 11 (2014): 178-183. 
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4202960/#:~:text=Job%20loss%20was%20significantly%20as
sociated,%2D%20and%20higher%2Dincome%20unemployed. 
8 Berkowitz, Seth A., & Basu, Sanjay, "Unemployment Insurance, Health-Related Social Needs, Health 
Care Access, and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic," JAMA Internal Medicine 181, no. 5 
(2021): 699-702 (analyzing the impact of UI on health-related social needs, healthcare access, and mental 
health during the COVID-19 pandemic), 
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2773234. 
9 See generally Coibion, Olivier, Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, and Weber, Michael, "Labor Markets During the 
COVID-19 Crisis: A Preliminary View," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 
27017 (2020) (documenting widespread job losses and economic disruption caused by the pandemic), 
https://www.nber.org/papers/w27017. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43176 
Page 8 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
6 
 
 
became even more critical in helping mitigate the adverse impacts of the pandemic across 
various dimensions, including access to household necessities, payment of bills, food insecurity, 
high-cost borrowing, and other financial hardships. 
24. To prevent widespread economic devastation during the pandemic, the federal 
government made UI more generous than usual.10 From late March to July 2020, the federal 
government provided an extra $600 per week on top of normal state UI benefits. Pandemic 
Unemployment Assistance was also extended to gig workers and others not normally covered by 
UI.11 A crucial goal of UI during this lockdown phase was to encourage people to stay safe at 
home and help them afford to pay their bills and purchase food without having to seek a job 
outside. For the rest of 2020 through March 2021, UI recipients received an extra $300 per week 
on top of normal benefits.12  
25. UI benefits were particularly critical for low-income individuals during this time, because 
during the first year of the pandemic, adults aged 25 to 64 with low socioeconomic position 
(SEP) were less likely to have remote work opportunities and were five times more likely to die 
from COVID than their high-SEP counterparts.13 
26. The pandemic exacerbated food insecurity among the unemployed.14 Many individuals  
were initially forced to make difficult choices between paying for food and other essential 
expenses, but UI benefits provided a source of income that could be used to purchase food 
 
10 Petrosky-Nadeau, Nicolas, and Robert G. Valletta, "UI Generosity and Job Acceptance: Effects of the 
2020 CARES Act," Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series (2021) (documenting 
the generosity of UI during COVID and its impact on job acceptance), https://www.frbsf.org/wp-
content/uploads/wp2021-13.pdf. 
11 Greig, Fiona, Daniel M. Sullivan, Samantha Anderson, Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel, and Joseph Vavra. 
"Lessons Learned from the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance Program during COVID-19," JPMorgan 
Chase Institute (2022). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4100569. 
12 U.S. Department of Labor, "U.S. Department of Labor Issues Guidance on Federal Pandemic 
Unemployment Compensation and Mixed Earner Unemployment Compensation," Jan. 5, 2021, 
https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20210105. 
13 See Pathak, Elizabeth B., Janelle M. Menard, Rebecca B. Garcia, & Jason L. Salemi, "Joint Effects of 
Socioeconomic Position, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender on COVID-19 Mortality Among Working-Age 
Adults in the United States," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 
9 (2022): 5479 ("During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, low-SEP adults 
aged 25–64 years old were five times as likely as high-SEP adults to die from COVID-19…"), 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35564872/. 
14 See Fang et al. supra note 3. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43177 
Page 9 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
7 
 
 
without forcing families to make difficult decisions between food and healthcare, food and 
transportation, and food and bills.15 UI benefits reduced food insecurity for many jobless 
individuals, and the payments were especially helpful in reducing food insecurity among low-
income households with children during the pandemic.16   
27. The ongoing availability of UI benefits during the pandemic was also particularly 
valuable because those payments helped individuals maintain health insurance and afford much-
needed health care.17 
28. In many other ways, the pandemic exacerbated the financial challenges that ordinarily 
come with job loss, such as mortgage default and difficulty paying bills.18 UI benefits 
significantly reduced the likelihood of mortgage default and provided families with vital income 
support to prevent falling behind on bills.19 
 
15 See id. at 166 (“[o]ur results indicate that losing a job due to the pandemic was associated with the 
highest level of food insecurity…"); id. at 174 ("unemployment benefits are helping to alleviate food 
insecurity"). 
16 See id. at 174 ("receipt of unemployment benefits is negatively associated with food insecurity with the 
strongest associations and significant associations among those who lost a job due to the pandemic, 
households with children, and Black households"); Raifman, J., Bor, J., Venkataramani, A. “Association 
Between Receipt of Unemployment Insurance and Food Insecurity Among People Who Lost Employment 
During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States,” JAMA Network Open (2021) at 7 (investigating 
the association between receiving UI benefits and food insecurity among individuals who lost 
employment during the COVID-19 pandemic) (UI reduced food insecurity by 4.3 percentage points, a 35 
percent relative decrease, among jobless individuals), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33512519/. 
17 See Kuka, Elira, "Quantifying the Benefits of Social Insurance: Unemployment Insurance and Health," 
The Review of Economics and Statistics 102, no. 3 (2020): 490-505, at 490 ("The results show that higher 
UI generosity increases health insurance coverage and utilization, with stronger effects during periods of 
high unemployment rates."), https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/102/3/490/96788/Quantifying-the-
Benefits-of-Social-Insurance?redirectedFrom=fulltext; see generally Shafer, Paul R., "Expanded 
Unemployment Benefits and Their Implications for Health During the COVID‐19 Pandemic," Health 
Services Research 57, no. 1 (2021): 12 (analyzing the impact of expanded UI benefits on health care 
spending and social well-being), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8652454/. 
18 See Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, "Housing Insecurity and the COVID-19 Pandemic," 1-20, 
at 2 (2021) ("In 2020, those who have fallen behind at least three months on their mortgage increased 250 
percent to over 2 million households, and is now at a level not seen since the height of the Great 
Recession in 2010."), https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/housing-
insecurity-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/. 
19 See Park, JungHo, and Dongha Park, "Racial Disparities in Unemployment Benefits Among U.S. 
Mortgage Borrowers During COVID-19," Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 38, no. 3 
(2023): 1619-1649, at 1619 ("UI recipients—regardless of race and ethnicity—were less likely to 
experience mortgage difficulties…"), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36624828/. See generally Ganong, 
Peter, Pascal Noel, and Joseph Vavra, "US Unemployment Insurance Replacement Rates During the 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43178 
Page 10 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
8 
 
 
29. Based on this literature, it is my opinion that the unemployed individuals who received 
UI benefits in California during the class periods were less likely to turn to high-cost borrowing 
options, less likely to forego healthcare, and less likely to experience eviction, mortgage default, 
and lower credit scores. UI recipients with a temporary source of income were more able to 
afford household necessities and prevent these harms from occurring. When these benefits were 
abruptly withheld, it is my opinion that class members faced an opportunity cost when they 
sought other funds to prevent these harms from occurring—or, alternatively, when they incurred 
costs related to reducing consumption. 
30. A compound interest rate is an appropriate way to measure this opportunity cost because 
it can be applied to the principal amount of funds withheld and the length of time benefits were 
delayed, which represented the costs incurred over time as the affected individuals either paid to 
avoid or incurred these harms. 
II. 
The Credit Card Interest Rate is a Conservative Measure of the Opportunity 
Costs of Depriving UI Recipients of Their Benefits 
31. I was asked to opine on what interest rate would be appropriate to use in calculating the 
aggregate harm to class members whose access to UI benefit funds was delayed by the Bank’s 
challenged actions. It is my opinion that a standard credit card interest rate is a conservative 
estimate of the aggregate harm caused by those delays. The credit card interest rate, applied to 
the principal amount of delayed funds and the length of time funds were inaccessible, is an 
appropriate methodology for measuring class-wide harm and is supported by commonly used 
tools in labor economics. This next section describes the opportunity costs faced by individuals 
in the absence of UI and explains why the credit card interest rate is a conservative estimate of 
this harm. 
32. My opinion on the appropriateness of using the credit card interest rate is supported by 
research showing demographic and socio-economic features of the average Californian who 
receives UI and my analysis of how those individuals are likely to cope with delayed UI 
 
Pandemic." Journal of Public Economics 191 (2020): 104273 (finding that UI benefits significantly 
reduced the likelihood of mortgage default during the pandemic), 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272720301377?via%3Dihub. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43179 
Page 11 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
9 
 
 
payments. Economists have studied the outcomes for unemployed people during COVID. These 
results suggest that of those not using a credit card as the source of funds to replace UI payments, 
the majority would have been accessing much higher cost sources of funds than the credit card 
rate. As a result, it is my opinion that the credit card interest rate is a conservative estimate of the 
cost faced by these class members. 
33. My review of the academic literature on UI recipients supports the conclusion that the 
delay or denial of UI benefits generates a cost for every individual whose benefits were denied. 
Because of the research cited above that shows that UI benefits during the pandemic were used 
to cover the cost of household necessities, bills, rent, childcare, and healthcare, and because it is 
unlikely that many UI recipients during this period had sufficient savings to cover several 
months of expenses, every class member who was denied their benefits suffered some harm.  
34. It is my opinion that the typical class member was likely to have suffered at least the cost 
represented by the credit card interest rate during the time their benefits were denied. This 
conclusion is based on my research which shows that most class members would have turned to 
credit card borrowing to cover their essential expenses in lieu of UI, and others would have 
turned to even higher-cost forms of borrowing. 
35. First, it is unlikely that class members could fall back on savings to cover expenses the 
whole time their UI benefits were denied. Pre-pandemic data shows that only about 37% of all 
adults had at least one month’s worth of expenses in emergency savings, and for several reasons, 
it is my opinion that 37% undercounts the percentage of the class in this category.20 First, UI 
recipients in general have lower levels of savings than those who are employed: “[t]he workers 
most exposed to job losses and wage cuts are some of the same workers least likely to have a 
buffer of savings to weather an income shortfall.”21 Second, families with uncertain delays will 
 
20 Caroline Ratcliffe, et al., “Emergency Savings and Financial Security: Insights from the Making Ends 
Meet Survey and Consumer Credit Panel” at 36, CFPB Office of Research Data Point No. 2022-01 
(2022). 
21 Washington Center for Equitable Growth. "What the U.S. Census Household Pulse Survey Reveals 
About the First Year of the Coronavirus Recession in Six Charts," Washington Center for Equitable 
Growth (April 1, 2021), https://equitablegrowth.org/what-the-u-s-census-household-pulse-survey-reveals-
about-the-first-year-of-the-coronavirus-recession-in-six-charts/; see also Berman, Yonatan, "The 
Distributional Short-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Wages in the United States," City University 
of New York Working PAper (2020), https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.08763.pdf (showing impact of COVID-19 
on wage cuts). 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43180 
Page 12 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
10 
 
 
not want to deplete all of their savings—especially if they have children or other reasons to be 
risk averse. Because Plaintiffs’ counsel has informed me that most UI payments in this class 
were delayed by over a month even this small proportion of adults may not have survived the 
length of the delay without incurring debt. This research supports my opinion that a large 
majority of class members were likely unable to cover the costs of their essential expenses 
without borrowing or incurring other costs associated with extreme deprivation.  
36. To arrive at a measure of the costs that these individuals who did not rely solely on 
savings did face when their benefits were abruptly withheld, I examined the ways in which the 
literature shows that class members might have coped with this sudden loss of funds. It is my 
opinion that class members whose benefits were denied most commonly coped by borrowing 
funds on a credit card, while others sought even higher-cost forms of borrowing like payday 
loans, and others still incurred higher costs related to deprivation of food, housing, and medical 
care. 
37. Most class members whose UI benefits were denied likely incurred credit card debt to  
cover their essential expenses. This conclusion is supported by research that shows that by the 
end of 2021, 190.6 million adults in the United States (74%) had a credit card.22 An even higher 
share of households would have had a credit card at the time of that statistic, and it can be 
assumed that if even one line of credit is available to a household, that card will be used for 
essential expenses. 
38. Studies also show that during the pandemic, recipients of extra government funds most 
commonly used those funds to pay off credit card debt. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 
Household Pulse Survey indicates that 66% of respondent households at the end of January 2021 
who indicated that they were “laid off due to coronavirus pandemic” or whose “employer went 
out of business due to the coronavirus pandemic” used their COVID-19 stimulus payment 
primarily to pay off debt.23 Indeed, when stimulus relief was delayed in late 2020, many 
 
22 See Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Consumer Credit Card Market, (October 2023) at 15, 
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/the-consumer-credit-card-market/. 
23 See “Household Pulse Survey Public Use File: January 20 – February 1, 2021,” U.S. Census Bureau, 
https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/datasets/hhp/2021/wk23/HPS_Week23_PUF_CSV.zip, 
accessed October 7, 2024. Of the 5,207,469 respondents to the Census Bureau who indicated they were 
“laid off due to coronavirus pandemic” or did not work in the past seven days because their employer 
“went out of business,” “experienced a reduction in business (including furlough),” or “closed 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43181 
Page 13 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
11 
 
 
households resorted to credit, then used the eventual stimulus checks to pay down that debt.24 
For families in this category, who would have used a government transfer to pay off credit card 
debt, the opportunity cost of not receiving that transfer is the credit card interest rate. 
39. Other class members—especially those who did not have access to credit—would have 
turned to even higher cost forms of borrowing. It is well-established that 26% of American adults 
had no credit card in their names as of the end of 2021.25 This group includes only 0.2% of all 
superprime consumers, 40% of deep subprime, and 95% of those with a thin or stale credit file.26 
I expect the unemployed to be over-represented among this group, and it is my opinion that 
individuals in this category would have incurred costs even higher than the cost of credit card 
debt.  
40. Because UI recipients rely on these benefits to cover essential expenses, the loss of those  
benefits can push individuals without access to credit towards high-cost borrowing options, such 
as payday loans or pawn shops, to make ends meet.27 These types of loans often come with high 
interest rates and fees, which can trap borrowers in a cycle of debt.28 The average payday loan 
has an annual percentage rate (APR) of 339% according to a report by the Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau (CFPB) in 2013, which is far higher than the average credit card interest 
rate.29 Class members who were unbanked may have even turned to high-cost forms of credit, 
such as pawn loans, etc. In California, a $1000 pawn loan for 3 months compounds to an annual 
 
temporarily” due to the coronavirus pandemic and received a COVID-19 stimulus payment, 3,417,137 
respondents mostly used their payment to pay down debt, and 633,287 respondents mostly used their 
payment to increase savings. Responses are weighted by the Census Bureau to reflect differences between 
the survey sample and the general population of households. 
24 Id. 
25 See Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2023), supra note 22, at 15. 
26 Id. at 16. 
27 See e.g., Bhutta, Neil, Jacob Goldin, and Tatiana Homonoff, "Consumer Borrowing After Payday Loan 
Bans," The Journal of Law and Economics 59, no. 1 (2016): 225-59 (examining the use of payday loans 
by unemployed individuals, and other high-interest rate borrowing options used by the same consumer 
population), https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/686033. 
28 Id. at 226. 
29 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, "Payday Loans and Deposit Advance Products" at 17 (2013), 
https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201304_cfpb_payday-dap-whitepaper.pdf. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43182 
Page 14 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
12 
 
 
interest rate of around 50%.30 The opportunity cost of delayed UI funds for these individuals far 
exceeded the credit card interest rate. 
41. Other individuals without access to credit may have been forced to cut back on high-
value spending, and that, too, has extreme opportunity costs. This group includes individuals 
who were unable to borrow and those who chose not to borrow because the only options had 
extremely high costs or they were not willing to deplete their assets to zero. The latter group is 
impacted by the fact that class members here did not know if or when they would receive their 
UI payments, so they may have chosen to forego food or incur other high costs to prevent 
spending their last dollar.31 
42. Individuals who cut back on essential expenses paid costs measured by late fees on 
unpaid bills, damage to housing opportunities and credit scores, and human hardship measured in 
skipped meals and foregone healthcare.  
43. A conservative way to quantify these harms is to use the deep subprime effective interest 
rate on credit cards (21%). To arrive at this estimate, I examined research that shows that a 
payday loan is likely to be beneficial if (1) the individual has a short-term need for cash and (2) 
the individual knows they will be able to repay the loan in a few weeks. In these circumstances, 
borrowing $265 (e.g., to be able to buy food or pay rent) and repaying $300 in a few weeks can 
 
30 CAPA - Notice to the Public – Pawn Loan Charges (2016), https://gemsnloans.com/wp-
content/uploads/2021/04/CAPA-Notice-to-Public-2020.pdf. 
31 We see the value of precautionary savings in a related context; many families have revolving credit card 
debt even when they have savings in the bank, even though credit cards charge much higher interest rates 
than banks pay on savings deposits. The Consumer Finance Protection Board reports that 65% of those 
with positive savings, but less than a month’s income worth, had positive credit balances after making 
their last payment. This share is lower, but still 28%, for those with savings over one month’s income. 
Ratcliffe, supra note 20 at 36. Academic studies agree that holding liquid assets does not imply lack of 
credit card debt, and those studies also find that a large fraction of households “co-hold” credit card debt 
and liquid savings simultaneously. Telyukova emphasizes that precautionary motives (fear of losing 
income, unexpected expenses) and liquidity needs can help explain why people don’t simply pay down 
high-interest debt with their savings. Telyukova, Irina A., "Household Need for Liquidity and the Credit 
Card Debt Puzzle," Review of Economic Studies 80, no. 3 (2013): 1148-1177, 
https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/80/3/1148/1571542; see also Gross, D. B., & Souleles, N. S., “Do 
Liquidity Constraints and Interest Rates Matter for Consumer Behavior? Evidence from Credit Card 
Data,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 149–185 (2002), 
https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/117/1/149/1851757; Gorbachev, O., & Luengo-Prado, M. J., 
“The Credit Card Debt Puzzle: The Role of Preferences, Credit Access Risk, and Financial Literacy,” 
Review of Economics of the Household, 17(4), 1301–1328 (2019), https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-
abstract/101/2/294/58511/The-Credit-Card-Debt-Puzzle-The-Role-of?redirectedFrom=fulltext. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43183 
Page 15 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
13 
 
 
be beneficial.32 If the second factor (prompt ability to repay) does not occur, payday loans can 
cause more harm than good. If class members did not borrow and were instead forced into 
extreme deprivation, my assumption is that the uncertainty they faced about if and when their UI 
would arrive was so great as to reduce their incentive to use payday lending (the alternative they 
would have chosen had they been secure in the knowledge that their UI benefits would soon 
arrive to help repay that high-interest loan). As a result, these individuals sacrificed high-value 
consumption (such as missing meals or medical care) or failed to pay bills (potentially running 
up late fees and harming their credit scores), even when the consequences of these actions were 
worse than borrowing for a month at 13% interest (that is, with an annual interest rate greater 
than 350%). This supports my conclusion that the deep subprime effective interest rate on credit 
cards, 21%, is an extremely conservative measure of the cost faced by this group. The costs they 
faced were often much higher—in suffering, instability, and missed meals, in addition to late fees 
and damage to credit scores from delinquencies on bills and rent. 
44. This research supports my opinion that the credit card interest rate would be a 
conservative measure of the average opportunity cost faced by members of the impacted classes. 
Those who were denied their UI benefits incurred costs at least as great as the cost of incurring 
credit card debt, and the harm to many was far higher. Using the credit card interest rate as a 
measure of the average opportunity cost of an impacted class member is extremely conservative 
because it undervalues the damage caused to class members who were forced to take out a 
payday loan, pawn loan, or other high-cost forms of borrowing, and it also undervalues the 
downstream costs of extreme deprivations in food, medical care, and other necessities. 
45. I estimate that class members paid an effective interest rate of at least 15.9%. Credit card 
rates vary, but I arrived at this conclusion after estimating the effects of two known forces: First, 
people with lower credit scores on average pay higher credit card rates than those with higher 
credit scores, and those who were unemployed during COVID tended to have lower education, 
which predicts lower credit scores; and second, Californians have slightly higher credit scores 
 
32 These figures are merely illustrative. They imply a 13% monthly interest rate, which compounds to 
360% per year, approximately matching the California average rate on payday loans. See California 
Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, “Annual Report of Payday Lending Activity Under 
the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law,” at 7, Table 2, Department of Financial Protection and 
Innovation, https://dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/DFPI-Annual-Report-CDDTL-2023.pdf. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43184 
Page 16 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
14 
 
 
than the rest of the nation. Due to data limitations, I neglect all other disadvantages the 
unemployed had which would have tended to further reduce their credit scores and increase their 
cost of borrowing. For the many reasons listed above, this is a conservative lower bound on the 
average opportunity cost funds for UI recipients in California during the COVID pandemic.  
III. The Minimum Wage is an Appropriate Measure of the Value of Lost Time for the 
Customer Service Class 
46. In my opinion, the minimum wage is an appropriate measure of the value of time 
Customer Service class members spent waiting on hold in pursuit of customer service.  
47. I understand that the Customer Service Class is seeking damages for time spent on hold 
with the Bank’s Claims call center, waiting for the Bank to answer their calls.  
48. Economists frequently measure the value of time, and several studies have found that the 
typical value of time is close to the median wage. Economists using very different methodologies 
have arrived at this same conclusion. 
49. Importantly, the value of time is frequently measured using this methodology even when 
the time is not spent at work. For example, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 
and Medicine reports that leisure travelers' value of waiting in an airport lounge is about the 
median wage (even when those travelers can accomplish other leisure tasks during that time, like 
reading a book or chatting with friends).33 The U.S. Department of Transportation also measures 
the average value of time for infrastructure projects as a percentage of the wage rate (50%).34 
Another study examined how much individuals would pay for a rapid pick-up on Lyft, the ride-
share app.35 Again, this study found that the value of time was near the median wage.  
 
33 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Passenger Value of Time, Benefit-Cost 
Analysis and Airport Capital Investment Decisions, Volume 2: Final Report” at 64 (2015), 
https://doi.org/10.17226/22161 (“[T]he median individual income for leisure travelers fell in the $50,000 
to $74,999 category.”). 
34 U.S. Department of Transportation, “Revised Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in 
Economic Analysis” at 9-10 (2016), https://www.transportation.gov/office-policy/transportation-
policy/revised-departmental-guidance-valuation-travel-time-economic. 
35 See Goldszmidt, Ariel, John A. List, Robert D. Metcalfe, Ian Muir, V. Kerry Smith, and Jenny Wang, 
“The Value of Time in the United States: Estimates from Nationwide Natural Field Experiments,” 
National Bureau of Economic Research (2020), https://www.nber.org/papers/w28208 (Researchers used 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43185 
Page 17 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
15 
 
 
50. Other studies show that time spent unproductively is of an even higher value to people, 
reflecting the frustration with wasted time. A study from the United Kingdom found that people 
valued time spent commuting at about $15 per hour, and time spent stuck in traffic at about twice 
as much ($31).36 This value of time spent stuck in traffic was substantially above the median 
hourly wage (roughly $22/ hour).37 
51. A separate body of literature also confirms the unsurprising conclusion that people do not 
like waiting on hold for customer service.38 Dissatisfaction with long hold time increases when 
the eventual response the caller receives is not informative.39 My understanding is that the Bank 
systematically provided unhelpful and/or false information to members of the Customer Service 
Class, which would magnify the disutility of the phone call and increase the value of time spent 
on hold. 
52. Academics have also noted that increased stress can also raise the value of time. For 
example, the survey by the National Academies found that the value of an unexpected flight 
delay is about five times the median wage.40  
 
data from ridesharing company Lyft, analyzing random variations in wait times and prices across millions 
of observations to estimate consumers' value of time.). 
36 Krekel, Christian, and George MacKerron, “Back to Edgeworth? Estimating the Value of Time Using 
Hedonic Experiences” at 5, CEP Discussion Paper No. 1932, Centre for Economic Performance, London 
School of Economics and Political Science (2024), https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1932.pdf. 
37 Office for National Statistics, "Employee Earnings in the UK: 2024,” last modified Oct. 29, 2024, 
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/a
nnualsurveyofhoursandearnings/2024 (reporting median hourly earnings, excluding overtime, for full-
time employees to be £17.52 in April 2023, which roughly corresponds to $22). 
38 See Taylor, S., "Waiting for Service: The Relationship Between Delays and Evaluations of Service," 
Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 56-69, (1994), https://www.jstor.org/stable/1252269?seq=1. In this peer-
reviewed study, Taylor explores how waiting times affect customers' evaluations of service quality. The 
research demonstrates that longer waits significantly decrease customer satisfaction. The findings 
highlight that even brief delays can have a notable impact on perceptions of service. See also Chatterjee, 
S., “Wait for Service and Customer Specific Service Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis,” Indian Institute of 
Management: Bangalore, (2013), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2259403. This 
meta-analysis examines the relationship between service wait times and customer-related outcomes. The 
author concludes that service delay has a significant negative impact on customer satisfaction. 
39 Garcia, Danilo, Trevor Archer, Saleh Moradi, and Bibinaz Ghiabi. "Waiting in Vain: Managing Time 
and Customer Satisfaction at Call Centers," Psychology vol. 3, no. 2 (2012): 213-216 at 215. 
https://www.scirp.org/pdf/psych20120200012_35892130.pdf. 
40 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at 80 supra note 33. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43186 
Page 18 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
16 
 
 
53. In all of these instances, the median wage (or higher) is used to represent the value of 
time. To err on the side of a conservative estimate, it is my opinion that the minimum wage is an 
appropriate measure of the value of time UI beneficiaries in the Customer Service Class spent 
waiting on hold for the Bank’s assistance. 
54. The fact that leisure travelers value their time is an important reminder that time is 
money, but time is also time with friends and family, housework, childcare, hobbies, and so 
forth. Thus, even unemployed people value their time, and any suggestion to the contrary defies 
this widespread research. 
55. As a result, my expert opinion is that the minimum wage is a reasonable lower bound on 
the average value of the time the Customer Service Class members spent on hold waiting for the 
Bank’s Claims call center to answer their calls.  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Dated: March 4, 2025  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
David I. Levine 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43187 
Page 19 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
17 
 
 
Appendices 
Appendix A: CV 
 
DAVID I. LEVINE 
 
Haas School of Business 
 
 
+1.925.899.5938 
University of California  
 
 
levine@berkeley.edu 
Berkeley CA  94720-1900  
 
         http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/levine/ 
 
EDUCATION  
 
• 1987 Ph.D. Harvard University: Economics 
• 1985  A.M. Harvard University: Economics 
• 1982 B.A. 
University of California, Berkeley: Economics and Computer Science 
 
EMPLOYMENT  
 
• Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley: Eugene E. and Catherine M. 
Trefethen Professor of Business Administration, 2006-present  
o Previously Professor 2002-06, Associate Professor 1993-2002, and Assistant 
Professor 1987-1993 
• Council of Economic Advisers: Senior Economist, 1994-1995 
• Office of the American Workplace, U.S. Department of Labor: Senior Research 
Economist, 1994  
• Sloan School, MIT: Visiting Scholar, Industrial Relations Group, 1991   
• Harvard University: Teaching Fellow, 1983-86  
• NBER: Research assistant for Professor Lawrence Summers, 1984  
• Programmer for Intermetrics (1982), Apple Computer (1979-81) and Intel (1978)  
 
OTHER AFFILIATIONS 
 
• Educate Girls Globally, Board member 2022-present  
• Development Engineering Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley: Executive 
Committee, 2013-present  
• Graduate Group in Health Services, University of California, Berkeley: Executive 
Committee, 2008-present 
• Economic Analysis and Policy Group, Haas School of Business, University of California, 
Berkeley: chair, 2008-2011 and 2019-2023  
• Haas Undergraduate Program Committee, chair, 2013-15, 2018-19, and 2021-2022.  
• Haas Policy and Planning Committee, 2010-12 and 2020-22 (chair, 2021-22)  
• WE CARE Solar: Scientific Advisory Board, 2008-2012 
• University of California, Berkeley, Campus Undergraduate Committee, 2019-2020  
• Panel of Counselors (Faculty committee), University of California, Berkeley, 2017-18 
• Goodguide: Scientific Advisory Board, 2007-2012 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43188 
Page 20 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
18 
 
 
• Ombudsman Committee, UC Berkeley, 2008-12  
• Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA), University of California: Founding chair of 
the Advisory Board, 2006-2011 
• Center for Responsible Business, Haas School of Business, University of California, 
Berkeley: Faculty Advisory Board, 2003-2009.  Research Director, 2004-2006  
• Center for Health Research, University of California, Berkeley: Chair, 2005-2008 
• NERA Economic Consulting: Special consultant, 2005-2008  
• Industrial Relations: Editor, 1993-2005 
• Institute of Industrial Relations, U.C. Berkeley: Associate Director, 1997-2005 
• Center for Labor Research and Education, U.C. Berkeley: Executive Committee and 
Advisory Board, 1995-2005 
• Institute for Labor and the Economy, University of California: Research Committee, 
2001-2003 
• Center for Organization and Human Resource Effectiveness: Founding Director of 
Research, 1996-2000  
• Labor Center Reporter: Faculty Mentor, U.C. Berkeley, 1998-1992 
• Dollars and Sense: Editorial Associate, 1985-1990 
 
BOOKS AND MONOGRAPHS 
Global Challenges in Responsible Business, editor, with CB Bhattacharya, Craig Smith and 
David Vogel, Cambridge University Press, 2010 
Carve-outs in Workers’ Compensation Programs in California Construction, with Cristian 
Echeverria, Frank Neuhauser, Richard Reuben, and Jeffrey S Petersen, Upjohn Institute, 
Kalamazoo MI, 2003 
How New is the “New” Employment Contract? with Dale Belman, Gary Charness, Erica 
Groshen, and KC O’Shaughnessy, Upjohn Institute, Kalamazoo MI, 2002 (Listed as 
“Noteworthy” by the Princeton Industrial Relations Section)  
The American Workplace: Skills, Pay, and Employee Involvement, editor, with Casey 
Ichniowski, Craig Olson, and George Strauss, Cambridge University Press, 2000 
Working in the 21st Century: Government Policies to Promote Opportunity, Learning and 
Productivity in the New Economy, ME Sharpe, Armonk NY, 1998 
Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win, Brookings Institution, 
Washington DC, 1995  
REFEREED ARTICLES (Most articles are on my web site)  
“Vaccination as personal public-good provision,” with J. Lucas Reddinger and Gary 
Charness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 224 (2024): 481-499. 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124002336  
“Evaluating India’s Intensified Diarrhea Control Fortnight: an analysis of the National Family 
Health Survey 2015-2016.” With Xinyu Ren. Journal of Global Health Reports. 2023. 7: 
e2023012. doi:10.29392/001c.75428 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43189 
Page 21 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
19 
 
 
“The Effects of Fuel-Efficient Cookstoves on Fuel Use, Particulate Matter, and Cooking 
Practices: Results from a Randomized Trial in Rural Uganda,” with Andrew Simons, Theresa 
Beltramo, Garrick Blalock, and Stephen Harrell, Energy Journal, 2023.  
“Improving Regulatory Effectiveness Through Better Targeting: Evidence from OSHA,” with 
Matthew Johnson and Michael Toffel.  American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 15(4), 
30-67.  https://papersssrncom/sol3/paperscfm?abstract_id=3443052  (SSRN Top Ten list, Oct 4, 
2019, ORG: Regulations, PSN: Bureaucratic behavior, PSN: Labor)  
“Can targeted messages reduce COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy? A randomized trial,” with 
Jonathan Lucas Reddinger and Gary Charness, Preventive Medicine Reports. 29, 2022.. 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335522002108  
“Optimal Arrangements for Distribution in Developing Markets: Theory and Evidence” With 
William Fuchs and Brett Green. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14 (1), Feb 
2022: 411-50 
“Cost Effectiveness of Free Distribution of Diarrhea Treatment by Community Health Workers: 
Evidence from Uganda” With Zachary Wagner, John Bosco Asiimwe, and Rushil Zutshi Health 
Policy and Planning 37 (1) October 2021  
“The Refill Gap: Clean Cooking Fuel Adoption in Rural India” With Bodie Cabiyo and Isha Ray  
Environmental Research Letters 16, 1, 2020  
“Incentivizing elimination of biomass cooking fuels with a reversible commitment and a spare 
LPG cylinder” With Stephen Harrell, Ajay Pillarisetti, Sudipto Roy, Sanjay Juvekar, Rutuja 
Patil, and Kirk RSmith  Environmental Science and Technology, 2020  
“A Marriage-based Pilot Clean Household Fuel Intervention in India for Improved Pregnancy 
Outcomes” With Ajay Pillarisetti, Sudipto Roy, Nadia Diamond-Smith, Makarand Ghorpade, 
Arun Dhongade, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Sambandam Sankar, Rutuja Patil, Sanjay Juvekar, Kirk 
R Smith BMJ Open 10, 10, Oct 2020 https://bmjopenbmjcom/content/10/10/e044127full 
“Encouraging fertilizer adoption through risk free sample purchase: A randomized control trial in 
Uganda”  With Annet Adong, James Tinker, Swaibu Mbowa, and Tony Odokonyero World 
Development Perspectives 19 (2020): 100230  
“When financial incentives backfire: evidence from a community health worker experiment in 
Uganda,” with Zachary Wagner and John Bosco Asiimwe  Journal of Development Economics  
Volume 144, May 2020  https://authorselseviercom/a/1aPm915DRFs0CP   
(https://doiorg/101016/jjdeveco2019102437)  
“Effectiveness of a community-based water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention in 
reduction of diarrhoea among under-five children: Evidence from a repeated cross-sectional 
study (2007–2015) in rural Bangladesh” with Nepal C Dey, Mahmood Parvez, Mir Raihanul 
Islam, Sabuj K Mistry International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health  20 August 
2019 https://doiorg/101016/jijheh201908006 
“A community-based health education program using drama and song for increasing knowledge 
and prevention of pesticide exposure from Indoor Residual Spraying in Limpopo South Africa”  
With Brenda Eskenazi, David I Levine, Stephen Rauch, Muvhulawa Obida, Diana Bahena, 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43190 
Page 22 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
20 
 
 
Riana Bornman, and Jonathan Chevrier Malaria Journal Vol 18, Article number: 199 (June 
2019) https://malariajournalbiomedcentralcom/articles/101186/s12936-019-2828-5 
“Automation as Part of the Solution,” in “The Future of Jobs in an Increasingly Autonomous 
Economy: A Dialog” David Choi, ed, Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 3, July 2019, pp 316-
318  https://doiorg/101177/1056492619827375  
“Promoting LPG usage during pregnancy: A pilot study in rural Maharashtra, India,” with 
Pillarisetti, Ajay, Makarand Ghorpade, Sathish Madhav, Arun Dhongade, Sudipto Roy, Kalpana 
Balakrishnan, Sambandam Sankar, Rutujua Patil, Sanjay Juvekar, and Kirk RSmith  
Environment International 127 (2019): 540-549 https://doiorg/101016/jenvint201904017   
“The role of price and convenience in underuse of oral rehydration salts to treat child diarrhea: A 
cluster randomized trial in Uganda,” with Zachary Wagner, John Bosco Asiimwe, and William H 
Dow PLOS Medicine, January 24, 2019  https://doiorg/101371/journalpmed1002734  
“Cross-Subsidies for Improved Sanitation in Low Income Settlements: Assessing the 
Willingness to Pay of Water Utility Customers in Kenyan Cities”  With Charisma Acey, Joyce 
Kisiangani, Patrick Ronoh, Caroline Delaire, Evelyn Makena, Guy Norman, Ranjiv Khush, and 
Rachel Peletz  World Development Vol 115, March 2019, pp 160-177  
https://authorselseviercom/sd/article/S0305750X18304108  
“What Impedes Efficient Adoption of Products? Evidence from Randomized Variation in Sales 
Offers for Improved Cookstoves in Uganda,” with Theresa Beltramo, Garrick Blalock, Carolyn 
Cotterman and Andrew Simons, Journal of the European Economic Association  January 2018  
https://doiorg/101093/jeea/jvx051   
“Sensor data to measure Hawthorne effects in cookstove evaluation,” with Andrew Simons, 
Theresa Beltramo, and Garrick Blalock  Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 
18, June 2018: 1334-1339 https://doiorg/101016/jdib201804021  
“Rapid Prototyping a School-based Health Program in the Developing World,” with Kelsey 
Steffen and William Riggs  Development Engineering, 2 (2017): 68-81 
http://wwwsciencedirectcom/science/article/pii/S2352728516300100#  
“What is a ‘meal’? Comparative methods of auditing carbon offset compliance for fuel-efficient 
cookstoves,” with Steve Harrell, Theresa Beltramo, Garrick Blalock, Juliet Kyayesimira, and 
Andrew Simons, Ecological Economics, v 128  Aug 2016: 8-16   
doi:101016/jecolecon201603014  
“The Disgust Box: A Novel Approach to Illustrate Water Contamination with Feces” With Kaniz 
Jannat, Mahfuzur Rahman and Leanne Unicomb  Global Health Promotion 2016: 1-10  DOI: 
101177/1757975916658638 
“Insuring Health or Insuring Wealth? An Experimental Evaluation of Health Insurance in Rural 
Cambodia,” with Rachel Polimeni and Ian Ramage  Journal of Development Economics Vol 
119, March 2016: 1–15 http://wwwsciencedirectcom/science/article/pii/S0304387815001194 
“Design Thinking in Development Engineering,” with Martha A Lesniewski and Alice M 
Agogino, International Journal of Engineering Education, special issue 32, 3(B)), May/June 
2016: 1396-1406 [Preprint: 
https://pdfssemanticscholarorg/8ca6/c89ac1d26b8015908232baae473670aedd56pdf] 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43191 
Page 23 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
21 
 
 
“Disgust, Shame and Soapy Water: Tests of Novel Interventions to Promote Safe Water and 
Hygiene,” with Raymond P Guiteras, Stephen P Luby, Thomas H Polley, Kaniz Khatun-e-Jannat 
and Leanne Unicomb Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 
3(2) May 2016 321-359 http://wwwjournalsuchicagoedu/doi/pdfplus/101086/684161  
“The Pursuit of Balance in Sequential Randomized Trials,” with Raymond P Guiteras and 
Thomas H Polley  Development Engineering 1 (2016) 12–25  (Preprint at 
http://wwwsciencedirectcom/science/article/pii/S2352728515300580)  
“The effect of marketing messages and payment over time on willingness to pay for fuel-
efficient cookstoves” With Theresa Beltramo, Garrick Blalock, and Andrew M Simons Journal 
of Economic Behavior & Organization 118 (2015): 333-345 
http://wwwsciencedirectcom/science/article/pii/S0167268115001353#  
“Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Strategy Research” with Aaron Chatterji, 
Rodolphe Durand, and Samuel Touboul  Strategic Management Journal  2015 doi: 
101002/smj2407 http://onlinelibrarywileycom/doi/101002/smj2407/epdf  
“Explaining low rates of sustained use of siphon water filter: Evidence from follow-up of a 
randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh, with Nusrat Najin and others, Tropical Medicine & 
International Health April 2015 20(4):471-83 doi:101111/tmi12448   
“Does Peer Use Influence Adoption of Efficient Cookstoves? Evidence from a Randomized 
Controlled Trial in Uganda” With Andrew Simons, Theresa Beltramo and Garrick Blalock 
Health Communications, 20, 2015: 55–66  http://dxdoiorg/101080/108107302014994244 
“Comparing Methods for Signal Analysis of Temperature Readings from Stove Use Monitors” 
With Andrew Simons, Theresa Beltramo and Garrick Blalock Biomass and Bioenergy 2014 
(http://authorselseviercom/sd/article/S0961953414003808) 
“Nudging to Use: Achieving Safe Water Behaviors in Kenya and Bangladesh,” with Jill Luoto, 
Jeff Albert and Stephen Luby, Journal of Development Economics, 110, September 2014: 13–21 
(http://authorselseviercom/sd/article/S0304387814000303) 
“The Effect of Solar Ovens on Fuel Use, Emissions, and Health: Results from a Randomized 
Controlled Trial,” with Theresa Beltramo  Journal of Development Effectiveness, 3, 2, June 
2013: 178-207  http://wwwtandfonlinecom/doi/full/101080/194393422013775177  
“A rapid assessment randomized-controlled trial of improved cookstoves in rural Ghana,” with 
Jason Burwen Energy for Sustainable Development 16, 3, September 2012: 328–338 
http://wwwsciencedirectcom/science/article/pii/S0973082612000208 
“Randomized Government Safety Inspections Reduce Worker Injuries with No Detectable Job 
Loss,” with Michael W Toffel and Matthew S Johnson  Science  336, May 18, 2012: 907-912 
“Learning to Dislike Safe Water Products: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of the 
Effects of Direct and Peer Experience on Willingness to Pay” With Jill Luoto, Minhaj Mahmud, 
Jeff Albert, Stephen Luby, Nusrat Najnin, and Leanne Unicomb  Environmental Science & 
Technology: 46 (11), May 2012: 6244-6251 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43192 
Page 24 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
22 
 
 
“Thermostats for Smart Grid: Models, Benchmarks and Insights”  With Yong Liang and Zuo-Jun 
Shen  Energy Journal  33 (4), 2012  (SSRN's Top Ten download list for: Sustainable Technology 
eJournal)  
“What Point-of-Use Water Treatment Products do Consumers Use and Value?  Evidence from 
the Urban Poor in Bangladesh,” with Jill Luoto, Nusrat Najnin, Minhaj Mahmud, Jeff Albert, M 
Sirajul Islam, Stephen Luby, Leanne Unicomb  PLoS ONE, Oct 20, 2011 
[http://dxplosorg/101371/journalpone0026132] 
“The Effect of Industrialization on Children’s Education: The Experience of Mexico,” with Ann 
Le Brun and Susan Helper, Review of Economics and Institutions, 2, 2, article 1, Spring 2011 
“The Economics of International Refugee Law” with Ryan Bubb and Michael Kremer, Journal 
of Legal Studies 40, 2, June 2011: 367-404 [http://wwwjstororg/stable/101086/661185]  
“Do Race, Age, and Gender Differences Affect Manager-Employee Relations? An Analysis of 
Quits, Dismissals, and Promotions at a Large Retail Firm,” with Laura Giuliano and Jonathan 
Leonard Journal of Human Resources  46, 1, Winter 2011, 26-52  
“End-User Preferences for and Performance of Competing POU Water Treatment Technologies 
among the Rural Poor of Kenya,” with Jeff Albert and Jill Luoto, Environmental Science & 
Technology, 44 (12), 2010 pp 4426–4432 (Editor’s Choice Award as ES&T’s Best Policy 
Analysis Paper of 2010) 
“When Is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence From Quasi-Experiments” With 
Gary Charness  Industrial Relations 49, 4, October 2010: 499-523 
“Quality Management and Job Quality: How the ISO 9001 Standard for Quality Management 
Systems Affects Employees and Employers,” with Michael Toffel  Management Science 56, 6, 
June 2010 (Working paper version was Top Ten download list for MRN Operations Research 
Network and OPER, Labor: Public Policy & Regulation eJournal, Law & Society: Private Law, 
MRN Production & Operations Management Network and PROD Subject Matter eJournals) 
“Customer Discrimination,” with Laura Giuliano and Jonathan Leonard  Review of Economics 
and Statistics 92, 3, August 2010: 670-678  
“Industrialization, Pollution and Infant Mortality” (June 2010) With Maya Environment and 
Development Economics, 15, 05, pp 557-584   
“Manager Race and the Race of New Hires,” with Laura Giuliano and Jonathan Leonard Journal 
of Labor Economics 27, 4, 2009: 589-631 
“Do Microfinance Programs Help Families Insure Consumption Against Illness?” with Paul 
Gertler and Enrico Moretti  Health Economics, 18, 3, 2009: 257-273 
“How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?” with Aaron 
K Chatterji and Michael W Toffel  Journal of Economics, Management and Strategy, Spring 
2009, 18, 1: 125-169  (Working paper was on SSRN's Top Ten download list for Environmental 
Economics, ERPN: Social Responsibility & Public Policy (Topic), ERPN: Social Responsibility, 
Sustainability & Environmental Policy (Sub-Topic) and MRN Production & Operations 
Management Network)  
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43193 
Page 25 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
23 
 
 
“Investment Following a Financial Crisis: Does Foreign Ownership Matter?” with Garrick 
Blalock and Paul Gertler  Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 3, April 2008: 568-591  
“Are measured school effects just sorting? Causality and correlation in the National Education 
Longitudinal Survey,” with Gary Painter  Economics of Education Review, 27, 4, August 2008: 
460-470 
“Fairness and the employment contract: North American regions versus Germany,” with Knut 
Gerlach, Gesine Stephan, and Olaf Struck Cambridge Journal of Economics 32, 3, May 2008: 
421-439. 
“Intention and Stochastic Outcomes: An Experimental Study,” with Gary Charness Economic 
Journal, 117 July 2007: 1051–1072 
“The Growing Importance of Family and Community: An Analysis of Changes in the Sibling 
Correlation in Earnings,” with Bhashkar Mazumder  Industrial Relations, 46, 1, January 2007: 7-
21 
“Growth, Industrialization, and the Intergenerational Correlation of Advantage,” with Jon R 
Jellema  Industrial Relations, 46, 1, January 2007: 130-170  
“Is Social Capital the Capital of the Poor? The Role of Family and Community in Helping Insure 
Living Standards Against Health Shocks,” with Paul Gertler and Enrico Moretti CESifo 
Economic Studies, no 52, September 2006: 455 - 499 
“The Effect of Diversity on Turnover: A Large Case Study,” with Jonathan S Leonard  Industrial 
and Labor Relations Review, 39, 4, July 2006: 457-572   
“Does Trade Affect Health?” with Dov Rothman Journal of Health Economics 25, 2006: 538–
554 
“Breaking Down The Wall Of Codes: Evaluating Non-Financial Performance Measurement,” 
with Aaron Chatterji, California Management Review, 48, 2, winter 2006: 29-51  
“Did Industrialization Destroy Social Capital in Indonesia?” with Paul Gertler and Ted Miguel 
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54, 2, winter 2006: 287-318 
“Does Social Capital Promote Industrialization? Evidence from a Rapid Industrializer,” with Ted 
Miguel and Paul Gertler, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 4, November 2005: 754-762  
“The Effect of Industrialization on School Enrollment: Evidence from Indonesia,” with Maya 
Federman, Contributions to Macroeconomics, BE Journals in Macroeconomics, 5, 1, Article 1, 
2005 
“Size, Skill and Sorting,” with Dale Belman  Labour, 18, 4, Dec 2004: 515-561 
“Do Birds of a Feather Shop Together? The Effects of Employees’ Similarity with each Other 
and With Customers on Performance,” with Jonathan Leonard and Aparna Joshi, Journal of 
Organizational Behavior, 25, 6, August 2004: 731-754 
“Daddies, Devotion, and Dollars: How Do They Matter for Youth?” With Gary Painter, 
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63, 4, October 2004: 813 - 850   
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43194 
Page 26 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
24 
 
 
“Schooling and Parental Death,” with Paul Gertler and Minnie Ames Review of Economics and 
Statistics, 86, 1, Feb 2004: 211-225 
“The Costs of Teenage Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing: Analysis with a Within-School Propensity 
Score Matching Estimator,” with Gary Painter, Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 4, Nov 
2003: 884-900  
“The Effects of Diversity on Business Performance: Report of a Feasibility Study of the 
Diversity Research Network,” with Thomas Kochan, and others Human Resource Management, 
42, 1, Spring 2003: 3-23 Winner of the Ulrich & Lake Award for Excellence in HRM 
Scholarship, 2004 
“Are Investments in Daughters Lower When Daughters Move Away? Evidence from Indonesia,” 
with Michael Kevane  World Development, 31, 6, June 2003 (SSRN Top Ten download list for 
“Other East Asian Studies eJournal- Forthcoming”)  
“ ‘Carve-outs’ from the Workers’ Compensation System,” with Jeffrey S Petersen and Frank 
Neuhauser  The Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21, 3, Summer 2002: 467-483  
“Employee Involvement and Pay at American Auto Suppliers,” with Susan Helper and Elliot 
Bendoly  Journal of Economic Management and Strategy, 11, 2, Summer 2002: 329-377 
“Changes in the Employment Contract,” with Gary Charness Journal of Economic Behavior and 
Organization Apr 2002, 47, 4: 391-405 
“Changes in Managerial Pay Structures 1986-1992: Tests of Human Capital and Other 
Explanations,” with KC O’Shaughnessy and Peter Cappelli Oxford Economics Papers, 3 (2001), 
482-507 
“Family Structure and Youth Outcomes: Which Correlations are Causal?” With Gary Painter, 
Summer 2000, Journal of Human Resources, XXXV, 3, pp 524-549 
“When are Layoffs Acceptable?  Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment,” with Gary Charness  
April 2000, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 3, pp 381-400  
“The NELS Curve: Replicating The Bell Curve with the National Educational Longitudinal 
Survey,” with Gary Painter, Industrial Relations, 38, 3, July 1999, pp 364-406  
“Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production 
System,” Organization Science, 10, 1, January-February 1999, pp 43-68 
“Computer Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study,” with Elizabeth 
Bishop, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 2, January 1999, pp 213-233   
“Reinventing Regulation: Letting Employees and Employers Solve their Own Problems,” The 
California Management Review, 39, 4, September, 1997, pp 98-117 
“Institutional Incentives for Employer Training,” with David Finegold, Journal of Education and 
Work, 10, 2 June, 1997   
“Ergonomics, Employee Involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A Case Study of 
NUMMI’s 1993 Model Introduction,” with Paul S Adler and Barbara Goldoftas, Industrial and 
Labor Relations Review, 50, 3, April 1997, pp 416-437  Reprinted in The Fordism of Ford and 
Modern Management, Huw Beynon, editor, Elgar, 2005  
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43195 
Page 27 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
25 
 
 
“What Does it Mean to Be Poor in America,” with Maya Federman, Thesia Garner, Kathleen 
Short, John Kiely, Duane McGough, and Marilyn McNillen, Monthly Labor Review, May 1996, 
pp 3-17 
“A Quality Policy for America,” with Susan Helper, Contemporary Policy Issues, 13, 2, April 
1995, pp 26-37  
[https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/1795/Imvp068a.pdf?sequence=2  
“Work Organization, Employment Security, and Macroeconomic Stability,” with Richard 
Parkin, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 24, 3, August 1994, pp 251-271 
“Fairness, Markets and Ability to Pay: Evidence from Compensation Executives,” American 
Economic Review, 83, 5, December 1993, pp 1241-1259 
“The Effects of Non-Traditional Attitudes on Married Women’s Labor Supply,” Journal of 
Economic Psychology, 14, 4, December 1993, pp 665-679 
“What Do Wages Buy?” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 3, September, 1993, pp 462-483  
A short version appeared in the Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 
1993, pp 133-141 
“Worth Waiting For?  Delayed Compensation, Training and Turnover in the United States and 
Japan,” Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 3, September 1993, pp 724-752 
“Do Corporate Executives have Rational Expectations?” Journal of Business, 66, 2, April 1993, 
pp 271-294 
“Long-Term Supplier Relations and Product Market Structure,” with Susan Helper, Journal of 
Law, Economics and Organization, 8, 3, October, 1992, pp 561-581  
“Can Wage Increases Pay for Themselves?  Tests with a Production Function,” Economic 
Journal, 102, 414, September 1992, pp 1102-1115 
“Piece Rates, Output Restriction, and Cohesiveness,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 3, 
September 1992, pp 473-479  
“Product Quality and Pay Equity Between Low-Level Employees and Top Management: An 
Investigation of Distributive Justice Theory,” with Douglas Cowherd, Administrative Science 
Quarterly, 37, 2, June 1992, pp 302-320  
“Public Policy Implications of Imperfections in the Market for Worker Participation,” Economic 
and Industrial Democracy, 13, 3, May 1992, pp 184-206 
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0143831X92132003  
“Just Cause Employment Policies in the Presence of Worker Adverse Selection,” Journal of 
Labor Economics, 9, 3, July 1991, pp 294-305 
“Cohesiveness, Productivity, and Wage Dispersion,” Journal of Economic Behavior and 
Organizations, 15, March 1991, pp 237-255 
“Just Cause Employment Policies When Unemployment is a Worker Discipline Device,” 
American Economic Review, 79, 4, September, 1989, pp 902-905 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43196 
Page 28 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
26 
 
 
“Efficiency Wages in Weitzman’s Share Economy,” Industrial Relations, 28, 3, Fall 1989, pp 
321-334  A short version appeared in Economics Letters, 23, 1987, pp 245-249 
OTHER ARTICLES AND BOOK CHAPTERS 
“Do Multinational Corporations Exploit Foreign Workers?” with Emma Aisbett, Ann E. 
Harrison, Jason Scorse and Jed Silver. In JHC Fritz Foley, Global Goliaths: Multinational 
Corporations in the 21st Century Economy. Brookings, Washington DC, 2021: 259-300. 
“Hygiene Heroes: A dental health intervention for Indian Schools” With SR Samuel and G 
Geetha, Journal of Global Oral Health  3, 1, Jan 2020: 34-35  DOI:1025259/JGOH_15_2020 
https://jglobaloralhealth.org/hygiene-heroes-a-dental-health-intervention-for-schools/  
“Do Multinational Corporations Exploit Their Workers?” with Emma Aisbett, Ann E Harrison, 
Jason Scorse, and Jed Silver  in Global Goliaths: Multinational Corporations in a Changing 
Global Economy, edited by James Hines and David Wessel, Brookings, 2021.  
“Toward Universal Health Insurance in Cambodia,” with Virginie Diaz Pedregal, Stéphanie 
Pamies-Sumner and Ian Ramage, in Rémi Genevey, Rajendra, KPachauri and Laurence Tubiana, 
eds, Reducing Inequalities, TERI, Delhi, 2013, p 133-137  
“The New ‘Managerial Misclassification’ Challenge to Old Wage & Hour Law or What is 
Managerial Work?” with David Lewin, in Contemporary Issues in Employment Relations, David 
Lewin, ed, LERA Research Volume, Cornell University Press, 2006: 189-222  
“The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers,” with Michael Handel, in America at Work, 
Edward E Lawler III and James O’Toole, editors, Palgrave Macmillan, New York NY: 73-86  
(An earlier version appeared in Industrial Relations, 43, 1, January 2004: 1-43)  
“Public Policy Implications,” in The American Workplace: Skills, Pay, and Employee 
Involvement, edited by Casey Ichniowski and others, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp 273-
282 
“The Economics of Works Councils,” with Bruce Kaufman, in Nonunion Forms of Employee 
Representation: History, Contemporary Practice, and Policy, Kaufman and Daphne Taras, eds, 
M E Sharpe, Armonk NY, 2000, pp 149-175  
“The Quality of Incentives and the Incentives of Quality,” with Katherine Shaw, in The Quality 
Movement in America: Lessons for Theory and Research, Robert Cole and Richard Scott, eds, 
Sage, NY, 2000, pp 367-386 
“A Case Study of the Mortgage Application Process,” with Ken Temkin and Diane Levy, in 
Mortgage Lending Discrimination: A Review of the Evidence, Margery Austin Turner and 
Felicity Skidmore, eds, Urban Institute Press, Washington DC, 1999, pp 137-160   
“Stability and Change at NUMMI,” with Paul S Adler and Barbara Goldoftas, in Robert Boyer, 
Elsie Charron, Ulrich Jürgens, and Steven Tolliday (eds), Between Imitation and Innovation: 
Transfer and Hybridization of Production Models in the International Automobile Industry, New 
York: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp 128-160 
“(Attempts at) Replication of The Bell Curve,” editor’s introduction to a symposium, Industrial 
Relations, July 1999, pp 245-249 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43197 
Page 29 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
27 
 
 
“They Should Solve Their Own Problems: Reinventing Workplace Regulation,” in Government 
Regulation of the Employment Relationship: A Critical Appraisal, Industrial Relations Research 
Association, Madison WI, 1997  
“Team Production,” in The Human Resource Management Handbook, David Lewin, Daniel JB 
Mitchell, and Mahmood Zaidi, editors, JAI Press, Greenwich CN, 1997 pp 35-61 
“What Works at Work: A Critical Review,” with Casey Ichniowski, Thomas Kochan, Craig 
Olson, and George Strauss, Industrial Relations, vol 35, no 3, Summer, 1996, pp 299-333  (A 
version appeared in The American Workplace, Cambridge U Press, 2000, pp 1-37) 
“The US Labor Market: ‘Institutions’ ≠ Rigid and ‘Unregulated’ ≠ Market-Clearing,” 
Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994 
“The Relation between Supplier Participation and Worker Participation,” with Susan Helper, 
Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994, pp 12-25 
“Demand Variability and Work Organization,” in Democracy and Markets: Participation, 
Accountability, and Efficiency, Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis, and Bo Gufstafsson, eds, 
Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp 159-175  
“Computer Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study,” with Elizabeth 
Bishop, Proceedings of the Conference on NetWORKing, IFIP WG 91, 1993 
“Participation, Productivity, and the Firm’s Environment,” with Laura D’Andrea Tyson, in 
Paying for Productivity, Alan Blinder, ed, Brookings Institution, 1990, pp 183-244  (Selected for 
Frontier Issues in Economic Thought series, The Changing Nature of Work, Global Development 
and Environment Institute, 1999) 
“Employee Participation and Involvement,” with George Strauss, in Investing in People, Report 
for the Commission on Workforce Quality and Labor Market Efficiency, Background papers, 
Vol II, paper 35b, US Department of Labor, September, 1989, pp 1893-1948 
Efficiency Wage Theories:  Micro- and Macroeconomic Implications and Empirical Tests, PhD 
Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, 1987  
Spot and Futures Markets for Natural Gas, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report, 1984  
WORKING PAPERS  (Most are on my website) 
“Large Language Models to Support Community Health Workers” 2024 (listed on SSRN's Top 
Ten download list for: Health Communication eJournal) 
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4784960  
“Estimating how the COVID-19 crisis affects access to water & sanitation” With Xinyu Ren, 
Jeff Albert and Ranjiv Khush 2021  
“Design for Impact: A Development Engineering Graduate Program at UC Berkeley,” with Alice 
M Agogino and Martha A Lesniewski Working paper http://bestberkeleyedu/wp-
content/uploads/2015/07/DE_for-DevEngJournalv9pdf, 2015. 
“Mobile Phones, Rent-to-Own Payments & Water Filters: Evidence from Kenya” With Jill 
Luoto, RAND Working Paper Series WR-1039, March 19, 2014 
http://wwwrandorg/pubs/working_papers/WR1039html   
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43198 
Page 30 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
28 
 
 
“Credit Constraints, Discounting and Investment in Health: Evidence from Micropayments for 
Clean Water in Dhaka,” with Raymond Guiteras, Thomas Polley and Brian Quistorff, Feb 2104  
https://wwweconumdedu/research/papers/648/download/379 
“Prices Matter: Comparing Two Tests of Adverse Selection in Health Insurance” with Rachel 
Polemini, Working Paper 135-12, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC 
Berkeley, December 2012 http://wwwirleberkeleyedu/workingpapers/135-12pdf  
“Losing the Presence and Presents of Parents: How Parental Death Affects Children” with Paul 
Gertler, Sebastian Martinez, and Stefano Bertozzi, 2007 
PATENT  
“Smart Thermostat Design for the Smart Grid,” Patent Application 61/732,911, filed November 
8, 2012 (Provisional patent) 
BOOK REVIEWS AND NON-TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 
“Making Workplaces Safer Through Machine Learning.” With Matthew S. Johnson and Michael 
W. Toffel. The Regulatory Review. Feb. 26, 2024. 
https://www.theregreview.org/2024/02/26/johnson-levine-toffel-making-workplaces-safer-
through-machine-learning/ 
“Increasing Use of ORS and Zinc to Treat Child Diarrhea in Uganda.” With Zachary Wagner, 
John Bosco Asiimwe and William H Dow. Defeat Diarrheal Disease blog, Aug 24, 2021 
https://wwwdefeatddorg/blog/increasing-use-ors-and-zinc-treat-child-diarrhea-uganda 
“Increasing Use of ORS and Zinc to Treat Child Diarrhea in Uganda.”  With Zachary Wagner 
and John Bosco Asiimwe  CHWCentralorg blog post August 2021 
“Why You Should be Glad the FDA has Resumed Johnson & Johnson Vaccines.” With Bruce 
Wydick April 30, 2021  https://wwwacrosstwoworldsnet/why-you-should-be-glad-the-fda-has-
resumed-johnson-johnson-vaccines/  
“Our first vaccines can save more lives.” UC Berkeley blog, January 11, 2021 
https://blogsberkeleyedu/2021/01/11/17407/ 
“Monitoring vaccine safety is a crucial first step.” UC Berkeley blog, January 11, 2021 
https://blogsberkeleyedu/2021/01/12/monitoring-vaccine-safety-is-a-crucial-first-step  
“How gift certificates can help (a little bit) to support local businesses.” UC Berkeley Blog,  
March 23, 2020  https://blogsberkeleyedu/2020/03/23/how-gift-certificates-can-help-a-little-bit-
to-support-local-businesses/ 
“Why Workplace Hygiene Should Be More Than Just Hand-Washing,” Q&A with Jill Cowan, 
New York Times California Today, March 11, 2020  
https://wwwnytimescom/2020/03/11/us/coronavirus-covid-19-hygienehtml 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43199 
Page 31 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
29 
 
 
“Simple steps to reduce the odds of a global catastrophe” With Warwick J McKibbin, February 
19, 2020. Australian Financial Review  Also, Brookings Institution, Opinions 
https://wwwbrookingsedu/opinions/simple-steps-to-reduce-the-odds-of-a-global-catastrophe/ 
“A cheaper, easier, more effective way to combat one of Uganda’s deadliest illnesses” The 
Center for Effective Global Action blog, with John Bosco Asiimwe and Zachary Wagner, June 
26, 2019  [https://mediumcom/center-for-effective-global-action/a-cheaper-easier-more-
effective-way-to-combat-one-of-ugandas-deadliest-illnesses-503c5cdf0eb3] 
“Check Cholera Threat,” Daily Monitor [Uganda], with John Bosco Asiimwe and Zachary 
Wagner, Feb 12, 2019  
“OSHA Inspection Should be Welcome,” with Michael Toffel The Compass, vol 14, no 1 ASSE, 
p 4, 2014   
Book review of Paying Out-of-Pocket for Drugs, Diagnostics and Medical Services: A Study of 
Households in Three Indian States, Journal of Economic Literature June 2014: 549-550 
[http://pubsaeaweborg/doi/pdfplus/101257/jel522535] 
A Guide to Optimizing Behavior Change in Stove Programs, with Theresa Beltramo, Stephen 
Harrell, and Johanna Young Impact Carbon, 2013  
http://tractionprojectorg/content/implementation-research-behavior-change-interventions-
improve-acquisition-and-correct-use 
Implementation Research on Behavior Change Interventions to Improve the Acquisition and 
Correct Use of Improved Cookstoves, with Theresa Beltramo, Stephen Harrell, Caitlyn Toombs 
and Johanna Young Final report to USAID, Impact Carbon, 2013 
http://tractionprojectorg/content/guide-optimizing-behavior-change-stove-programs 
“Improving sales offers for improved stoves,” CEGA blog, January 24, 2013  
“Renting Inefficiency,” with Lucas Davis, Energy Economics Exchange, November 26, 2012 
[http://energyathaaswordpresscom/2012/11/26/renting-inefficiency/] 
“Exorcising phantom power,” Los Angeles Times, November 26, 2012  
[http://wwwlatimescom/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-levine-phantom-power-
20121126,0,6297253story] 
“Randomized Government Safety Inspections Reduce Worker Injuries with No Detectable Job 
Loss,” testimony before the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, 
Hearing on “Promoting Safe Workplaces Through Voluntary Protection Programs,” June 28, 
2012 
[http://democratsedworkforcehousegov/sites/democratsedworkforcehousegov/files/documents/11
2/pdf/statements/62812_Levine-Testimonypdf]  
Evaluation of SKY health insurance in Cambodia 
• “Results of the Second Health Centre Survey,” with Rachel Gardner, Ian Ramage and Karen 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43200 
Page 32 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
30 
 
 
Zhang, 2011 
• “Who Buys SKY Health Insurance?,” with Rachel Polimeni, Ian Ramage, and Patrick Searles, 
2011 
• “Village Monograph Summary Report,” with Ian Ramage, Kim Hour Ramage, Eisel Mazard, 
Mark Kavenagh, and Gabriel Pictet, 2010 
• “Health Insurance for the Rural Poor: Evidence from Cambodia,” in Innovations in Insuring 
the Poor, Ruth Vargas Hill and Maximo Torero, eds, International Food Policy Research 
Institute, Focus 17, Brief 10,Dec 2009 
http://wwwifpriorg/sites/default/files/publications/focus17_10pdf  
• “Results of the First Health Centre Survey” with Rachel Gardner, Gabriel Pictet, Rachel 
Polimeni and Ian Ramage, 2009  
• BASIS Brief no 2007-05 Insuring Health: Testing the Effectiveness of Micro-health 
Insurance to Promote Economic Wellbeing for the Poor, with Nhong Hema and Ian Ramage 
July 2007 
 
“Improving Sales Offers for Improved Stoves,” Stanford Social Innovation Review blog, June 
15, 2011  A longer version is on my website: “New Sales Offers for Improved Cookstoves,” 
Briefing paper, with CIRCODU  
“Do SMS Text Messaging and SMS Community Forums Improve Outcomes of Adult and 
Adolescent Literacy Programs? Evidence from the Jokko Initiative in Senegal” With Theresa 
Beltramo Final report to TOSTAN and UNICEF, September 2010 
http://tostanorg/data/images/project%20jokko%20final%20report%20september%202010pdf 
“Quality Management and Job Quality: How the ISO 9001 Standard for Quality Management 
Systems Affects Employees and Employers,” (Executive Summary) with Michael Toffel, 
Quality Progress, American Society for Quality, March 2010 
“A New Era,” in Obama Reflections from Election Day to Presidency: Social Justice Thought 
Leaders Speak Out, Kirwan Institute, Ohio State University, 2009: 7 
“A Note on the Impact of Local Rainfall on Rice Output in Indonesian Districts,” with Dean 
Yang, 2006 http://www-personalumichedu/~deanyang/papers/levineyang_ricerainpdf 
“Perspectives on Corporate Governance: Executive Compensation” Case in Point Concept Paper, 
Caseplaceorg, May 2007 
[http://wwwcaseplaceorg/references/references_showhtm?doc_id=484244#Attachment_anchor], 
last accessed June 5, 2007  
“Social Security Panel,” with Reuel Schiller, Peter Edelman and Thomas Davidoff, Race and 
Poverty Law Journal, 3 (2), Spring 2006: 185-202  
“Our opportunity to end poverty -- or fail to even try,” San Francisco Chronicle, Sunday, May 
21, 2006: E3  
“The Wheels of Washington:  Groupthink and Iraq,” San Francisco Chronicle, Thursday, 
February 5, 2004, p A23 
[sfgatecom/articlecgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/02/05/EDGV34OCEP1DTL] 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43201 
Page 33 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
31 
 
 
Book review of The New Relationship: Human Capital in the American Corporation, Journal of 
Economic Literature, 40 (2), June 2002:  547-549  
Book review of Manufacturing Advantage, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55 (1), 
October 2001: 175-176 
“Gilding the Ghetto,” Across the Board, Oct 1999, 36 (9): 10 
“Knowledge Transfer: Managerial Practices Underlying One Piece of the Learning 
Organization,” with April Gilbert, COHRE briefing paper,  
[http://socratesberkeleyedu/~iir/cohre/ knowledgehtml], 1998 
“Editorial: Overt Discrimination by Multinational Firms,” Industrial Relations, 37, 2, April 
1998, pp 121-125 [http://facultyhaasberkeleyedu/levine/discedit2html] 
“Brave New Work” interview with Josh Clark, Mother Jones, July/Aug 1997  
“The OECD’s Role in Measuring Human Capital,” background paper for the OECD, 
DEELSA/CERI//HCI (96) 6, 1996 
“A Deficit of Clear Thinking,” with Brad DeLong, CalBusiness, Fall 1996, p 6 
“Dole Tax Cuts Ignore Deficits, Investment, Education, Future,” with Brad DeLong, San Jose 
Mercury News, August 26, 1996, p 5E  
“Model Changes at NUMMI (A) and (B),” with Paul S Adler and Barbara Goldoftas, teaching 
cases, USC, 1995 
“Government Should Take Lead in Quantifying Workplace Skills,” San Jose Mercury News, 
December 25, 1995, p 3F 
“Not Such a Capital Idea,” with Brad DeLong, San Francisco Chronicle, December 5, 1995, p 
A23 
“Welfare Reform that Makes Poor Kids Poorer Will Never Pay Off,” with Brad DeLong, Los 
Angeles Times, Sunday Forum, October 15, 1995, p D2 
Book review of Darcy D’Art, Economic Democracy and Financial Participation, Journal of 
Economic Behavior and Organization, 1993 
“The Quality Movement,” Dollars and Sense, September 1992, pp 20-22  A short version 
appeared in Cal Business, June 1992 
“Management Education is an Oxymoron,” Cal Business Weekly, May 1992 
Book review of Tom Korver, The Fictitious Commodity: A Study of the US Labor Market 1880-
1940 for, Journal of Labor History, 32, 4, Fall 1991, pp 624-625 
“Participation, Productivity, and the Firm’s Environment,” California Management Review, 
Summer 1990, pp 86-100 
“Japan’s Other Export,” Dollars and Sense, September 1990, pp 18-21 
“No Voice For Workers,” with Laura D’Andrea Tyson, Dollars and Sense, no 152, December 
1989, pp 20-22  Reprinted in Microeconomics 91/92, Don Cole, ed, Dushkin Publishing Group, 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43202 
Page 34 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
32 
 
 
Guilford CN, 1990; Real World Macro, seventh and eighth editions, and Real World Micro, third 
edition Economic Affairs Bureau, Somerville MA, 1990, 1991, and 1992  
“Sweden: Full Employment in a Free Market Economy,” Labor Center Reporter, no 251, 
November 1988  
 “Capitalism, Swedish Style,” Dollars and Sense, no 140, October 1988, pp 20-22  Reprinted in 
Real World Macro, sixth edition, Economic Affairs Bureau, Somerville MA, 1989 
“Why Comparable Worth Won’t Upset the Marketplace,” San Francisco Chronicle, March 7, 
1988, p C6 
 
EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS ABOUT HEALTH  
 
(Materials available at http://hygieneheroesberkeleyedu) 
Curriculum  
• Unit 1: Handwashing curriculum and teacher training 
• Unit 2: Safe Water curriculum and teacher training 
• Unit 3: Sanitation curriculum  
• Unit 4: Preventing colds and flu curriculum  
• Unit 5: Avoiding malaria curriculum  
• Unit 6: Dental Hygiene curriculum and teacher training 
• Unit 7: Preventing COVID 
Each unit contain vivid demonstrations, experiments, class participation stories, games, and 
activities for students to engage and educate their families  
Stories, games, scripts and videos 
• Preventing COVID  
o Cory the Coronavirus: Illustrated book 
Connie the COVID, Participation Story for Younger Children 
o “How leaders can reopen schools safely,” editorial 
o COVID prevention curriculum and teacher training 
• Handwashing  
o Gerry the Germ goes to School:  Class participation story  
o Baby is Happy: Early reader  
o Gerry the Germ goes to School: Comic book  
o The Bully and Why did T Rex go Extinct?: Comics  
o Chhota Bheem meets the Robot and The Robot: Comics and script  
o Tenali Rama gets in Trouble, illustrated by Jacqueline Zhou: Illustrated story  
o The Winning Sports Team: Online game  
o Uncle Silly Washes Hands Video  
o Handwashing curriculum and teacher training 
• Safe water   
o Little Monkey, with Echo Yupan Lu, illustrated by Nazia Rahman: Story  
o Little Monkey Puppet show video 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43203 
Page 35 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
33 
 
 
o Gerry the Germ gets Wet, with Benji Levine, illustrated by Jennifer Kotler Story  
o The Disgusting Box (with Kaniz Janat): Video  
o Safe water curriculum and teacher training 
• Sanitation  
o Gerry the Germ, with Benji Levine, illustrated by Jennifer Kotler: Illustrated story  
o Grandma wants you to eat cookies, illustrated by Bernadette Justine McVerry: 
Board game  
o The Germ Race Board game  
o Sanitation curriculum and teacher training 
• Preventing cold and flu 
o The Returns of Gerry the Germ, with Echo Yupan Lu, illustrated by Charlotte 
Passot: Illustrated story  
o The Cold & Flu Germ Race Board game  
o The New Bride:  Soap opera illustrated story about safe cookstoves 
• Preventing malaria  
o General Trouble gets Sprayed: Script about indoor residual spraying  
o Baby Sleeps: An early reader about anti-mosquito bed nets  
• Dental hygiene  
o The Sad Tooth: Early reader  
o Will Chhota Bheem miss his own party?  Illustrations by Divya Lagisetti 
• Nutrition 
o The Race  Story about anemia, with Dan Besilu Illustrations by Kaavya Venkat 
• Safety  
o Monster Maruti: Class participation story about traffic safety   
o Munching Maruti, with Padma Priya: Story about traffic safety  
o Street smarts for teens Handout  
• Women’s health  
o The Red Fairy, with Rawan AbuShaban: Story about menstrual hygiene 
management  
o Womb with a View: 3-panel comics about antenatal care  
 
HONORS 
• Earl Cheit Outstanding Teaching Award, Haas School of Business, 1990, 2022 
(undergraduate), 2000 (Evening MBA) 
• Listed in Who’s Who in Economics, a selection based on citation count 
• Listed in Who’s Who of Professionals  
• Member Haas School “60” Teaching Honor Society (for mean or median, depending on 
the year,of 6 out of 7) several dozen times since 1988 
• Phi Beta Kappa  
• Omicron Delta Epsilon Economics Honor Society   
• University of California Alumni Scholar 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43204 
Page 36 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
34 
 
 
GRANTS 
• “An intervention to improve sexual and reproductive health among Indian self-help group 
members.” Center for Growth Markets, 2022-2023. 
• “Selling health-related goods in smalls shops in Kenya,” MasterCard Foundation, 2018-
19   
• “Replication grant” BITSS, 2015 ($3000) 
• CEGA EASST, “Working with Village Health Teams to Increase ORS Use in Uganda: A 
Randomized Controlled Trial,” with Will Dow; John BoscoAsiimwe; Zachary Wagner, 
University of Makere, Uganda, EASST Collaborative, 2014-2017 ($49,000) 
• “Randomized control trial of a risk-free sample purchase for inorganic fertilizer in 
Uganda” with Annet Adong, EPRC, Uganda, EASST Collaborative, 2014-2017 
($49,000) 
• “Distribution to the Rural Poor,” co-PI with Joseph Arineitwe Ndemere, EASST 
Collaborative, CEGA, 2012-13 ($25,000) 
• Travel grant, CEGA, 2012 ($3000) 
• “Cookstoves in Uganda”, CEGA, 2012 ($8000) 
• “Behavior Change Interventions to Improve the Acquisition and Correct Use of Improved 
Cookstoves,” (co-PI, with Impact Carbon), USAID TRAction, 2011-2013 
• “Piloting Novel Sales Contracts,” Goggio Family Foundation, 2009-11 
• “Courting Safe Behaviors: Testing Courtyard-based Safe Water and Hygiene 
Interventions in Urban Bangladesh” (with ICDDR,B), International Initiative for Impact 
Evaluation (3ie), 2010-2012  
• “Improved Cookstoves in the Tumu Region of Ghana” (with CSIR and Plan-Ghana), 
International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), 2009-2011 
• “Preferences for Point-of-Use Water Treatment” (with ICDDR,B), Swedish International 
Development Agency (SIDA), 2008-9  
• “Evaluating a Telecommunications Intervention to Promote Literacy and Fight Poverty in 
Senegal” (with TOSTAN), UNICEF, 2009-10  
• “Identification of Appropriate Postharvest Technologies for Improving Market Access 
and Incomes for Small Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia,” (with UC Davis 
and the World Food and Logistics Organization), Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 
2009-10 
• “Roundtable on safe stoves,” Berkeley Institute on the Environment, UC Berkeley, 2008-
9  
• “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Solar Ovens in Senegal,” Sustainable Products and 
Services, UC Berkeley, 2008-9 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43205 
Page 37 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
35 
 
 
• “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Micro-Health Insurance in Cambodia,” grants from 
BASIS Assets and Market Access Collaborative Research Support (USAID) 2007-2010; 
AFD (Agence français pour development) 2007-2010, and the Coleman Fung Foundation 
2007-2009  
• “Choosing and Using Safe Water Products,” (with Jeff Alert of Aquayaorg), The P&G 
Fund of The Greater Cincinnati Foundation and The Blum Center for Developing 
Economies, 2007-8  
• “Evaluating The Hunger Project’s Scaling-up of Epicenter Strategy in Ghana,” (with 
Chris Udry, Dean Karlan and John Anarfi), Robertson Foundation, 2007-2015 
• “How Industrialization in China has affected the Elderly,” Center on the Economics and 
Demography of Aging, University of California at Berkeley, 2003-2004 
• “Measuring Corporate Responsibility,” Haas Family Fund, 2004-6 
• “The Effects of Age Diversity in the Workplace,” Center on the Economics and 
Demography of Aging, University of California at Berkeley, 2003-2004 
• “Diversity at Work: Effects on Workers, Customers and Employers,” Russell Sage 
Foundation, 2003-4 
• “Diversity and Performance,” Sloan Foundation and BOLD, with Jonathan Leonard, 
2001 
• “A Follow-up Evaluation of the Progresa Child Welfare Program,” National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), 2001-2006, with Paul Gertler and 
others 
• “The Effects of Industrialization on Children,” Center on the Economics and 
Demography of Aging, University of California at Berkeley, 2001-2002 
• “Financial and Social Capital as Protection Against Health Shocks in Indonesia,” Center 
for Health Research, UC Berkeley, 2001-02  
• “Investments in Children in Indonesia: Lessons to be Learned from the Economic Crisis,” 
Research Bridging Grant from the Committee on Research, UC Berkeley, 1999-2000 
• Subcontractor on Mortgage Lending Discrimination: What Do We Know? Urban Institute 
grant from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1998 
• COHRE, “Causes and Consequences of Employee Turnover,” with Jonathan Leonard, 
1998-99Sage Foundation, “Perceptions of the Fair Employment Contract: Evidence from 
a Quasi-Experiment,” with Gary Charness, 1998-99  
• Upjohn Institute, “Changes in Careers, Compensation and Internal Labor Markets at 
Large American Employers,” with Dale Belman and KC O’Shaughnessy, 1998-99  
• California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation, “Evaluation 
of Workers’ Compensation Programs Established Pursuant to Labor-Management 
Agreements in the Construction Industry,” 1997-8 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43206 
Page 38 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
36 
 
 
• Committee On Teaching, Office of Educational Development, UC Berkeley, Classroom 
Technologies Grant: 1995-1996 
• Sloan Foundation, “What Works at Work,” with the National Center for the Workplace, 
1993-5 
• Sloan Foundation, “Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in the 
1990’s,” with Edward E Lawler III, Gerald Ledford, and Susan Mohrman, 1992-4 
• Consortium on Competition and Cooperation, “Human Resource Policies and Corporate 
Performance in the United States and Japan,” 1991-92 
• Consortium on Competition and Cooperation, “Cooperative Supplier Relations: An Exit-
Voice Approach,” 1990-91 
 
COURSES TAUGHT 
• Design, Evaluate and Scale Development Technologies (MBA, joint with Engineering & 
Alice Agogino – new course) 
• Macroeconomics  in the Global Economy (Undergraduate, MBA, and executive MBA) 
• Business Strategies for Emerging Markets (MBA – new course) 
• Freshman seminars (new courses): 
o Behavior change in global public health: Can games and stories help?  
o The New Employment Contract  
o Films about Work  
• Bargaining and Negotiation (Undergraduate) 
• Human Resource Strategies (MBA – new course)  
• Industrial Relations (Undergraduate and PhD)  
• Research Methods (PhD) 
 
CONSULTANT 
• Government 
o US Dept of Labor 
▪ Mathematica (subcontract from US Dept of Labor) 
▪ Summit Consulting (subcontracts from US Dept of Labor) 
▪ Abt Associates (subcontract from US Dept of Labor) 
o World Bank 
o Berkeley Planning Associates (subcontract from US Dept of Health and Human 
Services) 
o Urban Institute (subcontract from US Dept of Housing and Urban Development) 
o CalTrans 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43207 
Page 39 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
37 
 
 
o OECD 
• Nonprofit sector 
o Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Board (WCIRB) 
o Emerson College 
o RAND (subcontract to USAID on “Increasing uptake and use of safe water filters 
at scale”) 
o Aquaya  
o Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation  
o UNICEF 
o Filene Research Institute 
o American Automobile Association  
• Private sector 
o UBS  
o Conoco 
o San Francisco Electrical Contractors Association 
o NERA 
o BPI 
o Korean Human Resources Study Group 
• Legal consultant 
o Goldman and Goldman 
o Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP 
• Expert / Expert Witness 
o Leonard Carder, LLP (Roberts, et al, v Best Buy Co, Inc) 
o Gradstein, Luskin & Van Dalsem (Adams v Home Depot USA, Inc) 
o Quisenberry Law Firm (Daniel Sepulveda, Anita Perez and Antonio Prangner v 
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc) 
o Keker & Van Nest LLP (Tjian v Westamerica Bancorporation) 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43208 
Page 40 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
38 
 
 
Appendix B: Materials Considered 
Case Materials 
Expert Report of Greg Regan dated August 29, 2024 
Expert Report of Victor Stango dated October 24, 2024  
Expert Report of Greg Regan dated November 21, 2024 
Research 
• 
Agarwal, S., Chomsisengphet, S., & Liu, C. (2010). "Consumer Bankruptcy and Default: 
The Role of Credit Supply and Financial Literacy." Journal of Monetary Economics. 
• 
Allegretto, Sylvia A., & Liedtke, B. (2020). “Workers and the COVID-19 Recession: 
Trends in UI Claims & Benefits, Jobs, and Unemployment.” Center on Wage and 
Employment Dynamics, Center for Labor Research and Education, University of 
California, Berkeley. 
• 
Bhutta, N., & Keys, B. J. (2016). "Interest Rates and Equity Extraction During the 
Housing Boom." American Economic Review. 
• 
California State Auditor. (2020). “Employment Development Department (EDD)’s Poor 
Planning and Ineffective Management Left It Unprepared to Assist Californians 
Unemployed by COVID-19 Shutdowns.” Auditor of the State of California. 
• 
Chetty, R. (2008). “Moral Hazard Versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment 
Insurance.” Journal of Political Economy. 
• 
Congressional Research Service (2022). “How Did COVID-10 Unemployment Insurance 
Benefits Impact Consumer Spending and Unemployment?” 
• 
Cox, N. & Ganong, P. et al. (2020). “Initial Impacts of the Pandemic on Consumer 
Behavior.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 
• 
Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York: 
Crown. 
• 
Desmond, M. & Gershenson, C. (2016). “Housing and Unemployment Insecurity Among 
the Working Poor.” Social Problems. 
• 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (2021). "Household Debt and Credit Report." 
• 
Gorbachev, O., & Luengo-Prado, M. J. (2019). "The Credit Card Debt Puzzle and 
Noncognitive Ability." Review of Economics and Statistics. 
• 
Gundersen, C., & Ziliak, J. P. (2015). "Food Insecurity and Health Outcomes." Health 
Affairs. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43209 
Page 41 of 42

Expert Report of David I. Levine 
 
39 
 
 
• 
Keys, B. J. (2018). “The Credit Market Consequences of Job Displacement.” The Review 
of Economics and Statistics. 
• 
Lusardi, A., Schneider, D., & Tufano, P. (2011). "Financially Fragile Households: 
Evidence and Policy Implications." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 
• 
Martinchek, K. et al. (2022). “Credit Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” The 
Urban Institute. 
• 
McConnell, K.E., et al. (2017). “A Strategy for Evaluating the Opportunity Cost of Time 
Estimates From New Choice Margins.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working 
Paper. 
• 
Mian, A., Rao, K., & Sufi, A. (2013). "Household Balance Sheets, Consumption, and the 
Economic Slump." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 
• 
Parker, J. A., & Souleles, N. S. (2006). "Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus 
Payments of 2001." American Economic Review. 
• 
Quinn, T. (2022). “Deep Dive into Distribution of the FICO Score Across the US.” FICO 
Blog. 
• 
Smith, C., McGill, B., & Medalia, C. (2019). "The Role of Informal Borrowing in 
Financial Distress." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 
• 
Stolba, S. L. (2021). “Fewer Subprime Consumers Across U.S. in 2021.” Experian. 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 593-1     Filed 10/20/25     PageID.43210 
Page 42 of 42

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.593.1.pdf
Size
729,887 bytes
SHA-256
838127de1f67d94a9249b6b700509fe730c8bfaf41e85268fe3fd5017b02d2d4
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.593.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top