ORDER Granting Defendant Bank Of America, N.A.'S Motion To Seal Documents Filed In… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 600)

Summary

An order dated December 11, 2025 and filed as Document 600 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. It grants the bank's motion to seal documents filed in support of its motion to exclude the expert testimony of the plaintiffs' expert, whom the order calls Chloe L. East. The court finds compelling reasons to seal portions of the bank's motion to exclude, portions of the appendix of exhibits and portions of exhibits HX 30, 33 and 34 to the Hoyle Declaration. It seals exhibit HX 31 in its entirety.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. SEAL RE EAST 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING 
DEFENDANT BANK OF 
AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION TO 
SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN 
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE THE EXPERT 
TESTIMONY OF CHLOE L. EAST 
 
[Dkt. No. 581.] 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 600     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43262     Page
1 of 2

 
1 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. TO SEAL RE EAST 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (BANA) Motion to 
Seal Documents Filed in Support of its Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of 
Chloe L. East (Motion to Seal) and the documents at issue, the Court concludes that 
compelling reasons exist to seal the documents.  Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 
BANA’s Motion to Seal the following: 
• 
Portions of BANA’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Chloe 
L. East; 
• 
Portions of the Appendix of Exhibits to BANA’s Motion to Exclude the 
Expert Opinions of Chloe L. East;  
• 
Portions of the following exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration: HX 30, 33, 
and 34; and  
• 
The following exhibit to the Hoyle Declaration in its entirety: HX 31.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  December 11, 2025 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 600     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43263     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.600.0.pdf

Size

147,549 bytes

SHA-256

1a468b891bbc063bb5e70cbc911c5bac3c78a2d0d4491d150dd30fcc020d8b2e

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.600.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)