ORDER Granting Defendant Bank Of America, N.A.'S Motion To Seal Documents Filed In… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 599)

Summary

A two-page order in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB, dated December 11, 2025 and filed 12/11/25 as Document 599. The court finds compelling reasons to seal and grants Bank of America, N.A.'s motion to seal documents filed in support of its motion to exclude the expert testimony of plaintiffs' call center expert Jay Minnucci. It seals portions of the motion to exclude and its appendix of exhibits, portions of several exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration, and other Hoyle Declaration exhibits in their entirety.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. SEAL RE MINNUCCI 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING 
DEFENDANT BANK OF 
AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION TO 
SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN 
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE THE EXPERT 
TESTIMONY OF JAY MINNUCCI 
 
[Dkt. No. 279.]  
 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 599     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43260     Page
1 of 2

 
1 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. SEAL RE MINNUCCI 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (BANA) Motion to 
Seal Documents Filed in Support of its Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of 
Jay Minnucci (Motion to Seal) and the documents at issue, the Court concludes that 
compelling reasons exist to seal the documents.  Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 
BANA’s Motion to Seal the following: 
• 
Portions of BANA’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Jay 
Minnucci; 
• 
Portions of the Appendix of Exhibits to BANA’s Motion to Exclude the 
Expert Opinions of Jay Minnucci;   
• 
Portions of the following exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration: HX 11, 13, 
16, 17, 18, 19, 24, 26, and 27. 
• 
The following exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration in their entirety: HX 10, 
11A, 12, 14, 20, 21, 23, and 25.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  December 11, 2025 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 599     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43261     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.599.0.pdf

Size

148,014 bytes

SHA-256

d6daeb6515fbd4950ea812d3ffd6c4d7dcbfad24e82b3ee76a30d553c2495cef

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.599.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)