Order Granting Bank of America's Motion to Seal Documents Filed in Support of Its Motion to Exclude Jane Cloninger

Summary

An Order Granting Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Seal Documents Filed in Support of Its Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Jane Cloninger, by Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB in the Southern District of California. Dated December 11, 2025 and filed 12/11/25 as Document 598, it rules on the bank's motion (Dkt. No. 577). The Court found compelling reasons to seal and sealed portions of the bank's motion to exclude Cloninger's opinions and its appendix of exhibits, portions of Hoyle Declaration exhibits HX 1, 2 and 3, and exhibits HX 4 through 9 in their entirety.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. SEAL RE CLONINGER 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING 
DEFENDANT BANK OF 
AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION TO 
SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN 
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
EXCLUDE THE EXPERT 
TESTIMONY OF JANE 
CLONINGER  
 
[Dkt. No. 577.] 
 
Ctrm: 
12A – 12th Floor 
Judge: 
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 598     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43258     Page
1 of 2

 
1 
ORDER GRANTING BANA’S MOT. SEAL RE CLONINGER 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (BANA) Motion to 
Seal Documents Filed in Support of its Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of 
Jane Cloninger (Motion to Seal) and the documents at issue, the Court concludes that 
compelling reasons exist to seal the documents.  Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 
BANA’s Motion to Seal the following: 
• 
Portions of BANA’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Jane 
Cloninger; 
• 
Portions of the Appendix of Exhibits to BANA’s Motion to Exclude the 
Expert Opinions of Jane Cloninger;   
• 
Portions of the following exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration: HX 1, 2, and 
3; and  
• 
The following exhibits to the Hoyle Declaration in their entirety: HX 4, 
5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  December 11, 2025 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 598     Filed 12/11/25     PageID.43259     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.598.0.pdf

Size

147,962 bytes

SHA-256

25341f44c1099a078b40f0f3cfad180df1a7834031f9e338ef992e0eef9a4ee7

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.598.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)