Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Exclude Expert Testimony Of Victor Stango… —…

Court filing

ORDER Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Exclude Expert Testimony Of Victor Stango… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 597)

Filed October 17, 2025 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-10-17

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 597 · 2025-10-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
21MD2992-GPC(MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION, 
 
 Case No.:  21MD2992-GPC(MSB) 
 
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 
MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT 
TESTIMONY OF VICTOR STANGO 
AND CARL PRY WITHOUT 
PREJUDICE  
 
[Dkt. Nos. 571, 574.] 
 
 
On October 17, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to exclude certain testimony of 
Victor Stango, (Dkt. No. 571), and a motion to exclude testimony of Carl Pry.  (Dkt. No. 
574.)  Because both Daubert motions do not appear to be related to the pending motion 
for partial summary judgment,1 the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions to exclude the  
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
 
1 This Court’s scheduling orders generally provide that, “All other pretrial motions, including those 
addressing Daubert issues related to dispositive motions must be filed” by the pretrial motions deadline.  
The Court recognizes that the original scheduling order was based on Judge Burns’ practices which does 
not include the same practice as this Court.  
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 597     Filed 12/09/25     PageID.43256     Page
1 of 2

 
2 
21MD2992-GPC(MSB) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
testimony of Victor Stango and Carl Pray without prejudice to refiling at the motion in 
limine stage.   
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:  December 9, 2025 
 
 
  
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 597     Filed 12/09/25     PageID.43257     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.597.0.pdf
Size
164,680 bytes
SHA-256
f03f7ea8f00046c09952664579b4e11c33bfd5566125e4d844f6b67b53700828
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.597.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top