Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Chambless Enterprises, LLC v. Redfield — W.D. La., Monroe Division Plaintiffs' Appeal from Order of Magistrate Judge — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)

Court filing

Plaintiffs' Appeal from Order of Magistrate Judge — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)

Summary

Plaintiffs' Appeal from Order of Magistrate Judge, Document 53, filed 05/03/21 in Chambless Enterprises LLC, et al. v. Robert Redfield, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-1455-TAD-KDM, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Monroe Division, Judge Terry A. Doughty. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 72 and Local Rule 74.1, Plaintiffs object to the Magistrate Judge's April 19, 2021, order granting Defendants' motion to stay District Court proceedings. They state that the decision was clearly erroneous and contrary to law and renew their request that the Court direct Defendants to produce the administrative record. The filing refers to Exhibit A, the order, Exhibit B, Plaintiffs' opposition to the stay, and Exhibit C, a supporting memorandum. It is dated May 3, 2021.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed May 3, 2021 in Chambless v. Redfield; one of 27 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Filed2021-05-03

Cite this document

“Plaintiffs' Appeal from Order of Magistrate Judge — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.).” U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, No. 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM, Doc. 53, filed 2021-05-03. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/chambless-v-redfield/2021-05-03-plaintiffs-appeal-magistrate-order-dkt-53/, SHA-256 3ebdfb94db2fe374f2c4c2b12240bbcc3aa5009a3cd058ad8d50cc9bcd6bca2e.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 
MONROE DIVISION 
 
 
 
CHAMBLESS ENTERPRISES LLC, et al., 
 
      Plaintiffs, 
 
v. 
 
ROBERT REDFIELD, et al., 
 
      Defendants. 
 
 
 
 
 Case No. 3:20-cv-1455-TAD-KDM 
 
Judge Terry A. Doughty 
 
Magistrate Judge Kayla D. McClusky 
 
 
PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL FROM ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 72 and Local Rule 74.1, Plaintiffs, 
Chambless Enterprises, LLC, and the Apartment Association of Louisiana, Inc., herein object to 
the Magistrate Judge’s order issued in this case on April 19, 2021, included as Exhibit A. The 
Magistrate granted Defendants’ motion to stay District Court proceedings in this matter, 
notwithstanding Plaintiffs’ objection that a stay will be prejudicial and is not in the interest of 
justice. A copy of Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion to stay is included as Exhibit B.  
The Magistrate’s decision staying District Court proceedings was clearly erroneous and 
contrary to law. Accordingly, Plaintiffs object to the Magistrate’s decision and renew their request 
that this Court should direct Defendants to produce the administrative record in this case. Plaintiffs 
further state their reasons for appealing the Magistrate’s decision in the attached Memorandum in 
Support of Plaintiffs’ Appeal of Magistrate’s Order Staying Trial Court Proceedings, included as 
Exhibit C. 
 
 
Case 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM   Document 53   Filed 05/03/21   Page 1 of 3 PageID #:  715

2 
 
 
DATED:  May 3, 2021. 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
/s/ Steven M. Simpson                     
STEVEN M. SIMPSON* 
DC Bar No. 462553 
Pacific Legal Foundation 
3100 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 610 
Arlington, VA 22201 
Tel: (202) 888-6881 
SSimpson@pacificlegal.org 
 
/s/ James C. Rather, Jr.  
JAMES C. RATHER, JR.  
Louisiana Bar No. 25839  
ALKER & RATHER, LLC  
4030 Lonesome Rd., Suite B  
Mandeville, LA 70448  
Tel: (985) 727-7501  
JRather@alker-rather.com 
LUKE A. WAKE* 
DC Bar No. 1009181 
ETHAN W. BLEVINS* 
Washington State Bar No. 48219 
HANNAH SELLS MARCLEY* 
Washington State Bar No. 52692 
Pacific Legal Foundation 
930 G Street 
Sacramento, CA 95814 
Tel: (916) 419-7111 
Fax: (916) 419-7747 
LWake@pacificlegal.org  
EBlevins@pacifclegal.org 
HMarcley@pacificlegal.org 
*Pro hac vice 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs 
 
 
 
Case 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM   Document 53   Filed 05/03/21   Page 2 of 3 PageID #:  716

3 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on May 3, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 
Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will cause a copy to be served upon counsel of 
record. 
DATED:  May 3, 2021. 
 
 
/s/ Steven M. Simpson 
 
STEVEN M. SIMPSON 
 
 
 
Case 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM   Document 53   Filed 05/03/21   Page 3 of 3 PageID #:  717

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.lawd.176977.53.0.pdf
Size
144,551 bytes
SHA-256
3ebdfb94db2fe374f2c4c2b12240bbcc3aa5009a3cd058ad8d50cc9bcd6bca2e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.lawd.176977.53.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Appeal from Magistrate's Stay Order — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same docket · 2021-05-03
  2. Fifth Circuit Order Granting Amicus Motions — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2021-05-03
  3. Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority (Alabama Realtors) — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La., 2021-05-06)same docket · 2021-05-06
  4. Magistrate's Memorandum Order Granting Stay — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2021-04-19
  5. Defendants' Opposition to Appeal from Magistrate's Stay Order — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same docket · 2021-05-25
  6. Magistrate Judge Memorandum Order Granting Stay — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2021-04-19
  7. Memorandum Order Affirming Magistrate's Stay — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2021-06-02
  8. Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority (Skyworks/Terkel) — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La., 2021-03-11)same docket · 2021-03-11
  9. Plaintiffs' Reply — Appeal from Magistrate's Stay Order — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same case · 2021-06-02
  10. Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Stay — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same case · 2021-03-05
  11. Fifth Circuit Order — Injunction Pending Appeal Granted — Chambless v. Walensky (W.D. La.)same case · 2021-08-27
  12. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Stay — Chambless v. Redfieldsame case · 2021-02-26
  13. Fifth Circuit Order Dismissing Appeal — Chambless v. Walenskysame case · 2021-09-21
  14. Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Stay — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same case · 2021-02-09
  15. Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings — Chambless v. Redfieldsame case
  16. Defendants' Answer to Complaint — Chambless v. Redfieldsame case · 2021-02-09
  17. Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket
  18. Ruling — Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Chambless v. Redfield (W.D. La.)same docket · 2020-12-22
  19. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2020-12-14
  20. Declaration of Erin E. Babich Runge — Chambless v. Redfieldsame docket · 2020-12-14

Part of: Chambless Enterprises, LLC v. Redfield — W.D. La., Monroe Division · U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana · Pandemic unemployment insurance · Suits against governments and agencies · Orders and opinions · 2021 · Court filings

Back to top