Memorandum Order Affirming Magistrate's Stay — Chambless v. Redfield

Record facts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT · No. 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM · Doc. 60 · 2021-06-02 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA  
 
MONROE DIVISION  
  
  
CHAMBLESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL.      CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:20-cv-01455  
  
VERSUS  
  
  
  
  
 
JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY  
 
ROBERT REDFIELD, ET AL. 
   
  
MAG. JUDGE KAYLA MCCLUSKY 
 
MEMORANDUM ORDER 
 
 
Pending before the Court is an Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision filed by Plaintiffs 
[Doc. No. 53].  Plaintiffs appeals Magistrate Judge McClusky’s April 19, 2021 Memorandum 
Order [Doc. No. 52] granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay these proceedings pending the Fifth 
Circuit’s review of the denial of the preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 44]. 
A magistrate judge’s non-dispositive pretrial order is reviewable under the clearly 
erroneous and contrary to law standard.  28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).  
Following a review of the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum 
Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to the law.1  Accordingly, 
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ appeal [Doc. No. 53] is DENIED, and Magistrate 
Judge McClusky’s Order [Doc. No. 52] is AFFIRMED. 
 
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 2nd day of June, 2021.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
__________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  TERRY A. DOUGHTY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
1 Even if the Court were to apply the de novo review standard, the Court would reach the same decision. 
Case 3:20-cv-01455-TAD-KDM   Document 60   Filed 06/02/21   Page 1 of 1 PageID #:  790

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.lawd.176977.60.0.pdf

Size

134,278 bytes

SHA-256

8f1d1013ee9a8a26c73c87216e25be7be964f011a05541e83abdf15378c8f5b1

Our copy

gov.uscourts.lawd.176977.60.0.pdf

Original

archive.org