NOTICE OF WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT re: pldg. (24 in CAC/2:20-cv-03588, 21 in… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 51)

Summary

A Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument filed July 22, 2020 with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in In re: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Plan Litigation, MDL No. 2954, as Document 51. On this two-page JPML Form 9, the party waives oral argument pursuant to Rule 11.1(b)(i). The form marks the party's position as opposing centralization and leaves the proposed transferee district blank. It is filed on behalf of plaintiff Guofeng Ma in Ma v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Case No. 20-CV-3697 (N.D. Cal.), and is signed by Jeremy A. Lieberman of Pomerantz LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

          Case MDL No. 2954         Document 51         Filed 07/22/20        Page 1 of 2




UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
            NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OR WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT


       _______ & TITLE - IN RE: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Plan Litigation
MDL No. 2954

1.     Oral Argument – Check ONE of the following boxes:

                     The attorney designated below shall PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT at the Panel
                     hearing session on behalf of the designated party or parties. (Note: All attorneys
                     presenting oral argument should be mindful of Panel Rule 11.1(d)(i), which states
                     that:

                             Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to
                             actions who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order
                             shall be permitted to present oral argument.

                     Also note that Rule 11.1(e) requires counsel with like positions to confer prior to
                     oral argument for the purpose of selecting a spokesperson to avoid duplication
                     during oral argument.)

              ✔      The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT pursuant to
                     Rule 11.1(b)(i). (Note: A party waiving oral argument need not appear at the
                     hearing session, through counsel or otherwise.)

                     The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT IF ALL
                     OTHER PARTIES IN THIS MATTER WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; otherwise,
                     the attorney designated below shall present oral argument at the Panel hearing
                     session on behalf of the designated party or parties pursuant to Rule 11.1. (Note:
                     In the event of a global waiver, the parties and their counsel need not attend the
                     hearing session.)

2.     Position on Centralization – Check ONE of the following boxes:

                     Support Centralization

              ✔      Oppose Centralization

                     Other ____________________________________________________________

3.     Position on Transferee District. If you SUPPORT Centralization or if you OPPOSE
       centralization but ALTERNATIVELY SUPPORT Centralization in a particular venue(s),
       if the Panel orders centralization over your objections, indicate your proposed transferee
       district(s) here:

       ________________________________________________________________________
         Case MDL No. 2954         Document 51        Filed 07/22/20         Page 2 of 2




4.    Change of Position from Written Response – If your position regarding Centralization or
      the choice of transferee district has changed from the position set forth in your motion or
      written response to the motion or order, check the following box:

5.    Parties Represented – Indicate party name and state whether plaintiff or defendant. Attach
      list if more than one action:
      Plaintiff Guofeng Ma




6.    Short Case Caption(s) – Include District(s) and Civil Action No(s). Attach list if more than
      one action:
      Ma v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Case No. 20-CV-3697 (N.D. Cal.)




7.    Name and Address of Attorney Designated to Present Oral Argument:

      Jeremy A. Lieberman
      ____________________________________________________
      Name

      POMERANTZ LLP, 600 Third Avenue, Floor 20
      ____________________________________________________
      Law Firm

      New York
      __________________________________________           _____
                                                            NY
      City                                                 State


      Telephone No.: 212-661-1100
                    _____________________________

      Email Address: jalieberman@pomlaw.com
                     _______________________________________________________




_______________
2020-07-22           __________________________
                     Jeremy A. Lieberman                   /s/ Jeremy A. Lieberman
                                                           ______________________________
      Date                   Printed Name                          Authorized Signature




                                                                               JPML Form 9 (12/15)


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.51.0.pdf

Size

39,683 bytes

SHA-256

31b876b5024572f6447c0ab2837f70bec5491a03bd58bc86c910e2a609309f98

Our copy

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.51.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.