NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT re: pldg. (24 in CAC/2:20-cv-03588, 21 in… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 40)

Summary

A Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument filed June 26, 2020 as Document 40 in IN RE: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation, MDL No. 2954, before the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. On the form, the box is checked stating that the designated attorney shall present oral argument at the Panel hearing session. The form marks the position as Oppose Centralization and names the District of Colorado / Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer as the proposed transferee district if the Panel orders centralization. The parties represented and case captions are referred to an attached Exhibit A. The two-page JPML Form 9 is signed by Christopher M. Viapiano of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

         Case MDL No. 2954         Document 40         Filed 06/26/20        Page 1 of 2




UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
            NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OR WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT


       _______ & TITLE - IN RE: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation
MDL No. 2954

1.    Oral Argument – Check ONE of the following boxes:

              ✔     The attorney designated below shall PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT at the Panel
                    hearing session on behalf of the designated party or parties. (Note: All attorneys
                    presenting oral argument should be mindful of Panel Rule 11.1(d)(i), which states
                    that:

                            Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to
                            actions who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order
                            shall be permitted to present oral argument.

                    Also note that Rule 11.1(e) requires counsel with like positions to confer prior to
                    oral argument for the purpose of selecting a spokesperson to avoid duplication
                    during oral argument.)

                    The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT pursuant to
                    Rule 11.1(b)(i). (Note: A party waiving oral argument need not appear at the
                    hearing session, through counsel or otherwise.)

                    The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT IF ALL
                    OTHER PARTIES IN THIS MATTER WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; otherwise,
                    the attorney designated below shall present oral argument at the Panel hearing
                    session on behalf of the designated party or parties pursuant to Rule 11.1. (Note:
                    In the event of a global waiver, the parties and their counsel need not attend the
                    hearing session.)

2.    Position on Centralization – Check ONE of the following boxes:

                    Support Centralization

              ✔     Oppose Centralization

                    Other ____________________________________________________________

3.    Position on Transferee District. If you SUPPORT Centralization or if you OPPOSE
      centralization but ALTERNATIVELY SUPPORT Centralization in a particular venue(s),
      if the Panel orders centralization over your objections, indicate your proposed transferee
      district(s) here:

      ________________________________________________________________________
      District of Colorado / Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer
         Case MDL No. 2954           Document 40      Filed 06/26/20      Page 2 of 2




4.    Change of Position from Written Response – If your position regarding Centralization or
      the choice of transferee district has changed from the position set forth in your motion or
      written response to the motion or order, check the following box:

5.    Parties Represented – Indicate party name and state whether plaintiff or defendant. Attach
      list if more than one action:
      See attached Exhibit A.




6.    Short Case Caption(s) – Include District(s) and Civil Action No(s). Attach list if more than
      one action:
      See attached Exhibit A.




7.    Name and Address of Attorney Designated to Present Oral Argument:

      Christopher M. Viapiano
      ____________________________________________________
      Name

      Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
      ____________________________________________________
      Law Firm

      Washington, D.C.
      __________________________________________           _____
      City                                                 State


      Telephone No.: (202) 956-6985
                    _____________________________

      Email Address: viapianoc@sullcrom.com
                     _______________________________________________________




_______________
6/26/2020            __________________________
                     Christopher M. Viapiano               /s/ Christopher M. Viapiano
                                                           ______________________________
      Date                      Printed Name                       Authorized Signature




                                                                             JPML Form 9 (12/15)


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.40.0.pdf

Size

139,434 bytes

SHA-256

e5fa3ec9ff9400beb0e3da2b92890c08201f2821c5546f5203f0d929ae70652b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.40.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.