Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Agent Fee Litigation NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT re: pldg. (25 in TXS/4:20-cv-01790), ( 38 in… —…

Court filing

NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT re: pldg. (25 in TXS/4:20-cv-01790), ( 38 in… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 45)

Summary

A notice of presentation or waiver of oral argument (JPML Form 9) filed July 6, 2020 with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in In re: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation, MDL No. 2954, as Document 45. The form is filed for plaintiff DNM Contracting, Inc. in DNM Contracting, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01790, in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. It indicates that the designated attorney will present oral argument at the Panel hearing session. The form checks support for centralization and names the Southern District of Texas as the proposed transferee district. Alfonso Kennard Jr of Kennard Law, P.C is designated to present argument. The form is two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

         Case MDL No. 2954         Document 45         Filed 07/06/20        Page 1 of 2




UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
            NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OR WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT


       _______ & TITLE - IN RE: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation
MDL No. 2954

1.    Oral Argument – Check ONE of the following boxes:

              ✔     The attorney designated below shall PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT at the Panel
                    hearing session on behalf of the designated party or parties. (Note: All attorneys
                    presenting oral argument should be mindful of Panel Rule 11.1(d)(i), which states
                    that:

                            Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to
                            actions who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order
                            shall be permitted to present oral argument.

                    Also note that Rule 11.1(e) requires counsel with like positions to confer prior to
                    oral argument for the purpose of selecting a spokesperson to avoid duplication
                    during oral argument.)

                    The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT pursuant to
                    Rule 11.1(b)(i). (Note: A party waiving oral argument need not appear at the
                    hearing session, through counsel or otherwise.)

                    The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT IF ALL
                    OTHER PARTIES IN THIS MATTER WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; otherwise,
                    the attorney designated below shall present oral argument at the Panel hearing
                    session on behalf of the designated party or parties pursuant to Rule 11.1. (Note:
                    In the event of a global waiver, the parties and their counsel need not attend the
                    hearing session.)

2.    Position on Centralization – Check ONE of the following boxes:

              ✔     Support Centralization

                    Oppose Centralization

                    Other ____________________________________________________________

3.    Position on Transferee District. If you SUPPORT Centralization or if you OPPOSE
      centralization but ALTERNATIVELY SUPPORT Centralization in a particular venue(s),
      if the Panel orders centralization over your objections, indicate your proposed transferee
      district(s) here:

      ________________________________________________________________________
      Southern District of Texas
         Case MDL No. 2954              Document 45     Filed 07/06/20       Page 2 of 2




4.    Change of Position from Written Response – If your position regarding Centralization or
      the choice of transferee district has changed from the position set forth in your motion or
      written response to the motion or order, check the following box:

5.    Parties Represented – Indicate party name and state whether plaintiff or defendant. Attach
      list if more than one action:
      Plaintiff DNM Contracting, Inc.




6.    Short Case Caption(s) – Include District(s) and Civil Action No(s). Attach list if more than
      one action:

      DNM Contracting, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01790; In the United
      States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

7.    Name and Address of Attorney Designated to Present Oral Argument:

      Alfonso Kennard Jr
      ____________________________________________________
      Name

      Kennard Law, P.C
      ____________________________________________________
      Law Firm

      Houston
      __________________________________________              _____
                                                               TX
      City                                                    State


      Telephone No.: 713-742-0900
                    _____________________________

      Email Address: alfonso.kennard@kennardlaw.com
                     _______________________________________________________




7/6/2020
_______________       __________________________
                      Alfonso Kennard Jr                     ______________________________
      Date                    Printed Name                            Authorized Signature




                                                                                JPML Form 9 (12/15)


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.45.0.pdf
Size
38,187 bytes
SHA-256
31262e44d0bfd0599adbfe0aa65aa721db5888c90f1384619d6b664a5885b13f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.45.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top