SEE PLEADING 47 in MDL No. 2954NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT re: pldg. (21… — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 46)

Summary

A Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument (JPML Form 9) filed July 6, 2020 with the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in MDL No. 2954, In re: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation, as Document 46. It is submitted for plaintiff Karen's Custom Grooming LLC in Karen's Custom Grooming LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-0956-LAB-BGS, in the Southern District of California. On centralization, the form marks Other, stating that the party does not oppose centralization of consumer cases. It proposes the Southern District of California as transferee district and lists other California districts, including the Central district, as alternatives. The form designates Kathleen Herkenhoff of Haeggquist & Eck, LLP to present oral argument and is two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case MDL No. 2954              Document 46           Filed 07/06/20         Page 1 of 2




UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

           NOTICE OF PRESENTATION OR WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT


MDL No.   2954     & TITLE - IN RE: Wells Fargo Paycheck Protection Program Litigation

1.   Oral Argument - Check ONE of the following boxes:

            0         The attorney designated below shall PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT at the Panel
                      hearing session on behalf of the designated party or parties. (Note: All attorneys
                      presenting oral argument should be mindful of Panel Rule 11.1 (d)(i), which states
                      that:

                              Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to
                              actions who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order
                              shall be permitted to present oral argument.

                      Also note that Rule 11.l(e) requires counsel with like positions to confer prior to
                      oral argument for the purpose of selecting a spokesperson to avoid duplication
                      during oral argument.)


            □
                      The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT pursuant to
                      Rule 11.1 (b)(i). (Note: A party waiving oral argument need not appear at the
                      hearing session, through counsel or otherwise.)


            □
                      The party or parties listed hereafter will WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT IF ALL
                      OTHER PARTIES IN THIS MATTER WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT; otherwise,
                      the attorney designated below shall present oral argument at the Panel hearing
                      session on behalf of the designated party or parties pursuant to Rule 11. 1. (Note:
                      In the event of a global waiver, the parties and their counsel need not attend the
                      hearing session.)

2.   Position on Centralization -Check ONE of the following boxes:

            D         Support Centralization

            D         Oppose Centralization

            0         Other Do Not Oppose Centralization of Consumer Cases

3.   Position on Transferee District. If you SUPPORT Centralization or if you OPPOSE
     centralization but ALTERNATIVELY SUPPORT Centralization in a particular venue(s),
     if the Panel orders centralization over your objections, indicate your proposed transferee
     district(s) here:

     Southern District of California (proposed); Central or Nothem District of California (alternatives)
        Case MDL No. 2954                Document 46             Filed 07/06/20    Page 2 of 2




4.     Change of Position from Written Response - If your position regarding Centralization or
       the choice of transferee district has changed from the position set forth in your motion or
       written response to the motion or order, check the following box:           D
5.     Parties Represented - Indicate party name and state whether plaintiff or defendant. Attach
       list if more than one action:
        Plaintiff Karen's Custom Grooming LLC




6.     Short Case Caption(s) - IncludeDistrict(s) and Civil ActionNo(s). Attach list if more th~
       one action:
        Karen's Custom Grooming LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., Case No.
        3:20-cv-0956-LAB-BGS (Southern District of California)


7.     Name and Address of Attorney Designated to Present Oral Argument:

       Kathleen Herkenhoff
       Name

        Haeggquist & Eck, LLP
       Law Firm

        San Diego                                                     CA
       City                                                          State


       Telephone No.: -'6_1_9-_3--"42~----'80
                                            --'----0'-0_ __ _ __ _

       Email Address: kathleenh@haelaw.com




July 6, 2020             Kathleen Herkenhoff
       Date                       Printed Name                               Authorized Signature




                                                                                      JPML Form 9 (12/15)


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.46.0.pdf

Size

729,577 bytes

SHA-256

09c609cf691b2730cffa74aec8904419b220562b35045f8ef39dfda0f890369d

Our copy

gov.uscourts.jpml.1161957.46.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.