Order on First Amended Complaint — Airboss Defense Group, LLC v. United States (Court of Federal Claims)

Summary

An order of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in No. 24-365, Airboss Defense Group, LLC v. United States, with String King Lacrosse LLC as plaintiff-intervenor and New York Embroidery Studio, Inc. as defendant-intervenor, filed June 12, 2024 as Document 53 in Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH. The order states that plaintiff-intervenor filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 52, after a notice of June 7, 2024, ECF No. 49. It states that RCFC 15(a)(2) required the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave and that there is no indication consent was obtained. The court nevertheless accepts the first amended complaint as filed, and the order is signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 24-365

 (Filed: June 12, 2024)

AIRBOSS DEFENSE GROUP, LLC,

Plaintiff,

          and

STRING KING LACROSSE LLC,

                       Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

          and

NEW YORK EMBROIDERY
STUDIO, INC.

Defendant-Intervenor.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

On June 12, 2024, plaintiff-intervenor filed a first amended complaint in this case, ECF
No. 52, following a notice of June 7, 2024, indicating its intent to file this amended complaint.
ECF No. 49.  Under Rule 15(a)(2) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”),
plaintiff-intervenor was required to obtain “the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s
leave,” before filing this amended complaint.  RCFC 15(a)(2).  There is no indication that such
consent was obtained.  See generally ECF Nos. 49, 52.

Although there is no indication that consent was obtained for the filing of plaintiff-
intervenor’s first amended complaint, the court nevertheless ACCEPTS plaintiff-intervenor’s
first amended complaint as filed.

It is so ORDERED.
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH     Document 53     Filed 06/12/24     Page 1 of 2

2

s/ Charles F. Lettow

Charles F. Lettow

Senior Judge

Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH     Document 53     Filed 06/12/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.53.0.pdf

Size

120,213 bytes

SHA-256

7b6c5b628bc6dd891c4502807f7808dc3d83f857507fc7a8223dff7a9be05dda

Our copy

gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.53.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)